Discriminative value of FRAX for fracture prediction in a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women

Summary We followed 2,266 postmenopausal Chinese women for 4.5 years to determine which model best predicts osteoporotic fracture. A model that contains ethnic-specific risk factors, some of which reflect frailty, performed as well as or better than the well-established FRAX model. Introduction Clin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOsteoporosis international Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 871 - 878
Main Authors Cheung, E. Y. N., Bow, C. H., Cheung, C. L., Soong, C., Yeung, S., Loong, C., Kung, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Springer-Verlag 01.03.2012
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0937-941X
1433-2965
1433-2965
DOI10.1007/s00198-011-1647-5

Cover

Abstract Summary We followed 2,266 postmenopausal Chinese women for 4.5 years to determine which model best predicts osteoporotic fracture. A model that contains ethnic-specific risk factors, some of which reflect frailty, performed as well as or better than the well-established FRAX model. Introduction Clinical risk assessment, with or without T-score, can predict fractures in Chinese postmenopausal women although it is unknown which combination of clinical risk factors is most effective. This prospective study sought to compare the accuracy for fracture prediction using various models including FRAX, our ethnic-specific clinical risk factors (CRF) and other simple models. Methods This study is part of the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study. A total of 2,266 treatment naïve postmenopausal women underwent clinical risk factor and bone mineral density assessment. Subjects were followed up for outcome of major osteoporotic fracture and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for different models were compared. The percentage of subjects in different quartiles of risk according to various models who actually fractured was also compared. Results The mean age at baseline was 62.1 ± 8.5 years and mean follow-up time was 4.5 ± 2.8 years. A total of 106 new major osteoporotic fractures were reported, of which 21 were hip fractures. Ethnic-specific CRF with T-score performed better than FRAX with T-score (based on both Chinese normative and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) databases) in terms of AUC comparison for prediction of major osteoporotic fracture. The two models were similar in hip fracture prediction. The ethnic-specific CRF model had a 10% higher sensitivity than FRAX at a specificity of 0.8 or above. Conclusion CRF related to frailty and differences in lifestyle between populations are likely to be important in fracture prediction. Further work is required to determine which and how CRF can be applied to develop a fracture prediction model in our population.
AbstractList We followed 2,266 postmenopausal Chinese women for 4.5 years to determine which model best predicts osteoporotic fracture. A model that contains ethnic-specific risk factors, some of which reflect frailty, performed as well as or better than the well-established FRAX model. Introduction: Clinical risk assessment, with or without T-score, can predict fractures in Chinese postmenopausal women although it is unknown which combination of clinical risk factors is most effective. This prospective study sought to compare the accuracy for fracture prediction using various models including FRAX, our ethnic-specific clinical risk factors (CRF) and other simple models. Methods: This study is part of the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study. A total of 2,266 treatment naive postmenopausal women underwent clinical risk factor and bone mineral density assessment. Subjects were followed up for outcome of major osteoporotic fracture and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for different models were compared. The percentage of subjects in different quartiles of risk according to various models who actually fractured was also compared. Results: The mean age at baseline was 62.1 plus or minus 8.5 years and mean follow-up time was 4.5 plus or minus 2.8 years. A total of 106 new major osteoporotic fractures were reported, of which 21 were hip fractures. Ethnic-specific CRF with T-score performed better than FRAX with T-score (based on both Chinese normative and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) databases) in terms of AUC comparison for prediction of major osteoporotic fracture. The two models were similar in hip fracture prediction. The ethnic-specific CRF model had a 10% higher sensitivity than FRAX at a specificity of 0.8 or above. Conclusion: CRF related to frailty and differences in lifestyle between populations are likely to be important in fracture prediction. Further work is required to determine which and how CRF can be applied to develop a fracture prediction model in our population.
We followed 2,266 postmenopausal Chinese women for 4.5 years to determine which model best predicts osteoporotic fracture. A model that contains ethnic-specific risk factors, some of which reflect frailty, performed as well as or better than the well-established FRAX model. Clinical risk assessment, with or without T-score, can predict fractures in Chinese postmenopausal women although it is unknown which combination of clinical risk factors is most effective. This prospective study sought to compare the accuracy for fracture prediction using various models including FRAX, our ethnic-specific clinical risk factors (CRF) and other simple models. This study is part of the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study. A total of 2,266 treatment naïve postmenopausal women underwent clinical risk factor and bone mineral density assessment. Subjects were followed up for outcome of major osteoporotic fracture and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for different models were compared. The percentage of subjects in different quartiles of risk according to various models who actually fractured was also compared. The mean age at baseline was 62.1 ± 8.5 years and mean follow-up time was 4.5 ± 2.8 years. A total of 106 new major osteoporotic fractures were reported, of which 21 were hip fractures. Ethnic-specific CRF with T-score performed better than FRAX with T-score (based on both Chinese normative and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) databases) in terms of AUC comparison for prediction of major osteoporotic fracture. The two models were similar in hip fracture prediction. The ethnic-specific CRF model had a 10% higher sensitivity than FRAX at a specificity of 0.8 or above. CRF related to frailty and differences in lifestyle between populations are likely to be important in fracture prediction. Further work is required to determine which and how CRF can be applied to develop a fracture prediction model in our population.
We followed 2,266 postmenopausal Chinese women for 4.5 years to determine which model best predicts osteoporotic fracture. A model that contains ethnic-specific risk factors, some of which reflect frailty, performed as well as or better than the well-established FRAX model.UNLABELLEDWe followed 2,266 postmenopausal Chinese women for 4.5 years to determine which model best predicts osteoporotic fracture. A model that contains ethnic-specific risk factors, some of which reflect frailty, performed as well as or better than the well-established FRAX model.Clinical risk assessment, with or without T-score, can predict fractures in Chinese postmenopausal women although it is unknown which combination of clinical risk factors is most effective. This prospective study sought to compare the accuracy for fracture prediction using various models including FRAX, our ethnic-specific clinical risk factors (CRF) and other simple models.INTRODUCTIONClinical risk assessment, with or without T-score, can predict fractures in Chinese postmenopausal women although it is unknown which combination of clinical risk factors is most effective. This prospective study sought to compare the accuracy for fracture prediction using various models including FRAX, our ethnic-specific clinical risk factors (CRF) and other simple models.This study is part of the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study. A total of 2,266 treatment naïve postmenopausal women underwent clinical risk factor and bone mineral density assessment. Subjects were followed up for outcome of major osteoporotic fracture and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for different models were compared. The percentage of subjects in different quartiles of risk according to various models who actually fractured was also compared.METHODSThis study is part of the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study. A total of 2,266 treatment naïve postmenopausal women underwent clinical risk factor and bone mineral density assessment. Subjects were followed up for outcome of major osteoporotic fracture and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for different models were compared. The percentage of subjects in different quartiles of risk according to various models who actually fractured was also compared.The mean age at baseline was 62.1 ± 8.5 years and mean follow-up time was 4.5 ± 2.8 years. A total of 106 new major osteoporotic fractures were reported, of which 21 were hip fractures. Ethnic-specific CRF with T-score performed better than FRAX with T-score (based on both Chinese normative and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) databases) in terms of AUC comparison for prediction of major osteoporotic fracture. The two models were similar in hip fracture prediction. The ethnic-specific CRF model had a 10% higher sensitivity than FRAX at a specificity of 0.8 or above.RESULTSThe mean age at baseline was 62.1 ± 8.5 years and mean follow-up time was 4.5 ± 2.8 years. A total of 106 new major osteoporotic fractures were reported, of which 21 were hip fractures. Ethnic-specific CRF with T-score performed better than FRAX with T-score (based on both Chinese normative and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) databases) in terms of AUC comparison for prediction of major osteoporotic fracture. The two models were similar in hip fracture prediction. The ethnic-specific CRF model had a 10% higher sensitivity than FRAX at a specificity of 0.8 or above.CRF related to frailty and differences in lifestyle between populations are likely to be important in fracture prediction. Further work is required to determine which and how CRF can be applied to develop a fracture prediction model in our population.CONCLUSIONCRF related to frailty and differences in lifestyle between populations are likely to be important in fracture prediction. Further work is required to determine which and how CRF can be applied to develop a fracture prediction model in our population.
We followed 2,266 postmenopausal Chinese women for 4.5 years to determine which model best predicts osteoporotic fracture. A model that contains ethnic-specific risk factors, some of which reflect frailty, performed as well as or better than the well-established FRAX model. Clinical risk assessment, with or without T-score, can predict fractures in Chinese postmenopausal women although it is unknown which combination of clinical risk factors is most effective. This prospective study sought to compare the accuracy for fracture prediction using various models including FRAX, our ethnic-specific clinical risk factors (CRF) and other simple models. This study is part of the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study. A total of 2,266 treatment naive postmenopausal women underwent clinical risk factor and bone mineral density assessment. Subjects were followed up for outcome of major osteoporotic fracture and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for different models were compared. The percentage of subjects in different quartiles of risk according to various models who actually fractured was also compared. The mean age at baseline was 62.1±8.5 years and mean follow-up time was 4.5±2.8 years. A total of 106 new major osteoporotic fractures were reported, of which 21 were hip fractures. Ethnic-specific CRF with T-score performed better than FRAX with T-score (based on both Chinese normative and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) databases) in terms of AUC comparison for prediction of major osteoporotic fracture. The two models were similar in hip fracture prediction. The ethnic-specific CRF model had a 10% higher sensitivity than FRAX at a specificity of 0.8 or above. CRF related to frailty and differences in lifestyle between populations are likely to be important in fracture prediction. Further work is required to determine which and how CRF can be applied to develop a fracture prediction model in our population.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Summary We followed 2,266 postmenopausal Chinese women for 4.5 years to determine which model best predicts osteoporotic fracture. A model that contains ethnic-specific risk factors, some of which reflect frailty, performed as well as or better than the well-established FRAX model. Introduction Clinical risk assessment, with or without T-score, can predict fractures in Chinese postmenopausal women although it is unknown which combination of clinical risk factors is most effective. This prospective study sought to compare the accuracy for fracture prediction using various models including FRAX, our ethnic-specific clinical risk factors (CRF) and other simple models. Methods This study is part of the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study. A total of 2,266 treatment naïve postmenopausal women underwent clinical risk factor and bone mineral density assessment. Subjects were followed up for outcome of major osteoporotic fracture and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for different models were compared. The percentage of subjects in different quartiles of risk according to various models who actually fractured was also compared. Results The mean age at baseline was 62.1 ± 8.5 years and mean follow-up time was 4.5 ± 2.8 years. A total of 106 new major osteoporotic fractures were reported, of which 21 were hip fractures. Ethnic-specific CRF with T-score performed better than FRAX with T-score (based on both Chinese normative and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) databases) in terms of AUC comparison for prediction of major osteoporotic fracture. The two models were similar in hip fracture prediction. The ethnic-specific CRF model had a 10% higher sensitivity than FRAX at a specificity of 0.8 or above. Conclusion CRF related to frailty and differences in lifestyle between populations are likely to be important in fracture prediction. Further work is required to determine which and how CRF can be applied to develop a fracture prediction model in our population.
Author Soong, C.
Cheung, C. L.
Kung, A.
Bow, C. H.
Loong, C.
Cheung, E. Y. N.
Yeung, S.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: E. Y. N.
  surname: Cheung
  fullname: Cheung, E. Y. N.
  email: cheunyne@ha.org.hk
  organization: Department of Medicine, United Christian Hospital, Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, United Christian Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: C. H.
  surname: Bow
  fullname: Bow, C. H.
  organization: Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
– sequence: 3
  givenname: C. L.
  surname: Cheung
  fullname: Cheung, C. L.
  organization: Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew Senior Life and Harvard Medical School
– sequence: 4
  givenname: C.
  surname: Soong
  fullname: Soong, C.
  organization: Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
– sequence: 5
  givenname: S.
  surname: Yeung
  fullname: Yeung, S.
  organization: Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
– sequence: 6
  givenname: C.
  surname: Loong
  fullname: Loong, C.
  organization: Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
– sequence: 7
  givenname: A.
  surname: Kung
  fullname: Kung, A.
  organization: Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21562875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkU1rFTEUhkOp2NvWH9CNBDeuRvM1yWRZblsVCoIodBczmTM2ZW5ym2Ra_PdmvK1CweIqBJ4nJ-d9D9F-iAEQOqHkHSVEvc-EUN01hNKGSqGadg-tqOC8YVq2-2hFNFeNFvTqAB3mfEOqo7V6iQ4YbSXrVLtC3898dslvfLDF3wG-s9MMOI744svpFR5jwmOyrswJ8DbB4F3xMWAfsMUuXsdUFnZ97QPkSsRcNhDi1s7ZTvg-1ssxejHaKcOrh_MIfbs4_7r-2Fx-_vBpfXrZOEFYaZgSPbW8biE7B0oOggPVgvctMAfWDVK1riNEEN0Ofa-saG3HpXWdspITxY_Q29272xRvZ8jFbOpmME02QJyz0Ux2mnPC_oOkgrGO6Uq-eULexDmFukaFiNaa_h78-gGa-w0MZlvTtOmnecy4AnQHuBRzTjD-QSgxS49m16OpPZqlR7M46onjfLFL9iVZPz1rsp2Z65TwA9LfP_9b-gX2Ma_s
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_gerona_glz178
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00223_012_9582_9
crossref_primary_10_1136_rmdopen_2017_000509
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eclinm_2023_101876
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_afos_2024_05_003
crossref_primary_10_21823_2311_2905_2017_23_1_153_162
crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2023_1137671
crossref_primary_10_1001_jama_2018_6537
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10067_014_2533_2
crossref_primary_10_29333_ejgm_15993
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00198_022_06657_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_afos_2019_12_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_afos_2019_12_003
crossref_primary_10_3803_EnM_2020_35_2_359
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11657_023_01360_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_afos_2023_03_009
crossref_primary_10_1111_cen_12322
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_071430
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00198_013_2504_5
crossref_primary_10_1136_annrheumdis_2015_207907
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_014_0154_x
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0136968
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jocd_2017_06_027
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_afos_2023_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbspin_2014_01_020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_afos_2016_07_001
crossref_primary_10_14336_AD_2021_1206
crossref_primary_10_1002_jbmr_1956
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00198_019_04919_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11657_017_0392_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_afos_2016_10_004
crossref_primary_10_11005_jbm_24_781
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11657_024_01397_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rhum_2014_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00198_013_2553_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00198_019_05173_6
Cites_doi 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00653-6
10.1001/archinternmed.2009.404
10.1007/s001980050254
10.1001/archinternmed.2009.2094
10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4
10.1007/s00198-007-0343-y
10.1007/BF01623184
10.1016/j.bone.2003.10.001
10.1359/jbmr.090511
10.1002/jbmr.12
10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.1947
10.1210/jc.86.11.5217
10.1503/cmaj.081720
10.1002/9780470317051
10.1359/jbmr.070320
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02767.x
10.1007/s00198-008-0588-0
10.1097/00004424-199209000-00015
10.1210/jc.2004-1568
10.1007/s00198-007-0362-8
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2011
International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2012
Copyright_xml – notice: International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2011
– notice: International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2012
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QP
7RV
7TS
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
CCPQU
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1P
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s00198-011-1647-5
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Physical Education Index
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Public Health Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
Physical Education Index
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1433-2965
EndPage 878
ExternalDocumentID 2583505921
21562875
10_1007_s00198_011_1647_5
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Hong Kong
China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Hong Kong
– name: China
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
123
199
1N0
1SB
203
28-
29O
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
36B
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5QI
5RE
5VS
67Z
6NX
78A
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAWTL
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABLJU
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABOCM
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACPRK
ACUDM
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
EX3
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GXS
H13
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
L7B
LAS
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NAPCQ
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
P19
P2P
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
RNS
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
WOW
YLTOR
Z45
Z7U
Z7W
Z82
Z83
Z87
Z8O
Z8Q
Z8V
Z8W
Z91
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
ZXP
~A9
~EX
~KM
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACSTC
ADHKG
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
ABRTQ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
7QP
7TS
7XB
8FK
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-274b1a364768ce76d43e1943b5e2ceacd675c8004095dbb7a45a836ac87a63073
IEDL.DBID U2A
ISSN 0937-941X
1433-2965
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 06:12:08 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 04:26:23 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 03:00:08 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:54:56 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:10:10 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:13 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:34:08 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Chinese postmenopausal women
FRAX
Fracture prediction
Discriminative value
Ethnic-specific clinic risk factors
Osteoporotic fracture
Language English
License http://www.springer.com/tdm
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c402t-274b1a364768ce76d43e1943b5e2ceacd675c8004095dbb7a45a836ac87a63073
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 21562875
PQID 920999107
PQPubID 33762
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_926893302
proquest_miscellaneous_921422829
proquest_journals_920999107
pubmed_primary_21562875
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00198_011_1647_5
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00198_011_1647_5
springer_journals_10_1007_s00198_011_1647_5
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20120300
2012-3-00
2012-Mar
20120301
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 3
  year: 2012
  text: 20120300
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationSubtitle With other metabolic bone diseases
PublicationTitle Osteoporosis international
PublicationTitleAbbrev Osteoporos Int
PublicationTitleAlternate Osteoporos Int
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher Springer-Verlag
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer-Verlag
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Ensrud, Lui, Taylor, Schousboe, Donaldson, Fink, Cauley, Hillier, Browner, Cummings (CR15) 2009; 169
Mei, Yeung, Kung (CR17) 2001; 86
Hippisley-Cox, Coupland (CR12) 2009; 339
Johnell, Kanis (CR2) 2006; 17
Schuit, van der Klift, Weel, de Laet, Burger, Seeman, Hofman, Uitterlinden, van Leeuwen, Pols (CR3) 2004; 34
Dorfman, Berbaum, Metz (CR20) 1992; 27
Nguyen, Frost, Center, Eisman, Nguyen (CR7) 2007; 18
Trémollieres, Pouillès, Drewniak, Laparra, Ribot, Dargent-Molina (CR8) 2010; 25
Kung, Luk, Chu, Tang (CR18) 1999; 10
Colón-Emeric, Lyles (CR10) 2009; 169
van den Bergh, van Geel, Lems, Geusens (CR13) 2010; 8
Lachin (CR19) 2000
Donaldson, Palermo, Schousboe, Ensrud, Hochberg, Cummings (CR21) 2009; 24
Wainwright, Marshall, Ensrud, Cauley, Black, Hillier, Hochberg, Vogt, Orwoll (CR5) 2005; 90
Cooper, Melton (CR9) 1992; 2
Kung, Lee, Ho, Tang, Luk (CR16) 2007; 22
Berry, Ngo, Samelson, Kiel (CR22) 2010; 58
Ioannidis, Papaioannou, Hopman, Noori, Tassos, Pickard, Kennedy, Prior, Olszynski, Davison, Goltzman, Thabane, Amiran, Papadimitropoulos, Brown, Josse, Hanley, Adachi (CR1) 2009; 81
Nguyen, Frost, Center, Eisman, Nguyen (CR11) 2008; 19
Oden, Johnell, Johansson, De Laet, Brown, Burckhardt, Cooper, Christiansen, Cummings, Eisman, Fujiwara, Glüer, Goltzman, Hans, Krieg, La Croix, McCloskey, Mellstrom, Melton, Pols, Reeve, Sanders, Schott, Silman, Torgerson, van Staa, Watts, Yoshimura (CR14) 2007; 18
Stone, Seeley, Lui, Cauley, Ensrud, Browner, Nevitt, Cummings (CR4) 2003; 18
Kanis, Johnell, Oden, De Laet, Jonsson, Dawson (CR6) 2002; 30
FA Trémollieres (1647_CR8) 2010; 25
SA Wainwright (1647_CR5) 2005; 90
ND Nguyen (1647_CR11) 2008; 19
J Mei (1647_CR17) 2001; 86
DD Dorfman (1647_CR20) 1992; 27
KL Stone (1647_CR4) 2003; 18
CS Colón-Emeric (1647_CR10) 2009; 169
MG Donaldson (1647_CR21) 2009; 24
J Hippisley-Cox (1647_CR12) 2009; 339
AWC Kung (1647_CR18) 1999; 10
JA Kanis (1647_CR6) 2002; 30
JP Bergh van den (1647_CR13) 2010; 8
AWC Kung (1647_CR16) 2007; 22
JM Lachin (1647_CR19) 2000
SC Schuit (1647_CR3) 2004; 34
KE Ensrud (1647_CR15) 2009; 169
G Ioannidis (1647_CR1) 2009; 81
SD Berry (1647_CR22) 2010; 58
A Oden (1647_CR14) 2007; 18
ND Nguyen (1647_CR7) 2007; 18
O Johnell (1647_CR2) 2006; 17
C Cooper (1647_CR9) 1992; 2
1399456 - Invest Radiol. 1992 Sep;27(9):723-31
18324342 - Osteoporos Int. 2008 Oct;19(10):1431-44
19926696 - BMJ. 2009 Nov 19;339:b4229
20200927 - J Bone Miner Res. 2010 May;25(5):1002-9
20008691 - Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2087-94
20563901 - Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2010 Sep;8(3):131-7
17370100 - Osteoporos Int. 2007 Aug;18(8):1109-17
17371165 - J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Jul;22(7):1080-7
11701680 - J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Nov;86(11):5217-21
14606506 - J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Nov;18(11):1947-54
11792594 - Bone. 2002 Jan;30(1):251-8
20008692 - Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2094-5
20345862 - J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Apr;58(4):783-7
1421796 - Osteoporos Int. 1992 Nov;2(6):285-9
16983459 - Osteoporos Int. 2006 Dec;17(12):1726-33
19419318 - J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Nov;24(11):1793-9
15728213 - J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 May;90(5):2787-93
19654194 - CMAJ. 2009 Sep 1;181(5):265-71
14751578 - Bone. 2004 Jan;34(1):195-202
10663345 - Osteoporos Int. 1999;10 (6):456-61
17323110 - Osteoporos Int. 2007 Aug;18(8):1033-46
References_xml – volume: 30
  start-page: 251
  year: 2002
  end-page: 258
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Ten-year risk of osteoporotic fracture and the effect of risk factors on screening strategies
  publication-title: Bone
  doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00653-6
– volume: 169
  start-page: 2087
  issue: 22
  year: 2009
  end-page: 2094
  ident: CR15
  article-title: A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women: is more better?
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.404
– volume: 10
  start-page: 456
  year: 1999
  end-page: 461
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Quantitative ultrasound and symptomatic vertebral fracture risk in Chinese women
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s001980050254
– volume: 169
  start-page: 2094
  issue: 22
  year: 2009
  end-page: 2095
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Should there be a fracas over FRAX and other fracture prediction tools?: Comment on “A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women”
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.2094
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1726
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1733
  ident: CR2
  article-title: An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4
– volume: 8
  start-page: 131
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  end-page: 137
  ident: CR13
  publication-title: Assessment of individual fracture risk: FRAX and beyond Curr Osteoporos Rep
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1033
  issue: 8
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1046
  ident: CR14
  article-title: The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0343-y
– volume: 2
  start-page: 285
  year: 1992
  end-page: 289
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/BF01623184
– volume: 34
  start-page: 195
  year: 2004
  end-page: 202
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study
  publication-title: Bone
  doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.10.001
– volume: 339
  start-page: b4229
  year: 2009
  ident: CR12
  publication-title: Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores BMJ
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1793
  issue: 11
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1799
  ident: CR21
  article-title: FRAX and risk of vertebral fractures: the fracture intervention trial
  publication-title: J Bone Miner Res
  doi: 10.1359/jbmr.090511
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1002
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1009
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool
  publication-title: J Bone Miner Res May
  doi: 10.1002/jbmr.12
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1947
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1954
  ident: CR4
  article-title: BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures
  publication-title: J Bone Miner Res
  doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.1947
– volume: 86
  start-page: 5217
  year: 2001
  end-page: 5221
  ident: CR17
  article-title: High dietary phytoestrogen intake is associated with higher bone mineral density in postmenopausal but not premenopausal women
  publication-title: J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
  doi: 10.1210/jc.86.11.5217
– volume: 81
  start-page: 265
  year: 2009
  end-page: 270
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study
  publication-title: CMAJ1
  doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081720
– year: 2000
  ident: CR19
  publication-title: Biostatistical methods: The assessment of relative risks
  doi: 10.1002/9780470317051
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1080
  issue: 7
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1087
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Ten-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal Chinese women according to clinical risk factors and BMD T-scores: a prospective study
  publication-title: J Bone Miner Res
  doi: 10.1359/jbmr.070320
– volume: 58
  start-page: 783
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  end-page: 787
  ident: CR22
  article-title: Competing risk of death: an important consideration in studies of older adults
  publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02767.x
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1431
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1444
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0588-0
– volume: 27
  start-page: 723
  issue: 9
  year: 1992
  end-page: 731
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method
  publication-title: Invest Radiol
  doi: 10.1097/00004424-199209000-00015
– volume: 90
  start-page: 2787
  year: 2005
  end-page: 2793
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis
  publication-title: J Clin Endocrinol Metab
  doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1568
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1109
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1117
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0362-8
– volume: 58
  start-page: 783
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  ident: 1647_CR22
  publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02767.x
– volume: 81
  start-page: 265
  year: 2009
  ident: 1647_CR1
  publication-title: CMAJ1
  doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081720
– volume: 86
  start-page: 5217
  year: 2001
  ident: 1647_CR17
  publication-title: J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
  doi: 10.1210/jc.86.11.5217
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1109
  year: 2007
  ident: 1647_CR7
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0362-8
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1726
  year: 2006
  ident: 1647_CR2
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4
– volume: 27
  start-page: 723
  issue: 9
  year: 1992
  ident: 1647_CR20
  publication-title: Invest Radiol
  doi: 10.1097/00004424-199209000-00015
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1080
  issue: 7
  year: 2007
  ident: 1647_CR16
  publication-title: J Bone Miner Res
  doi: 10.1359/jbmr.070320
– volume: 339
  start-page: b4229
  year: 2009
  ident: 1647_CR12
  publication-title: Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores BMJ
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1793
  issue: 11
  year: 2009
  ident: 1647_CR21
  publication-title: J Bone Miner Res
  doi: 10.1359/jbmr.090511
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1033
  issue: 8
  year: 2007
  ident: 1647_CR14
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0343-y
– volume: 34
  start-page: 195
  year: 2004
  ident: 1647_CR3
  publication-title: Bone
  doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.10.001
– volume: 169
  start-page: 2094
  issue: 22
  year: 2009
  ident: 1647_CR10
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.2094
– volume: 30
  start-page: 251
  year: 2002
  ident: 1647_CR6
  publication-title: Bone
  doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00653-6
– volume: 169
  start-page: 2087
  issue: 22
  year: 2009
  ident: 1647_CR15
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.404
– volume: 8
  start-page: 131
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 1647_CR13
  publication-title: Assessment of individual fracture risk: FRAX and beyond Curr Osteoporos Rep
– volume: 2
  start-page: 285
  year: 1992
  ident: 1647_CR9
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/BF01623184
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1431
  year: 2008
  ident: 1647_CR11
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0588-0
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1947
  year: 2003
  ident: 1647_CR4
  publication-title: J Bone Miner Res
  doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.1947
– volume: 90
  start-page: 2787
  year: 2005
  ident: 1647_CR5
  publication-title: J Clin Endocrinol Metab
  doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1568
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1002
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  ident: 1647_CR8
  publication-title: J Bone Miner Res May
  doi: 10.1002/jbmr.12
– volume-title: Biostatistical methods: The assessment of relative risks
  year: 2000
  ident: 1647_CR19
  doi: 10.1002/9780470317051
– volume: 10
  start-page: 456
  year: 1999
  ident: 1647_CR18
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s001980050254
– reference: 14751578 - Bone. 2004 Jan;34(1):195-202
– reference: 17370100 - Osteoporos Int. 2007 Aug;18(8):1109-17
– reference: 20008691 - Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2087-94
– reference: 10663345 - Osteoporos Int. 1999;10 (6):456-61
– reference: 17323110 - Osteoporos Int. 2007 Aug;18(8):1033-46
– reference: 1421796 - Osteoporos Int. 1992 Nov;2(6):285-9
– reference: 1399456 - Invest Radiol. 1992 Sep;27(9):723-31
– reference: 16983459 - Osteoporos Int. 2006 Dec;17(12):1726-33
– reference: 20563901 - Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2010 Sep;8(3):131-7
– reference: 18324342 - Osteoporos Int. 2008 Oct;19(10):1431-44
– reference: 20008692 - Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2094-5
– reference: 19654194 - CMAJ. 2009 Sep 1;181(5):265-71
– reference: 19419318 - J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Nov;24(11):1793-9
– reference: 20200927 - J Bone Miner Res. 2010 May;25(5):1002-9
– reference: 11792594 - Bone. 2002 Jan;30(1):251-8
– reference: 17371165 - J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Jul;22(7):1080-7
– reference: 15728213 - J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 May;90(5):2787-93
– reference: 19926696 - BMJ. 2009 Nov 19;339:b4229
– reference: 20345862 - J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Apr;58(4):783-7
– reference: 11701680 - J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Nov;86(11):5217-21
– reference: 14606506 - J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Nov;18(11):1947-54
SSID ssj0007997
Score 2.2057896
Snippet Summary We followed 2,266 postmenopausal Chinese women for 4.5 years to determine which model best predicts osteoporotic fracture. A model that contains...
We followed 2,266 postmenopausal Chinese women for 4.5 years to determine which model best predicts osteoporotic fracture. A model that contains...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 871
SubjectTerms Absorptiometry, Photon - methods
Adult
Age
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Asian Continental Ancestry Group - psychology
Asian Continental Ancestry Group - statistics & numerical data
Bone
Bone Density - physiology
Bone mineral density
Cohort Studies
Corticotropin-releasing hormone
Endocrinology
Ethnicity
Female
Femur Neck - physiopathology
Fractures
Hip
Hip Fractures - epidemiology
Hip Fractures - etiology
Hip Fractures - physiopathology
Hong Kong - epidemiology
Humans
Life Style - ethnology
Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Menopause
Middle Aged
Nutrition
Original Article
Orthopedics
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - complications
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - epidemiology
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - physiopathology
Osteoporotic Fractures - epidemiology
Osteoporotic Fractures - etiology
Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology
Post-menopause
Rheumatology
Risk assessment
Risk Assessment - methods
Risk factors
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Public Health Database
  dbid: 8C1
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3dS8MwEA86QXwRv51TyYNPSnBt03w8yZiOIcwHcbC3miYpCNLOdfv_vevaioh7zoWEu9zlLne5HyE33DmLcHUsdDJlPLCGpcZGTBgex8pETmX4G3nyIsZT_jyLZ3VtTlmXVTY2sTLUrrD4Rn6vw8qX6cuH-RdD0ChMrtYIGttkJwATjHqphj8VHlJX2CoQs0umeTBrkpr9qodogH_LsJ5LcMni39fSH1_zT560un5GB2S_9hvpYC3oQ7Ll8yOyO6kz48fk_fEDDQAWtqABo9jE29Mio6PXwYyCZ0oz_A-1Wng6X-AsFAj9yKmhiJG7WCItgmn7EiiKEovPIZ5elbBo1aXhhExHT2_DMavRE5iFmHDJINxMA4Pt4YWyXgrHIx9oHqWxDy2YWwehglWoxDp2aSpBOEZFwlgljUDNPyWdvMj9OaEyACa5SGWZ59y7SAdGe81TIZQHWym7pN8wL7F1a3FEuPhM2qbIFb8T4HeC_E7iLrltp8zXfTU2EfcaiSS1ipVJeyC6hLajoBuY8DC5L1ZIgi9cKtSbSITCN52wS87Wom63A86QgHgSVr9rZP-z-r97vdi41x7ZA48rXBexXZLOcrHyV-DVLNPr6ux-A8iT8WQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Discriminative value of FRAX for fracture prediction in a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00198-011-1647-5
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21562875
https://www.proquest.com/docview/920999107
https://www.proquest.com/docview/921422829
https://www.proquest.com/docview/926893302
Volume 23
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlR1da9sw8OgHjL2Utvto1jXooU8rgtiW9fGYdMnKSsMoDbhPnizJUChOiZP_vzvHdhntCnuxHnyyxJ3vdKf7AjgX3jtqV8djrwouImd5YV3CpRVpqm3idUnZyDdzebUQP7M0a_O46y7avXNJNpK6T3YjbYQCr6ixsVA83YX9FE134sZFPO7FrzJNRxW01BU3Iso6V-Zrn_j7MHqhYb7wjjaHzuwQDlptkY235D2CnVAdw7ub1h_-AX5_fyC2p3AWEluMSncHtizZ7HacMdRHWUlZUJtVYE8rmkVkYA8Vs4w6467WBEsttEONEMuaQs7Rit7UuGhTm-EjLGbTu8sr3vZM4A4twTVHI7OILBWFl9oFJb1IQmREUqQhdihkPRoIThPrmtQXhUKSWJ1I67Sykvj9E-xVyyqcAFMRIsknuiyDEMEnJrImGFFIqQNKSDWAUYe83LUFxamvxWPel0Ju8J0jvnPCd54O4Fs_5WlbTeMt4NOOInnLWHVu4kalHeHqrH-LHEFuDluF5YZA6F5Lx-YtEKnpJicewOctqfvtoAok0YrE1S862j-v_s-9fvkv6FN4H5PZTkfg6CvsrVebcIa6zboYwq7KFD71ZTSE_fFsMpnT-OP-eorjZDr_dTts_vc_LO702w
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR1dT9wwzGJMYnuZYGxw42N52F42Rbs2aZo-TBMCTsfgeJhAureSJqmEhNrb9U7TftT-4-x-IYS4N57r1JZjO3bs2ACfpHOWxtXx0MUZl4E1PDNWcGVkFGkjnM7pNfLkUo2v5c9pNF2Df91bGCqr7GxibahdaemO_FsS1r7MMP4x-81paBQlV7sJGo1UnPu_fzBiq76fneD2fg7D0enV8Zi3QwW4xVBpwTEKywJDXdOVtj5WTgqPgbzIIh9atEIOPWirSbaTyGVZjDQbLZSxOjaKFAL_-wJeSiEUKZE-vq8oiZN6lssQT3yeyGDaJVGHdc_SgN6yUf0YoubRw2PwkW_7KC9bH3ejTXjT-qnsqBGsLVjzxVvYmLSZ-G24Obklg0OFNGQwGTUN96zM2ejX0ZShJ8xyen-1nHs2m9MqEgB2WzDDaCbvfEGwNLzbVwhRVlTsjvH7skKkdVeId3D9LIx9D-tFWfhdYHGATHJC57mX0juRBCbxicyU0h5tczyAYce81LatzGmixl3aN2Gu-Z0iv1PidxoN4Eu_ZNb08VgFvNftSNqqdJX2AjgA1n9FXaQEiyl8uSQQulHTYbIKRGm6QwoHsNNsdU8OOl8K41fE_rXb-3vsT9L6YSWtH-HV-GpykV6cXZ7vwWv09sKmgG4f1hfzpT9Aj2qRHdZyzODmuRXnP3R7LWI
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3LatwwcEg3EHop6TPb9KFDe2kRWduyJB9CSbtZkqZZQmhgb44syRAo9na9S-gn9q8645VdSujecvbYkuelGc0L4J1wztK4Oh47VXARWcMLYxMujUhTbRKnS6pGPp_KkyvxdZbOtuB3VwtDaZWdTmwVtast3ZEfZHFry4zUQRmyIi7Gk0_zn5wGSFGgtZumYcKUBXfYdhsLNR5n_tctenPN4ekYSf8-jifH37-c8DBwgFt0o5YcPbQiMtRRXWrrlXQi8ejkJ0XqY4sayqF1bTXxfZa6olD4P0Yn0litjCRhwe8-gG2Fh6QYwPbn4-nFZX8sqKyd9DJCe4BnIpp1IdZR29E0oko3yi7DxXn67yF5x_K9E7VtD8PJLjwKViw7WrPdY9jy1RPYOQ9x-qdwPb4hdURpNqROGbUU96wu2eTyaMbQTmYlVWetFp7NF_QWsQe7qZhhNLF3sSRYGu3tG4SoG0qFR-9-1eCibc-IZ3B1L6h9DoOqrvweMBUhklyiy9IL4V2SRSbzmSik1B41txrCqENebkOjc5q38SPvWzS3-M4R3znhO0-H8KF_Zb7u8rEJeL-jSB4Evsl79hwC65-ipFL4xVS-XhEI3bfpONsEIjXdMMVDeLEmdb8dNM0kere4-seO9n9X_-9eX27c61vYQSHKv51Oz_bhIZqC8Tq77hUMlouVf43m1rJ4ExiZwfV9y84fAP44Wg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discriminative+value+of+FRAX+for+fracture+prediction+in+a+cohort+of+Chinese+postmenopausal+women&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis+international&rft.au=Cheung%2C+E.+Y.+N.&rft.au=Bow%2C+C.+H.&rft.au=Cheung%2C+C.+L.&rft.au=Soong%2C+C.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=871&rft.epage=878&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00198-011-1647-5&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s00198_011_1647_5
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0937-941X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0937-941X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0937-941X&client=summon