Global deep learning optimization of chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance fingerprinting acquisition schedule
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST‐MRF signal depends on mult...
Saved in:
Published in | NMR in biomedicine Vol. 36; no. 10; p. e4954 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.10.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0952-3480 1099-1492 1099-1492 |
DOI | 10.1002/nbm.4954 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST‐MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual‐network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST‐MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test–retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated (
r
= 0.99) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST‐MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual‐network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST‐MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test–retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated (
r
= 0.99) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST‐MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual‐network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST‐MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test–retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated (r = 0.99) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST-MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual-network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST-MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test-retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated ( r = 0.99 ) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST-MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual-network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST-MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test-retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated (r = 0.99) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule.Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST-MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual-network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST-MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test-retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated (r = 0.99) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule. |
Author | Otazo, Ricardo Cohen, Ouri |
AuthorAffiliation | 2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA 1 Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA – name: 2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ouri surname: Cohen fullname: Cohen, Ouri organization: Department of Medical Physics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Ricardo orcidid: 0000-0002-3782-4930 surname: Otazo fullname: Otazo, Ricardo organization: Department of Medical Physics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA, Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNplkctu1DAUQC3Uik5bJL4ARWLDJsP1I68VQhUUpEps2rV141zPuErsqZ0gYMef4-m05bXywuceHfuesiMfPDH2ksOaA4i3vp_WqqvUM7bi0HUlV504YivoKlFK1cIJO03pFgBaJcVzdiIbaEAIvmI_L8fQ41gMRLtiJIze-U0RdrOb3A-cXfBFsIXZ0uRMxuib2aLfUJFwXuLhfo7ok6VYTLjxNDtTRErBozdU2GyjuIvOz3svmrvFJXc_lrJ0WEY6Z8cWx0QvHs4zdvPxw_XFp_Lqy-Xni_dXpVHA59LaTtUcG4RBica2VLeiqiVHGgYu5WAH3sieKqzJcuS9AdNUKMmAGMCoSp6xdwfvbuknGgz5HD7q3DZh_K4DOv33jXdbvQlfNYe2q6FusuHNgyGGu4XSrCeXDI0jegpL0qIF0ba5EjL6-h_0NizR5_dlqlZSZV2bqVd_Jj21PK4nA-sDYGJIKZLVxs33v54L3ZjT9H7_Ou9f7_f_O_Fp4NH5H_oL7JG0nA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering11030236 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10334_024_01189_0 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2023_1323131 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mri_2024_03_023 crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_30089 crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_30488 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jocmr_2024_100997 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/mrm.21752 10.1002/mrm.10398 10.1002/mrm.20605 10.1038/s41551‐021‐00809‐7 10.1093/neuonc/nov095 10.1118/1.3213517 10.1002/mrm.26639 10.1137/S1052623400378742 10.1002/mrm.27937 10.1016/S0893‐6080(09)80018‐X 10.1002/mp.13078 10.1002/mrm.26867 10.1073/pnas.1600663113 10.1042/cs0790001 10.1002/jmri.24619 10.1016/0893‐6080(91)90074‐F 10.1109/7.705889 10.1002/mrm.29448 10.1002/mrm.27221 10.1002/jmri.25838 10.1109/TMI.2018.2873704 10.1002/nbm.4662 10.1016/j.mri.2017.02.010 10.1002/mrm.25559 10.1002/mrm.27832 10.1002/mrm.29173 10.1016/0378‐3758(94)90115‐5 10.1109/42.712135 10.1002/mrm.24907 10.1038/nature11971 10.1002/mrm.27198 10.1063/1.1744152 10.1002/mrm.28516 10.1002/nbm.3879 10.1002/mrm.20408 10.2307/2532051 10.1002/mrm.27665 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2023 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2023 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. – notice: 2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 8FD FR3 K9. P64 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1002/nbm.4954 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Engineering Research Database Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Chemistry Physics |
EISSN | 1099-1492 |
EndPage | e4954 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC10896067 37070221 10_1002_nbm_4954 |
Genre | Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: R37 CA262662 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: P30 CA008748 |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 31~ 33P 3SF 3WU 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5RE 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAYXX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACGOF ACIWK ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG AHBTC AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 CITATION CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 DUUFO EBD EBS EJD EMOBN F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.X HBH HF~ HGLYW HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M JPC KBYEO LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M65 MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- OIG P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4D PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 UB1 V2E W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIB WIH WIJ WIK WJL WOHZO WQJ WVDHM WXSBR XG1 XPP XV2 ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AEUQT AFPWT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM RGB RWI WRC WUP 7QO 8FD AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY FR3 K9. P64 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ff9461a7a0d427f8e6825631aedd133dfd173be5a6ef1a1bc0c75a3ec02d0c453 |
ISSN | 0952-3480 1099-1492 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:35:08 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 03:50:45 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:02:57 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:04:36 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:45:48 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:36 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 10 |
Keywords | deep learning magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) DRONE chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) global optimization |
Language | English |
License | 2023 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c401t-ff9461a7a0d427f8e6825631aedd133dfd173be5a6ef1a1bc0c75a3ec02d0c453 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-3782-4930 |
OpenAccessLink | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10896067 |
PMID | 37070221 |
PQID | 2864346738 |
PQPubID | 2029982 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10896067 proquest_miscellaneous_2802884610 proquest_journals_2864346738 pubmed_primary_37070221 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_nbm_4954 crossref_primary_10_1002_nbm_4954 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-10-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2023 text: 2023-10-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Oxford |
PublicationTitle | NMR in biomedicine |
PublicationTitleAlternate | NMR Biomed |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | e_1_2_10_23_1 e_1_2_10_24_1 e_1_2_10_21_1 e_1_2_10_22_1 e_1_2_10_20_1 e_1_2_10_41_1 e_1_2_10_40_1 e_1_2_10_2_1 e_1_2_10_4_1 e_1_2_10_3_1 e_1_2_10_6_1 e_1_2_10_16_1 e_1_2_10_39_1 e_1_2_10_5_1 e_1_2_10_17_1 e_1_2_10_38_1 e_1_2_10_8_1 e_1_2_10_14_1 e_1_2_10_37_1 e_1_2_10_7_1 e_1_2_10_15_1 e_1_2_10_36_1 e_1_2_10_12_1 e_1_2_10_35_1 e_1_2_10_9_1 e_1_2_10_13_1 e_1_2_10_34_1 e_1_2_10_10_1 e_1_2_10_33_1 e_1_2_10_11_1 e_1_2_10_32_1 e_1_2_10_31_1 e_1_2_10_30_1 Cohen O (e_1_2_10_18_1) 2019 e_1_2_10_29_1 e_1_2_10_27_1 Perlman O (e_1_2_10_19_1) 2020 e_1_2_10_28_1 e_1_2_10_25_1 e_1_2_10_26_1 |
References_xml | – ident: e_1_2_10_21_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.21752 – ident: e_1_2_10_40_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.10398 – ident: e_1_2_10_39_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.20605 – ident: e_1_2_10_8_1 doi: 10.1038/s41551‐021‐00809‐7 – start-page: 4531 volume-title: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Montreal year: 2019 ident: e_1_2_10_18_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_33_1 doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov095 – ident: e_1_2_10_27_1 doi: 10.1118/1.3213517 – ident: e_1_2_10_34_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.26639 – ident: e_1_2_10_30_1 doi: 10.1137/S1052623400378742 – ident: e_1_2_10_7_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.27937 – ident: e_1_2_10_16_1 doi: 10.1016/S0893‐6080(09)80018‐X – ident: e_1_2_10_36_1 doi: 10.1002/mp.13078 – ident: e_1_2_10_37_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.26867 – ident: e_1_2_10_28_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600663113 – start-page: 3576 volume-title: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Meeting, Virtual Conference year: 2020 ident: e_1_2_10_19_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_41_1 doi: 10.1042/cs0790001 – ident: e_1_2_10_23_1 doi: 10.1002/jmri.24619 – ident: e_1_2_10_17_1 doi: 10.1016/0893‐6080(91)90074‐F – ident: e_1_2_10_29_1 doi: 10.1109/7.705889 – ident: e_1_2_10_6_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.29448 – ident: e_1_2_10_5_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.27221 – ident: e_1_2_10_26_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_2_1 doi: 10.1002/jmri.25838 – ident: e_1_2_10_11_1 doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2873704 – ident: e_1_2_10_12_1 doi: 10.1002/nbm.4662 – ident: e_1_2_10_10_1 doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.02.010 – ident: e_1_2_10_38_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.25559 – ident: e_1_2_10_14_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.27832 – ident: e_1_2_10_13_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.29173 – ident: e_1_2_10_25_1 doi: 10.1016/0378‐3758(94)90115‐5 – ident: e_1_2_10_31_1 doi: 10.1109/42.712135 – ident: e_1_2_10_24_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.24907 – ident: e_1_2_10_9_1 doi: 10.1038/nature11971 – ident: e_1_2_10_15_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.27198 – ident: e_1_2_10_20_1 doi: 10.1063/1.1744152 – ident: e_1_2_10_4_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.28516 – ident: e_1_2_10_3_1 doi: 10.1002/nbm.3879 – ident: e_1_2_10_22_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.20408 – ident: e_1_2_10_32_1 doi: 10.2307/2532051 – ident: e_1_2_10_35_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.27665 |
SSID | ssj0008432 |
Score | 2.4522371 |
Snippet | Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | e4954 |
SubjectTerms | Biological products Brain - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma, Renal Cell Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Deep Learning Error analysis Fingerprinting Humans Image reconstruction Imaging techniques In vivo methods and tests Kidney Neoplasms Magnetic resonance Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Mathematical analysis Metastases Neuroimaging Noise reduction Optimization Parameters Phantoms, Imaging Renal cell carcinoma Reproducibility Reproducibility of Results Schedules Substantia alba Substantia grisea Tissues |
Title | Global deep learning optimization of chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance fingerprinting acquisition schedule |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070221 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2864346738 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2802884610 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10896067 |
Volume | 36 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdZx7q-jC37ytYNDQZ7CO6sD1vO4-g2SqEdlBb6ZmRJbgONnSU2jL7tP9_Jshy7y2DbiwmWYoPup9Pd-e53CL1nOglpnmTBTBAVcCKEbfOiAkrDXDA2i7RusnxP46MLfnwZXY5Gx72spbrKDtTt1rqS_5Eq3AO52irZf5Bs91C4Ab9BvnAFCcP1r2TsCPun2pilb_9wNS1BCSza6somadxTApgfrsp3urZknm68auxWs5ou5FVhHJ-zNc7tds-biJ8N_DWp0VJ9r-cuw2sKLjEcUTeDNKLTkzMbPHH1_IPv9V0JyLd6Ne-iupW8LdvSfkBp2Q8_0E0iG5weTmVajk_wswY61ZGaeOyEPQ1pwCPjW3V3ywWbLQ7uToFVXy4aGTIBKopSsjm9upxCP3QP3afgMlgl_flsQyWWcEY9-XBIP_rX7KFd_8ehZfKbu3E3a7Znhpw_Ro9a_wF_cmB4gkamGKOHh75t3xjtnrSrP0YPmvRetX6KfjqkYIsU7JGC-0jBZY49UrBHCt4gBXukYI8U3CEFD5GCe0jBHinP0MXXL-eHR0HbfCNQ4HJXQZ7PeEykkKHmVOSJiROwjhmRRmvCmM41ESwzkYxNTiTJVKhEJJlRIdWh4hF7jnaKsjAvEZ7FmhtuGDWS8SiMMzAKI5KEksYRi2IxQR_8wqeqZaa3DVJuUsepTVOQVmqlNUHvuplLx8ayZc6-l13a7tV1ShOwvLntcAuP6IZBMvbzmCxMWds5YGsntv_ABL1wou5e4jEyQckABN0Ey9I-HCnm1w1bOwkTGyUQr_740Ndob7Oz9tFOtarNGzB1q-xtg-FfdVeyIg |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global+deep+learning+optimization+of+chemical+exchange+saturation+transfer+magnetic+resonance+fingerprinting+acquisition+schedule&rft.jtitle=NMR+in+biomedicine&rft.au=Cohen%2C+Ouri&rft.au=Otazo%2C+Ricardo&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.eissn=1099-1492&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e4954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fnbm.4954&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F37070221&rft.externalDocID=37070221 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0952-3480&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0952-3480&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0952-3480&client=summon |