Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry

To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and experimental optometry Vol. 101; no. 2; pp. 206 - 212
Main Authors Mansoori, Tarannum, Balakrishna, Nagalla
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne Taylor & Francis 01.03.2018
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0816-4622
1444-0938
1444-0938
DOI10.1111/cxo.12620

Cover

Abstract To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes. Four hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13-20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland-Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co-efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis. The mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, −1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13-20 mmHg and −2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01). In this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT-80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable.
AbstractList To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes. Four hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13-20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland-Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co-efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis. The mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, −1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13-20 mmHg and −2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01). In this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT-80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable.
Background To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT‐80 non‐contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes. Methods Four hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13–20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland–Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co‐efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis. Results The mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, −1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13–20 mmHg and −2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01). Conclusion In this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT‐80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable.
BackgroundTo compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT‐80 non‐contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes.MethodsFour hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13–20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland–Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co‐efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis.ResultsThe mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, −1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13–20 mmHg and −2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01).ConclusionIn this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT‐80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable.
To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes.BACKGROUNDTo compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes.Four hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13-20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland-Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co-efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis.METHODSFour hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13-20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland-Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co-efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis.The mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, -1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13-20 mmHg and -2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01).RESULTSThe mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, -1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13-20 mmHg and -2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01).In this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT-80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable.CONCLUSIONIn this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT-80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable.
To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes. Four hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13-20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland-Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co-efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis. The mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, -1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13-20 mmHg and -2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01). In this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT-80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable.
Author Balakrishna, Nagalla
Mansoori, Tarannum
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Tarannum
  surname: Mansoori
  fullname: Mansoori, Tarannum
  organization: Department of Glaucoma, Anand Eye Institute
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Nagalla
  surname: Balakrishna
  fullname: Balakrishna, Nagalla
  organization: Department of Statistics, National Institute of Nutrition
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29044716$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kc9uGyEQxlGVqnHSHvICFVIv7WETYDG7HCsrTSpFysWH3hDLH4WEhS2wcv0efeDi2M4hbbkMA7_vY5g5AychBgPABUaXuK4r9SteYsIIegMWmFLaIN72J2CBeswaygg5BWc5PyJEaMvpO3BKOKK0w2wBfl9ba1SB0UJlQknSQxVTMDWWB6eegskZxgDd7i6q2csEp1QP52SgDLrS4ySTy5WpHus4qbpbrZsewVplU7Miq3-JIY6mpC3cuPIAb6LXowwBymnyMsjiquqFeQ_eWumz-XCI52D97Xq9um3u7m--r77eNarlPWo4Ydy2vBukYpp1li0l6YyVjGM9cDRQOjDJloj2rR6oQR23tNe4o7pl1tD2HHze204p_pxNLmJ0WRlfCzJxzgLzJVm2mPW4op9eoY9xTqEWJwhCXd8jznbUxwM1D6PRYkpulGkrju2uwNUeUCnmnIwVypXnz9fuOi8wEruBijpQ8TzQqvjySnE0_Rd7cN84b7b_B8Xqx_1RQfcKF2xMo9zE5LUocutjskkG5bJo_37oD2hLwzw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_024_03210_w
crossref_primary_10_3390_app11094025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogla_2019_07_004
crossref_primary_10_31797_vetbio_980971
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10163452
crossref_primary_10_3390_ph16081172
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10091839
crossref_primary_10_1159_000504717
crossref_primary_10_1177_11206721211069227
crossref_primary_10_12677_HJO_2023_123019
crossref_primary_10_1136_vetreccr_2019_000820
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijo_IJO_1982_22
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfo_2023_01_042
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_019_1236_5
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_62956_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_019_01203_8
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2022_819715
Cites_doi 10.1136/bjo.2004.056614
10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00077.x
10.1136/bjo.85.11.1303
10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00068.x
10.1038/sj.eye.6701458
10.1136/bjo.2004.056622
10.4103/0301-4738.27952
10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00424-0
10.1016/0039-6257(80)90042-9
10.1097/00061198-199702000-00009
10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00110-7
10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96021-3
10.1007/BF00133937
10.1016/S0002-9394(14)71455-2
10.1016/j.optom.2013.06.002
10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00945.x
10.1001/archopht.120.6.714
10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00299.x
10.1111/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01135.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2017 Optometry Australia 2017
2017 Optometry Australia
2017 Optometry Australia.
2018 Optometry Australia
Copyright_xml – notice: 2017 Optometry Australia 2017
– notice: 2017 Optometry Australia
– notice: 2017 Optometry Australia.
– notice: 2018 Optometry Australia
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7TK
NAPCQ
7X8
DOI 10.1111/cxo.12620
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
Neurosciences Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1444-0938
EndPage 212
ExternalDocumentID 29044716
10_1111_cxo_12620
CXO12620
12124285
Genre Original Article
article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
05W
0BK
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
24P
29B
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
6J9
6PF
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AABVL
AAESR
AAEVG
AAMIU
AAONW
AAPUL
AAQRR
AAWTL
AAZKR
ABBKH
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABPVW
ABXYU
ACENM
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEZ
ACMXC
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUQT
AFBPY
AFGKR
AFPWT
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AIAGR
AIRBT
AIURR
AJAOE
AKBVH
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALYBC
AMBMR
AMDAE
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BAWUL
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DIK
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMB
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HZI
HZ~
IX1
J0M
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M4Z
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
OIG
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RNANH
ROL
RVRKI
RX1
SUPJJ
SV3
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TEORI
TERGH
TFL
TR2
TUROJ
UB1
UEQFS
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WXI
XG1
XSB
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
.Y3
2WC
31~
AAHHS
AANHP
AAORF
ABEML
ABWCV
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACKZS
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACYXJ
ADFOM
ADNMO
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIIZ
AEQDE
AFLEI
AFZJQ
AGDLA
AHEFC
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJVHN
ALQZU
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BDRZF
C1A
CAG
COF
FEDTE
H13
HF~
HVGLF
KTM
NUSFT
PALCI
RIWAO
RJQFR
WOQ
AAGDL
AAYXX
ABWVI
ADYSH
AFRVT
AMPGV
CITATION
NPM
7TK
NAPCQ
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3980-9269f397bac6d67f65a27efa691db90b44b6a650483db4e079f48d174d36fe43
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0816-4622
1444-0938
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 17:56:34 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 07 03:46:17 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:42:16 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:59:19 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:12:44 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:54:28 EST 2025
Wed Dec 25 09:07:14 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Topcon CT-80 NCT
Goldmann applanation tonometer
central corneal thickness
Language English
License 2017 Optometry Australia.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3980-9269f397bac6d67f65a27efa691db90b44b6a650483db4e079f48d174d36fe43
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 29044716
PQID 2007880961
PQPubID 2045178
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1952531681
proquest_journals_2007880961
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1111_cxo_12620
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_cxo_12620
crossref_primary_10_1111_cxo_12620
wiley_primary_10_1111_cxo_12620_CXO12620
pubmed_primary_29044716
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 3/1/2018
March 2018
2018-03-01
2018-03-00
20180301
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2018
  text: 3/1/2018
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Melbourne
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Melbourne
– name: Australia
– name: Chichester
PublicationTitle Clinical and experimental optometry
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Exp Optom
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis
– name: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
– name: Taylor & Francis Ltd
References 2005; 19
2002; 120
2006; 89
2009; 92
2011
2006; 54
1980; 24
2000; 44
2002; 43
2002; 22
1988; 12
1998; 105
1997; 6
2003; 136
2014; 7
1993; 115
2012; 32
2001; 85
2005; 89
53
Allingham RR (CIT0002) 2011
CIT0021
CIT0020
CIT0001
CIT0022
Gupta V (CIT0011) 2006; 54
Ehlers N (CIT0014); 53
Verdoorn C (CIT0009) 1988; 12
Bhan A (CIT0012) 2002; 43
Parker VA (CIT0010) 2001; 85
CIT0003
CIT0013
CIT0005
CIT0016
CIT0004
CIT0015
CIT0007
CIT0018
CIT0006
CIT0017
CIT0008
CIT0019
References_xml – volume: 85
  start-page: 1303
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1304
  article-title: Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 with Goldmann applanation tonometry
  publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol
– volume: 89
  start-page: 851
  year: 2005
  end-page: 854
  article-title: The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measures by pneumotonometry, non‐contact tonometry, the Tono‐Pen XL and Goldmann applanation tonometry
  publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol
– volume: 19
  start-page: 327
  year: 2005
  end-page: 332
  article-title: Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers
  publication-title: Eye
– volume: 22
  start-page: 560
  year: 2002
  end-page: 564
  article-title: Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550: a new noncontact tonometer
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
– volume: 105
  start-page: 969
  year: 1998
  end-page: 973
  article-title: Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in a Mongolian population
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
– volume: 7
  start-page: 86
  year: 2014
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Clinical comparison of Pulsair non‐contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in Indian population
  publication-title: J Optom
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1301
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1304
  article-title: Clinical comparison of Keeler Pulsair 3000 with Goldmann applanation tonometry
  publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol
– volume: 54
  start-page: 261
  year: 2006
  end-page: 265
  article-title: Inter‐instrument agreement and influence of central corneal thickness on measurements with Goldmann, pneumotonometer and noncontact tonometer in glaucomatous eyes
  publication-title: Indian J Ophthalmol
– volume: 53
  start-page: 34
  end-page: 43
  article-title: Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1389
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1392
  article-title: Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer and Tono‐Pen
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
– volume: 115
  start-page: 592
  year: 1993
  end-page: 596
  article-title: The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
– volume: 89
  start-page: 847
  year: 2005
  end-page: 850
  article-title: A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability
  publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol
– volume: 89
  start-page: 310
  year: 2006
  end-page: 314
  article-title: Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of the Topcon CT80 non‐contact tonometer
  publication-title: Clin Exp Optom
– start-page: 24
  year: 2011
  end-page: 40
– volume: 44
  start-page: 367
  year: 2000
  end-page: 408
  article-title: Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta‐analysis approach
  publication-title: Surv Ophthalmol
– volume: 92
  start-page: 14
  year: 2009
  end-page: 18
  article-title: Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the Pascal dynamic contour, Canon TX‐10 non‐contact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in healthy subjects
  publication-title: Clin Exp Optom
– volume: 120
  start-page: 714
  year: 2002
  end-page: 720
  article-title: The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open‐angle glaucoma
  publication-title: Arch Ophthalmol
– volume: 24
  start-page: 211
  year: 1980
  end-page: 219
  article-title: The non‐contact tonometer. Its value and limitations
  publication-title: Surv Ophthalmol
– volume: 12
  start-page: 223
  year: 1988
  end-page: 225
  article-title: Clinical evaluation of the Topcon CT10 tonometer
  publication-title: Int Ophthalmol
– volume: 136
  start-page: 603
  year: 2003
  end-page: 613
  article-title: Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
– volume: 32
  start-page: 547
  year: 2012
  end-page: 555
  article-title: Influence of central corneal thickness on measured intraocular pressure differentials: Nidek RKT‐7700, Topcon CT‐80 NCTs and Goldmann Tonometer
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
– volume: 6
  year: 1997
  article-title: A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry
  publication-title: J Glaucoma
– ident: CIT0007
  doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.056614
– ident: CIT0006
  doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00077.x
– ident: CIT0005
  doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1303
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00068.x
– ident: CIT0013
  doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701458
– ident: CIT0017
  doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.056622
– volume: 54
  start-page: 261
  year: 2006
  ident: CIT0011
  publication-title: Indian J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.27952
– ident: CIT0022
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00424-0
– ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(80)90042-9
– start-page: 24
  volume-title: Shields Textbook of Glaucoma
  year: 2011
  ident: CIT0002
– ident: CIT0004
  doi: 10.1097/00061198-199702000-00009
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1301
  year: 2001
  ident: CIT0010
  publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1303
– ident: CIT0015
  doi: 10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00110-7
– ident: CIT0018
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96021-3
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1389
  year: 2002
  ident: CIT0012
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
– volume: 12
  start-page: 223
  year: 1988
  ident: CIT0009
  publication-title: Int Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/BF00133937
– ident: CIT0016
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)71455-2
– ident: CIT0020
  doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2013.06.002
– ident: CIT0021
  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00945.x
– ident: CIT0001
  doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.714
– ident: CIT0019
  doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00299.x
– volume: 53
  start-page: 34
  ident: CIT0014
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01135.x
SSID ssj0024394
Score 2.2565293
Snippet To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in...
Background To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT‐80 non‐contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer...
BackgroundTo compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT‐80 non‐contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 206
SubjectTerms central corneal thickness
Cornea
Eye
Glaucoma
Goldmann applanation tonometer
Pressure
Regression analysis
Topcon CT-80 NCT
Ultrasound
Title Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cxo.12620
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcxo.12620
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29044716
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2007880961
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1952531681
Volume 101
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Pi9QwFA7LHhYv6vpzdJUoHrx0aNM0TfAko-siqCAjzEEoSfoCsrvtMtMB9bR_wh79-_xLfEnaOiMjiLdCXtu0fe_1S_Lle4Q8kwWARSSdgMuKhCtWJsaWCgOPKw3MSaYD2-K9OPnE3y6KxR55MeyFifoQ44Sbj4yQr32Aa7PaCHL7tZ1mXk4d82-WC6-b_-oj29DZC0UQfV2JhAvGelUhz-IZz9z6F20ple7Cm9vwNfx_jm-Qz0PPI-3kdLruzNR-_0PU8T8f7Sa53uNS-jI60iHZg-YWOXjXr7zfJj-izDFtHe35nBTHrQ3CTOoZ86c-Y9K2oV98WxvIrTRwbNdLoLqpqR0LHvprzNsLHIjT2fzn5ZVMadM2eOBp8xrv0fmNFtAtv1E_S0zftGf1uW4a6hfbdZy9_G1zh8yPX89nJ0lf1SGxuZJpophQDlGQ0VbUonSi0KwEp4XKaqNSw7kRGnEjl3ltOKSlclzWOHCqc-GA53fJPnYK7hOaljpH_Ce1zoE7DsoJBibVYJUsJaQT8nz4vJXtFc994Y2zahj54IuuwouekKej6UWU-dhllGz6SNWFORUXC6BU-Q77o8GJqj4zrHzZzxJzphLZhDwZmzGm_UKNbqBdr6pMFazwFcXQ5l50vrFXTKUcAYXAhwsu9PfuVrPFh3Dw4N9NH5JriAhlJNkdkf1uuYZHiLo68ziE1y-afCz4
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwELVKkYBL-SxdKGAQBy5ZJY7j2BIXtFAWaIuEgrQXFNmJLaGWpNpmJeDUn9Bjf19_CTPOB7tokRC3SJkkTjLjvBm_vCHkuUysLQBJB9ZFScAVSwNTpAoCjyttmZNMe7bFoZh-5u9nyWyDvOz_hWn1IYaCG0aGn68xwLEgvRTlxfd6HKGe-hVylQPQwNTr9Se2pLTn2yBiZ4mAC8Y6XSHk8QyHrnyNVrRK1yHOVQDrv0B7N8mXfuwt8eRovGjMuPj5h6zj_97cLbLVQVP6qvWl22TDVnfItYNu8f0uuWiVjmntaEfppJC6VoA0KZLmj3DSpHVFv-K-2vNbqafZLuaW6qqkxdDzEM-R1SeQi9NJdnl2LkNa1RVsIHNewzUa_NfCNvMfFAvF9G19XH7TVUVxvV23BczfNvdItvcmm0yDrrFDUMRKhoFiQjkAQkYXohSpE4lmqXVaqKg0KjScG6HhjXIZl4bbMFWOyxJypzIWzvJ4m2zCoOwOoWGqY4CAUuvYcsetcoJZE2pbKJlKG47Ii_795kUneo69N47zPvmBB537Bz0izwbTk1bpY51RsOwkeePLKq7tgZLHa-x3ey_Ku8nhFDt_pjBtKhGNyNNhN4Q1rtXoytaL0zxSCUuwqRjY3G-9bxgVUyEHTCHg5rwP_X24-WT20W88-HfTJ-T6NDvYz_ffHX54SG4AQJQt526XbDbzhX0EIKwxj32s_QJF6jEX
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9QwFA7rCosv3i-zrhrFB186tGmaJvgko-N6W0VGmAehJGkCsrvpMNsB9cmf4KO_z1_iSdLWGRlBfCv0tE3Sc9LvJF-_g9BDXhijAUknxmZFQgUpE6VLAYFHhTTEciID2-KIHX6gL-fFfAc97v-FifoQw4Kbj4wwX_sAX9R2Lcj152aceTn1c-g8ZYAkPCJ6T9aE9kIVRF9YIqGMkE5WyNN4hks3PkYbUqXbAOcmfg0foOkl9LFveuSdHI9XrRrrr3-oOv5n3y6jix0wxU-iJ11BO8ZdRXtvuq33a-hH1DnGjcUdoRND4uoAZ2JPmT_2UyZuHP7kzzWB3YoDyXa1NFi6Guuh4qG_x6xZQCaOJ7Of377zFLvGwYHnzUt4Ruv_tDDt8gv2y8T4eXNSn0rnsN9tl3H58rfNdTSbPptNDpOurEOic8HTRBAmLMAgJTWrWWlZIUlprGQiq5VIFaWKSQCOlOe1oiYthaW8hsypzpk1NL-BdqFR5hbCaSlzAIBcytxQS42wjBiVSqMFL7lJR-hR_3or3Ume-8obJ1Wf-sBAV2GgR-jBYLqIOh_bjJJ1H6nasKhiYwWUKt9if9A7UdVNDWe-7mcJk6Zg2QjdH05DUPudGulMszqrMlGQwpcUA5ub0fmGVhGRUkAUDDoXXOjvza0m87fhYP_fTe-hvXdPp9XrF0evbqMLgA55JNwdoN12uTJ3AIG16m6ItF-diy_G
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+central+corneal+thickness+on+intraocular+pressure+and+comparison+of+Topcon+CT%E2%80%9080+non%E2%80%90contact+tonometry+with+Goldmann+applanation+tonometry&rft.jtitle=Clinical+and+experimental+optometry&rft.au=Mansoori%2C+Tarannum&rft.au=Nagalla+Balakrishna&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis+Ltd&rft.issn=0816-4622&rft.eissn=1444-0938&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=212&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fcxo.12620&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0816-4622&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0816-4622&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0816-4622&client=summon