Characterizing the Influence of Preload Dosing on Percent Signal Recovery (PSR) and Cerebral Blood Volume (CBV) Measurements in a Patient Population with High-Grade Glioma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI

• Published in: Tomography (Ann Arbor) Vol. 3; no. 2; pp. 89 - 95
• Main Authors: Bell, Laura C., Hu, Leland S., Stokes, Ashley M., McGee, Samuel C., Baxter, Leslie C., Quarles, C. Chad
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Grapho Publications, LLC 01.06.2017
• Subjects: percent signal recovery; DSC-MRI; preload doses; relative cerebral blood volume
• DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2017.00004
• ISSN: 2379-139X; 2379-1381

With DSC-MRI, contrast agent leakage effects in brain tumors can either be leveraged for percent signal recovery (PSR) measurements or be adequately resolved for accurate relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) measurements. Leakage effects can be dimished by administration of a preload dose before imaging and/or specific postprocessing steps. This study compares the consistency of both PSR and rCBV measurements as a function of varying preload doses in a retrospective analysis of 14 subjects with high-grade gliomas. The scans consisted of 6 DSC-MRI scans during 6 sequential bolus injections (0.05 mmol/kg). Mean PSR was calculated for tumor and normal-appearing white matter regions of interest. DSC-MRI data were corrected for leakage effects before computing mean tumor rCBV. Statistical differences were seen across varying preloads for tumor PSR (P value = 4.57E-24). Tumor rCBV values did not exhibit statistically significant differences across preloads (P value = .14) and were found to be highly consistent for clinically relevant preloads (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93). For a 0.05 mmol/kg injection bolus and pulse sequence parameters used, the highest PSR contrast between normal-appearing white matter and tumor occurs when no preload is used. This suggests that studies using PSR as a biomarker should acquire DSC-MRI data without preload. The finding that leakage-corrected rCBV values do not depend on the presence or dose of preload contradicts that of previous studies with dissimilar acquisition protocols. This further confirms the sensitivity of rCBV to preload dosing schemes and pulse sequence parameters and highlights the importance of standardization efforts for achieving multisite rCBV consistency.