Comparing the diversity and composition of waterbird functional traits between natural, restored, and artificial wetlands

• Published in: Freshwater biology Vol. 65; no. 12; pp. 2196 - 2210
• Main Authors: Almeida, Bia A., Sebastián‐González, Esther, dos Anjos, Luiz, Green, Andy J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.12.2020
• Subjects: Aquatic birds; Artificial ponds; Artificial wetlands; Biodiversity; Body mass; Breeding seasons; Composition; Conservation; created wetlands; Dispersal; Environmental restoration; Evaluation; Fish; Fish culture; Fish ponds; Foraging; Freshwater; functional diversity; Functional groups; Inland water environment; Nature conservation; Nutrient cycles; Overwintering; Pond construction; Ponds; Restoration; Seabirds; Seed dispersal; Species richness; Waterfowl; wetland restoration; Wetlands
• ISSN: 0046-5070; 1365-2427
• DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13618

The restoration of degraded areas and the creation of artificial ecosystems have partially compensated for the continuing loss of natural wetlands. However, the success of these wetlands in terms of the capacity of supporting biodiversity and ecosystem functions is unclear. Research is needed to improve our understanding of the value of restored and constructed wetlands for functional diversity of freshwater fauna. We compared natural, restored, and artificially created wetlands present within the Doñana Natural Space, Spain and valued as important for waterbirds. We evaluated if these wetlands are equivalent in terms of waterbird functional trait diversity and composition, during both the wintering and breeding seasons. We modelled functional diversity measures and functional group species richness describing species diet, body mass, and foraging techniques with generalised linear mixed models in 20 wetlands monitored between 2006 and 2011. We used three different statistical approaches to evaluate the robustness of our results. Artificial wetlands constructed for conservation failed to reach the functional diversity of natural and restored wetlands. Unexpectedly, artificial ponds constructed for fish production performed better, and even exceeded natural wetlands for functional richness during winter. Fish ponds stood out as having a unique functional composition, connected with increase in richness of opportunistic gulls and decrease of species sensitive to high salinity. Overall, the functional structure of breeding communities was more affected by wetland type than wintering communities. Our findings suggest that compensating the loss of natural wetlands with restored and artificial wetlands results in systems with altered waterbird‐supported functions, such as seed dispersal or nutrient cycling. Protection of natural Mediterranean wetlands is vital to maintain the original diversity and composition of waterbird functional traits. Furthermore, restoration must be prioritised over the creation of artificial wetlands, which, even when intended for conservation, may not provide an adequate replacement.