A realist social ontology of religion

Jonathan Z. Smith famously pointed out that the concept of 'religion' is not universal but emerged only in the modern West. Several scholars have drawn from Smith the non-realist implication that the existence of religion apart from that concept is an illusion. The word 'religion,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inReligion (London. 1971) Vol. 47; no. 2; pp. 161 - 178
Main Author Schilbrack, Kevin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bergen Routledge 01.04.2017
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Jonathan Z. Smith famously pointed out that the concept of 'religion' is not universal but emerged only in the modern West. Several scholars have drawn from Smith the non-realist implication that the existence of religion apart from that concept is an illusion. The word 'religion,' they say, does not refer to something out there in the world. In this article, the author argues that Smith's point is open to a realist interpretation according to which religion exists in the world, as a transhistorical and transcultural reality, even apart from the concept. To make this case, the author outlines and responds to non-realist positions that draw on genealogical, deconstructive, and linguistic arguments, as well as to the alternative proposal that 'religion' is simply a heuristic device. In short, the goal of this article is to argue that a realist social ontology provides the better understanding of the central theoretical term in our field.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-721X
1096-1151
DOI:10.1080/0048721X.2016.1203834