Menstrual cycle associated changes in hormone-related gene expression in oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer

• Published in: NPJ breast cancer Vol. 5; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
• Main Authors: Haynes, Ben P., Ginsburg, Ophira, Gao, Qiong, Folkerd, Elizabeth, Afentakis, Maria, Buus, Richard, Quang, Le Hong, Thi Han, Pham, Khoa, Pham Hong, Dinh, Nguyen Van, To, Ta Van, Clemons, Mark, Holcombe, Chris, Osborne, Caroline, Evans, Abigail, Skene, Anthony, Sibbering, Mark, Rogers, Clare, Laws, Siobhan, Noor, Lubna, Smith, Ian E., Dowsett, Mitch
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group 15.11.2019; Nature Publishing Group UK
• Subjects: Breast cancer; Gene expression; Menstruation; Tumors
• DOI: 10.1038/s41523-019-0138-2
• ISSN: 2374-4677

Abstract The major changes in hormone levels that occur through the menstrual cycle have been postulated to affect the expression of hormone-regulated and proliferation-associated genes (PAGs) in premenopausal ER+ breast cancer. Whilst previous studies have demonstrated differences in gene expression, here, we investigated if there are within patient changes in the expression of oestrogen- and progesterone-regulated genes (ERGs and PRGs) and PAGs in ER+ breast cancer during the menstrual cycle. Samples from 96 patients in two independent prospective studies of the effect of menstrual cycle on ER+ breast cancer were used. Plasma hormone measurements were used to assign tumours to one of three pre-defined menstrual cycle windows: W1 (days 27–35 and 1–6; low oestradiol and low progesterone), W2 (days 7–16; high oestradiol and low progesterone) and W3 (days 17–26; intermediate oestradiol and high progesterone). RNA expression of 50 genes, including 27 ERGs, 11 putative PRGs and seven PAGs was measured. The AvERG (geomean of PGR , GREB1 , TFF1 and PDZK1 ) was used as a composite measure of ERG expression and showed significant changes between the three windows of the menstrual cycle increasing over 2.2-fold between W1 and W2 and decreasing between W2 and W3 and between W3 and W1. Proliferation gene expression also varied significantly, following the same pattern of changes as ERG expression, but the changes were of lower magnitude (1.4-fold increase between W1 and W2). Significant changes in the expression of eight individual ERGs, including GREB1 , PGR and TFF1 , and two PAGs were observed between W1 and either W2 or W3 with all genes showing higher levels in W2 or W3 (1.3–2.4-fold; FDR 0.016–0.05). The AvProg, a composite measure of PRG expression, increased significantly (1.5-fold) in W3 compared to W1 or W2 but no significant changes were observed for individual PRGs. In conclusion, we observed significant changes in ERG, PRG and PAG expression in ER+ breast tumours during the menstrual cycle that may affect the assessment and interpretation of prominent biomarkers (e.g. PgR) and commonly used multigene prognostic signatures in premenopausal ER+ breast cancer.