Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. II. Effects of Stimulus Intensity
1 Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques, 2 Département de Physiologie, and 3 École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada Williams, Stephan R. and C. Elaine Chapman. Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neurophysiology Vol. 84; no. 2; pp. 863 - 875 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Am Phys Soc
01.08.2000
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | 1 Centre de Recherche en Sciences
Neurologiques, 2 Département de
Physiologie, and 3 École de
Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine,
Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7,
Canada
Williams, Stephan R. and
C. Elaine Chapman.
Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile
Detection in Humans. II. Effects of Stimulus Intensity. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 863-875, 2000. This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus
intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating
of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to
perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to
a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five
different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of
stimuli were detected at rest (1 × P 90 ); four
multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and
2.0 × P 90 ). At all intensities of stimulation,
detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished
significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases
occurring within ±12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in
the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset).
Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the
lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher
intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was
seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 × P 90 ), magnitude estimation experiments were
performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 × P 90 (5 subjects) and 3 × P 90 (3 subjects). Significant
movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were
observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to
the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus
intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in
scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately
described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on
movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was
then combined with a previous model that described the effects of
stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a
given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement.
Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result
of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent
processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of
the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of
movement-related gating will have to fulfill. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 x P(90)); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2. 0 x P(90)). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within +/-12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 x P(90)), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 x P(90) (5 subjects) and 3 x P(90) (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill. This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 × P 90 ); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2.0 × P 90 ). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within ±12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25–45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 × P 90 ), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 × P 90 (5 subjects) and 3 × P 90 (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill. 1 Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques, 2 Département de Physiologie, and 3 École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada Williams, Stephan R. and C. Elaine Chapman. Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. II. Effects of Stimulus Intensity. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 863-875, 2000. This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 × P 90 ); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2.0 × P 90 ). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within ±12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 × P 90 ), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 × P 90 (5 subjects) and 3 × P 90 (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill. This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 x P(90)); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2. 0 x P(90)). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within +/-12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 x P(90)), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 x P(90) (5 subjects) and 3 x P(90) (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill.This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 x P(90)); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2. 0 x P(90)). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within +/-12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 x P(90)), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 x P(90) (5 subjects) and 3 x P(90) (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill. This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection and scaling in 17 human subjects trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Electrical stimulation was delivered to D2 at five different intensities. At the lowest intensity, approximately 90% of stimuli were detected at rest (1 x P sub(90)); four multiples of this intensity were also tested (1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2.0 x P sub(90)). At all intensities of stimulation, detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit was diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with peak decreases occurring within plus or minus 12 ms of the onset of electromyographic activity in the first dorsal interosseous (25-45 ms before movement onset). Reductions in the proportion of stimuli detected were greatest at the lowest stimulus intensity and progressively smaller at higher intensities. No shift in the timing of the decreases in performance was seen with increasing intensity. Once the weakest intensity at which most stimuli were perceived during movement had been established (2 x P sub(90)), magnitude estimation experiments were performed using two stimulus intensities, 2 x P sub(90) (5 subjects) and 3 x P sub(90) (3 subjects). Significant movement-related decreases in estimated stimulus magnitude were observed at both intensities, the time course of which was similar to the time course of reductions in detection performance. As stimulus intensity increased, the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in scaling diminished. A model of detection performance that accurately described the effect of stimulus intensity and timing on movement-related reductions in detection was created. This model was then combined with a previous model that described the effects of stimulus localization and timing to predict detection performance at a given stimulation site, intensity, and time during movement. Movement-related gating of tactile perception represents the end result of movement-related effects on the transmission and subsequent processing of the stimulus. The combined model clearly defines many of the requirements that proposed physiological mechanisms of movement-related gating will have to fulfill. |
Author | Williams, Stephan R Chapman, C. Elaine |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Williams, Stephan R – sequence: 2 fullname: Chapman, C. Elaine |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10938313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkc1v1DAQxS1URLeFOyfkE7cEfyRr54iWfqzUCgmWs-Uk412vHHuJnZb973HUrUBIFacZzfzeaPTeBTrzwQNC7ykpKa3Zp70vGSGklFXJSrnkr9Aij1lB60aeoQUhuedEiHN0EeM-k6Im7A06p6ThklO-QA8bOwBehWmMgLXv8b3eepumHnAw-D48wAA-Fd_A6QQ9vtHJ-u282uguWQf4CyTIXfDYenw7DdrHEq_XJb4yJi_izH5PdpjcFPHaJ_DRpuNb9NpoF-HdqV6iH9dXm9Vtcff1Zr36fFd0FSGp0JoB4QDS0K4yWkvZtq2RotMVb2XNpKlBtFyahhreQl0TulxCA20lGyG6ll-ij093D2P4OUFMarCxA-e0hzBFJaioasab_4JULGWVHcvghxM4tQP06jDaQY9H9WxpBpZPQDeGGEcwqrNJzw6lUVuXQTVnp_ZezdkpWSmmcnZZSP4R_rn9ouT09c5ud492BHXYHaMNLmyPM_0XyF4GryfnNvArZcWzQB16w38DodG8bA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2024_111643 crossref_primary_10_1044_2020_JSLHR_19_00318 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2013_01_011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_008_1410_0 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00751_2005 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_2002_88_4_1968 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci15030231 crossref_primary_10_1080_08990220_2024_2358298 crossref_primary_10_1152_physrev_00048_2011 crossref_primary_10_3109_08990220_2015_1091771 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2330_19_2020 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_016_1203_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2017_11_024 crossref_primary_10_1097_j_pain_0000000000002206 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00568_2020 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00905_2012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_007_1191_x crossref_primary_10_1111_ejn_12816 crossref_primary_10_1177_0022034510363101 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2024_110582 crossref_primary_10_1027_1618_3169_a000203 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00214_2006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2009_12_009 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_010_2308_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_012_3245_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_011_2632_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_14156 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neucli_2015_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00043_2009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2024_115389 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_humov_2014_06_006 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_22133_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2022_104077 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2009_07_003 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_010_2407_z crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_psych_011624_101129 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/ana.410190406 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90377-4 10.1007/BF00247604 10.1093/brain/110.2.451 10.1007/BF00229790 10.1007/BF00230430 10.1152/jn.1974.37.5.831 10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.947 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1965.tb00689.x 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61620-9 10.1016/0168-0102(94)90083-3 10.1007/BF00249795 10.1007/BF00227283 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90051-6 10.1007/BF00250254 10.3758/BF03333619 10.1016/0014-4886(82)90244-8 10.1038/2870 10.1007/BF00228261 10.1007/BF00228877 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90010-9 10.1007/s002210050388 10.1007/BF00231455 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90153-8 10.1007/BF00586390 10.1016/0014-4886(82)90082-6 10.1016/0003-9969(93)90137-B |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1152/jn.2000.84.2.863 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic Neurosciences Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1522-1598 |
EndPage | 875 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10938313 10_1152_jn_2000_84_2_863 jn_84_2_863 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | - 08R 0VX 1Z7 2WC 39C 3O- 41 53G 55 5GY 5VS AALRV ABFLS ABIVO ABPTK ABUFD ABZEH ACGFS ACNCT ADACO ADBBV ADBIT ADKLL AENEX AETEA AFFNX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL C1A CS3 DIK DL DU5 DZ E3Z EBS EJD F5P FH7 FRP GJ GX1 H~9 KQ8 L7B MVM NEJ O0- OHT OK1 P2P RAP RHF RHI RPL SJN UHB UPT UQL VH1 WH7 WOQ WOW X X7M ZA5 ZGI ZXP ZY4 --- -DZ -~X .55 .GJ 18M 1CY 41~ AAYXX ABCQX ABHWK ABJNI ABKWE ACGFO ADFNX ADHGD ADIYS AFOSN AI. AIZAD BKKCC BTFSW CITATION EMOBN H13 ITBOX RPRKH TR2 W8F XSW YBH YQT YSK 29L 4.4 8M5 ABTAH CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM VXZ XJT XOL 7TK 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-aa2e03ee8f1c4faa88bbbf87ca43b8528f5e7b38f91f3be550166e9eb48977cb3 |
ISSN | 0022-3077 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 19:25:54 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:37:11 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:41:06 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:11:09 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:09:13 EDT 2025 Tue Jan 05 17:54:11 EST 2021 Mon May 06 12:26:09 EDT 2019 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c400t-aa2e03ee8f1c4faa88bbbf87ca43b8528f5e7b38f91f3be550166e9eb48977cb3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
PMID | 10938313 |
PQID | 17684313 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_jn_2000_84_2_863 pubmed_primary_10938313 proquest_miscellaneous_71745239 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_2000_84_2_863 highwire_physiology_jn_84_2_863 proquest_miscellaneous_17684313 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2000-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2000-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2000 text: 2000-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of neurophysiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neurophysiol |
PublicationYear | 2000 |
Publisher | Am Phys Soc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Am Phys Soc |
References | B20 B21 B22 B23 B24 B25 Williams SR (B35) 1999; 25 B27 B28 B29 Williams SR (B34) 1996; 22 B30 B31 B32 B33 B12 B14 B36 B15 B17 B18 Contini R (B10) 1972; 16 B19 Coquery JM (B13) 1971; 165 B1 B2 B3 B5 B6 B7 B9 Brooke JD (B4) 1997; 37 |
References_xml | – ident: B2 doi: 10.1002/ana.410190406 – ident: B32 doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90377-4 – ident: B24 doi: 10.1007/BF00247604 – ident: B9 doi: 10.1093/brain/110.2.451 – ident: B20 doi: 10.1007/BF00229790 – ident: B21 doi: 10.1007/BF00230430 – ident: B14 doi: 10.1152/jn.1974.37.5.831 – ident: B36 doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.947 – volume: 37 start-page: 451 year: 1997 ident: B4 publication-title: Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol – volume: 22 start-page: 106 year: 1996 ident: B34 publication-title: Soc Neurosci Abstr – ident: B33 doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1965.tb00689.x – ident: B22 doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61620-9 – ident: B31 doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(94)90083-3 – ident: B6 doi: 10.1007/BF00249795 – ident: B28 doi: 10.1007/BF00227283 – ident: B29 doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90051-6 – ident: B7 doi: 10.1007/BF00250254 – volume: 16 start-page: 1 year: 1972 ident: B10 publication-title: Artificial Limbs – ident: B23 doi: 10.3758/BF03333619 – ident: B1 doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(82)90244-8 – ident: B3 doi: 10.1038/2870 – ident: B27 doi: 10.1007/BF00228261 – ident: B30 doi: 10.1007/BF00228877 – volume: 165 start-page: 1946 year: 1971 ident: B13 publication-title: C R Soc Biol (Paris) – ident: B18 doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90010-9 – ident: B25 doi: 10.1007/s002210050388 – volume: 25 start-page: 1169 year: 1999 ident: B35 publication-title: Soc Neurosci Abstr – ident: B17 doi: 10.1007/BF00231455 – ident: B12 doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90153-8 – ident: B15 doi: 10.1007/BF00586390 – ident: B5 doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(82)90082-6 – ident: B19 doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(93)90137-B |
SSID | ssj0007502 |
Score | 1.8206983 |
Snippet | 1 Centre de Recherche en Sciences
Neurologiques, 2 Département de
Physiologie, and 3 École de
Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine,
Université de Montréal,... This study examined the effect of systematically varying stimulus intensity on the time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref highwire |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 863 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Biomechanical Phenomena Electromyography Female Fingers - innervation Fingers - physiology Humans Male Movement - physiology Psychomotor Performance - physiology Sensory Thresholds - physiology Time Factors Touch - physiology |
Title | Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. II. Effects of Stimulus Intensity |
URI | http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/84/2/863 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10938313 https://www.proquest.com/docview/17684313 https://www.proquest.com/docview/71745239 |
Volume | 84 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELfKeOEFAeOjfM0PCAlVyRrHSZ3HCQ1tTCAQnbQ3y05sadOSVGuCBH89ZztO0rIi4CWq4qsT-X6-nO273yH0JpPmqy5YUBSpDihAOMiKNA1SoSSluYy1JdL-9Dk9OacfL5KLyeRsFLXUNjLMf96aV_I_WoV7oFeTJfsPmu07hRvwG_QLV9AwXP9Ox5elCTY3cRj2EKAUJhaoLew-QFlbKvAmsOkq4FcaLg0X4tyYbAabMdWo3Ec72mp963B2ehrOjocoDzABZXvdri2xRGUiOHb4s5YZ026UbO7UjzZ0vg3hiaO8B58N4fcehsi3jVyAeVeIpbOnruRbhxsyMo7MmbLfjXZiSGCvLBvtPGQ0JOGWKAz7qrRKNOxXLHbpq1tE2b7pDrpLYM1gylmcfR2o48E1Gqjj4ZX9mXVCDrcfbZhku8423RVPIb17OWLdkuUDdL8bf3zkwPEQTVT1CO0fVaKpyx_4Lf7SK2QffTd4wQ4vGPCCe7zgWuNtvGCHF9PU4QX3eMGXFe7wggEvuMOLkfV4wT1eHqPzD8fL9ydBV3cjyMGiN4EQRM1jpZiOcqqFYExKqdkiFzSWLCFMJ2ohY6azSMdSwRo3SlOVweRmsJqA-f0E7VV1pZ4hnMIXhWSRiqEncH2JyESko6RQlBZyoeUUHfrh5XlHSm9qo1xzuzhNCL-qTKXUOWeUEw66maJ3_T9WjpDlD7IzrzE-4J-bzZ0lYAfkvSRfFXqKDm6Thk6H_g682jlYYXO0JipVt2semfNsgMtuiQUs_RMSZ1P01OFl9PYOas93trxA94bZ9xLtNTetegW-cCNfW4z_AmMztWY |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Time+course+and+magnitude+of+movement-related+gating+of+tactile+detection+in+humans.+II.+Effects+of+stimulus+intensity&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Williams%2C+S+R&rft.au=Chapman%2C+C+E&rft.date=2000-08-01&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=863&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.2000.84.2.863&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F10938313&rft.externalDocID=10938313 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |