Global deep learning optimization of chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance fingerprinting acquisition schedule

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST‐MRF signal depends on mult...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNMR in biomedicine Vol. 36; no. 10; p. e4954
Main Authors Cohen, Ouri, Otazo, Ricardo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0952-3480
1099-1492
1099-1492
DOI10.1002/nbm.4954

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST‐MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual‐network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST‐MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test–retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated ( r  = 0.99) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule.
AbstractList Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST‐MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual‐network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST‐MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test–retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated ( r  = 0.99) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule.
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST‐MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual‐network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST‐MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test–retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated (r = 0.99) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule.
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST-MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual-network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST-MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test-retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated ( r = 0.99 ) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule.
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST-MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual-network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST-MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test-retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated (r = 0.99) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule.Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST-MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual-network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST-MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test-retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated (r = 0.99) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule.
Author Otazo, Ricardo
Cohen, Ouri
AuthorAffiliation 2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
1 Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
– name: 2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ouri
  surname: Cohen
  fullname: Cohen, Ouri
  organization: Department of Medical Physics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ricardo
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3782-4930
  surname: Otazo
  fullname: Otazo, Ricardo
  organization: Department of Medical Physics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA, Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNplkctu1DAUQC3Uik5bJL4ARWLDJsP1I68VQhUUpEps2rV141zPuErsqZ0gYMef4-m05bXywuceHfuesiMfPDH2ksOaA4i3vp_WqqvUM7bi0HUlV504YivoKlFK1cIJO03pFgBaJcVzdiIbaEAIvmI_L8fQ41gMRLtiJIze-U0RdrOb3A-cXfBFsIXZ0uRMxuib2aLfUJFwXuLhfo7ok6VYTLjxNDtTRErBozdU2GyjuIvOz3svmrvFJXc_lrJ0WEY6Z8cWx0QvHs4zdvPxw_XFp_Lqy-Xni_dXpVHA59LaTtUcG4RBica2VLeiqiVHGgYu5WAH3sieKqzJcuS9AdNUKMmAGMCoSp6xdwfvbuknGgz5HD7q3DZh_K4DOv33jXdbvQlfNYe2q6FusuHNgyGGu4XSrCeXDI0jegpL0qIF0ba5EjL6-h_0NizR5_dlqlZSZV2bqVd_Jj21PK4nA-sDYGJIKZLVxs33v54L3ZjT9H7_Ou9f7_f_O_Fp4NH5H_oL7JG0nA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering11030236
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10334_024_01189_0
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2023_1323131
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mri_2024_03_023
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_30089
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_30488
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jocmr_2024_100997
Cites_doi 10.1002/mrm.21752
10.1002/mrm.10398
10.1002/mrm.20605
10.1038/s41551‐021‐00809‐7
10.1093/neuonc/nov095
10.1118/1.3213517
10.1002/mrm.26639
10.1137/S1052623400378742
10.1002/mrm.27937
10.1016/S0893‐6080(09)80018‐X
10.1002/mp.13078
10.1002/mrm.26867
10.1073/pnas.1600663113
10.1042/cs0790001
10.1002/jmri.24619
10.1016/0893‐6080(91)90074‐F
10.1109/7.705889
10.1002/mrm.29448
10.1002/mrm.27221
10.1002/jmri.25838
10.1109/TMI.2018.2873704
10.1002/nbm.4662
10.1016/j.mri.2017.02.010
10.1002/mrm.25559
10.1002/mrm.27832
10.1002/mrm.29173
10.1016/0378‐3758(94)90115‐5
10.1109/42.712135
10.1002/mrm.24907
10.1038/nature11971
10.1002/mrm.27198
10.1063/1.1744152
10.1002/mrm.28516
10.1002/nbm.3879
10.1002/mrm.20408
10.2307/2532051
10.1002/mrm.27665
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1002/nbm.4954
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)

MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Chemistry
Physics
EISSN 1099-1492
EndPage e4954
ExternalDocumentID PMC10896067
37070221
10_1002_nbm_4954
Genre Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: R37 CA262662
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: P30 CA008748
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
31~
33P
3SF
3WU
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAYXX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
AHBTC
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CITATION
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
DUUFO
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
H.X
HBH
HF~
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HVGLF
HZ~
IX1
J0M
JPC
KBYEO
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M65
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OIG
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
UB1
V2E
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIB
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WVDHM
WXSBR
XG1
XPP
XV2
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AEUQT
AFPWT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
RGB
RWI
WRC
WUP
7QO
8FD
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ff9461a7a0d427f8e6825631aedd133dfd173be5a6ef1a1bc0c75a3ec02d0c453
ISSN 0952-3480
1099-1492
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:35:08 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 03:50:45 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 10:02:57 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:04:36 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:45:48 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:36 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Keywords deep learning
magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF)
DRONE
chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)
global optimization
Language English
License 2023 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c401t-ff9461a7a0d427f8e6825631aedd133dfd173be5a6ef1a1bc0c75a3ec02d0c453
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-3782-4930
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10896067
PMID 37070221
PQID 2864346738
PQPubID 2029982
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10896067
proquest_miscellaneous_2802884610
proquest_journals_2864346738
pubmed_primary_37070221
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_nbm_4954
crossref_primary_10_1002_nbm_4954
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle NMR in biomedicine
PublicationTitleAlternate NMR Biomed
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References e_1_2_10_23_1
e_1_2_10_24_1
e_1_2_10_21_1
e_1_2_10_22_1
e_1_2_10_20_1
e_1_2_10_41_1
e_1_2_10_40_1
e_1_2_10_2_1
e_1_2_10_4_1
e_1_2_10_3_1
e_1_2_10_6_1
e_1_2_10_16_1
e_1_2_10_39_1
e_1_2_10_5_1
e_1_2_10_17_1
e_1_2_10_38_1
e_1_2_10_8_1
e_1_2_10_14_1
e_1_2_10_37_1
e_1_2_10_7_1
e_1_2_10_15_1
e_1_2_10_36_1
e_1_2_10_12_1
e_1_2_10_35_1
e_1_2_10_9_1
e_1_2_10_13_1
e_1_2_10_34_1
e_1_2_10_10_1
e_1_2_10_33_1
e_1_2_10_11_1
e_1_2_10_32_1
e_1_2_10_31_1
e_1_2_10_30_1
Cohen O (e_1_2_10_18_1) 2019
e_1_2_10_29_1
e_1_2_10_27_1
Perlman O (e_1_2_10_19_1) 2020
e_1_2_10_28_1
e_1_2_10_25_1
e_1_2_10_26_1
References_xml – ident: e_1_2_10_21_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.21752
– ident: e_1_2_10_40_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.10398
– ident: e_1_2_10_39_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.20605
– ident: e_1_2_10_8_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41551‐021‐00809‐7
– start-page: 4531
  volume-title: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Montreal
  year: 2019
  ident: e_1_2_10_18_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_33_1
  doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov095
– ident: e_1_2_10_27_1
  doi: 10.1118/1.3213517
– ident: e_1_2_10_34_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.26639
– ident: e_1_2_10_30_1
  doi: 10.1137/S1052623400378742
– ident: e_1_2_10_7_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.27937
– ident: e_1_2_10_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0893‐6080(09)80018‐X
– ident: e_1_2_10_36_1
  doi: 10.1002/mp.13078
– ident: e_1_2_10_37_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.26867
– ident: e_1_2_10_28_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600663113
– start-page: 3576
  volume-title: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Meeting, Virtual Conference
  year: 2020
  ident: e_1_2_10_19_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_41_1
  doi: 10.1042/cs0790001
– ident: e_1_2_10_23_1
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.24619
– ident: e_1_2_10_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/0893‐6080(91)90074‐F
– ident: e_1_2_10_29_1
  doi: 10.1109/7.705889
– ident: e_1_2_10_6_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.29448
– ident: e_1_2_10_5_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.27221
– ident: e_1_2_10_26_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_2_1
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.25838
– ident: e_1_2_10_11_1
  doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2873704
– ident: e_1_2_10_12_1
  doi: 10.1002/nbm.4662
– ident: e_1_2_10_10_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.02.010
– ident: e_1_2_10_38_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.25559
– ident: e_1_2_10_14_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.27832
– ident: e_1_2_10_13_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.29173
– ident: e_1_2_10_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/0378‐3758(94)90115‐5
– ident: e_1_2_10_31_1
  doi: 10.1109/42.712135
– ident: e_1_2_10_24_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.24907
– ident: e_1_2_10_9_1
  doi: 10.1038/nature11971
– ident: e_1_2_10_15_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.27198
– ident: e_1_2_10_20_1
  doi: 10.1063/1.1744152
– ident: e_1_2_10_4_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.28516
– ident: e_1_2_10_3_1
  doi: 10.1002/nbm.3879
– ident: e_1_2_10_22_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.20408
– ident: e_1_2_10_32_1
  doi: 10.2307/2532051
– ident: e_1_2_10_35_1
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.27665
SSID ssj0008432
Score 2.4522371
Snippet Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage e4954
SubjectTerms Biological products
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Deep Learning
Error analysis
Fingerprinting
Humans
Image reconstruction
Imaging techniques
In vivo methods and tests
Kidney Neoplasms
Magnetic resonance
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Mathematical analysis
Metastases
Neuroimaging
Noise reduction
Optimization
Parameters
Phantoms, Imaging
Renal cell carcinoma
Reproducibility
Reproducibility of Results
Schedules
Substantia alba
Substantia grisea
Tissues
Title Global deep learning optimization of chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance fingerprinting acquisition schedule
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070221
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2864346738
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2802884610
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10896067
Volume 36
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdZx7q-jC37ytYNDQZ7CO6sD1vO4-g2SqEdlBb6ZmRJbgONnSU2jL7tP9_Jshy7y2DbiwmWYoPup9Pd-e53CL1nOglpnmTBTBAVcCKEbfOiAkrDXDA2i7RusnxP46MLfnwZXY5Gx72spbrKDtTt1rqS_5Eq3AO52irZf5Bs91C4Ab9BvnAFCcP1r2TsCPun2pilb_9wNS1BCSza6somadxTApgfrsp3urZknm68auxWs5ou5FVhHJ-zNc7tds-biJ8N_DWp0VJ9r-cuw2sKLjEcUTeDNKLTkzMbPHH1_IPv9V0JyLd6Ne-iupW8LdvSfkBp2Q8_0E0iG5weTmVajk_wswY61ZGaeOyEPQ1pwCPjW3V3ywWbLQ7uToFVXy4aGTIBKopSsjm9upxCP3QP3afgMlgl_flsQyWWcEY9-XBIP_rX7KFd_8ehZfKbu3E3a7Znhpw_Ro9a_wF_cmB4gkamGKOHh75t3xjtnrSrP0YPmvRetX6KfjqkYIsU7JGC-0jBZY49UrBHCt4gBXukYI8U3CEFD5GCe0jBHinP0MXXL-eHR0HbfCNQ4HJXQZ7PeEykkKHmVOSJiROwjhmRRmvCmM41ESwzkYxNTiTJVKhEJJlRIdWh4hF7jnaKsjAvEZ7FmhtuGDWS8SiMMzAKI5KEksYRi2IxQR_8wqeqZaa3DVJuUsepTVOQVmqlNUHvuplLx8ayZc6-l13a7tV1ShOwvLntcAuP6IZBMvbzmCxMWds5YGsntv_ABL1wou5e4jEyQckABN0Ey9I-HCnm1w1bOwkTGyUQr_740Ndob7Oz9tFOtarNGzB1q-xtg-FfdVeyIg
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global+deep+learning+optimization+of+chemical+exchange+saturation+transfer+magnetic+resonance+fingerprinting+acquisition+schedule&rft.jtitle=NMR+in+biomedicine&rft.au=Cohen%2C+Ouri&rft.au=Otazo%2C+Ricardo&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.eissn=1099-1492&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e4954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fnbm.4954&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F37070221&rft.externalDocID=37070221
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0952-3480&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0952-3480&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0952-3480&client=summon