Shorter anogenital distance correlates with undescended testis: a detailed genital anthropometric analysis in human newborns

STUDY QUESTION Are the anogenital distance (AGD) and stretched penile length (SPL) shorter in human newborn males with cryptorchidism? SUMMARY ANSWER AGD is significantly shorter in boys with undescended testis (UDT) and this correlation may indicate that both have a common antecedent early in gesta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman reproduction (Oxford) Vol. 28; no. 9; pp. 2343 - 2349
Main Authors Jain, Viral G., Singal, Arbinder Kumar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.09.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract STUDY QUESTION Are the anogenital distance (AGD) and stretched penile length (SPL) shorter in human newborn males with cryptorchidism? SUMMARY ANSWER AGD is significantly shorter in boys with undescended testis (UDT) and this correlation may indicate that both have a common antecedent early in gestation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Animal studies have reported a critical time period during early gestation termed the male programming window (MPW) where androgen deficiency results in reduced AGD and penile length, as well as cryptorchidism and hypospadias. Two pilot human studies have explored this association but these studies were small and heterogeneous with regard to age, race and had selection bias. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A prospective descriptive study involving measurement of AGD and SPL at birth in a racially homogenous sample of 1154 consecutive newborns was performed over a period of 6 months. All measurements were taken by a single trained observer (V.J.). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS All consecutively born male infants at a community hospital were classified as having descended and or UDT. Testicular position in the undescended group was graded as high scrotal, inguinal or non-palpable. AGD (from the centre of anus to the junction of the smooth and rugated skin of scrotum) and SPL were measured. The AGD index (AGDi) was calculated by dividing AGD by cube root of birthweight. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Of the 1154 infants examined, 624 were males and 71 had UDT. AGD was significantly shorter in infants with UDT when compared with infants with descended testis (mean ± SD; 2.21 ± 0.36 versus 2.56 ± 0.31 cm; P < 0.001). AGDi was also significantly shorter in infants with UDT (mean ± SD; 1.68 ± 0.27 versus 1.81 ± 0.20 cm/kg−3; P < 0.001). Significance was maintained even when preterm (P < 0.001) and low birthweight boys (LBW) (P < 0.001) were excluded. SPL was also significantly shorter in infants with UDT (Mean ± SD; 3.08 ± 0.52 versus 3.31 ± 0.38 cm; P < 0.001) but the significance was not maintained when preterm (P = 0.119) and LBW boys (P = 0.666) were excluded. Birthweight, gestational age and length adjusted regression models showed significantly shorter AGD in infants with UDT, but SPL was not different. Infants with higher position of testis appeared to have a shorter AGD and SPL but the correlation did not reach statistical significance. No difference in AGD or SPL was noted between boys with unilateral and bilateral UDT. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The present study did not include data pertaining to maternal or newborn health status. Also parental drug exposure or occupational exposures to endocrine-disrupting chemicals was not studied. These may possibly affect genital anthropometric measurements. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The study strengthens the hypothesis of existence of MPW in humans. Shorter AGD in cryptorchid infants may reflect the effect of androgen disruption or deficiency during MPW. AGD may be a more reliable non-invasive marker of androgen action during MPW than SPL to predict reproductive outcomes in humans. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Supported by Hypospadias Foundation, India. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
AbstractList Are the anogenital distance (AGD) and stretched penile length (SPL) shorter in human newborn males with cryptorchidism?STUDY QUESTIONAre the anogenital distance (AGD) and stretched penile length (SPL) shorter in human newborn males with cryptorchidism?AGD is significantly shorter in boys with undescended testis (UDT) and this correlation may indicate that both have a common antecedent early in gestation.SUMMARY ANSWERAGD is significantly shorter in boys with undescended testis (UDT) and this correlation may indicate that both have a common antecedent early in gestation.Animal studies have reported a critical time period during early gestation termed the male programming window (MPW) where androgen deficiency results in reduced AGD and penile length, as well as cryptorchidism and hypospadias. Two pilot human studies have explored this association but these studies were small and heterogeneous with regard to age, race and had selection bias.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYAnimal studies have reported a critical time period during early gestation termed the male programming window (MPW) where androgen deficiency results in reduced AGD and penile length, as well as cryptorchidism and hypospadias. Two pilot human studies have explored this association but these studies were small and heterogeneous with regard to age, race and had selection bias.A prospective descriptive study involving measurement of AGD and SPL at birth in a racially homogenous sample of 1154 consecutive newborns was performed over a period of 6 months. All measurements were taken by a single trained observer (V.J.).STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATIONA prospective descriptive study involving measurement of AGD and SPL at birth in a racially homogenous sample of 1154 consecutive newborns was performed over a period of 6 months. All measurements were taken by a single trained observer (V.J.).All consecutively born male infants at a community hospital were classified as having descended and or UDT. Testicular position in the undescended group was graded as high scrotal, inguinal or non-palpable. AGD (from the centre of anus to the junction of the smooth and rugated skin of scrotum) and SPL were measured. The AGD index (AGDi) was calculated by dividing AGD by cube root of birthweight.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODSAll consecutively born male infants at a community hospital were classified as having descended and or UDT. Testicular position in the undescended group was graded as high scrotal, inguinal or non-palpable. AGD (from the centre of anus to the junction of the smooth and rugated skin of scrotum) and SPL were measured. The AGD index (AGDi) was calculated by dividing AGD by cube root of birthweight.Of the 1154 infants examined, 624 were males and 71 had UDT. AGD was significantly shorter in infants with UDT when compared with infants with descended testis (mean ± SD; 2.21 ± 0.36 versus 2.56 ± 0.31 cm; P < 0.001). AGDi was also significantly shorter in infants with UDT (mean ± SD; 1.68 ± 0.27 versus 1.81 ± 0.20 cm/kg⁻³; P < 0.001). Significance was maintained even when preterm (P < 0.001) and low birthweight boys (LBW) (P < 0.001) were excluded. SPL was also significantly shorter in infants with UDT (Mean ± SD; 3.08 ± 0.52 versus 3.31 ± 0.38 cm; P < 0.001) but the significance was not maintained when preterm (P = 0.119) and LBW boys (P = 0.666) were excluded. Birthweight, gestational age and length adjusted regression models showed significantly shorter AGD in infants with UDT, but SPL was not different. Infants with higher position of testis appeared to have a shorter AGD and SPL but the correlation did not reach statistical significance. No difference in AGD or SPL was noted between boys with unilateral and bilateral UDT.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEOf the 1154 infants examined, 624 were males and 71 had UDT. AGD was significantly shorter in infants with UDT when compared with infants with descended testis (mean ± SD; 2.21 ± 0.36 versus 2.56 ± 0.31 cm; P < 0.001). AGDi was also significantly shorter in infants with UDT (mean ± SD; 1.68 ± 0.27 versus 1.81 ± 0.20 cm/kg⁻³; P < 0.001). Significance was maintained even when preterm (P < 0.001) and low birthweight boys (LBW) (P < 0.001) were excluded. SPL was also significantly shorter in infants with UDT (Mean ± SD; 3.08 ± 0.52 versus 3.31 ± 0.38 cm; P < 0.001) but the significance was not maintained when preterm (P = 0.119) and LBW boys (P = 0.666) were excluded. Birthweight, gestational age and length adjusted regression models showed significantly shorter AGD in infants with UDT, but SPL was not different. Infants with higher position of testis appeared to have a shorter AGD and SPL but the correlation did not reach statistical significance. No difference in AGD or SPL was noted between boys with unilateral and bilateral UDT.The present study did not include data pertaining to maternal or newborn health status. Also parental drug exposure or occupational exposures to endocrine-disrupting chemicals was not studied. These may possibly affect genital anthropometric measurements.LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTIONThe present study did not include data pertaining to maternal or newborn health status. Also parental drug exposure or occupational exposures to endocrine-disrupting chemicals was not studied. These may possibly affect genital anthropometric measurements.The study strengthens the hypothesis of existence of MPW in humans. Shorter AGD in cryptorchid infants may reflect the effect of androgen disruption or deficiency during MPW. AGD may be a more reliable non-invasive marker of androgen action during MPW than SPL to predict reproductive outcomes in humans.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGSThe study strengthens the hypothesis of existence of MPW in humans. Shorter AGD in cryptorchid infants may reflect the effect of androgen disruption or deficiency during MPW. AGD may be a more reliable non-invasive marker of androgen action during MPW than SPL to predict reproductive outcomes in humans.
STUDY QUESTION Are the anogenital distance (AGD) and stretched penile length (SPL) shorter in human newborn males with cryptorchidism? SUMMARY ANSWER AGD is significantly shorter in boys with undescended testis (UDT) and this correlation may indicate that both have a common antecedent early in gestation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Animal studies have reported a critical time period during early gestation termed the male programming window (MPW) where androgen deficiency results in reduced AGD and penile length, as well as cryptorchidism and hypospadias. Two pilot human studies have explored this association but these studies were small and heterogeneous with regard to age, race and had selection bias. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A prospective descriptive study involving measurement of AGD and SPL at birth in a racially homogenous sample of 1154 consecutive newborns was performed over a period of 6 months. All measurements were taken by a single trained observer (V.J.). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS All consecutively born male infants at a community hospital were classified as having descended and or UDT. Testicular position in the undescended group was graded as high scrotal, inguinal or non-palpable. AGD (from the centre of anus to the junction of the smooth and rugated skin of scrotum) and SPL were measured. The AGD index (AGDi) was calculated by dividing AGD by cube root of birthweight. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Of the 1154 infants examined, 624 were males and 71 had UDT. AGD was significantly shorter in infants with UDT when compared with infants with descended testis (mean plus or minus SD; 2.21 plus or minus 0.36 versus 2.56 plus or minus 0.31 cm; P < 0.001). AGDi was also significantly shorter in infants with UDT (mean plus or minus SD; 1.68 plus or minus 0.27 versus 1.81 plus or minus 0.20 cm/kg super(-3); P < 0.001). Significance was maintained even when preterm (P < 0.001) and low birthweight boys (LBW) (P < 0.001) were excluded. SPL was also significantly shorter in infants with UDT (Mean plus or minus SD; 3.08 plus or minus 0.52 versus 3.31 plus or minus 0.38 cm; P < 0.001) but the significance was not maintained when preterm (P = 0.119) and LBW boys (P = 0.666) were excluded. Birthweight, gestational age and length adjusted regression models showed significantly shorter AGD in infants with UDT, but SPL was not different. Infants with higher position of testis appeared to have a shorter AGD and SPL but the correlation did not reach statistical significance. No difference in AGD or SPL was noted between boys with unilateral and bilateral UDT. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The present study did not include data pertaining to maternal or newborn health status. Also parental drug exposure or occupational exposures to endocrine-disrupting chemicals was not studied. These may possibly affect genital anthropometric measurements. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The study strengthens the hypothesis of existence of MPW in humans. Shorter AGD in cryptorchid infants may reflect the effect of androgen disruption or deficiency during MPW. AGD may be a more reliable non-invasive marker of androgen action during MPW than SPL to predict reproductive outcomes in humans. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Supported by Hypospadias Foundation, India. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
STUDY QUESTION Are the anogenital distance (AGD) and stretched penile length (SPL) shorter in human newborn males with cryptorchidism? SUMMARY ANSWER AGD is significantly shorter in boys with undescended testis (UDT) and this correlation may indicate that both have a common antecedent early in gestation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Animal studies have reported a critical time period during early gestation termed the male programming window (MPW) where androgen deficiency results in reduced AGD and penile length, as well as cryptorchidism and hypospadias. Two pilot human studies have explored this association but these studies were small and heterogeneous with regard to age, race and had selection bias. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A prospective descriptive study involving measurement of AGD and SPL at birth in a racially homogenous sample of 1154 consecutive newborns was performed over a period of 6 months. All measurements were taken by a single trained observer (V.J.). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS All consecutively born male infants at a community hospital were classified as having descended and or UDT. Testicular position in the undescended group was graded as high scrotal, inguinal or non-palpable. AGD (from the centre of anus to the junction of the smooth and rugated skin of scrotum) and SPL were measured. The AGD index (AGDi) was calculated by dividing AGD by cube root of birthweight. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Of the 1154 infants examined, 624 were males and 71 had UDT. AGD was significantly shorter in infants with UDT when compared with infants with descended testis (mean ± SD; 2.21 ± 0.36 versus 2.56 ± 0.31 cm; P < 0.001). AGDi was also significantly shorter in infants with UDT (mean ± SD; 1.68 ± 0.27 versus 1.81 ± 0.20 cm/kg−3; P < 0.001). Significance was maintained even when preterm (P < 0.001) and low birthweight boys (LBW) (P < 0.001) were excluded. SPL was also significantly shorter in infants with UDT (Mean ± SD; 3.08 ± 0.52 versus 3.31 ± 0.38 cm; P < 0.001) but the significance was not maintained when preterm (P = 0.119) and LBW boys (P = 0.666) were excluded. Birthweight, gestational age and length adjusted regression models showed significantly shorter AGD in infants with UDT, but SPL was not different. Infants with higher position of testis appeared to have a shorter AGD and SPL but the correlation did not reach statistical significance. No difference in AGD or SPL was noted between boys with unilateral and bilateral UDT. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The present study did not include data pertaining to maternal or newborn health status. Also parental drug exposure or occupational exposures to endocrine-disrupting chemicals was not studied. These may possibly affect genital anthropometric measurements. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The study strengthens the hypothesis of existence of MPW in humans. Shorter AGD in cryptorchid infants may reflect the effect of androgen disruption or deficiency during MPW. AGD may be a more reliable non-invasive marker of androgen action during MPW than SPL to predict reproductive outcomes in humans. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Supported by Hypospadias Foundation, India. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Are the anogenital distance (AGD) and stretched penile length (SPL) shorter in human newborn males with cryptorchidism? AGD is significantly shorter in boys with undescended testis (UDT) and this correlation may indicate that both have a common antecedent early in gestation. Animal studies have reported a critical time period during early gestation termed the male programming window (MPW) where androgen deficiency results in reduced AGD and penile length, as well as cryptorchidism and hypospadias. Two pilot human studies have explored this association but these studies were small and heterogeneous with regard to age, race and had selection bias. A prospective descriptive study involving measurement of AGD and SPL at birth in a racially homogenous sample of 1154 consecutive newborns was performed over a period of 6 months. All measurements were taken by a single trained observer (V.J.). All consecutively born male infants at a community hospital were classified as having descended and or UDT. Testicular position in the undescended group was graded as high scrotal, inguinal or non-palpable. AGD (from the centre of anus to the junction of the smooth and rugated skin of scrotum) and SPL were measured. The AGD index (AGDi) was calculated by dividing AGD by cube root of birthweight. Of the 1154 infants examined, 624 were males and 71 had UDT. AGD was significantly shorter in infants with UDT when compared with infants with descended testis (mean ± SD; 2.21 ± 0.36 versus 2.56 ± 0.31 cm; P < 0.001). AGDi was also significantly shorter in infants with UDT (mean ± SD; 1.68 ± 0.27 versus 1.81 ± 0.20 cm/kg⁻³; P < 0.001). Significance was maintained even when preterm (P < 0.001) and low birthweight boys (LBW) (P < 0.001) were excluded. SPL was also significantly shorter in infants with UDT (Mean ± SD; 3.08 ± 0.52 versus 3.31 ± 0.38 cm; P < 0.001) but the significance was not maintained when preterm (P = 0.119) and LBW boys (P = 0.666) were excluded. Birthweight, gestational age and length adjusted regression models showed significantly shorter AGD in infants with UDT, but SPL was not different. Infants with higher position of testis appeared to have a shorter AGD and SPL but the correlation did not reach statistical significance. No difference in AGD or SPL was noted between boys with unilateral and bilateral UDT. The present study did not include data pertaining to maternal or newborn health status. Also parental drug exposure or occupational exposures to endocrine-disrupting chemicals was not studied. These may possibly affect genital anthropometric measurements. The study strengthens the hypothesis of existence of MPW in humans. Shorter AGD in cryptorchid infants may reflect the effect of androgen disruption or deficiency during MPW. AGD may be a more reliable non-invasive marker of androgen action during MPW than SPL to predict reproductive outcomes in humans.
Author Jain, Viral G.
Singal, Arbinder Kumar
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Viral G.
  surname: Jain
  fullname: Jain, Viral G.
  organization: Department of Paediatrics, MGM Medical College and MGM University of Health Sciences, Sector 18, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra 410209, India
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Arbinder Kumar
  surname: Singal
  fullname: Singal, Arbinder Kumar
  organization: MITR Hospital & Hypospadias Foundation, Navi Mumbai, Kharghar, India
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23838161$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkcFv1TAMxiO0ib0NjlxRjlzK4iZNU25oGhvSJA7AuXJTlxfUJiVJNU3ijyfTe-OAhOCSxNbP9pfP5-zEB0-MvQLxFkQnL_fbEmm9HCnXRj9jO1BaVLVsxAnbiVqbCkDDGTtP6bsQ5Wn0c3ZWSyNNCXbs5-d9iJkiRx--kXcZZz66lNFb4jbESDNmSvze5T3f_EjJUjlHXpLZpXcceRmNbi6pp3r0eR_DGhbK0dkS4vyQXOLO86IWPfd0P4To0wt2OuGc6OXxvmBfP1x_ubqt7j7dfLx6f1dZ2Zlc0VC3rR2nqRmEVNhOACDqplaoRoCmU6gbpVszSS1goGGUgMaAVRonpZWRF-zNoe8aw4-tCO8XV_4xz-gpbKkHpaRs6xa6_0CLFtV0RhT09RHdhoXGfo1uwfjQP5lbgOoA2BhSijT9RkD0j8vrD8vrD8srvPyDt8XP7ILPsTj816qj4rCt_xjwC-AbsJk
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_dev180
crossref_primary_10_1289_ehp_1408163
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines11102618
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9092863
crossref_primary_10_1038_pr_2017_287
crossref_primary_10_1111_and_12403
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_dew115
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_4399
crossref_primary_10_7863_ultra_16_01006
crossref_primary_10_1111_andr_12059
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_deac079
crossref_primary_10_11648_j_sf_20240502_14
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrurol_2017_90
crossref_primary_10_1515_jpem_2021_0189
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2023_117598
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rbmo_2018_09_008
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_dey265
crossref_primary_10_18502_ijrm_v21i8_14016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rbmo_2018_08_020
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43032_022_01009_7
crossref_primary_10_1289_EHP522
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_dew163
crossref_primary_10_1210_en_2014_1534
crossref_primary_10_1111_and_13152
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rbmo_2020_04_019
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_deae025
crossref_primary_10_1111_andr_12544
crossref_primary_10_1111_andr_12863
crossref_primary_10_1042_BST20200200
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2018_08_055
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_dew052
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00204_018_2350_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_025_04429_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2016_08_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_reprotox_2019_08_007
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12978_022_01458_y
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_dev323
crossref_primary_10_1159_000519964
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12887_022_03325_y
crossref_primary_10_1111_andr_12156
crossref_primary_10_1080_19396368_2017_1401682
crossref_primary_10_1111_and_12507
crossref_primary_10_1289_ehp_1409637
crossref_primary_10_1093_molehr_gav060
crossref_primary_10_1172_jci_insight_91204
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijheh_2019_01_008
crossref_primary_10_18502_ijrm_v21i2_12801
crossref_primary_10_1002_jat_4377
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_dey244
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12020_020_02436_9
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_deu363
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10654_021_00793_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_10937404_2018_1505354
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_reprotox_2017_07_009
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_dex274
crossref_primary_10_1111_and_13571
crossref_primary_10_4111_icu_2018_59_1_55
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13148_022_01409_1
crossref_primary_10_1210_clinem_dgaa393
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5459
crossref_primary_10_1111_acer_13595
crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2021_696879
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2014_11_018
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_dey326
crossref_primary_10_1111_andr_12202
crossref_primary_10_1289_ehp_1510385
crossref_primary_10_1002_pros_23279
Cites_doi 10.1002/bdra.20707
10.1016/j.mce.2011.11.015
10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00810.x
10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02654.x
10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01190.x
10.1172/JCI34241
10.1093/humrep/des087
10.1111/ppe.12022
10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.11.001
10.1093/humrep/deh887
10.1016/S0890-6238(99)00036-2
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11516.x
10.1016/j.beem.2009.10.003
10.1289/ehp.1205221
10.1530/eje.1.02066
10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01005.x
10.1371/journal.pone.0018973
10.1289/ehp.0900881
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.07.030
10.1159/000207485
10.1186/1475-2891-11-100
10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01044.x
10.1186/1476-069X-3-8
10.1007/s003830050239
10.1007/BF03345105
10.1007/s11934-008-0025-0
10.1289/ehp.11226
10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181f20bed
10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01175.x
10.1093/humupd/dmm027
10.1093/humrep/deq323
10.1136/adc.2008.150219
10.1210/jc.2005-0302
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.026
10.1177/074823379901500106
10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15998-9
10.1210/en.2009-0700
10.1093/humrep/16.5.972
10.1289/ehp.1002635
10.1289/ehp.1103421
10.1007/BF02750875
10.1289/ehp.8100
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2013
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2013
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7T2
C1K
DOI 10.1093/humrep/det286
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
Health & Safety Science Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
Health & Safety Science Abstracts

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology
EISSN 1460-2350
EndPage 2349
ExternalDocumentID 23838161
10_1093_humrep_det286
10.1093/humrep/det286
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations India
GeographicLocations_xml – name: India
GroupedDBID ---
-E4
.2P
.55
.GJ
.I3
.XZ
.ZR
0R~
1TH
29I
2WC
3O-
4.4
482
48X
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
5WA
5WD
6.Y
70D
AABZA
AACZT
AAIMJ
AAJKP
AAJQQ
AAMDB
AAMVS
AAOGV
AAPGJ
AAPNW
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AARHZ
AASNB
AAUAY
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAVLN
AAWDT
AAYOK
ABEUO
ABIXL
ABJNI
ABKDP
ABMNT
ABNHQ
ABNKS
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABQNK
ABQTQ
ABSAR
ABSMQ
ABWST
ABXVV
ABZBJ
ACCCW
ACFRR
ACGFS
ACMRT
ACPQN
ACPRK
ACUFI
ACUTJ
ACUTO
ACYHN
ACZBC
ADBBV
ADEYI
ADEZT
ADGKP
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADHZD
ADIPN
ADJQC
ADOCK
ADQBN
ADRIX
ADRTK
ADVEK
ADYVW
ADZXQ
AEGPL
AEJOX
AEKPW
AEKSI
AELWJ
AEMDU
AENEX
AENZO
AEPUE
AETBJ
AEWNT
AFFNX
AFFZL
AFGWE
AFIYH
AFOFC
AFSHK
AFXAL
AFXEN
AFYAG
AGINJ
AGKEF
AGKRT
AGMDO
AGQXC
AGSYK
AGUTN
AHMBA
AHXPO
AIJHB
AJEEA
AKWXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
ANFBD
APIBT
APWMN
AQDSO
AQKUS
ARIXL
ASAOO
ASPBG
ATDFG
ATGXG
ATTQO
AVNTJ
AVWKF
AXUDD
AYOIW
AZFZN
BAWUL
BAYMD
BCRHZ
BEYMZ
BHONS
BQDIO
BSWAC
BTRTY
BVRKM
BZKNY
C1A
C45
CAG
CDBKE
COF
CS3
CXTWN
CZ4
DAKXR
DFGAJ
DIK
DILTD
DU5
D~K
E3Z
EBS
EE~
EIHJH
EJD
ELUNK
EMOBN
ENERS
F5P
F9B
FECEO
FEDTE
FHSFR
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FOTVD
FQBLK
GAUVT
GJXCC
GX1
H13
H5~
HAR
HVGLF
HW0
HZ~
IOX
J21
JXSIZ
KAQDR
KBUDW
KC5
KOP
KQ8
KSI
KSN
L7B
M-Z
M49
MBLQV
MBTAY
MHKGH
ML0
N9A
NGC
NLBLG
NOMLY
NOYVH
NTWIH
NU-
NVLIB
O0~
O9-
OAUYM
OAWHX
OBOKY
OCZFY
ODMLO
OHT
OJQWA
OJZSN
OK1
OPAEJ
OVD
OWPYF
O~Y
P2P
PAFKI
PB-
PEELM
PQQKQ
Q1.
Q5Y
QBD
R44
RD5
RIG
RNI
ROL
ROX
ROZ
RUSNO
RW1
RXO
RZF
RZO
TCN
TCURE
TEORI
TJX
TLC
TMA
TR2
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7H
X7M
YAYTL
YKOAZ
YXANX
ZGI
ZKX
ZXP
~91
AAYXX
ABDFA
ABEJV
ABGNP
ABPQP
ABVGC
ABXZS
ADNBA
AEMQT
AGORE
AHMMS
AJBYB
AJNCP
ALXQX
CITATION
ABNGD
AEHUL
AFFQV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7T2
C1K
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-eb277cdff5b034a7f11102524a4d11594a654678f3601bebd31a881c46af46483
ISSN 0268-1161
1460-2350
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 03:27:42 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 02:46:22 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:54:01 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:48 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:02:49 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 28 03:20:33 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9
Keywords anogenital distance
male programming window
testicular dysgenesis syndrome
cryptorchidism
endocrine-disrupting chemicals
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c398t-eb277cdff5b034a7f11102524a4d11594a654678f3601bebd31a881c46af46483
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
OpenAccessLink https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-pdf/28/9/2343/1631473/det286.pdf
PMID 23838161
PQID 1427745980
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1443372719
proquest_miscellaneous_1427745980
pubmed_primary_23838161
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_det286
crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_humrep_det286
oup_primary_10_1093_humrep_det286
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Human reproduction (Oxford)
PublicationTitleAlternate Hum Reprod
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford University Press
References Kristensen (17_38655816) 2011; 119
Thankamony (33_36467396) 2009; 117
(15_42184453) 2012; 27
Boas (3_21286972) 2006; 154
(7_46113434) 2012; 110
(21_45782673) 2010; 24
Main (20_34356578) 2009; 14
Hsieh (14_30929417) 2008; 9
Mital (23_12536552) 1972; 39
(5_19251280) 2005; 90
Mendiola (22_39419878) 2011; 119
Salazar-Martinez (27_18810233) 2004; 3
Ostby (13_10772613) 1999; 15
(25_19149269) 2005; 20
Brouwers (6_38768756) 2012; 8
Thonneau (35_17536702) 2003; 24
(18_38518063) 2011; 26
Thorup (36_38239925) 2010; 45
Toppari (37_38184579) 2010; 88
Virtanen (41_41353206) 2012; 355
Boisen (4_18143791) 2004; 363
(40_29900431) 2008; 14
Skakkebak (30_11135967) 2001; 16
Das (8_44294797) 2012; 11
Gallavan (11_6361771) 1999; 13
(24_45927627) 2013; 27
Ghirri (12_17246722) 2002; 25
(38_46113435) 2012; 121
Romano-Riquer (26_28397519) 2007; 21
Sathyanarayana (28_36618601) 2010; 33
Swan (32_19308108) 2005; 113
Macleod (19_36334313) 2010; 33
Suzuki (31_40200970) 2012; 35
(1_35087972) 2009; 94
Welsh (42_31012065) 2008; 118
van den Driesche (39_40054898) 2011; 34
Sharpe (29_30678041) 2008; 89
Thong (34_5818664) 1998; 13
Arbuckle (2_31545879) 2008; 116
(9_35727761) 2009; 150
Eisenberg (10_39965787) 2011; 6
Jensen (16_38056489) 2010; 21
25629115 - J Urol. 2014 Jul;192(1):181-2
References_xml – volume: 88
  start-page: 910
  issn: 1542-0752
  issue: 10
  year: 2010
  ident: 37_38184579
  publication-title: Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology
  doi: 10.1002/bdra.20707
– volume: 355
  start-page: 208
  issn: 0303-7207
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  ident: 41_41353206
  publication-title: Molecular and cellular endocrinology
  doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.11.015
– volume: 21
  start-page: 219
  issn: 0269-5022
  issue: 3
  year: 2007
  ident: 26_28397519
  publication-title: Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00810.x
– volume: 24
  start-page: 155
  issn: 0196-3635
  issue: 2
  year: 2003
  ident: 35_17536702
  publication-title: Journal of Andrology
  doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02654.x
– volume: 35
  start-page: 236
  issn: 0105-6263
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  ident: 31_40200970
  publication-title: International journal of andrology
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01190.x
– volume: 118
  start-page: 1479
  issn: 0021-9738
  issue: 4
  year: 2008
  ident: 42_31012065
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical Investigation
  doi: 10.1172/JCI34241
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1577
  issn: 0268-1161
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  ident: 15_42184453
  publication-title: Human Reproduction
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/des087
– volume: 27
  start-page: 89
  issn: 0269-5022
  year: 2013
  ident: 24_45927627
  publication-title: Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology
  doi: 10.1111/ppe.12022
– volume: 8
  start-page: 59
  issn: 1873-4898
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 6_38768756
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.11.001
– volume: 20
  start-page: 1928
  issn: 0268-1161
  issue: 7
  year: 2005
  ident: 25_19149269
  publication-title: Human Reproduction
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh887
– volume: 13
  start-page: 383
  issn: 0890-6238
  issue: 5
  year: 1999
  ident: 11_6361771
  publication-title: Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)
  doi: 10.1016/S0890-6238(99)00036-2
– volume: 110
  start-page: e707
  issn: 1464-4096
  year: 2012
  ident: 7_46113434
  publication-title: BJU international
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11516.x
– volume: 24
  start-page: 279
  issn: 1521-690X
  year: 2010
  ident: 21_45782673
  publication-title: Bailli  re's best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism
  doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2009.10.003
– volume: 121
  start-page: 125
  issn: 1552-9924
  year: 2012
  ident: 38_46113435
  publication-title: Environmental Health Perspectives
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205221
– volume: 154
  start-page: 125
  issn: 0804-4643
  issue: 1
  year: 2006
  ident: 3_21286972
  publication-title: European Journal of Endocrinology
  doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02066
– volume: 33
  start-page: 279
  issn: 0105-6263
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: 19_36334313
  publication-title: International journal of andrology
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01005.x
– volume: 6
  start-page: e18973
  issn: 1932-6203
  issue: 5
  year: 2011
  ident: 10_39965787
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018973
– volume: 117
  start-page: 1786
  issn: 1552-9924
  issue: 11
  year: 2009
  ident: 33_36467396
  publication-title: Environmental Health Perspectives
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900881
– volume: 45
  start-page: 2074
  issn: 0022-3468
  issue: 10
  year: 2010
  ident: 36_38239925
  publication-title: Journal of pediatric surgery
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.07.030
– volume: 14
  start-page: 167
  issn: 1421-7082
  year: 2009
  ident: 20_34356578
  publication-title: Endocrine development
  doi: 10.1159/000207485
– volume: 11
  start-page: 100
  issn: 1475-2891
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 8_44294797
  doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-100
– volume: 33
  start-page: 317
  issn: 0105-6263
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: 28_36618601
  publication-title: International journal of andrology
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01044.x
– volume: 3
  start-page: 8
  issn: 1476-069X
  issue: 1
  year: 2004
  ident: 27_18810233
  publication-title: Environmental health : a global access science source [electronic resource]
  doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-3-8
– volume: 13
  start-page: 37
  issn: 0179-0358
  issue: 1
  year: 1998
  ident: 34_5818664
  publication-title: Pediatric surgery international
  doi: 10.1007/s003830050239
– volume: 25
  start-page: 709
  issn: 0391-4097
  issue: 8
  year: 2002
  ident: 12_17246722
  publication-title: Journal of endocrinological investigation
  doi: 10.1007/BF03345105
– volume: 9
  start-page: 137
  issn: 1527-2737
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  ident: 14_30929417
  publication-title: Current urology reports
  doi: 10.1007/s11934-008-0025-0
– volume: 116
  start-page: 948
  issn: 1552-9924
  issue: 7
  year: 2008
  ident: 2_31545879
  publication-title: Environmental Health Perspectives
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.11226
– volume: 21
  start-page: 779
  issn: 1044-3983
  issue: 6
  year: 2010
  ident: 16_38056489
  publication-title: Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
  doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181f20bed
– volume: 34
  start-page: e578
  issn: 0105-6263
  issue: 6 Pt 2
  year: 2011
  ident: 39_40054898
  publication-title: International journal of andrology
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01175.x
– volume: 14
  start-page: 49
  issn: 1355-4786
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 40_29900431
  publication-title: Human Reproduction Update
  doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmm027
– volume: 26
  start-page: 235
  issn: 0268-1161
  issue: 1
  year: 2011
  ident: 18_38518063
  publication-title: Human Reproduction
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq323
– volume: 94
  start-page: 868
  issn: 0003-9888
  issue: 11
  year: 2009
  ident: 1_35087972
  publication-title: Archives of Disease in Childhood
  doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.150219
– volume: 90
  start-page: 4041
  issn: 0021-972X
  issue: 7
  year: 2005
  ident: 5_19251280
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0302
– volume: 89
  start-page: e33
  issn: 0015-0282
  issue: 2 Suppl
  year: 2008
  ident: 29_30678041
  publication-title: Fertility and sterility
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.026
– volume: 15
  start-page: 48
  issn: 0748-2337
  issue: 1-2
  year: 1999
  ident: 13_10772613
  publication-title: Toxicology and Industrial Health
  doi: 10.1177/074823379901500106
– volume: 363
  start-page: 1264
  issn: 0140-6736
  issue: 9417
  year: 2004
  ident: 4_18143791
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15998-9
– volume: 150
  start-page: 5055
  issn: 0013-7227
  issue: 11
  year: 2009
  ident: 9_35727761
  publication-title: Endocrinology
  doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0700
– volume: 16
  start-page: 972
  issn: 0268-1161
  issue: 5
  year: 2001
  ident: 30_11135967
  publication-title: Human Reproduction
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.972
– volume: 119
  start-page: 534
  issn: 1552-9924
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  ident: 17_38655816
  publication-title: Environmental Health Perspectives
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002635
– volume: 119
  start-page: 958
  issn: 1552-9924
  issue: 7
  year: 2011
  ident: 22_39419878
  publication-title: Environmental Health Perspectives
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103421
– volume: 39
  start-page: 171
  issn: 0019-5456
  issue: 292
  year: 1972
  ident: 23_12536552
  publication-title: Indian journal of pediatrics
  doi: 10.1007/BF02750875
– volume: 113
  start-page: 1056
  issn: 1552-9924
  issue: 8
  year: 2005
  ident: 32_19308108
  publication-title: Environmental Health Perspectives
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.8100
– reference: 25629115 - J Urol. 2014 Jul;192(1):181-2
SSID ssj0016186
Score 2.3905618
Snippet STUDY QUESTION Are the anogenital distance (AGD) and stretched penile length (SPL) shorter in human newborn males with cryptorchidism? SUMMARY ANSWER AGD is...
Are the anogenital distance (AGD) and stretched penile length (SPL) shorter in human newborn males with cryptorchidism? AGD is significantly shorter in boys...
Are the anogenital distance (AGD) and stretched penile length (SPL) shorter in human newborn males with cryptorchidism?STUDY QUESTIONAre the anogenital...
STUDY QUESTION Are the anogenital distance (AGD) and stretched penile length (SPL) shorter in human newborn males with cryptorchidism? SUMMARY ANSWER AGD is...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
oup
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 2343
SubjectTerms Abnormalities, Multiple - epidemiology
Abnormalities, Multiple - pathology
Age
Algorithms
Biomarkers
Birth Weight
Body Height
Cohort Studies
Cryptorchidism - epidemiology
Cryptorchidism - pathology
Fetal Development
Gestational Age
Hospitals, Community
Humans
Hypospadias - epidemiology
Hypospadias - pathology
Incidence
India - epidemiology
Infant, Low Birth Weight
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Male
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Title Shorter anogenital distance correlates with undescended testis: a detailed genital anthropometric analysis in human newborns
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23838161
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1427745980
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1443372719
Volume 28
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fb9MwELZgSIgXBB2w8ktGQn2h2ZLYSR3eJrRpjDGQ1qK-RY7riEpbitrsoYg_njufk7aiwOAlSiPbSXxfnTvf3XeMvcaiRsKYMlAxuhm1NUGhygQUOVCHtYiFLFy0xXl6MpKn42S8Cgly2SV1sW--b80r-R-pwjWQK2bJ_oNk20HhApyDfOEIEobjjWR88RVDZTEKcgZtsPwHOlxqlwVgsOzGJWqStNeKyWLI3DQBDbNGao0F5TlTDClcbEbQvnTCFdbaQjJXz1oyrXxBP1DEATh-l8_rteQLQIZMRyBLmFKUjbi22XCqibLgyxR5AdqyXhdYl5uiBeYF8jfO37jQ7_UtCSwPkTVbErRyxSmYphGxrO9bWlllGgaxIJbZZumN1RrEsvV1VBB5k_8mw89s63pPXFjw9vCCcAJTFm9j1j7_lB-Pzs7y4dF4eJvdicGkcOb3-w-txwnrBtB-HD2652OFGxzQ8Ac0-Ib-spET-Ytp4lSU4QN239sW_JCA8pDdslWH7R5Wup5dLXmPu2hf50bpsLsffVBFh_U-E335ss-Hq2y8Rd_1aInNl7vsh8cbX-GNN3jjK7xxxBtfwxsnvL3lmjdo403_TbTxBm18WnGHNt6g7REbHR8N350EvnpHYESm6sAWMM1mUpZJEQqpByV8VUHBjqWWEzBDMqkxj26gSpGGUWGLiYi0UpGRqS5lKpV4zHaqWWX3GE9AiS4TGw5sYqSFT7QygyJWUVroRMps0GX9Ria58dT2WGHlMqcQC5GTCHMSYZf12ubfiNPldw1fgYD_2qYRfw4rM7rbdGVn1wswqmECZJKp8E9tpBBgQkRZlz0h7LS3A2UavfrR0xv0fsburf6Iz9lOPb-2L0BbrouXDuY_AWmCyMg
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shorter+anogenital+distance+correlates+with+undescended+testis%3A+a+detailed+genital+anthropometric+analysis+in+human+newborns&rft.jtitle=Human+reproduction+%28Oxford%29&rft.au=Jain%2C+Viral+G&rft.au=Singal%2C+Arbinder+Kumar&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2343&rft.epage=2349&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fhumrep%2Fdet286&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0268-1161&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0268-1161&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0268-1161&client=summon