Comparative evaluation of compressive and flexural strength, fluoride release and bacterial adhesion of GIC modified with CPP-ACP, bioactive glass, chitosan and MDPB

Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F‒ ) release...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 16 - 21
Main Authors Kirthika, Natarajan, Vidhya, Sampath, Sujatha, Venkatappan, Mahalaxmi, Sekar, Senthil Kumar, Renganathan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Iran Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F‒ ) release, and bacterial adhesion of conventional glass-ionomer cement (C-GIC). Methods. Modifications were implemented by adding CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH to the glass powder, while MDPB-GIC was prepared by incorporating MDPB to the liquid of C-GIC. Custom-made molds were used for specimen preparation. Compressive and flexural strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. F‒ release was calculated with Erichrome cyanide reagent, using UV-spectrophotometry, at two time intervals of 24 hours and seven days. For bacterial adhesion, the test specimens were exposed to the bacterial suspension of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus for 4 hours, and the adherent bacteria were quantified using colorimetry as the optical density (OD). Results. The incorporation of MDPB increased the flexural strength of C-GIC, with no effect on its compressive strength. CH significantly improved the compressive and flexural strength; modifications with CPP-ACP, BAG, and MDPB significantly improved the flexural strength of C-GIC. While MDPB-GIC released significantly higher F‒ at 24 hours, CPP-ACP- and BAG-modified GICs were comparable to C-GIC on day 7. C-GIC exhibited the highest bacterial adhesion, and MDPB-GIC showed the least. The data were analyzed with one-way (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were made with Tukey HSD tests. Conclusion. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion.
AbstractList Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F‒ ) release, and bacterial adhesion of conventional glass-ionomer cement (C-GIC). Methods. Modifications were implemented by adding CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH to the glass powder, while MDPB-GIC was prepared by incorporating MDPB to the liquid of C-GIC. Custom-made molds were used for specimen preparation. Compressive and flexural strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. F‒ release was calculated with Erichrome cyanide reagent, using UV-spectrophotometry, at two time intervals of 24 hours and seven days. For bacterial adhesion, the test specimens were exposed to the bacterial suspension of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus for 4 hours, and the adherent bacteria were quantified using colorimetry as the optical density (OD). Results. The incorporation of MDPB increased the flexural strength of C-GIC, with no effect on its compressive strength. CH significantly improved the compressive and flexural strength; modifications with CPP-ACP, BAG, and MDPB significantly improved the flexural strength of C-GIC. While MDPB-GIC released significantly higher F‒ at 24 hours, CPP-ACP- and BAG-modified GICs were comparable to C-GIC on day 7. C-GIC exhibited the highest bacterial adhesion, and MDPB-GIC showed the least. The data were analyzed with one-way (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were made with Tukey HSD tests. Conclusion. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion.
[...]it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion. Despite these advantages, GIC has certain drawbacks, such as brittleness and porosity, which result in poor mechanical properties, such as low wear resistance and fracture toughness.2 The composition of GIC has been experimented with the incorporation of a wide variety of biologically active materials. [...]this in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of incorporating CPP-ACP, BAG, CH, and MDPB on the compressive and flexural strength, F- release, and bacterial (Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus) adhesion of C-GIC. [...]MDPB was prepared by mixing the prepared hydroxy dodecylpyridinium bromide and methacryloyl chloride at a ratio of 1:1.
Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F‒ ) release, and bacterial adhesion of conventional glass-ionomer cement (C-GIC). Methods. Modifications were implemented by adding CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH to the glass powder, while MDPB-GIC was prepared by incorporating MDPB to the liquid of C-GIC. Custom-made molds were used for specimen preparation. Compressive and flexural strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. F‒ release was calculated with Erichrome cyanide reagent, using UV-spectrophotometry, at two time intervals of 24 hours and seven days. For bacterial adhesion, the test specimens were exposed to the bacterial suspension of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus for 4 hours, and the adherent bacteria were quantified using colorimetry as the optical density (OD). Results. The incorporation of MDPB increased the flexural strength of C-GIC, with no effect on its compressive strength. CH significantly improved the compressive and flexural strength; modifications with CPP-ACP, BAG, and MDPB significantly improved the flexural strength of C-GIC. While MDPB-GIC released significantly higher F‒ at 24 hours, CPP-ACP- and BAG-modified GICs were comparable to C-GIC on day 7. C-GIC exhibited the highest bacterial adhesion, and MDPB-GIC showed the least. The data were analyzed with one-way (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were made with Tukey HSD tests. Conclusion. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion.Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F‒ ) release, and bacterial adhesion of conventional glass-ionomer cement (C-GIC). Methods. Modifications were implemented by adding CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH to the glass powder, while MDPB-GIC was prepared by incorporating MDPB to the liquid of C-GIC. Custom-made molds were used for specimen preparation. Compressive and flexural strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. F‒ release was calculated with Erichrome cyanide reagent, using UV-spectrophotometry, at two time intervals of 24 hours and seven days. For bacterial adhesion, the test specimens were exposed to the bacterial suspension of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus for 4 hours, and the adherent bacteria were quantified using colorimetry as the optical density (OD). Results. The incorporation of MDPB increased the flexural strength of C-GIC, with no effect on its compressive strength. CH significantly improved the compressive and flexural strength; modifications with CPP-ACP, BAG, and MDPB significantly improved the flexural strength of C-GIC. While MDPB-GIC released significantly higher F‒ at 24 hours, CPP-ACP- and BAG-modified GICs were comparable to C-GIC on day 7. C-GIC exhibited the highest bacterial adhesion, and MDPB-GIC showed the least. The data were analyzed with one-way (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were made with Tukey HSD tests. Conclusion. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion.
This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F ) release, and bacterial adhesion of conventional glass-ionomer cement (C-GIC). Modifications were implemented by adding CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH to the glass powder, while MDPB-GIC was prepared by incorporating MDPB to the liquid of C-GIC. Custom-made molds were used for specimen preparation. Compressive and flexural strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. F release was calculated with Erichrome cyanide reagent, using UV-spectrophotometry, at two time intervals of 24 hours and seven days. For bacterial adhesion, the test specimens were exposed to the bacterial suspension of and for 4 hours, and the adherent bacteria were quantified using colorimetry as the optical density (OD). The incorporation of MDPB increased the flexural strength of C-GIC, with no effect on its compressive strength. CH significantly improved the compressive and flexural strength; modifications with CPP-ACP, BAG, and MDPB significantly improved the flexural strength of C-GIC. While MDPB-GIC released significantly higher F at 24 hours, CPP-ACP- and BAG-modified GICs were comparable to C-GIC on day 7. C-GIC exhibited the highest bacterial adhesion, and MDPB-GIC showed the least. The data were analyzed with one-way (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were made with Tukey HSD tests. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion.
Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F ‒ ) release, and bacterial adhesion of conventional glass-ionomer cement (C-GIC). Methods. Modifications were implemented by adding CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH to the glass powder, while MDPB-GIC was prepared by incorporating MDPB to the liquid of C-GIC. Custom-made molds were used for specimen preparation. Compressive and flexural strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. F ‒ release was calculated with Erichrome cyanide reagent, using UV-spectrophotometry, at two time intervals of 24 hours and seven days. For bacterial adhesion, the test specimens were exposed to the bacterial suspension of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus for 4 hours, and the adherent bacteria were quantified using colorimetry as the optical density (OD). Results. The incorporation of MDPB increased the flexural strength of C-GIC, with no effect on its compressive strength. CH significantly improved the compressive and flexural strength; modifications with CPP-ACP, BAG, and MDPB significantly improved the flexural strength of C-GIC. While MDPB-GIC released significantly higher F ‒ at 24 hours, CPP-ACP- and BAG-modified GICs were comparable to C-GIC on day 7. C-GIC exhibited the highest bacterial adhesion, and MDPB-GIC showed the least. The data were analyzed with one-way (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were made with Tukey HSD tests. Conclusion. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion.
Author Mahalaxmi, Sekar
Vidhya, Sampath
Kirthika, Natarajan
Senthil Kumar, Renganathan
Sujatha, Venkatappan
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India
3 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Adhiparasakthi Dental College & Hospital, Melmaruvathur, India
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Tamil Nadu, India
– name: 3 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Adhiparasakthi Dental College & Hospital, Melmaruvathur, India
– name: 2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Natarajan
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5740-1062
  surname: Kirthika
  fullname: Kirthika, Natarajan
  organization: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Tamil Nadu, India
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Sampath
  surname: Vidhya
  fullname: Vidhya, Sampath
  organization: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Venkatappan
  surname: Sujatha
  fullname: Sujatha, Venkatappan
  organization: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Sekar
  surname: Mahalaxmi
  fullname: Mahalaxmi, Sekar
  organization: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Renganathan
  surname: Senthil Kumar
  fullname: Senthil Kumar, Renganathan
  organization: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Adhiparasakthi Dental College & Hospital, Melmaruvathur, India
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kk1vEzEQhleoiJbSMzdkiQuHbOrvXV-QSviqVEQOIHGzvOtx4mizTu3dAD-I_4nz0YpWwhePZt55PB69z4uTPvRQFC8JnjJOKnq5CtbaKcWUTDHmT4ozinFdUkLqk_sY_zgtLlJa4XyYEJWkz4pTxhStaibPij-zsN6YaAa_BQRb0405DD0KDrW5EiGlXcX0FrkOfo3RdCgNEfrFsJzk1Biit4AidGDSQdeYdoDos9DYJaQj7dP1DK2D9c6DRT_9sESz-by8ms0nqPEht-yeWXQmpQlql34IyfR73Jf383cviqfOdAkujvd58f3jh2-zz-XN18y9uilbjikvCcESjGNcOU6dFZxK5yQlomJSiVpUgkjTgnRCmorVYJVrnWmcwo2SDSXsvLg-cG0wK72Jfm3ibx2M1_tEiAtt4uDbDnSNAWNVKca45LVtlG2htpwrJbAQos6stwfWZmzWkKv9kJf3APqw0vulXoRtJouaCJYBb46AGG5HSINe-9RC15kewpg0FRTnP6laZOnrR9JVGGOfV5VVXEohuNipXv070f0od27IAnEQtDGkFMHp1g97P-QBfacJ1nvj6b3x9M54Ohsv910-6rtD_6_jLz8T28w
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_161950
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_30789
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e24217
crossref_primary_10_34172_joddd_41084
crossref_primary_10_3390_prosthesis5010024
crossref_primary_10_3390_coatings15030299
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2022_104071
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.038
10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00330-6
10.1590/0103-6440201600655
10.3390/ma13102313
10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00093-7
10.1055/s-0039-1693524
10.1177/154405910308201113
10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00247-6
10.1177/00220345840630021301
10.1080/09674845.2017.1347362
10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.007
10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80063-7
10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.09.020
10.4103/ejd.ejd_219_17
10.1177/0895937409335621
10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00217-5
10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.005
10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.120
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.031
10.1111/j.1754-4505.1998.tb01353.x
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.008
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 The Author(s).
2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2021 The Author(s). 2021
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 The Author(s).
– notice: 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2021 The Author(s). 2021
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
8AO
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
CWDGH
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
LK8
M0S
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.34172/joddd.2021.004
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
Middle East & Africa Database
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
Health Research Premium Collection
Middle East & Africa Database
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Dentistry
EISSN 2008-2118
EndPage 21
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_80e00979334648db9dce8d4499505558
PMC8058153
33927836
10_34172_joddd_2021_004
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States--US
Mumbai India
India
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
– name: India
– name: Mumbai India
GroupedDBID 29K
34H
5VS
7X7
8AO
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
AAYXX
ABUWG
ACPRK
ADBBV
AFKRA
AHMBA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BHPHI
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CITATION
CWDGH
D-I
DIK
EOJEC
FRP
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
KQ8
LK8
M48
M7P
OBODZ
OK1
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
RNS
RPM
TR2
UKHRP
W2D
ADRAZ
NPM
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4024-1106eaf349f42fd5426ff621573695857516ace6f56a738ed9fcfabf90b96b213
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2008-210X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:31:31 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:14:05 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 15:08:02 EDT 2025
Sun Jul 13 04:47:14 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:58:06 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:06:55 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:13:11 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Bioactive glass
Glass-ionomer cement
CPP-ACP
Bacterial adhesion
Chitosan
MDPB
Fluoride release
Language English
License 2021 The Author(s).
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4024-1106eaf349f42fd5426ff621573695857516ace6f56a738ed9fcfabf90b96b213
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-5740-1062
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.34172/joddd.2021.004
PMID 33927836
PQID 2546655455
PQPubID 2032003
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_80e00979334648db9dce8d4499505558
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8058153
proquest_miscellaneous_2520857985
proquest_journals_2546655455
pubmed_primary_33927836
crossref_citationtrail_10_34172_joddd_2021_004
crossref_primary_10_34172_joddd_2021_004
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2021
  text: 2021-00-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Iran
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Iran
– name: Tabriz
PublicationTitle Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects
PublicationTitleAlternate J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Publisher_xml – name: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
References R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R10
R21
R20
R12
R11
R14
R13
R16
R15
R18
R17
R19
R1
References_xml – ident: R4
  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.038
– ident: R19
  doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00330-6
– ident: R17
  doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600655
– ident: R1
  doi: 10.3390/ma13102313
– ident: R9
  doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00093-7
– ident: R12
  doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693524
– ident: R2
  doi: 10.1177/154405910308201113
– ident: R8
  doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00247-6
– ident: R21
  doi: 10.1177/00220345840630021301
– ident: R20
  doi: 10.1080/09674845.2017.1347362
– ident: R5
  doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.007
– ident: R7
  doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80063-7
– ident: R13
  doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.09.020
– ident: R16
  doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_219_17
– ident: R3
  doi: 10.1177/0895937409335621
– ident: R10
  doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00217-5
– ident: R18
  doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.005
– ident: R11
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.120
– ident: R15
  doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.031
– ident: R14
  doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1998.tb01353.x
– ident: R6
  doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.008
SSID ssj0000355762
Score 2.1811883
Snippet Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive...
This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG),...
[...]it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of...
Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 16
SubjectTerms Bacteria
bacterial adhesion
bioactive glass
Biological activity
Calcium phosphates
Cement
Chitosan
Chloride
Composite materials
cpp-acp
fluoride release
Fluorides
glass-ionomer cement
mdpb
Mechanical properties
Original
Porosity
Resins
Stainless steel
Streptococcus infections
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELVQL3BBlM9AQUbiwGHTbmLHTo5tSilIRXug0t4sOx6zW5UEdXel_iH-JzNOdruLQFy4xpPIyYw9z_H4PcbeZaSqahtIHXiXSi1sWsngUgiuyTKLGSLqp1x8UeeX8vO0mG5JfVFNWE8P3H-4o3IMdNYA191SydK7yjdQeolAvYhcVTT7Ys7bWkzFORjTqI5qonF_H9c1057XBydtnR9ddd4TTWieHY4HibZ1SorM_X-Cm79XTW6lobNH7OGAH_lx3-99dg_ax-z-KdX8kGzbE_azvuPz5ndc3rwLnMrHY9krttjW83ANt8S6wenASPttORvhpVV3M_fASUsFE1y0cz2jMxpaP4PF8LSPn2r-vfPzgCCW0-9cXk8m6XE9GXE372ycR3kE5yNOmxXdwrbxcRenk5On7PLsw9f6PB20GNIGV5gyRZSgwAYhqyDz4NHBKgSFeEELVRUk85kpdLkKhbJalOCr0ATrQjV2lXJ5Jp6xvbZr4QXjPneghINcaCsFBGshSKtloYPLFOQJO1y7wzQDUTnpZVwbXLBE_5noP0P-M-i_hL3f3PCj5-j4u-kJ-XdjRuTa8QKGnBlCzvwr5BJ2sI4OM4z4hSFdAYXYrCgS9nbTjGOVNmBsC92KbKIialWizfM-mDY9EQhU6URNwvROmO10dbelnc8iH3g5LkpMXC__x7u9Yg_oW_U_mQ7Y3vJmBa8Rdi3dmzjCfgE2xSpM
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Nb9QwELWgHOCCymfTlspIHDhs2iR27OSE2rSlIBXtgUp7i-zY7i4qSenuSv1D_E9mHG-WRcA1no28ebZnPB6_R8i7FFVVVWNjbY2OuWQqLrnTsXW6SVMFHsLrp1x-ERdX_PMkn4SE2zyUVa7WRL9Qm67BHPkR8rYL8H15_uH2R4yqUXi6GiQ0HpJHSF2Go1pO5JBjScCZSq8p6k_5YXcz6dl9YOmW2dG3zhgkC83SwyQIta0ck-fv_1vQ-Wft5G_O6HybPA1RJD3uYX9GHtj2OXl8ipU_KN72gvys1qzedM3oTTtHsYjcF79Ci2oNdTf2Hrk3KF4baa8X0xE8WsJfN5aiogq4OW-ne15nMFRmaufhbR8_VfR7Z2YOQlmKSV1ajcfxcTUeUT3rlF9NqQ_RRxSPLLq5av3rLk_HJy_J1fnZ1-oiDooMcQP7TB5DrCCscoyXjmfOAMzCOQFRg2SizFHsMxUAvHC5UJIV1pSucUq7MtGl0FnKXpGttmvtDqEm01YwbTMmFWfWKWUdV5Ln0ulU2Cwihys46ibQlaNqxk0N2xaPX-3xqxG_GvCLyPvhB7c9U8e_TU8Q38EMKbb9g-7uug4zti4Si5dcSsa44IXRJUBeGA47xNyTpEVkfzU66jDv5_V6lEbk7dAMMxaPYVRruyXaeF3UsgCb1_1gGnrCIFzFezURkRvDbKOrmy3tbOpZwYskL8B97f6_W3vkCX6FPom0T7YWd0v7BsKqhT7wc-cXsLYjaA
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Comparative evaluation of compressive and flexural strength, fluoride release and bacterial adhesion of GIC modified with CPP-ACP, bioactive glass, chitosan and MDPB
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927836
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2546655455
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2520857985
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8058153
https://doaj.org/article/80e00979334648db9dce8d4499505558
Volume 15
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELZg9wAXxHsDS2UkDhyaqokdJzkgtM2-QNpVhKiUW2TH9rZSSaAPaflB_E9mnLTdrsqNSw72xEoy48yMPf4-Qj4EyKoqK-Mro5XPYyb9lFvlG6uqIJDgIRx_ytW1uBzzr0VUbOmAug-42JvaIZ_UeD4b3P76_Rkm_CfMODk4YLhLa0T9DIOBwwY9DLEZ6_i6WN_9lsGzxo5g1G35Q6pTtFA_-8bY8VIOzH9fBHq_kPKOZzp_Sp50ISU9aW3gGXlg6ufk0SmWASGT2wvyJ9tCfNMtvDdtLMWKclcJCz2y1tTOzC0CcVA8Q1LfLCd9aFo186k2FOlVwOc5OdWCPIOg1BOz6Ea7-JLRH42eWohrKa7w0izP_ZMs71M1baT7tVIXr_cp7l80C1m74a5O89FLMj4_-55d-h09g19B0sl9CByEkZbx1PLQatC5sFZACBEzkUbI_BkIsAJhIyFjlhid2spKZdOhSoUKA_aKHNRNbY4I1aEygikTslhyZqyUxnIZ8yi2KhAm9MhgrY6y6rDLkUJjVkIO4_RXOv2VqL8S9OeRj5sbfrawHf8WHaF-N2KIt-0amvlN2U3fMhkaPPGSMsYFT7RKQeWJ5pAuRg4xzSPHa-so1zZcItWAgHAtijzyftMN0xf3ZGRtmhXKOJLUNAGZ160xbZ6EQeyKh2w8Eu-Y2c6j7vbU04mDCE-GUQK-7M3_eLe35DF-q3bd6ZgcLOcr8w4isaXqkYdxEffI4ejsOv_Wc-sZcL0ogp6be38BlrE3SA
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Pb9MwFLbGOIwL4jeFAUYCiUOzJbFjJweEtpapY-vUwyb1FuzYXotGMtZWwB_Elb-R95ykpQi47Rq_WJbf83t-9vP3EfIqQlZVVdhAW6MDLpkKMu50YJ0uokhBhPD8KcMTMTjjH8bJeIP8bN_CYFll6xO9ozZVgWfku4jbLiD2Jcm7yy8Bskbh7WpLoVGbxZH9_hVSttnbwz7o93UcH7w_7Q2ChlUgKCBX4gHEO2GVYzxzPHYGhiqcExD5JBNZgoSVkYDBC5cIJVlqTeYKp7TLQp0JHUcM-r1BbkLgDTHZk2O5PNMJIXhLz2HqqwogmxrXaEIQKmS8-6kyBsFJ42gnbIjh2kDo-QL-tsn9s1bzt-B3cIfcbnatdK82s7tkw5b3yFYfK42QLO4--dFboYjTFYI4rRzFonVfbAstqjTUXdhviPVB8ZlKeT6fdOHTAqbaWIoMLhBWvZyucaRBUJmJnTW9wRzTz5WZOtg6UzxEpr3RKNjrjbpUTyvlvTf1KUGX4hVJNVOl727YH-0_IGfXoquHZLOsSvuYUBNrK5i2MZOKM-uUso4ryRPpdCRs3CE7rTryooFHR5aOixzSJK-_3OsvR_3loL8OebP84bJGBvm36D7qdymGkN7-Q3V1njceIk9Di49qMsa44KnRGag8NRwy0sSDsnXIdmsdeeNnZvlqVXTIy2UzeAi89lGlrRYo43lYsxRkHtXGtBwJg-0xvuPpELlmZmtDXW8ppxOPQp6GSQrh8sn_h_WCbA1Oh8f58eHJ0VNyC2ekPsDaJpvzq4V9Blu6uX7u1xElH6974f4CgBJfTw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9MwELdGJwEviP8UBhgJJB6atYkdJ3lAaG1XbYxVEWJS3zI7tteikYy1FfCB-BJ8Ou6cpKUIeNtrfLVc3_nOZ59_P0Je-siqKnPjKaOVxyMmvYRb5Rmrct-XECEcf8rxWByc8HeTcLJFfjZvYbCssvGJzlHrMscz8i7itguIfWHYtXVZRDocvb344iGDFN60NnQalYkcme9fIX2bvzkcgq5fBcFo_-PgwKsZBrwc8ibuQewTRlrGE8sDq2HYwloBUTBiIgmRvNIX8EeEDYWMWGx0YnMrlU16KhEq8Bn0e41sR5gVtch2f3-cflid8PQglEeO0dTVGEBuNamwhSBwREH3U6k1QpUG_m6vpolrwqJjD_jblvfPys3fQuHoNrlV72HpXmV0d8iWKe6SG0OsO0LquHvkx2CNKU7XeOK0tBRL2F3pLbTIQlN7br4h8gfFRyvF2WLagU9LmGxtKPK5QJB1cqpClQZBqadmXvcGs0w_l3pmYSNN8UiZDtLU2xukHapmpXS-nLoEoUPxwqScy8J1dzxM-_fJyZVo6wFpFWVhHhGqA2UEUyZgkeTMWCmN5TLiYWSVL0zQJruNOrK8BktHzo7zDJImp7_M6S9D_WWgvzZ5vfrBRYUT8m_RPup3JYYA3-5DeXmW1f4ii3sGn9gkjHHBY60SUHmsOeSnoYNoa5Odxjqy2uvMs_UaaZMXq2bwF3gJJAtTLlHGsbImMcg8rIxpNRIGm2V81dMm0YaZbQx1s6WYTR0medwLYwiej_8_rOfkOiza7P3h-OgJuYkTUp1m7ZDW4nJpnsL-bqGe1QuJktOrXru_ANZCZOo
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+evaluation+of+compressive+and+flexural+strength%2C+fluoride+release+and+bacterial+adhesion+of+GIC+modified+with+CPP-ACP%2C+bioactive+glass%2C+chitosan+and+MDPB&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+dental+research%2C+dental+clinics%2C+dental+prospects&rft.au=Natarajan+Kirthika&rft.au=Sampath+Vidhya&rft.au=Venkatappan+Sujatha&rft.au=Sekar+Mahalaxmi&rft.date=2021&rft.pub=Tabriz+University+of+Medical+Sciences&rft.issn=2008-210X&rft.eissn=2008-2118&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=21&rft_id=info:doi/10.34172%2Fjoddd.2021.004&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_80e00979334648db9dce8d4499505558
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2008-210X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2008-210X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2008-210X&client=summon