From a Given to a Construct Heritage as a commons

• Published in: Cultural studies (London, England) Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 359 - 390
• Main Author: Alonso Gonzalez, Pablo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Colchester Routledge 04.05.2014; Taylor & Francis
• Subjects: Cognition; common; Community; Cultural heritage; Cultural studies; Epistemology; Ethnology; knowledge practices; Market forces; post-industrial economy; Social theory; Sources and methods; Specific concepts; Southern Europe; Spain; Common Good; knowledge practices; Ontology; common; Theory; Practice; Cultural heritage; Reflection; social theory; Knowledge; post-industrial economy; Community
• ISSN: 0950-2386; 1466-4348
• DOI: 10.1080/09502386.2013.789067

The transition towards a cognitive and post-industrial economy has led to the emergence of new strategies of capture of the immanent productive capacities of the social forces. Heritage entities are subject to, and also participate in, processes by which common creativity and knowledge are being harnessed by novel forms of rent and control. The objective of this paper was to show that conceiving heritage as a common situated in specific contexts rather than as a universal essence can open up novel epistemological spheres of communication between different knowledge practices. Also, it can help bridge some ontological gaps among the various stakeholders in the arena of heritage, such as academics, managers, architects, local communities and market forces. This entails considering heritage as an emergent material and immaterial construction process involving many different agents. Currently, these processes tend towards the privatization of common values and the shattering of local communities. Normally, this situation entails a fundamental alienation between objects and subjects, and the reification of heritage. This paper suggests that considering heritage as a common could provide a different perspective to tackle this crucial problem. Accordingly, scholars should not only be bound to a critical discursive stance, but should also commit to 'ontological politics' that would situate them as mediators between the global hierarchies of value generated by heritage and the common productive potential of local communities.