Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech

• Published in: Ear and hearing Vol. 36; no. 5; p. e214
• Main Authors: Levy, Suzanne Carr, Freed, Daniel J, Nilsson, Michael, Moore, Brian C J, Puria, Sunil
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.09.2015
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Audiometry, Speech; Case-Control Studies; Female; Hearing Aids; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Perceptual Masking; Sound Localization; Speech Perception; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1538-4667
• DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000161

The hypothesis that extending the audible frequency bandwidth beyond the range currently implemented in most hearing aids can improve speech understanding was tested for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired participants using target sentences and spatially separated masking speech. The Hearing In Speech Test (HIST) speech corpus was re-recorded, and four masking talkers were recorded at a sample rate of 44.1 kHz. All talkers were male native speakers of American English. For each subject, the reception threshold for sentences (RTS) was measured in two spatial configurations. In the asymmetric configuration, the target was presented from -45° azimuth and two colocated masking talkers were presented from +45° azimuth. In the diffuse configuration, the target was presented from 0° azimuth and four masking talkers were each presented from a different azimuth: +45°, +135°, -135°, and -45°. The new speech sentences, masking materials, and configurations were presented using low-pass filter cutoff frequencies of 4, 6, 8, and 10 kHz. For the normal-hearing participants, stimuli were presented in the sound field using loudspeakers. For the hearing-impaired participants, the spatial configurations were simulated using earphones, and a multiband wide-dynamic-range compressor with a modified CAM2 fitting algorithm was used to compensate for each participant's hearing loss. For the normal-hearing participants (N = 24, mean age 40 years), the RTS improved significantly by 3.0 dB when the bandwidth was increased from 4 to 10 kHz, and a significant improvement of 1.3 dB was obtained from extending the bandwidth from 6 to 10 kHz, in both spatial configurations. Hearing-impaired participants (N = 25, mean age 71 years) also showed a significant improvement in RTS with extended bandwidth, but the effect was smaller than for the normal-hearing participants. The mean decrease in RTS when the bandwidth was increased from 4 to 10 kHz was 1.3 dB for the asymmetric condition and 0.5 dB for the diffuse condition. Extending bandwidth from 4 to 10 kHz can improve the ability of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired participants to understand target speech in the presence of spatially separated masking speech. Future studies of the benefits of extended high-frequency amplification should investigate other realistic listening situations, masker types, spatial configurations, and room reverberation conditions, to determine added value in overcoming the technical challenges associated with implementing a device capable of providing extended high-frequency amplification.