ASSESSMENT OF INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY FOR THE LETOURNEL AND JUDET CLASSIFICATION

• Published in: Acta ortopedica brasileira Vol. 32; no. 1; p. e267640
• Main Authors: Yucens, Mehmet, Aydemir, Ahmet Nadir, Demirkan, Ahmet Fahir
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Portuguese
• Published: Brazil ATHA EDITORA 01.01.2024; Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
• Subjects: Acetabulum; Fractures, Bone; Original /Orthopedic Trauma; Orthopedic Surgeons; ORTHOPEDICS; Pelvis; Fractures, Bone; Acetabulum; Orthopedic Surgeons; Pelvis; Pelve; Acetábulo; Cirurgiões Ortopédicos; Fracturas Óseas
• ISSN: 1413-7852; 1809-4406; 1809-4406
• DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220243201e267640

The Judet and Letournel classification is the most widely used classification system for acetabular fractures. Some complex fractures couldn't be classified according to this classification. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the Letournel and Judet classification system for acetabular fractures. 10 acetabular fractures were analyzed among 17 orthopedic surgeons. The surgeons were asked to classify the fractures according to the Judet and Letournel classification. Their experience, the number of surgeries, and the incision type that the surgeon uses for the anterior part of the acetabulum were recorded. The overall interobserver agreement for the Letournel classification was found to be poor, with a Kappa value of 0.287. The Kappa value for interobserver agreement was 0.224 for plain radiographs, 0.293 for 2D-CT, and 0.321 for 3D-CT scans. There was no significant difference between the incision types used by the surgeons. The highest reliability was determined among the surgeons who operate on 10-20 acetabular fractures per year, with a Kappa value of 0.309. This results revealed that the Judet and Letournel Judet classification is not sufficient to classify acetabular fractures because of unclassified fractures and the complex algorithm of the system. .