Comparison of Biomicroscopy and Light Microscopy Findings in Demodex Diagnosis in Patients With Chronic Blepharitis

We aimed to compare the results of biomicroscopic examination and light microscopy in the diagnosis of Demodex infestation in chronic blepharitis cases. The study was performed with retrospective data and included patients with chronic blepharitis and who were admitted to the Medipol University Opht...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEye & contact lens Vol. 46; no. 5; p. 297
Main Authors Tanriverdi, Cafer, Balci, Ozlem, Demirci, Goktug, Odabasi, Mahmut, Ozsutcu, Mustafa, Nurozler Tabakci, Burcu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.09.2020
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract We aimed to compare the results of biomicroscopic examination and light microscopy in the diagnosis of Demodex infestation in chronic blepharitis cases. The study was performed with retrospective data and included patients with chronic blepharitis and who were admitted to the Medipol University Ophthalmology Outpatient Clinic. Biomicroscopic evaluation was performed intentionally under 40x magnification to investigate the presence of Demodex ectoparasites. Three or four pieces of eyelashes were obtained from all cases with epilation technique, and Demodex parasites were examined under ×100 and ×400 magnifications with light microscopy. The presence of one or more Demodex parasites in the examined area under light microscopy was considered to be positive for infestation. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate, false-negative rate, and positive and negative predictive values of biomicroscopic examination compared with those of positive light microscopy. Of the 255 subjects included in the study, 134 (52.5%) were men and 121 (47.5%) were women. The mean age was 43.9±11.9 years. Of the 255 chronic blepharitis cases, 130 (51%) presented Demodex infestation on light microscopy. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate, false-negative rate, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value and were found to be 83.07%, 90.4%, 9.6%, 16.9%, 90%, and 83.7%, respectively, for the biomicroscopic examination. Careful biomicroscopic examination can be time-efficient and cost-effective, and the need for more advanced and invasive procedures for the identification of Demodex in patients with chronic blepharitis can be reduced.
AbstractList We aimed to compare the results of biomicroscopic examination and light microscopy in the diagnosis of Demodex infestation in chronic blepharitis cases. The study was performed with retrospective data and included patients with chronic blepharitis and who were admitted to the Medipol University Ophthalmology Outpatient Clinic. Biomicroscopic evaluation was performed intentionally under 40x magnification to investigate the presence of Demodex ectoparasites. Three or four pieces of eyelashes were obtained from all cases with epilation technique, and Demodex parasites were examined under ×100 and ×400 magnifications with light microscopy. The presence of one or more Demodex parasites in the examined area under light microscopy was considered to be positive for infestation. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate, false-negative rate, and positive and negative predictive values of biomicroscopic examination compared with those of positive light microscopy. Of the 255 subjects included in the study, 134 (52.5%) were men and 121 (47.5%) were women. The mean age was 43.9±11.9 years. Of the 255 chronic blepharitis cases, 130 (51%) presented Demodex infestation on light microscopy. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate, false-negative rate, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value and were found to be 83.07%, 90.4%, 9.6%, 16.9%, 90%, and 83.7%, respectively, for the biomicroscopic examination. Careful biomicroscopic examination can be time-efficient and cost-effective, and the need for more advanced and invasive procedures for the identification of Demodex in patients with chronic blepharitis can be reduced.
Author Balci, Ozlem
Demirci, Goktug
Odabasi, Mahmut
Ozsutcu, Mustafa
Tanriverdi, Cafer
Nurozler Tabakci, Burcu
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Cafer
  surname: Tanriverdi
  fullname: Tanriverdi, Cafer
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ozlem
  surname: Balci
  fullname: Balci, Ozlem
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Goktug
  surname: Demirci
  fullname: Demirci, Goktug
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Mahmut
  surname: Odabasi
  fullname: Odabasi, Mahmut
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mustafa
  surname: Ozsutcu
  fullname: Ozsutcu, Mustafa
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Burcu
  surname: Nurozler Tabakci
  fullname: Nurozler Tabakci, Burcu
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31658176$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNj9tKxDAYhIMo7kHfQCQv0DWHJm0v3a6rCxW9UPRuSdO_7S_bpDQV3Ld38YDOxQx8FzPMjBw774CQC84WnGXJ1SYvFuy_tGZHZMpVLCIh5euEzEJ4Y0wwnvFTMpFcq5QnekpC7rveDBi8o76mS_Qd2sEH6_s9Na6iBTbtSO__4Bpdha4JFB1dQecr-KArNI3zAb_goxkR3BjoC44tzdvBO7R0uYO-PQyNGM7ISW12Ac5_ck6e1zdP-V1UPNxu8usisjHjLNImTaFU8uBCQsyMrSyrQcZKc2WlTWsrlNIZS4BzXYrEqpiDkRKyTFemFnNy-d3bv5cdVNt-wM4M--3ve_EJqkVebQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_02713683_2023_2265083
crossref_primary_10_1080_08820538_2021_1897859
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11175085
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_16378
ContentType Journal Article
DBID NPM
DOI 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000660
DatabaseName PubMed
DatabaseTitle PubMed
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1542-233X
ExternalDocumentID 31658176
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.Z2
0R~
2V-
53G
5GY
5VS
AAAAV
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AARTV
AASCR
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABVCZ
ABXRP
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACILI
ACNCT
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ADFPA
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNKB
AE3
AEETU
AFDTB
AHQNM
AHVBC
AINUH
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJNYG
AJZMW
AKCTQ
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AWKKM
BQLVK
BS7
C45
CS3
DIWNM
DUNZO
E.X
EBS
EEVPB
EJD
EX3
F5P
FCALG
FL-
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
IKREB
IN~
IPNFZ
JK3
JK8
K8S
KD2
L-C
NPM
N~M
O9-
OCUKA
ODA
OLW
OPUJH
ORVUJ
OUVQU
OVD
OVDNE
OXXIT
R58
RIG
RLZ
S4R
S4S
TEORI
TSPGW
UCJ
V2I
W3M
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
ZB8
ZZMQN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4010-6a88eb5388e23e40acdc0fe345615c3c8fc2556907e116b27c541ea33e996daf2
IngestDate Wed Feb 19 02:29:16 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4010-6a88eb5388e23e40acdc0fe345615c3c8fc2556907e116b27c541ea33e996daf2
PMID 31658176
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_31658176
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-Sep
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-Sep
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Eye & contact lens
PublicationTitleAlternate Eye Contact Lens
PublicationYear 2020
SSID ssj0020191
Score 2.2564027
Snippet We aimed to compare the results of biomicroscopic examination and light microscopy in the diagnosis of Demodex infestation in chronic blepharitis cases. The...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 297
Title Comparison of Biomicroscopy and Light Microscopy Findings in Demodex Diagnosis in Patients With Chronic Blepharitis
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31658176
Volume 46
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3JTsNADB0VkBAXxL6jOXBDgexpj1B2sR2KxA1NJjMQ0aYVtBLwK_ws9ixpWAX0kEYeaRTFrx7bfbYJ2RBwxsk4ixwZJMwJmSecFM5Jx4VblvIEvrF2-Ow8ProKT66j61rttcJaGvTTLf7yZV3Jf7QKMtArVsn-QbPlpiCAe9AvXEHDcP2VjpvVIYI4VrKD9DosNNFdlU4x8kZmvBUe5KqIRXFg9wROwXkCo6fIdrkSXuo2q8iKxeIk3Tl3c7ctendMtT96l8l_Fgo5SHfHUks4wEoPvcWKB6R8ZLmmlcghC3iXtbmSXry0TeIYPWnRyR-0_LB73x_clunfjMFRm-vCorvOoF9NVEBUaplYcM4Y44qlQIGa_1taX5OAzKv_b2tTqnm7n0y8bh183DzVrSftJ9ZjCSpa73WU2gMPnCxPD5n5efVD4227NEJGIATBmaqYCDKxPHjGnq3EbCTbXz3OBBm3W3yIWZTv0poikybooDsaQdOkJooZMn5maBWz5HEIJNqV9B2QKACJKiDRIZCoBRLNC2qAREsgodACiSKQqAESrQBpjlwd7LeaR46ZxuHwEBkTMavXRQrnY134gQhdxjPuShGgBx7xgNclx3Z2DTcRnhenfsKj0BMsCASE1BmT_jwZLbqFWCTUYxGYfsm4z6IwS2KwDrATi8OG9F3OsyWyoF_XTU-3XLmxL3L525UVMjEE3SoZk_AbF2vgMPbTdaW6N-JmbCI
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Biomicroscopy+and+Light+Microscopy+Findings+in+Demodex+Diagnosis+in+Patients+With+Chronic+Blepharitis&rft.jtitle=Eye+%26+contact+lens&rft.au=Tanriverdi%2C+Cafer&rft.au=Balci%2C+Ozlem&rft.au=Demirci%2C+Goktug&rft.au=Odabasi%2C+Mahmut&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.eissn=1542-233X&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FICL.0000000000000660&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31658176&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31658176&rft.externalDocID=31658176