Balanced crystalloid compared with balanced colloid solution using a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm
Controversy exists regarding the optimal i.v. fluids for use with a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm. In a double-blind pilot study, we randomly assigned 50 patients with primary ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery to receive either balanced crystalloid or balanced starch (HES, 130/0...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA Vol. 110; no. 2; pp. 231 - 240 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.02.2013
Oxford University Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Controversy exists regarding the optimal i.v. fluids for use with a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.
In a double-blind pilot study, we randomly assigned 50 patients with primary ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery to receive either balanced crystalloid or balanced starch (HES, 130/0.4, 6%) solutions up to the dose limit (50 ml kg−1). Fluids were administered to optimize stroke volume measured by oesophageal Doppler within a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.
Baseline subject characteristics were similar in both groups. The balanced HES solution maintained stroke volume (P=0.012) better with administration of less fluid. Subjects in the colloid group reached the dose limits of the study medication less frequently (92% vs 62%, P=0.036) and later (2:26 vs 3:33 h, P=0.006) and also required less transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma units (6.0 vs 3.5 units, P=0.035) compared with the crystalloid group. Intra- and postoperative urine output and perioperative plasma levels of creatinine and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as renal injury marker were similar in both groups. No differences in the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay were found.
Using a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm to optimize stroke volume, a balanced HES solution is associated with better haemodynamic stability and reduced need for fresh-frozen plasma. There were no signs of renal impairment by colloid solutions when fluid administration is targeted to optimize cardiac preload. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Controversy exists regarding the optimal i.v. fluids for use with a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.
In a double-blind pilot study, we randomly assigned 50 patients with primary ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery to receive either balanced crystalloid or balanced starch (HES, 130/0.4, 6%) solutions up to the dose limit (50 ml kg−1). Fluids were administered to optimize stroke volume measured by oesophageal Doppler within a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.
Baseline subject characteristics were similar in both groups. The balanced HES solution maintained stroke volume (P=0.012) better with administration of less fluid. Subjects in the colloid group reached the dose limits of the study medication less frequently (92% vs 62%, P=0.036) and later (2:26 vs 3:33 h, P=0.006) and also required less transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma units (6.0 vs 3.5 units, P=0.035) compared with the crystalloid group. Intra- and postoperative urine output and perioperative plasma levels of creatinine and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as renal injury marker were similar in both groups. No differences in the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay were found.
Using a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm to optimize stroke volume, a balanced HES solution is associated with better haemodynamic stability and reduced need for fresh-frozen plasma. There were no signs of renal impairment by colloid solutions when fluid administration is targeted to optimize cardiac preload. Background Controversy exists regarding the optimal i.v. fluids for use with a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm. Methods In a double-blind pilot study, we randomly assigned 50 patients with primary ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery to receive either balanced crystalloid or balanced starch (HES, 130/0.4, 6%) solutions up to the dose limit (50 ml kg−1). Fluids were administered to optimize stroke volume measured by oesophageal Doppler within a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm. Results Baseline subject characteristics were similar in both groups. The balanced HES solution maintained stroke volume (P=0.012) better with administration of less fluid. Subjects in the colloid group reached the dose limits of the study medication less frequently (92% vs 62%, P=0.036) and later (2:26 vs 3:33 h, P=0.006) and also required less transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma units (6.0 vs 3.5 units, P=0.035) compared with the crystalloid group. Intra- and postoperative urine output and perioperative plasma levels of creatinine and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as renal injury marker were similar in both groups. No differences in the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay were found. Conclusions Using a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm to optimize stroke volume, a balanced HES solution is associated with better haemodynamic stability and reduced need for fresh-frozen plasma. There were no signs of renal impairment by colloid solutions when fluid administration is targeted to optimize cardiac preload. Controversy exists regarding the optimal i.v. fluids for use with a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.BACKGROUNDControversy exists regarding the optimal i.v. fluids for use with a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.In a double-blind pilot study, we randomly assigned 50 patients with primary ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery to receive either balanced crystalloid or balanced starch (HES, 130/0.4, 6%) solutions up to the dose limit (50 ml kg(-1)). Fluids were administered to optimize stroke volume measured by oesophageal Doppler within a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.METHODSIn a double-blind pilot study, we randomly assigned 50 patients with primary ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery to receive either balanced crystalloid or balanced starch (HES, 130/0.4, 6%) solutions up to the dose limit (50 ml kg(-1)). Fluids were administered to optimize stroke volume measured by oesophageal Doppler within a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.Baseline subject characteristics were similar in both groups. The balanced HES solution maintained stroke volume (P=0.012) better with administration of less fluid. Subjects in the colloid group reached the dose limits of the study medication less frequently (92% vs 62%, P=0.036) and later (2:26 vs 3:33 h, P=0.006) and also required less transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma units (6.0 vs 3.5 units, P=0.035) compared with the crystalloid group. Intra- and postoperative urine output and perioperative plasma levels of creatinine and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as renal injury marker were similar in both groups. No differences in the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay were found.RESULTSBaseline subject characteristics were similar in both groups. The balanced HES solution maintained stroke volume (P=0.012) better with administration of less fluid. Subjects in the colloid group reached the dose limits of the study medication less frequently (92% vs 62%, P=0.036) and later (2:26 vs 3:33 h, P=0.006) and also required less transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma units (6.0 vs 3.5 units, P=0.035) compared with the crystalloid group. Intra- and postoperative urine output and perioperative plasma levels of creatinine and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as renal injury marker were similar in both groups. No differences in the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay were found.Using a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm to optimize stroke volume, a balanced HES solution is associated with better haemodynamic stability and reduced need for fresh-frozen plasma. There were no signs of renal impairment by colloid solutions when fluid administration is targeted to optimize cardiac preload.CONCLUSIONSUsing a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm to optimize stroke volume, a balanced HES solution is associated with better haemodynamic stability and reduced need for fresh-frozen plasma. There were no signs of renal impairment by colloid solutions when fluid administration is targeted to optimize cardiac preload. Controversy exists regarding the optimal i.v. fluids for use with a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm. In a double-blind pilot study, we randomly assigned 50 patients with primary ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery to receive either balanced crystalloid or balanced starch (HES, 130/0.4, 6%) solutions up to the dose limit (50 ml kg(-1)). Fluids were administered to optimize stroke volume measured by oesophageal Doppler within a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm. Baseline subject characteristics were similar in both groups. The balanced HES solution maintained stroke volume (P=0.012) better with administration of less fluid. Subjects in the colloid group reached the dose limits of the study medication less frequently (92% vs 62%, P=0.036) and later (2:26 vs 3:33 h, P=0.006) and also required less transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma units (6.0 vs 3.5 units, P=0.035) compared with the crystalloid group. Intra- and postoperative urine output and perioperative plasma levels of creatinine and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as renal injury marker were similar in both groups. No differences in the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay were found. Using a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm to optimize stroke volume, a balanced HES solution is associated with better haemodynamic stability and reduced need for fresh-frozen plasma. There were no signs of renal impairment by colloid solutions when fluid administration is targeted to optimize cardiac preload. |
Author | Jones, A. Fotopoulou, C. Wernecke, K.-D. Feldheiser, A. Spies, C. Sehouli, J. Pavlova, V. Bonomo, T. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: A. surname: Feldheiser fullname: Feldheiser, A. organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 2 givenname: V. surname: Pavlova fullname: Pavlova, V. organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 3 givenname: T. surname: Bonomo fullname: Bonomo, T. organization: UO di Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, ospedale Luigi Sacco, Milan, Italy – sequence: 4 givenname: A. surname: Jones fullname: Jones, A. organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 5 givenname: C. surname: Fotopoulou fullname: Fotopoulou, C. organization: Department of Gynaecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 6 givenname: J. surname: Sehouli fullname: Sehouli, J. organization: Department of Gynaecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 7 givenname: K.-D. surname: Wernecke fullname: Wernecke, K.-D. organization: Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin and SOSTANA GmbH Berlin, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 8 givenname: C. surname: Spies fullname: Spies, C. email: claudia.spies@charite.de organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23112214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1URLeFCz8A5YKEkEI9trNOjlCVD6kSFzhbY2eydeXEi50U7b_H25QeUMXJI_t5X8nPnLGTKU7E2GvgH4B38sLe4gVSllo_YxtQGuqt1nDCNpxzXfMOxCk7y_mWc9Cia16wUyEBhAC1Yf4TBpwc9ZVLhzxjCNGXOY57TOXyt59vKvuIxPU5x7DMPk7Vkv20q7DaRQx17xO5uWA3SGPsDxOO3lUYdjGVlvElez5gyPTq4TxnPz9f_bj8Wl9___Lt8uN17WTXzjVa1bQWh9Y2uh2EVQI73bt-6KRtoYOml0CD3oJSDoQk1UhBQkkrFG-5RnnO3q29-xR_LZRnM_rsKJQ_UFyyAaFl0_Ct5gV984AudqTe7JMfMR3MXz0FeL8CLsWcEw2PCHBzdG-Ke7O6LzD_B3Z-xqOnOaEPT0ferpG47P9frVaOirg7T8lk5-m4k3vnpo_-qdgfFCWoDQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000000186 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00595_018_1752_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12630_014_0266_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anrea_2019_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1097_EJA_0000000000000780 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2019_08_027 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_017_0320_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2020_00597 crossref_primary_10_1093_bja_aeu241 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redar_2015_06_011 crossref_primary_10_1093_bja_aev181 crossref_primary_10_1177_0267659114540022 crossref_primary_10_1111_vec_12283 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000000596 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000010579 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redare_2015_10_002 crossref_primary_10_1155_2020_2170828 crossref_primary_10_1093_bja_aeu015 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_020_01051_5 crossref_primary_10_1111_aas_13100 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2014_07_003 crossref_primary_10_1111_aas_12651 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2021_06_040 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_016_4080_3 crossref_primary_10_5812_ircmj_41729 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10081651 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00540_017_2416_1 crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000001936 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000007357 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10877_021_00686_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_annfar_2013_05_006 crossref_primary_10_1097_MCC_0000000000000049 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjane_2021_12_012 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jvca_2014_07_008 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0303165 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jvca_2015_03_027 crossref_primary_10_1093_bjaceaccp_mkt035 crossref_primary_10_3346_jkms_2022_37_e71 crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_14932 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjane_2021_10_009 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_015_1085_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00068_018_0980_1 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000004498 crossref_primary_10_1111_trf_14627 crossref_primary_10_1080_22201173_2013_10872922 crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0b013e31829fffdb crossref_primary_10_1007_s00134_016_4329_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13613_014_0038_4 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13741_021_00182_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjan_2014_07_003 crossref_primary_10_1051_ject_201547090 crossref_primary_10_1093_bja_aet303 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_022_09758_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anrea_2016_08_002 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0b013e3182969219 crossref_primary_10_1097_ANA_0000000000000046 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_020_01126_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redare_2017_02_009 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000002108 crossref_primary_10_1177_0300060513509548 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00101_019_00706_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_018_0677_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mjafi_2014_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000000021 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00101_013_2220_8 crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0000000000008762 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13054_016_1237_1 crossref_primary_10_1155_2024_4386447 crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_24828 crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000002603 crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000002601 crossref_primary_10_3109_00365513_2014_891259 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00540_013_1719_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjanes_2014_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000003663 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2017_10_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redar_2016_03_003 crossref_primary_10_19163_1994_9480_2019_1_69__16_22 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00540_020_02832_5 crossref_primary_10_2478_raon_2022_0035 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12010260 crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000000413 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redare_2015_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13741_024_00445_0 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000000564 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000003796 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redar_2017_02_008 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0b013e318296913f crossref_primary_10_3238_arztebl_2013_0443 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00134_013_2854_7 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13741_015_0014_z crossref_primary_10_1186_s13054_018_2055_4 crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0000000000000194 crossref_primary_10_1097_EJA_0000000000000447 crossref_primary_10_1093_bja_aeu422 crossref_primary_10_1097_EJA_0000000000000328 crossref_primary_10_1111_vec_12208 crossref_primary_10_1097_MCC_0b013e3283632de6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redar_2015_06_013 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000004926 crossref_primary_10_1093_bja_aet294 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0172806 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1749_1686 crossref_primary_10_1111_aas_13713 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjane_2014_07_018 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000003564 crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000004040 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_023_03738_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_020_04336_9 crossref_primary_10_1097_DCR_0000000000002650 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13741_024_00381_z crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000005903 crossref_primary_10_1002_jbm_b_33367 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_020_01128_1 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jvca_2014_04_016 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13049_018_0477_2 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00268-008-9881-5 10.1093/bja/aei223 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00840.x 10.1093/annonc/mdi961 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00008 10.1007/s11605-010-1333-5 10.1186/11358 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f79337 10.1016/S0008-6363(97)00226-5 10.1007/s00134-006-0195-5 10.1002/bjs.5454 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60878-8 10.1002/bjs.6552 10.1002/jso.21288 10.1056/NEJMoa070716 10.1017/S0029665110001734 10.1097/00000542-200210000-00012 10.1056/NEJMoa1204242 10.1378/chest.07-2331 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae 10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23 10.1093/bja/aer229 10.1097/01.CCM.0000249851.94101.4F |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 The Author(s) The Author [2012]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2012 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 The Author(s) – notice: The Author [2012]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2012 |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1093/bja/aes377 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1471-6771 |
EndPage | 240 |
ExternalDocumentID | 23112214 10_1093_bja_aes377 10.1093/bja/aes377 S0007091217328076 |
Genre | Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -E4 .2P .55 .GJ .I3 .XZ .ZR 18M 1TH 23N 2WC 354 3O- 4.4 482 48X 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 5WA 6.Y 6I. 6PF 70D AACTN AAEDW AAESY AAFTH AAIAV AAIYJ AAJKP AALRI AAMVS AAOGV AAPNW AAPXW AAQQT AAUQX AAVAP AAWTL AAXUO ABEUO ABIXL ABJNI ABKDP ABLJU ABMAC ABNKS ABPTD ABQLI ABQTQ ABSMQ ABVKL ABXVV ABZBJ ACCJX ACFRR ACGFO ACGFS ACMRT ACPQN ACUFI ACUTJ ACUTO ADBBV ADEYI ADHKW ADHZD ADJQC ADOCK ADORX ADQLU ADRIX ADZXQ AEGPL AEJOX AEKPW AEMDU AENEX AENZO AEPUE AEWNT AFFNX AFIYH AFOSN AFTJW AFXEN AGKEF AGKRT AGSYK AHMBA AHPSJ AHXPO AI. AIAGR AIJHB AITUG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC AMRAJ APIBT APWMN ASPBG AVWKF AWCFO AXUDD AZFZN BAWUL BEYMZ BGYMP BHONS BVRKM BZKNY C1A C45 CAG COF CS3 CZ4 DIK DILTD DU5 D~K E3Z EBS EE~ EJD F5P F9B FDB FEDTE GX1 H5~ HAR HVGLF HW0 HZ~ IH2 IOX J21 J5H KAQDR KC5 KOP KQ8 KSI KSN L7B M-Z M41 M49 N9A NCXOZ NGC NTWIH NU- O0~ OAWHX OHH OJQWA OJZSN OK1 OVD O~Y P2P PB- PEELM PQQKQ Q1. Q5Y R44 RD5 RHF RNI ROL ROX ROZ RW1 RXO RZF RZO SSZ TEORI TJX TMA TR2 VH1 W2D W8F WH7 WOQ WOW X7H X7M YHG ZA5 ZGI ZKX ZXP ~91 0R~ 0SF ADVLN AFETI AFSHK AGMDO AKRWK H13 AAFWJ AAYWO AAYXX ABEJV ABGNP ABNGD ACUKT ACVCV ACVFH ADCNI AEHUL AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AIGII AKBMS AKYEP APJGH APXCP CITATION P0W CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-ab458baf8b578f2b42a97dcdf93b81915d31ef76144c123e4532e243b240807a3 |
ISSN | 0007-0912 1471-6771 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 00:58:12 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:40:50 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:18 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:00:57 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 11 04:47:48 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 02:19:38 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | renal function goal-directed therapy transfusion balanced starch solution haemodynamic monitoring ovarian cancer |
Language | English |
License | http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0 https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c398t-ab458baf8b578f2b42a97dcdf93b81915d31ef76144c123e4532e243b240807a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
OpenAccessLink | https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes377 |
PMID | 23112214 |
PQID | 1273550670 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1273550670 pubmed_primary_23112214 crossref_primary_10_1093_bja_aes377 crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_bja_aes377 oup_primary_10_1093_bja_aes377 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1093_bja_aes377 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2013-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2013 text: 2013-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Br J Anaesth |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Br J Anaesth |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Oxford University Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Oxford University Press |
References | Dindo, Demartines, Clavien (bib12) 2004; 240 Noblett, Snowden, Shenton, Horgan (bib6) 2006; 93 Brunkhorst, Engel, Bloos (bib9) 2008; 358 Pries, Secomb, Sperandio, Gaehtgens (bib16) 1998; 37 Wakeling, McFall, Jenkins (bib7) 2005; 95 Prytherch, Whiteley, Higgins, Weaver, Prout, Powell (bib23) 1998; 85 Dart, Mutter, Ruth, Taback (bib10) 2010 James, Michell, Joubert, Nicol, Navsaria, Gillespie (bib17) 2011; 107 Gan, Soppitt, Maroof (bib5) 2002; 97 Marik, Baram, Vahid (bib20) 2008; 134 Osman, Ridel, Ray (bib21) 2007; 35 Varadhan, Lobo (bib4) 2010; 69 Perner, Haase, Guttormsen (bib18) 2012; 367 Sehouli, Senyuva, Fotopoulou (bib3) 2009; 99 Cunningham, Kavic (bib11) 2009; 33 Brandstrup, Tonnesen, Beier-Holgersen (bib13) 2003; 238 Rahbari, Zimmermann, Schmidt, Koch, Weigand, Weitz (bib8) 2009; 96 Jammer, Ulvik, Erichsen, Lodemel, Ostgaard (bib22) 2010; 113 Weiser, Regenbogen, Thompson (bib1) 2008; 372 Richards, Leitch, Horgan, McMillan (bib24) 2010; 14 du Bois, Quinn, Thigpen (bib2) 2005; 16 Nisanevich, Felsenstein, Almogy, Weissman, Einav, Matot (bib14) 2005; 103 Verheij, van Lingen, Beishuizen (bib15) 2006; 32 Guidet, Martinet, Boulain (bib19) 2012; 16 Rahbari (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib8) 2009; 96 Dart (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib10) 2010 Verheij (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib15) 2006; 32 Perner (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib18) 2012; 367 Wakeling (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib7) 2005; 95 Guidet (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib19) 2012; 16 Jammer (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib22) 2010; 113 Weiser (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib1) 2008; 372 Brandstrup (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib13) 2003; 238 Brunkhorst (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib9) 2008; 358 Cunningham (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib11) 2009; 33 Marik (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib20) 2008; 134 Noblett (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib6) 2006; 93 Osman (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib21) 2007; 35 Gan (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib5) 2002; 97 Nisanevich (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib14) 2005; 103 Richards (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib24) 2010; 14 du Bois (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib2) 2005; 16 Pries (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib16) 1998; 37 James (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib17) 2011; 107 Sehouli (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib3) 2009; 99 Varadhan (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib4) 2010; 69 Dindo (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib12) 2004; 240 Prytherch (10.1093/bja/aes377_bib23) 1998; 85 |
References_xml | – volume: 14 start-page: 1511 year: 2010 end-page: 1520 ident: bib24 article-title: A systematic review of POSSUM and its related models as predictors of post-operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg – volume: 372 start-page: 139 year: 2008 end-page: 144 ident: bib1 article-title: An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data publication-title: Lancet – volume: 367 start-page: 124 year: 2012 end-page: 134 ident: bib18 article-title: Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer’s acetate in severe sepsis publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 33 start-page: 1099 year: 2009 end-page: 1100 ident: bib11 article-title: What is a surgical complication? publication-title: World J Surg – start-page: CD007594 year: 2010 ident: bib10 article-title: Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online) – volume: 37 start-page: 225 year: 1998 end-page: 235 ident: bib16 article-title: Blood flow resistance during hemodilution: effect of plasma composition publication-title: Cardiovasc Res – volume: 240 start-page: 205 year: 2004 end-page: 213 ident: bib12 article-title: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 69 start-page: 488 year: 2010 end-page: 498 ident: bib4 article-title: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right publication-title: Proc Nutr Soc – volume: 16 start-page: viii7 year: 2005 end-page: vii12 ident: bib2 article-title: 2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (GCIG OCCC 2004) publication-title: Ann Oncol – volume: 35 start-page: 64 year: 2007 end-page: 68 ident: bib21 article-title: Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge publication-title: Crit Care Med – volume: 97 start-page: 820 year: 2002 end-page: 826 ident: bib5 article-title: Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 95 start-page: 634 year: 2005 end-page: 642 ident: bib7 article-title: Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery publication-title: Br J Anaesth – volume: 85 start-page: 1217 year: 1998 end-page: 1220 ident: bib23 article-title: POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 99 start-page: 424 year: 2009 end-page: 427 ident: bib3 article-title: Intra-abdominal tumor dissemination pattern and surgical outcome in 214 patients with primary ovarian cancer publication-title: J Surg Oncol – volume: 113 start-page: 1072 year: 2010 end-page: 1080 ident: bib22 article-title: Does central venous oxygen saturation-directed fluid therapy affect postoperative morbidity after colorectal surgery? A randomized assessor-blinded controlled trial publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 96 start-page: 331 year: 2009 end-page: 341 ident: bib8 article-title: Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 134 start-page: 172 year: 2008 end-page: 178 ident: bib20 article-title: Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares publication-title: Chest – volume: 358 start-page: 125 year: 2008 end-page: 139 ident: bib9 article-title: Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 93 start-page: 1069 year: 2006 end-page: 1076 ident: bib6 article-title: Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 103 start-page: 25 year: 2005 end-page: 32 ident: bib14 article-title: Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 32 start-page: 1030 year: 2006 end-page: 1038 ident: bib15 article-title: Cardiac response is greater for colloid than saline fluid loading after cardiac or vascular surgery publication-title: Intensive Care Med – volume: 107 start-page: 693 year: 2011 end-page: 702 ident: bib17 article-title: Resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch improves renal function and lactate clearance in penetrating trauma in a randomized controlled study: the FIRST trial (Fluids in Resuscitation of Severe Trauma) publication-title: Br J Anaesth – volume: 16 start-page: R94 year: 2012 ident: bib19 article-title: Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6% hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9% NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study publication-title: Crit Care – volume: 238 start-page: 641 year: 2003 end-page: 648 ident: bib13 article-title: Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 33 start-page: 1099 year: 2009 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib11 article-title: What is a surgical complication? publication-title: World J Surg doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9881-5 – volume: 95 start-page: 634 year: 2005 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib7 article-title: Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aei223 – volume: 85 start-page: 1217 year: 1998 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib23 article-title: POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00840.x – volume: 16 start-page: viii7 issue: Suppl. 8 year: 2005 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib2 article-title: 2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (GCIG OCCC 2004) publication-title: Ann Oncol doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi961 – volume: 103 start-page: 25 year: 2005 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib14 article-title: Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00008 – volume: 14 start-page: 1511 year: 2010 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib24 article-title: A systematic review of POSSUM and its related models as predictors of post-operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1333-5 – volume: 16 start-page: R94 year: 2012 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib19 article-title: Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6% hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9% NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study publication-title: Crit Care doi: 10.1186/11358 – volume: 113 start-page: 1072 year: 2010 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib22 article-title: Does central venous oxygen saturation-directed fluid therapy affect postoperative morbidity after colorectal surgery? A randomized assessor-blinded controlled trial publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f79337 – volume: 37 start-page: 225 year: 1998 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib16 article-title: Blood flow resistance during hemodilution: effect of plasma composition publication-title: Cardiovasc Res doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(97)00226-5 – volume: 32 start-page: 1030 year: 2006 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib15 article-title: Cardiac response is greater for colloid than saline fluid loading after cardiac or vascular surgery publication-title: Intensive Care Med doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0195-5 – start-page: CD007594 year: 2010 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib10 article-title: Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online) – volume: 93 start-page: 1069 year: 2006 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib6 article-title: Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.5454 – volume: 372 start-page: 139 year: 2008 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib1 article-title: An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60878-8 – volume: 96 start-page: 331 year: 2009 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib8 article-title: Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.6552 – volume: 99 start-page: 424 year: 2009 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib3 article-title: Intra-abdominal tumor dissemination pattern and surgical outcome in 214 patients with primary ovarian cancer publication-title: J Surg Oncol doi: 10.1002/jso.21288 – volume: 358 start-page: 125 year: 2008 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib9 article-title: Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070716 – volume: 69 start-page: 488 year: 2010 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib4 article-title: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right publication-title: Proc Nutr Soc doi: 10.1017/S0029665110001734 – volume: 97 start-page: 820 year: 2002 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib5 article-title: Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-200210000-00012 – volume: 367 start-page: 124 year: 2012 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib18 article-title: Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer’s acetate in severe sepsis publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1204242 – volume: 134 start-page: 172 year: 2008 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib20 article-title: Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares publication-title: Chest doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2331 – volume: 240 start-page: 205 year: 2004 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib12 article-title: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae – volume: 238 start-page: 641 year: 2003 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib13 article-title: Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23 – volume: 107 start-page: 693 year: 2011 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib17 article-title: Resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch improves renal function and lactate clearance in penetrating trauma in a randomized controlled study: the FIRST trial (Fluids in Resuscitation of Severe Trauma) publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aer229 – volume: 35 start-page: 64 year: 2007 ident: 10.1093/bja/aes377_bib21 article-title: Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge publication-title: Crit Care Med doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000249851.94101.4F |
SSID | ssj0017295 |
Score | 2.4389117 |
Snippet | Controversy exists regarding the optimal i.v. fluids for use with a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.
In a double-blind pilot study, we randomly assigned... Background Controversy exists regarding the optimal i.v. fluids for use with a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm. Methods In a double-blind pilot study, we... Controversy exists regarding the optimal i.v. fluids for use with a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.BACKGROUNDControversy exists regarding the optimal... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref oup elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 231 |
SubjectTerms | Algorithms balanced starch solution Blood Pressure - drug effects Blood Pressure - physiology Cardiotonic Agents - therapeutic use Double-Blind Method Endpoint Determination Fluid Therapy goal-directed therapy haemodynamic monitoring Hemodynamics - drug effects Hemodynamics - physiology Humans Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - therapeutic use Intraoperative Period Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use Length of Stay ovarian cancer Patient Selection Perfusion Pharmaceutical Solutions Pilot Projects Plasma Substitutes - therapeutic use renal function Stroke Volume - drug effects Stroke Volume - physiology transfusion Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use |
Title | Balanced crystalloid compared with balanced colloid solution using a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes377 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23112214 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1273550670 |
Volume | 110 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELfKeOEFMfFVPiYjeEGVt8RxmvRxnYYmEEhIHdpbZMf22ilrUD8mwQv_Ouf4o8la0OAlitw7K839ch8--w6hd0PKSxWnmiieS8IU00TojBKT0cllLkvR1Cn4_GV4ds4-XqQXvd6v1q6l9Uoclj93niv5H6nCGMjVnJL9B8mGSWEA7kG-cAUJw_VOMh6bfYkmgV8ufoCXV1X1TN7aVS4CSW1_9k80WDerBHxwWfOKWMsGZFOurmtp29QPeHVZL2CW607q15VBatWc4HMOxmWqljPeLDGMW7hQlZwq0_C50UKHm5TVTVXfNJ7rtzA4NicsmrXbSRgLzQQcr1uhMN0iwm4Pr3UzAn5JV-u63ayzVvTrdKgzC9YcU1vNaUvT2ypY4oobY6aWiWsG0ymofcvQhe2HNvGeFMBdWN576D6FOMO0wPj0dZOGgsjDtsBwf8DXtx0lR8B7ZHn_5NF0DkxuxS2N_zJ5hB66wAMfWxTto56aP0YzjyDcQhD2CMIGQVgEEosg7BGEGwRhjjsIwm0E4YCgJ-j8w-nk5Iy45hukTEb5inDB0lxwnQvQ6ZoKRvkok6XUo0SYID-VSax0ZtYTSvB-FEsTqihLhKmZF2U8eYr25oCQ5whHMs61GmrDzHQaCak5K2UqhdaRzGkfvfcvsChdZXrTIKUqtgXVR28D7Xdbj2UnFfFyKJwnad9CAfDZSX8AwvrrhG-8HAvQvyapxueqXi-LGPx_iPKHWdRHz6yAwzyA5JjSmL2400O_RA82X88rtLdarNVr8HhX4qBB5W_YnLNV |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Balanced+crystalloid+compared+with+balanced+colloid+solution+using+a+goal-directed+haemodynamic+algorithm&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+anaesthesia+%3A+BJA&rft.au=Feldheiser%2C+A.&rft.au=Pavlova%2C+V.&rft.au=Bonomo%2C+T.&rft.au=Jones%2C+A.&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=240&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fbja%2Faes377&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1093_bja_aes377 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0007-0912&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0007-0912&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0007-0912&client=summon |