Changing public attitudes toward nuclear energy
The public has always seen two faces of nuclear energy—the face of immense promise and the face of peril. The more the face of promise presents itself, the more the face of peril fades. Analysis of long-term public opinion trend data and in-depth public opinion research studies shows what influences...
Saved in:
Published in | Progress in nuclear energy (New series) Vol. 102; pp. 103 - 113 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01.01.2018
Elsevier BV |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The public has always seen two faces of nuclear energy—the face of immense promise and the face of peril. The more the face of promise presents itself, the more the face of peril fades. Analysis of long-term public opinion trend data and in-depth public opinion research studies shows what influences public opinion about nuclear energy and how public opinion could be influenced in the future. The potential for attitude change is great, as most people take middle positions on nuclear energy and most do not feel very well informed about the subject. Research shows how to bring clarity to the face of promise, which currently is not well defined. In a time of energy abundance, it is necessary to show that nuclear energy is not just another energy option; its unique role as the 24/7 clean air energy source makes nuclear energy vital and irreplaceable. The analysis draws from the 34-year program of public opinion research on nuclear energy sponsored by the Nuclear Energy Institute and directed by Ann Stouffer Bisconti, supplemented by illustrative polling data from the U.S. and other countries. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The public has always seen two faces of nuclear energy-the face of immense promise and the face of peril. The more the face of promise presents itself, the more the face of peril fades. Analysis of long-term public opinion trend data and in-depth public opinion research studies shows what influences public opinion about nuclear energy and how public opinion could be influenced in the future. The potential for attitude change is great, as most people take middle positions on nuclear energy and most do not feel very well informed about the subject. Research shows how to bring clarity to the face of promise, which currently is not well defined. In a time of energy abundance, it is necessary to show that nuclear energy is not just another energy option: its unique role as the 24/7 clean air energy source makes nuclear energy vital and irreplaceable. The analysis draws from the 34-year program of public opinion research on nuclear energy sponsored by the Nuclear Energy Institute and directed by Ann Stouffer Bisconti, supplemented by illustrative polling data from the U.S. and other countries. |
Author | Bisconti, Ann Stouffer |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ann Stouffer orcidid: 0000-0002-8195-5831 surname: Bisconti fullname: Bisconti, Ann Stouffer email: ann@bisconti.com organization: Bisconti Research, Inc., 5530 Greystone Street, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, United States |
BookMark | eNqFkF1LwzAUhoNMcJv-BKHgdbuTpGkbvBAZfsHAG70OaZLNlJrWJFX2741sV94MDhw4vM9z4F2gmRucQegaQ4EBV6uuGN2kjDMFAVwXkAbIGZrjpm7ykpByhuaAS55jXsMFWoTQQQpixuZotf6QbmfdLhuntrcqkzHaOGkTsjj8SK-zpO6N9Fny-93-Ep1vZR_M1XEv0fvjw9v6Od-8Pr2s7ze5KoHGnDKuGaFEt0oyiSuimkYRzWWVLmVbEcOAtABt1eiacYprRreUN6wpFcWypEt0c_COfviaTIiiGybv0ktBADiuKsKrlGKHlPJDCN5sxejtp_R7gUH8dSM6cexG_HUjIA2QxN3-45SNMtrBRS9tf5K-O9AmFfBtjRdBWeOU0dYbFYUe7AnDL2ABhD8 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s13705_020_00256_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_en16083468 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41578_019_0126_z crossref_primary_10_1021_acsami_2c05247 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jchemed_3c01213 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2022_110433 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_egyr_2021_07_079 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15021322 crossref_primary_10_22394_2074_0492_2024_4_103_134 crossref_primary_10_1080_13669877_2024_2360924 crossref_primary_10_3390_en16176162 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenrg_2022_976602 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_erss_2021_102291 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enpol_2023_113693 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_erss_2025_103980 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00339_022_06222_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pnucene_2024_105295 crossref_primary_10_61435_ijred_2024_55836 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_futures_2022_102930 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esr_2018_09_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14031283 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbef_2023_100829 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enpol_2025_114592 crossref_primary_10_1002_pa_2086 crossref_primary_10_3390_socsci12050260 crossref_primary_10_1088_2516_1083_ab9592 crossref_primary_10_3897_nucet_7_69414 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pnucene_2018_12_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pnucene_2021_103797 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00267_023_01870_5 |
Cites_doi | 10.1136/bmj.295.6606.1100 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2017 Elsevier Ltd Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2018 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2017 Elsevier Ltd – notice: Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2018 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7TB 8FD FR3 KR7 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Civil Engineering Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Civil Engineering Abstracts Engineering Research Database Technology Research Database Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | Civil Engineering Abstracts |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering |
EISSN | 1878-4224 |
EndPage | 113 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_pnucene_2017_07_002 S0149197017301695 |
GroupedDBID | --K --M .~1 0R~ 123 1B1 1~. 1~5 29P 4.4 457 4G. 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JN AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAHCO AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AARJD AAXUO ABEFU ABFNM ABMAC ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACIWK ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD AEBSH AEKER AENEX AFFNX AFKWA AFTJW AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AHIDL AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BELTK BKOJK BLXMC CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 FDB FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HZ~ IHE J1W JARJE KOM LY6 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAC SDF SDG SES SEW SPC SPCBC SPD SSR SSZ T5K TN5 WUQ ~02 ~G- AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AFXIZ AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP BNPGV CITATION SSH 7TB 8FD EFKBS FR3 KR7 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-359d5232dbca5a162c88c2d9a6dbc4b62e502b00b68d75931753f398584c31a43 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0149-1970 |
IngestDate | Mon Jul 14 08:45:53 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:01:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:29 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:34:24 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Messages Trends Public opinion Influences Changeability |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c403t-359d5232dbca5a162c88c2d9a6dbc4b62e502b00b68d75931753f398584c31a43 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-8195-5831 |
PQID | 2009166296 |
PQPubID | 2045411 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2009166296 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pnucene_2017_07_002 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_pnucene_2017_07_002 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_pnucene_2017_07_002 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | January 2018 2018-01-00 20180101 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2018 text: January 2018 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford |
PublicationTitle | Progress in nuclear energy (New series) |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Elsevier BV |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier BV |
References | The survey used a split sample approach. Half the Respondents Were Asked the Question Using the Term Low-carbon, and Half Using the Term Zero-carbon. There Was No Significant Difference between the Samples.. Newsline (bib4) 1987; 28 Yankelovich (bib8) 1991 Interview by Laura Scheele, in ansnuclearcafe.org, December 16, 2016. Trichopoulos, Zavitsanos, Koutis, Drogari (bib6) 31 October 1987; 295 . Lewis (bib3) 2017 Weart (bib7) 1988 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib5 Weart (10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib7) 1988 Yankelovich (10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib8) 1991 Lewis (10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib3) 2017 Newsline (10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib4) 1987; 28 Trichopoulos (10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib6) 1987; 295 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib1 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib2 |
References_xml | – year: 1991 ident: bib8 article-title: Coming to Public Judgment: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World – reference: Interview by Laura Scheele, in ansnuclearcafe.org, December 16, 2016. – volume: 295 start-page: 1100 year: 31 October 1987 ident: bib6 article-title: The victims of chernobyl in Greece: induced abortions after the accident publication-title: Br. Med. J. – reference: The survey used a split sample approach. Half the Respondents Were Asked the Question Using the Term Low-carbon, and Half Using the Term Zero-carbon. There Was No Significant Difference between the Samples.. – start-page: 115 year: 2017 ident: bib3 article-title: The Undoing Project – start-page: 421 year: 1988 ident: bib7 article-title: Nuclear Fear: a History of Images – volume: 28 start-page: 933 year: 1987 end-page: 942 ident: bib4 article-title: Lessons of chernobyl, part II publication-title: J. Nucl. Med. – reference: . – volume: 295 start-page: 1100 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib6 article-title: The victims of chernobyl in Greece: induced abortions after the accident publication-title: Br. Med. J. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6606.1100 – ident: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib1 – ident: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib2 – volume: 28 start-page: 933 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib4 article-title: Lessons of chernobyl, part II publication-title: J. Nucl. Med. – ident: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib5 – start-page: 421 year: 1988 ident: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib7 – start-page: 115 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib3 – year: 1991 ident: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002_bib8 |
SSID | ssj0017155 ssib019626759 |
Score | 2.2919197 |
Snippet | The public has always seen two faces of nuclear energy—the face of immense promise and the face of peril. The more the face of promise presents itself, the... The public has always seen two faces of nuclear energy-the face of immense promise and the face of peril. The more the face of promise presents itself, the... |
SourceID | proquest crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 103 |
SubjectTerms | Changeability Clean energy Influences Messages Nuclear energy Nuclear engineering Nuclear reactors Public opinion Studies Trends |
Title | Changing public attitudes toward nuclear energy |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.002 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2009166296 |
Volume | 102 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NS8MwFA9jXvQgfuJ0jh68Zm3zneMYjqm4k4PdQpqmsCF1bPXq327SpvMDYeCtDU0pL8l7vya_93sA3DFOjHRQHhaiQJDoJIHSMAGTQmJbUGK49QnOzzM2nZPHBV10wLjNhfG0yuD7G59ee-vQEgdrxuvlMva0JJlK7qYU9pIiPtGcEO5n-fBjR_NIeUoDjVFC__RXFk-8Gq5LZ7_Sq2WmvNbwDLsrf8SnX566Dj-TE3AccGM0aj7tFHRseQaOvqkJnoO4zhRwl1GjXR3pyvMAcruNqpocG5VevFhvIlsn_F2A-eT-ZTyFoR4CNCTBFcRU5u6_EeWZ0VSnDBkhDMqlZq6FZAxZmiC3jDImck6lRwa4wFI4jGFwqgm-BN3yrbRXIBLMaC69-LspiMgzaQrjACyyWe5CmaE9QForKBPEwn3NilfVssJWKhhPeeOpxB9jox4Y7rqtG7WMfR1Ea2L1Y9iV8-j7uvbbIVFh3W19UU2HdxmS7Pr_b74Bh-5ONBstfdCtNu_21kGPKhvUc2sADkYPT9PZJzia198 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LS8QwEB7W9aAexCc-Vu1Bj922aZomBw-iLquunhT2Fts0BUXq4lbEi3_KP-ikTdcHwoLgraQklC_TmUn7zTcA-yymSmAq7-Y8Jy5NfN8VinHXz0Wo84iqWJsC58sr1r-h58No2IL3phbG0Cqt7699euWt7Yhn0fRGd3eeoSWJQMRoUqGRFGmYlRf69QXPbePDsxPc5ANCeqfXx33XthZwFfXD0g0jkeERjGSpSqIkYERxrkgmEoYjNGVERz5Bi0wZz-JImCAb5qHgGK5VGCQ0xHVnYJaiuzBtE7pvE15JEAeR5U0K1zzeZ9mQd98dFbhhhZHnDOJKNNR-zvklIP4IDVW86y3Bok1UnaMai2Vo6WIFFr7IF66CV5Um4KVTi2U7SWmIB5keO2XFxnUKo5acPDm6qjBcg5t_QWkd2sVjoTfA4UwlsTBq8yqnPEuFyhVmzESnGcZOFW0CbVCQyqqTmyYZD7Khod1LC5404Enf_Dcnm9CdTBvV8hzTJvAGYvnNziSGkGlTO82WSPuij00XT0ywGRFs6-8r78Fc__pyIAdnVxfbMI93eP2VpwPt8ulZ72DeU6a7lZ05cPvfhv0BybMSHA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing+public+attitudes+toward+nuclear+energy&rft.jtitle=Progress+in+nuclear+energy+%28New+series%29&rft.au=Bisconti%2C+Ann+Stouffer&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0149-1970&rft.volume=102&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=113&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.pnucene.2017.07.002&rft.externalDocID=S0149197017301695 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0149-1970&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0149-1970&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0149-1970&client=summon |