Cost-effectiveness of Palivizumab for Respiratory Syncytial Virus: A Systematic Review

• Published in: Pediatrics (Evanston)
• Main Authors: Mac, Stephen, Sumner, Amanda, Duchesne-Belanger, Samuel, Stirling, Robert, Tunis, Matthew, Sander, Beate
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.05.2019
• ISSN: 1098-4275
• DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-4064

Palivizumab prophylaxis is used as passive immunization for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). However, because of its high cost, the value of this intervention is unclear. To systematically review the cost-effectiveness of palivizumab prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis in infants <24 months of age. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to August 2018. Two reviewers independently screened results to include economic evaluations conducted between 2000 and 2018 from Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. Two reviewers independently extracted outcomes. Quality appraisal was completed by using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Costs were adjusted to 2017 US dollars. We identified 28 economic evaluations (20 cost-utility analyses and 8 cost-effectiveness analyses); most were from the United States ( = 6) and Canada ( = 5). Study quality was high; 23 studies met >80% of the Joanna Briggs Institute criteria. Palivizumab prophylaxis ranged from a dominant strategy to having an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $2 526 203 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) depending on study perspective and targeted population. From the payer perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for preterm infants (29-35 weeks' gestational age) was between $5188 and $791 265 per QALY, with 90% of estimates <$50 000 per QALY. Influential parameters were RSV hospitalization reduction rates, palivizumab cost, and discount rate. Model design heterogeneity, model parameters, and study settings were barriers to definitive conclusions on palivizumab's economic value. Palivizumab as RSV prophylaxis was considered cost-effective in prematurely born infants, infants with lung complications, and infants from remote communities.