Comparative evaluation of compressive and flexural strength, fluoride release and bacterial adhesion of GIC modified with CPP-ACP, bioactive glass, chitosan and MDPB
Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F‒ ) release...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 16 - 21 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Iran
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F‒ ) release, and bacterial adhesion of conventional glass-ionomer cement (C-GIC). Methods. Modifications were implemented by adding CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH to the glass powder, while MDPB-GIC was prepared by incorporating MDPB to the liquid of C-GIC. Custom-made molds were used for specimen preparation. Compressive and flexural strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. F‒ release was calculated with Erichrome cyanide reagent, using UV-spectrophotometry, at two time intervals of 24 hours and seven days. For bacterial adhesion, the test specimens were exposed to the bacterial suspension of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus for 4 hours, and the adherent bacteria were quantified using colorimetry as the optical density (OD). Results. The incorporation of MDPB increased the flexural strength of C-GIC, with no effect on its compressive strength. CH significantly improved the compressive and flexural strength; modifications with CPP-ACP, BAG, and MDPB significantly improved the flexural strength of C-GIC. While MDPB-GIC released significantly higher F‒ at 24 hours, CPP-ACP- and BAG-modified GICs were comparable to C-GIC on day 7. C-GIC exhibited the highest bacterial adhesion, and MDPB-GIC showed the least. The data were analyzed with one-way (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were made with Tukey HSD tests. Conclusion. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F‒ ) release, and bacterial adhesion of conventional glass-ionomer cement (C-GIC). Methods. Modifications were implemented by adding CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH to the glass powder, while MDPB-GIC was prepared by incorporating MDPB to the liquid of C-GIC. Custom-made molds were used for specimen preparation. Compressive and flexural strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. F‒ release was calculated with Erichrome cyanide reagent, using UV-spectrophotometry, at two time intervals of 24 hours and seven days. For bacterial adhesion, the test specimens were exposed to the bacterial suspension of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus for 4 hours, and the adherent bacteria were quantified using colorimetry as the optical density (OD). Results. The incorporation of MDPB increased the flexural strength of C-GIC, with no effect on its compressive strength. CH significantly improved the compressive and flexural strength; modifications with CPP-ACP, BAG, and MDPB significantly improved the flexural strength of C-GIC. While MDPB-GIC released significantly higher F‒ at 24 hours, CPP-ACP- and BAG-modified GICs were comparable to C-GIC on day 7. C-GIC exhibited the highest bacterial adhesion, and MDPB-GIC showed the least. The data were analyzed with one-way (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were made with Tukey HSD tests. Conclusion. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion. [...]it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion. Despite these advantages, GIC has certain drawbacks, such as brittleness and porosity, which result in poor mechanical properties, such as low wear resistance and fracture toughness.2 The composition of GIC has been experimented with the incorporation of a wide variety of biologically active materials. [...]this in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of incorporating CPP-ACP, BAG, CH, and MDPB on the compressive and flexural strength, F- release, and bacterial (Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus) adhesion of C-GIC. [...]MDPB was prepared by mixing the prepared hydroxy dodecylpyridinium bromide and methacryloyl chloride at a ratio of 1:1. Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F‒ ) release, and bacterial adhesion of conventional glass-ionomer cement (C-GIC). Methods. Modifications were implemented by adding CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH to the glass powder, while MDPB-GIC was prepared by incorporating MDPB to the liquid of C-GIC. Custom-made molds were used for specimen preparation. Compressive and flexural strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. F‒ release was calculated with Erichrome cyanide reagent, using UV-spectrophotometry, at two time intervals of 24 hours and seven days. For bacterial adhesion, the test specimens were exposed to the bacterial suspension of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus for 4 hours, and the adherent bacteria were quantified using colorimetry as the optical density (OD). Results. The incorporation of MDPB increased the flexural strength of C-GIC, with no effect on its compressive strength. CH significantly improved the compressive and flexural strength; modifications with CPP-ACP, BAG, and MDPB significantly improved the flexural strength of C-GIC. While MDPB-GIC released significantly higher F‒ at 24 hours, CPP-ACP- and BAG-modified GICs were comparable to C-GIC on day 7. C-GIC exhibited the highest bacterial adhesion, and MDPB-GIC showed the least. The data were analyzed with one-way (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were made with Tukey HSD tests. Conclusion. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion.Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F‒ ) release, and bacterial adhesion of conventional glass-ionomer cement (C-GIC). Methods. Modifications were implemented by adding CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH to the glass powder, while MDPB-GIC was prepared by incorporating MDPB to the liquid of C-GIC. Custom-made molds were used for specimen preparation. Compressive and flexural strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. F‒ release was calculated with Erichrome cyanide reagent, using UV-spectrophotometry, at two time intervals of 24 hours and seven days. For bacterial adhesion, the test specimens were exposed to the bacterial suspension of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus for 4 hours, and the adherent bacteria were quantified using colorimetry as the optical density (OD). Results. The incorporation of MDPB increased the flexural strength of C-GIC, with no effect on its compressive strength. CH significantly improved the compressive and flexural strength; modifications with CPP-ACP, BAG, and MDPB significantly improved the flexural strength of C-GIC. While MDPB-GIC released significantly higher F‒ at 24 hours, CPP-ACP- and BAG-modified GICs were comparable to C-GIC on day 7. C-GIC exhibited the highest bacterial adhesion, and MDPB-GIC showed the least. The data were analyzed with one-way (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were made with Tukey HSD tests. Conclusion. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F ) release, and bacterial adhesion of conventional glass-ionomer cement (C-GIC). Modifications were implemented by adding CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH to the glass powder, while MDPB-GIC was prepared by incorporating MDPB to the liquid of C-GIC. Custom-made molds were used for specimen preparation. Compressive and flexural strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. F release was calculated with Erichrome cyanide reagent, using UV-spectrophotometry, at two time intervals of 24 hours and seven days. For bacterial adhesion, the test specimens were exposed to the bacterial suspension of and for 4 hours, and the adherent bacteria were quantified using colorimetry as the optical density (OD). The incorporation of MDPB increased the flexural strength of C-GIC, with no effect on its compressive strength. CH significantly improved the compressive and flexural strength; modifications with CPP-ACP, BAG, and MDPB significantly improved the flexural strength of C-GIC. While MDPB-GIC released significantly higher F at 24 hours, CPP-ACP- and BAG-modified GICs were comparable to C-GIC on day 7. C-GIC exhibited the highest bacterial adhesion, and MDPB-GIC showed the least. The data were analyzed with one-way (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were made with Tukey HSD tests. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion. Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG), chitosan (CH), and methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the compressive and flexural strength, fluoride (F ‒ ) release, and bacterial adhesion of conventional glass-ionomer cement (C-GIC). Methods. Modifications were implemented by adding CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH to the glass powder, while MDPB-GIC was prepared by incorporating MDPB to the liquid of C-GIC. Custom-made molds were used for specimen preparation. Compressive and flexural strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. F ‒ release was calculated with Erichrome cyanide reagent, using UV-spectrophotometry, at two time intervals of 24 hours and seven days. For bacterial adhesion, the test specimens were exposed to the bacterial suspension of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus for 4 hours, and the adherent bacteria were quantified using colorimetry as the optical density (OD). Results. The incorporation of MDPB increased the flexural strength of C-GIC, with no effect on its compressive strength. CH significantly improved the compressive and flexural strength; modifications with CPP-ACP, BAG, and MDPB significantly improved the flexural strength of C-GIC. While MDPB-GIC released significantly higher F ‒ at 24 hours, CPP-ACP- and BAG-modified GICs were comparable to C-GIC on day 7. C-GIC exhibited the highest bacterial adhesion, and MDPB-GIC showed the least. The data were analyzed with one-way (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were made with Tukey HSD tests. Conclusion. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of C-GIC to bacterial adhesion. |
Author | Mahalaxmi, Sekar Vidhya, Sampath Kirthika, Natarajan Senthil Kumar, Renganathan Sujatha, Venkatappan |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Tamil Nadu, India 2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India 3 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Adhiparasakthi Dental College & Hospital, Melmaruvathur, India |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Tamil Nadu, India – name: 3 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Adhiparasakthi Dental College & Hospital, Melmaruvathur, India – name: 2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Natarajan orcidid: 0000-0002-5740-1062 surname: Kirthika fullname: Kirthika, Natarajan organization: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Tamil Nadu, India – sequence: 2 givenname: Sampath surname: Vidhya fullname: Vidhya, Sampath organization: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India – sequence: 3 givenname: Venkatappan surname: Sujatha fullname: Sujatha, Venkatappan organization: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India – sequence: 4 givenname: Sekar surname: Mahalaxmi fullname: Mahalaxmi, Sekar organization: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India – sequence: 5 givenname: Renganathan surname: Senthil Kumar fullname: Senthil Kumar, Renganathan organization: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Adhiparasakthi Dental College & Hospital, Melmaruvathur, India |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kk1vEzEQhleoiJbSMzdkiQuHbOrvXV-QSviqVEQOIHGzvOtx4mizTu3dAD-I_4nz0YpWwhePZt55PB69z4uTPvRQFC8JnjJOKnq5CtbaKcWUTDHmT4ozinFdUkLqk_sY_zgtLlJa4XyYEJWkz4pTxhStaibPij-zsN6YaAa_BQRb0405DD0KDrW5EiGlXcX0FrkOfo3RdCgNEfrFsJzk1Biit4AidGDSQdeYdoDos9DYJaQj7dP1DK2D9c6DRT_9sESz-by8ms0nqPEht-yeWXQmpQlql34IyfR73Jf383cviqfOdAkujvd58f3jh2-zz-XN18y9uilbjikvCcESjGNcOU6dFZxK5yQlomJSiVpUgkjTgnRCmorVYJVrnWmcwo2SDSXsvLg-cG0wK72Jfm3ibx2M1_tEiAtt4uDbDnSNAWNVKca45LVtlG2htpwrJbAQos6stwfWZmzWkKv9kJf3APqw0vulXoRtJouaCJYBb46AGG5HSINe-9RC15kewpg0FRTnP6laZOnrR9JVGGOfV5VVXEohuNipXv070f0od27IAnEQtDGkFMHp1g97P-QBfacJ1nvj6b3x9M54Ohsv910-6rtD_6_jLz8T28w |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_161950 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_30789 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e24217 crossref_primary_10_34172_joddd_41084 crossref_primary_10_3390_prosthesis5010024 crossref_primary_10_3390_coatings15030299 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2022_104071 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.038 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00330-6 10.1590/0103-6440201600655 10.3390/ma13102313 10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00093-7 10.1055/s-0039-1693524 10.1177/154405910308201113 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00247-6 10.1177/00220345840630021301 10.1080/09674845.2017.1347362 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.007 10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80063-7 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.09.020 10.4103/ejd.ejd_219_17 10.1177/0895937409335621 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00217-5 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.005 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.120 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.031 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1998.tb01353.x 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.008 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021 The Author(s). 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2021 The Author(s). 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 The Author(s). – notice: 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2021 The Author(s). 2021 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 8AO 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU CWDGH DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. LK8 M0S M7P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.34172/joddd.2021.004 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College Middle East & Africa Database ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Biological Science Collection Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Biological Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences Health Research Premium Collection Middle East & Africa Database Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Dentistry |
EISSN | 2008-2118 |
EndPage | 21 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_80e00979334648db9dce8d4499505558 PMC8058153 33927836 10_34172_joddd_2021_004 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United States--US Mumbai India India |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US – name: India – name: Mumbai India |
GroupedDBID | 29K 34H 5VS 7X7 8AO 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAYXX ABUWG ACPRK ADBBV AFKRA AHMBA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BHPHI BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CITATION CWDGH D-I DIK EOJEC FRP FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE KQ8 LK8 M48 M7P OBODZ OK1 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC RNS RPM TR2 UKHRP W2D ADRAZ NPM 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ K9. PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4024-1106eaf349f42fd5426ff621573695857516ace6f56a738ed9fcfabf90b96b213 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2008-210X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:31:31 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:14:05 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 15:08:02 EDT 2025 Sun Jul 13 04:47:14 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:58:06 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:06:55 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:13:11 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Bioactive glass Glass-ionomer cement CPP-ACP Bacterial adhesion Chitosan MDPB Fluoride release |
Language | English |
License | 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4024-1106eaf349f42fd5426ff621573695857516ace6f56a738ed9fcfabf90b96b213 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-5740-1062 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.34172/joddd.2021.004 |
PMID | 33927836 |
PQID | 2546655455 |
PQPubID | 2032003 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_80e00979334648db9dce8d4499505558 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8058153 proquest_miscellaneous_2520857985 proquest_journals_2546655455 pubmed_primary_33927836 crossref_citationtrail_10_34172_joddd_2021_004 crossref_primary_10_34172_joddd_2021_004 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-00-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2021 text: 2021-00-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Iran |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Iran – name: Tabriz |
PublicationTitle | Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
Publisher_xml | – name: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
References | R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R21 R20 R12 R11 R14 R13 R16 R15 R18 R17 R19 R1 |
References_xml | – ident: R4 doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.038 – ident: R19 doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00330-6 – ident: R17 doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600655 – ident: R1 doi: 10.3390/ma13102313 – ident: R9 doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00093-7 – ident: R12 doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693524 – ident: R2 doi: 10.1177/154405910308201113 – ident: R8 doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00247-6 – ident: R21 doi: 10.1177/00220345840630021301 – ident: R20 doi: 10.1080/09674845.2017.1347362 – ident: R5 doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.007 – ident: R7 doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80063-7 – ident: R13 doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.09.020 – ident: R16 doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_219_17 – ident: R3 doi: 10.1177/0895937409335621 – ident: R10 doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00217-5 – ident: R18 doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.005 – ident: R11 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.120 – ident: R15 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.031 – ident: R14 doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1998.tb01353.x – ident: R6 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.008 |
SSID | ssj0000355762 |
Score | 2.1811883 |
Snippet | Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive... This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (BAG),... [...]it can be concluded that the incorporation of CPP-ACP, BAG, and CH improved the mechanical properties of C-GIC, whereas MDPB improved the resistance of... Background. This study evaluated the incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 16 |
SubjectTerms | Bacteria bacterial adhesion bioactive glass Biological activity Calcium phosphates Cement Chitosan Chloride Composite materials cpp-acp fluoride release Fluorides glass-ionomer cement mdpb Mechanical properties Original Porosity Resins Stainless steel Streptococcus infections |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELVQL3BBlM9AQUbiwGHTbmLHTo5tSilIRXug0t4sOx6zW5UEdXel_iH-JzNOdruLQFy4xpPIyYw9z_H4PcbeZaSqahtIHXiXSi1sWsngUgiuyTKLGSLqp1x8UeeX8vO0mG5JfVFNWE8P3H-4o3IMdNYA191SydK7yjdQeolAvYhcVTT7Ys7bWkzFORjTqI5qonF_H9c1057XBydtnR9ddd4TTWieHY4HibZ1SorM_X-Cm79XTW6lobNH7OGAH_lx3-99dg_ax-z-KdX8kGzbE_azvuPz5ndc3rwLnMrHY9krttjW83ANt8S6wenASPttORvhpVV3M_fASUsFE1y0cz2jMxpaP4PF8LSPn2r-vfPzgCCW0-9cXk8m6XE9GXE372ycR3kE5yNOmxXdwrbxcRenk5On7PLsw9f6PB20GNIGV5gyRZSgwAYhqyDz4NHBKgSFeEELVRUk85kpdLkKhbJalOCr0ATrQjV2lXJ5Jp6xvbZr4QXjPneghINcaCsFBGshSKtloYPLFOQJO1y7wzQDUTnpZVwbXLBE_5noP0P-M-i_hL3f3PCj5-j4u-kJ-XdjRuTa8QKGnBlCzvwr5BJ2sI4OM4z4hSFdAYXYrCgS9nbTjGOVNmBsC92KbKIialWizfM-mDY9EQhU6URNwvROmO10dbelnc8iH3g5LkpMXC__x7u9Yg_oW_U_mQ7Y3vJmBa8Rdi3dmzjCfgE2xSpM priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Nb9QwELWgHOCCymfTlspIHDhs2iR27OSE2rSlIBXtgUp7i-zY7i4qSenuSv1D_E9mHG-WRcA1no28ebZnPB6_R8i7FFVVVWNjbY2OuWQqLrnTsXW6SVMFHsLrp1x-ERdX_PMkn4SE2zyUVa7WRL9Qm67BHPkR8rYL8H15_uH2R4yqUXi6GiQ0HpJHSF2Go1pO5JBjScCZSq8p6k_5YXcz6dl9YOmW2dG3zhgkC83SwyQIta0ck-fv_1vQ-Wft5G_O6HybPA1RJD3uYX9GHtj2OXl8ipU_KN72gvys1qzedM3oTTtHsYjcF79Ci2oNdTf2Hrk3KF4baa8X0xE8WsJfN5aiogq4OW-ne15nMFRmaufhbR8_VfR7Z2YOQlmKSV1ajcfxcTUeUT3rlF9NqQ_RRxSPLLq5av3rLk_HJy_J1fnZ1-oiDooMcQP7TB5DrCCscoyXjmfOAMzCOQFRg2SizFHsMxUAvHC5UJIV1pSucUq7MtGl0FnKXpGttmvtDqEm01YwbTMmFWfWKWUdV5Ln0ulU2Cwihys46ibQlaNqxk0N2xaPX-3xqxG_GvCLyPvhB7c9U8e_TU8Q38EMKbb9g-7uug4zti4Si5dcSsa44IXRJUBeGA47xNyTpEVkfzU66jDv5_V6lEbk7dAMMxaPYVRruyXaeF3UsgCb1_1gGnrCIFzFezURkRvDbKOrmy3tbOpZwYskL8B97f6_W3vkCX6FPom0T7YWd0v7BsKqhT7wc-cXsLYjaA priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Comparative evaluation of compressive and flexural strength, fluoride release and bacterial adhesion of GIC modified with CPP-ACP, bioactive glass, chitosan and MDPB |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927836 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2546655455 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2520857985 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8058153 https://doaj.org/article/80e00979334648db9dce8d4499505558 |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELZg9wAXxHsDS2UkDhyaqokdJzkgtM2-QNpVhKiUW2TH9rZSSaAPaflB_E9mnLTdrsqNSw72xEoy48yMPf4-Qj4EyKoqK-Mro5XPYyb9lFvlG6uqIJDgIRx_ytW1uBzzr0VUbOmAug-42JvaIZ_UeD4b3P76_Rkm_CfMODk4YLhLa0T9DIOBwwY9DLEZ6_i6WN_9lsGzxo5g1G35Q6pTtFA_-8bY8VIOzH9fBHq_kPKOZzp_Sp50ISU9aW3gGXlg6ufk0SmWASGT2wvyJ9tCfNMtvDdtLMWKclcJCz2y1tTOzC0CcVA8Q1LfLCd9aFo186k2FOlVwOc5OdWCPIOg1BOz6Ea7-JLRH42eWohrKa7w0izP_ZMs71M1baT7tVIXr_cp7l80C1m74a5O89FLMj4_-55d-h09g19B0sl9CByEkZbx1PLQatC5sFZACBEzkUbI_BkIsAJhIyFjlhid2spKZdOhSoUKA_aKHNRNbY4I1aEygikTslhyZqyUxnIZ8yi2KhAm9MhgrY6y6rDLkUJjVkIO4_RXOv2VqL8S9OeRj5sbfrawHf8WHaF-N2KIt-0amvlN2U3fMhkaPPGSMsYFT7RKQeWJ5pAuRg4xzSPHa-so1zZcItWAgHAtijzyftMN0xf3ZGRtmhXKOJLUNAGZ160xbZ6EQeyKh2w8Eu-Y2c6j7vbU04mDCE-GUQK-7M3_eLe35DF-q3bd6ZgcLOcr8w4isaXqkYdxEffI4ejsOv_Wc-sZcL0ogp6be38BlrE3SA |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Pb9MwFLbGOIwL4jeFAUYCiUOzJbFjJweEtpapY-vUwyb1FuzYXotGMtZWwB_Elb-R95ykpQi47Rq_WJbf83t-9vP3EfIqQlZVVdhAW6MDLpkKMu50YJ0uokhBhPD8KcMTMTjjH8bJeIP8bN_CYFll6xO9ozZVgWfku4jbLiD2Jcm7yy8Bskbh7WpLoVGbxZH9_hVSttnbwz7o93UcH7w_7Q2ChlUgKCBX4gHEO2GVYzxzPHYGhiqcExD5JBNZgoSVkYDBC5cIJVlqTeYKp7TLQp0JHUcM-r1BbkLgDTHZk2O5PNMJIXhLz2HqqwogmxrXaEIQKmS8-6kyBsFJ42gnbIjh2kDo-QL-tsn9s1bzt-B3cIfcbnatdK82s7tkw5b3yFYfK42QLO4--dFboYjTFYI4rRzFonVfbAstqjTUXdhviPVB8ZlKeT6fdOHTAqbaWIoMLhBWvZyucaRBUJmJnTW9wRzTz5WZOtg6UzxEpr3RKNjrjbpUTyvlvTf1KUGX4hVJNVOl727YH-0_IGfXoquHZLOsSvuYUBNrK5i2MZOKM-uUso4ryRPpdCRs3CE7rTryooFHR5aOixzSJK-_3OsvR_3loL8OebP84bJGBvm36D7qdymGkN7-Q3V1njceIk9Di49qMsa44KnRGag8NRwy0sSDsnXIdmsdeeNnZvlqVXTIy2UzeAi89lGlrRYo43lYsxRkHtXGtBwJg-0xvuPpELlmZmtDXW8ppxOPQp6GSQrh8sn_h_WCbA1Oh8f58eHJ0VNyC2ekPsDaJpvzq4V9Blu6uX7u1xElH6974f4CgBJfTw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9MwELdGJwEviP8UBhgJJB6atYkdJ3lAaG1XbYxVEWJS3zI7tteikYy1FfCB-BJ8Ou6cpKUIeNtrfLVc3_nOZ59_P0Je-siqKnPjKaOVxyMmvYRb5Rmrct-XECEcf8rxWByc8HeTcLJFfjZvYbCssvGJzlHrMscz8i7itguIfWHYtXVZRDocvb344iGDFN60NnQalYkcme9fIX2bvzkcgq5fBcFo_-PgwKsZBrwc8ibuQewTRlrGE8sDq2HYwloBUTBiIgmRvNIX8EeEDYWMWGx0YnMrlU16KhEq8Bn0e41sR5gVtch2f3-cflid8PQglEeO0dTVGEBuNamwhSBwREH3U6k1QpUG_m6vpolrwqJjD_jblvfPys3fQuHoNrlV72HpXmV0d8iWKe6SG0OsO0LquHvkx2CNKU7XeOK0tBRL2F3pLbTIQlN7br4h8gfFRyvF2WLagU9LmGxtKPK5QJB1cqpClQZBqadmXvcGs0w_l3pmYSNN8UiZDtLU2xukHapmpXS-nLoEoUPxwqScy8J1dzxM-_fJyZVo6wFpFWVhHhGqA2UEUyZgkeTMWCmN5TLiYWSVL0zQJruNOrK8BktHzo7zDJImp7_M6S9D_WWgvzZ5vfrBRYUT8m_RPup3JYYA3-5DeXmW1f4ii3sGn9gkjHHBY60SUHmsOeSnoYNoa5Odxjqy2uvMs_UaaZMXq2bwF3gJJAtTLlHGsbImMcg8rIxpNRIGm2V81dMm0YaZbQx1s6WYTR0medwLYwiej_8_rOfkOiza7P3h-OgJuYkTUp1m7ZDW4nJpnsL-bqGe1QuJktOrXru_ANZCZOo |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+evaluation+of+compressive+and+flexural+strength%2C+fluoride+release+and+bacterial+adhesion+of+GIC+modified+with+CPP-ACP%2C+bioactive+glass%2C+chitosan+and+MDPB&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+dental+research%2C+dental+clinics%2C+dental+prospects&rft.au=Natarajan+Kirthika&rft.au=Sampath+Vidhya&rft.au=Venkatappan+Sujatha&rft.au=Sekar+Mahalaxmi&rft.date=2021&rft.pub=Tabriz+University+of+Medical+Sciences&rft.issn=2008-210X&rft.eissn=2008-2118&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=21&rft_id=info:doi/10.34172%2Fjoddd.2021.004&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_80e00979334648db9dce8d4499505558 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2008-210X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2008-210X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2008-210X&client=summon |