Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. II. Effects of Stimulus Intensity

  1 Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques,   2 Département de Physiologie, and   3 École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada Williams, Stephan R. and C. Elaine Chapman. Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurophysiology Vol. 84; no. 2; pp. 863 - 875
Main Authors Williams, Stephan R, Chapman, C. Elaine
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Am Phys Soc 01.08.2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract   1 Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques,   2 Département de Physiologie, and   3 École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada Williams, Stephan R. and C. Elaine Chapman. Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. II. Effects of Stimulus Intensity. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 863-875, 2000. This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 × P 90 ); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5,   1.75, and 2.0 × P 90 ). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within ±12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 × P 90 ), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 × P 90 (5 subjects) and 3 × P 90 (3   subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill.
AbstractList This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 x P(90)); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2. 0 x P(90)). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within +/-12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 x P(90)), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 x P(90) (5 subjects) and 3 x P(90) (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill.
This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 × P 90 ); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2.0 × P 90 ). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within ±12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25–45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 × P 90 ), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 × P 90 (5 subjects) and 3 × P 90 (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill.
  1 Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques,   2 Département de Physiologie, and   3 École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada Williams, Stephan R. and C. Elaine Chapman. Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. II. Effects of Stimulus Intensity. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 863-875, 2000. This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 × P 90 ); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5,   1.75, and 2.0 × P 90 ). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within ±12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 × P 90 ), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 × P 90 (5 subjects) and 3 × P 90 (3   subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill.
This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 x P(90)); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2. 0 x P(90)). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within +/-12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 x P(90)), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 x P(90) (5 subjects) and 3 x P(90) (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill.This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 x P(90)); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2. 0 x P(90)). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within +/-12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 x P(90)), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 x P(90) (5 subjects) and 3 x P(90) (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill.
This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 x P sub(90)); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2.0 x P sub(90)). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within plus or minus 12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 x P sub(90)), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 x P sub(90) (5 subjects) and 3 x P sub(90) (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill.
Author Williams, Stephan R
Chapman, C. Elaine
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Williams, Stephan R
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Chapman, C. Elaine
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10938313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkc1v1DAQxS1URLeFOyfkE7cEfyRr54iWfqzUCgmWs-Uk412vHHuJnZb973HUrUBIFacZzfzeaPTeBTrzwQNC7ykpKa3Zp70vGSGklFXJSrnkr9Aij1lB60aeoQUhuedEiHN0EeM-k6Im7A06p6ThklO-QA8bOwBehWmMgLXv8b3eepumHnAw-D48wAA-Fd_A6QQ9vtHJ-u282uguWQf4CyTIXfDYenw7DdrHEq_XJb4yJi_izH5PdpjcFPHaJ_DRpuNb9NpoF-HdqV6iH9dXm9Vtcff1Zr36fFd0FSGp0JoB4QDS0K4yWkvZtq2RotMVb2XNpKlBtFyahhreQl0TulxCA20lGyG6ll-ij093D2P4OUFMarCxA-e0hzBFJaioasab_4JULGWVHcvghxM4tQP06jDaQY9H9WxpBpZPQDeGGEcwqrNJzw6lUVuXQTVnp_ZezdkpWSmmcnZZSP4R_rn9ouT09c5ud492BHXYHaMNLmyPM_0XyF4GryfnNvArZcWzQB16w38DodG8bA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2024_111643
crossref_primary_10_1044_2020_JSLHR_19_00318
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2013_01_011
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_008_1410_0
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00751_2005
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_2002_88_4_1968
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci15030231
crossref_primary_10_1080_08990220_2024_2358298
crossref_primary_10_1152_physrev_00048_2011
crossref_primary_10_3109_08990220_2015_1091771
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2330_19_2020
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_016_1203_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2017_11_024
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_pain_0000000000002206
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00568_2020
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00905_2012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_007_1191_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_ejn_12816
crossref_primary_10_1177_0022034510363101
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2024_110582
crossref_primary_10_1027_1618_3169_a000203
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00214_2006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2009_12_009
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_010_2308_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_012_3245_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_011_2632_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_14156
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neucli_2015_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00043_2009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2024_115389
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_humov_2014_06_006
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_22133_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2022_104077
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2009_07_003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_010_2407_z
crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_psych_011624_101129
Cites_doi 10.1002/ana.410190406
10.1016/0006-8993(85)90377-4
10.1007/BF00247604
10.1093/brain/110.2.451
10.1007/BF00229790
10.1007/BF00230430
10.1152/jn.1974.37.5.831
10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.947
10.1111/j.2044-8317.1965.tb00689.x
10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61620-9
10.1016/0168-0102(94)90083-3
10.1007/BF00249795
10.1007/BF00227283
10.1016/0168-5597(85)90051-6
10.1007/BF00250254
10.3758/BF03333619
10.1016/0014-4886(82)90244-8
10.1038/2870
10.1007/BF00228261
10.1007/BF00228877
10.1016/0006-8993(90)90010-9
10.1007/s002210050388
10.1007/BF00231455
10.1016/0013-4694(72)90153-8
10.1007/BF00586390
10.1016/0014-4886(82)90082-6
10.1016/0003-9969(93)90137-B
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TK
7X8
DOI 10.1152/jn.2000.84.2.863
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
CrossRef

MEDLINE - Academic
Neurosciences Abstracts
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1522-1598
EndPage 875
ExternalDocumentID 10938313
10_1152_jn_2000_84_2_863
jn_84_2_863
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID -
08R
0VX
1Z7
2WC
39C
3O-
41
53G
55
5GY
5VS
AALRV
ABFLS
ABIVO
ABPTK
ABUFD
ABZEH
ACGFS
ACNCT
ADACO
ADBBV
ADBIT
ADKLL
AENEX
AETEA
AFFNX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CS3
DIK
DL
DU5
DZ
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FH7
FRP
GJ
GX1
H~9
KQ8
L7B
MVM
NEJ
O0-
OHT
OK1
P2P
RAP
RHF
RHI
RPL
SJN
UHB
UPT
UQL
VH1
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X
X7M
ZA5
ZGI
ZXP
ZY4
---
-DZ
-~X
.55
.GJ
18M
1CY
41~
AAYXX
ABCQX
ABHWK
ABJNI
ABKWE
ACGFO
ADFNX
ADHGD
ADIYS
AFOSN
AI.
AIZAD
BKKCC
BTFSW
CITATION
EMOBN
H13
ITBOX
RPRKH
TR2
W8F
XSW
YBH
YQT
YSK
29L
4.4
8M5
ABTAH
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
VXZ
XJT
XOL
7TK
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-aa2e03ee8f1c4faa88bbbf87ca43b8528f5e7b38f91f3be550166e9eb48977cb3
ISSN 0022-3077
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 19:25:54 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 09:37:11 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:41:06 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:11:09 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:09:13 EDT 2025
Tue Jan 05 17:54:11 EST 2021
Mon May 06 12:26:09 EDT 2019
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c400t-aa2e03ee8f1c4faa88bbbf87ca43b8528f5e7b38f91f3be550166e9eb48977cb3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
PMID 10938313
PQID 17684313
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_jn_2000_84_2_863
pubmed_primary_10938313
proquest_miscellaneous_71745239
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_2000_84_2_863
highwire_physiology_jn_84_2_863
proquest_miscellaneous_17684313
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2000-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2000-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2000
  text: 2000-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of neurophysiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurophysiol
PublicationYear 2000
Publisher Am Phys Soc
Publisher_xml – name: Am Phys Soc
References B20
B21
B22
B23
B24
B25
Williams SR (B35) 1999; 25
B27
B28
B29
Williams SR (B34) 1996; 22
B30
B31
B32
B33
B12
B14
B36
B15
B17
B18
Contini R (B10) 1972; 16
B19
Coquery JM (B13) 1971; 165
B1
B2
B3
B5
B6
B7
B9
Brooke JD (B4) 1997; 37
References_xml – ident: B2
  doi: 10.1002/ana.410190406
– ident: B32
  doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90377-4
– ident: B24
  doi: 10.1007/BF00247604
– ident: B9
  doi: 10.1093/brain/110.2.451
– ident: B20
  doi: 10.1007/BF00229790
– ident: B21
  doi: 10.1007/BF00230430
– ident: B14
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1974.37.5.831
– ident: B36
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.947
– volume: 37
  start-page: 451
  year: 1997
  ident: B4
  publication-title: Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol
– volume: 22
  start-page: 106
  year: 1996
  ident: B34
  publication-title: Soc Neurosci Abstr
– ident: B33
  doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1965.tb00689.x
– ident: B22
  doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61620-9
– ident: B31
  doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(94)90083-3
– ident: B6
  doi: 10.1007/BF00249795
– ident: B28
  doi: 10.1007/BF00227283
– ident: B29
  doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90051-6
– ident: B7
  doi: 10.1007/BF00250254
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1
  year: 1972
  ident: B10
  publication-title: Artificial Limbs
– ident: B23
  doi: 10.3758/BF03333619
– ident: B1
  doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(82)90244-8
– ident: B3
  doi: 10.1038/2870
– ident: B27
  doi: 10.1007/BF00228261
– ident: B30
  doi: 10.1007/BF00228877
– volume: 165
  start-page: 1946
  year: 1971
  ident: B13
  publication-title: C R Soc Biol (Paris)
– ident: B18
  doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90010-9
– ident: B25
  doi: 10.1007/s002210050388
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1169
  year: 1999
  ident: B35
  publication-title: Soc Neurosci Abstr
– ident: B17
  doi: 10.1007/BF00231455
– ident: B12
  doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90153-8
– ident: B15
  doi: 10.1007/BF00586390
– ident: B5
  doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(82)90082-6
– ident: B19
  doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(93)90137-B
SSID ssj0007502
Score 1.8206983
Snippet   1 Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques,   2 Département de Physiologie, and   3 École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal,...
This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
highwire
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 863
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Biomechanical Phenomena
Electromyography
Female
Fingers - innervation
Fingers - physiology
Humans
Male
Movement - physiology
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Sensory Thresholds - physiology
Time Factors
Touch - physiology
Title Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. II. Effects of Stimulus Intensity
URI http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/84/2/863
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10938313
https://www.proquest.com/docview/17684313
https://www.proquest.com/docview/71745239
Volume 84
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELfKeOEFAeOjfM0PCAlVyRrHSZ3HCQ1tTCAQnbQ3y05sadOSVGuCBH89ZztO0rIi4CWq4qsT-X6-nO273yH0JpPmqy5YUBSpDihAOMiKNA1SoSSluYy1JdL-9Dk9OacfL5KLyeRsFLXUNjLMf96aV_I_WoV7oFeTJfsPmu07hRvwG_QLV9AwXP9Ox5elCTY3cRj2EKAUJhaoLew-QFlbKvAmsOkq4FcaLg0X4tyYbAabMdWo3Ec72mp963B2ehrOjocoDzABZXvdri2xRGUiOHb4s5YZ026UbO7UjzZ0vg3hiaO8B58N4fcehsi3jVyAeVeIpbOnruRbhxsyMo7MmbLfjXZiSGCvLBvtPGQ0JOGWKAz7qrRKNOxXLHbpq1tE2b7pDrpLYM1gylmcfR2o48E1Gqjj4ZX9mXVCDrcfbZhku8423RVPIb17OWLdkuUDdL8bf3zkwPEQTVT1CO0fVaKpyx_4Lf7SK2QffTd4wQ4vGPCCe7zgWuNtvGCHF9PU4QX3eMGXFe7wggEvuMOLkfV4wT1eHqPzD8fL9ydBV3cjyMGiN4EQRM1jpZiOcqqFYExKqdkiFzSWLCFMJ2ohY6azSMdSwRo3SlOVweRmsJqA-f0E7VV1pZ4hnMIXhWSRiqEncH2JyESko6RQlBZyoeUUHfrh5XlHSm9qo1xzuzhNCL-qTKXUOWeUEw66maJ3_T9WjpDlD7IzrzE-4J-bzZ0lYAfkvSRfFXqKDm6Thk6H_g682jlYYXO0JipVt2semfNsgMtuiQUs_RMSZ1P01OFl9PYOas93trxA94bZ9xLtNTetegW-cCNfW4z_AmMztWY
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Time+course+and+magnitude+of+movement-related+gating+of+tactile+detection+in+humans.+II.+Effects+of+stimulus+intensity&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Williams%2C+S+R&rft.au=Chapman%2C+C+E&rft.date=2000-08-01&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=863&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.2000.84.2.863&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F10938313&rft.externalDocID=10938313
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon