Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry
To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements i...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical and experimental optometry Vol. 101; no. 2; pp. 206 - 212 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Melbourne
Taylor & Francis
01.03.2018
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0816-4622 1444-0938 1444-0938 |
DOI | 10.1111/cxo.12620 |
Cover
Abstract | To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes.
Four hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13-20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland-Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co-efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis.
The mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, −1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13-20 mmHg and −2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01).
In this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT-80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes.
Four hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13-20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland-Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co-efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis.
The mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, −1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13-20 mmHg and −2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01).
In this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT-80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable. Background To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT‐80 non‐contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes. Methods Four hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13–20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland–Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co‐efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis. Results The mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, −1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13–20 mmHg and −2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01). Conclusion In this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT‐80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable. BackgroundTo compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT‐80 non‐contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes.MethodsFour hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13–20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland–Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co‐efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis.ResultsThe mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, −1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13–20 mmHg and −2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01).ConclusionIn this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT‐80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable. To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes.BACKGROUNDTo compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes.Four hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13-20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland-Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co-efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis.METHODSFour hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13-20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland-Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co-efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis.The mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, -1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13-20 mmHg and -2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01).RESULTSThe mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, -1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13-20 mmHg and -2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01).In this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT-80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable.CONCLUSIONIn this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT-80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable. To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes. Four hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (≤ 12 mmHg, 13-20 mmHg and ≥ 21 mmHg) using Bland-Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co-efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis. The mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 ± 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of ≤ 12 mmHg, -1.665 ± 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13-20 mmHg and -2.202 ± 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of ≥ 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 μm change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01). In this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT-80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable. |
Author | Balakrishna, Nagalla Mansoori, Tarannum |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Tarannum surname: Mansoori fullname: Mansoori, Tarannum organization: Department of Glaucoma, Anand Eye Institute – sequence: 2 givenname: Nagalla surname: Balakrishna fullname: Balakrishna, Nagalla organization: Department of Statistics, National Institute of Nutrition |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29044716$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kc9uGyEQxlGVqnHSHvICFVIv7WETYDG7HCsrTSpFysWH3hDLH4WEhS2wcv0efeDi2M4hbbkMA7_vY5g5AychBgPABUaXuK4r9SteYsIIegMWmFLaIN72J2CBeswaygg5BWc5PyJEaMvpO3BKOKK0w2wBfl9ba1SB0UJlQknSQxVTMDWWB6eegskZxgDd7i6q2csEp1QP52SgDLrS4ySTy5WpHus4qbpbrZsewVplU7Miq3-JIY6mpC3cuPIAb6LXowwBymnyMsjiquqFeQ_eWumz-XCI52D97Xq9um3u7m--r77eNarlPWo4Ydy2vBukYpp1li0l6YyVjGM9cDRQOjDJloj2rR6oQR23tNe4o7pl1tD2HHze204p_pxNLmJ0WRlfCzJxzgLzJVm2mPW4op9eoY9xTqEWJwhCXd8jznbUxwM1D6PRYkpulGkrju2uwNUeUCnmnIwVypXnz9fuOi8wEruBijpQ8TzQqvjySnE0_Rd7cN84b7b_B8Xqx_1RQfcKF2xMo9zE5LUocutjskkG5bJo_37oD2hLwzw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_024_03210_w crossref_primary_10_3390_app11094025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogla_2019_07_004 crossref_primary_10_31797_vetbio_980971 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10163452 crossref_primary_10_3390_ph16081172 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10091839 crossref_primary_10_1159_000504717 crossref_primary_10_1177_11206721211069227 crossref_primary_10_12677_HJO_2023_123019 crossref_primary_10_1136_vetreccr_2019_000820 crossref_primary_10_4103_ijo_IJO_1982_22 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfo_2023_01_042 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_019_1236_5 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_62956_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_019_01203_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2022_819715 |
Cites_doi | 10.1136/bjo.2004.056614 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00077.x 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1303 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00068.x 10.1038/sj.eye.6701458 10.1136/bjo.2004.056622 10.4103/0301-4738.27952 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00424-0 10.1016/0039-6257(80)90042-9 10.1097/00061198-199702000-00009 10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00110-7 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96021-3 10.1007/BF00133937 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)71455-2 10.1016/j.optom.2013.06.002 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00945.x 10.1001/archopht.120.6.714 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00299.x 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01135.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2017 Optometry Australia 2017 2017 Optometry Australia 2017 Optometry Australia. 2018 Optometry Australia |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2017 Optometry Australia 2017 – notice: 2017 Optometry Australia – notice: 2017 Optometry Australia. – notice: 2018 Optometry Australia |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7TK NAPCQ 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/cxo.12620 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed Neurosciences Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Nursing & Allied Health Premium Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1444-0938 |
EndPage | 212 |
ExternalDocumentID | 29044716 10_1111_cxo_12620 CXO12620 12124285 |
Genre | Original Article article Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA 05W 0BK 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 24P 29B 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6J9 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AABVL AAESR AAEVG AAMIU AAONW AAPUL AAQRR AAWTL AAZKR ABBKH ABCQN ABCUV ABJNI ABLIJ ABPVW ABXYU ACENM ACGFO ACGFS ACIEZ ACMXC ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACXQS ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADXAS ADZMN AEIMD AENEX AEUQT AFBPY AFGKR AFPWT AGFJD AGRBW AGYJP AIAGR AIRBT AIURR AJAOE AKBVH ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALYBC AMBMR AMDAE AMYDB ATUGU AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BAWUL BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DIK DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 E3Z EBS EJD EMB F00 F01 F04 F5P FUBAC G-S G.N GODZA H.X HZI HZ~ IX1 J0M K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M4Z MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 OIG OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RNANH ROL RVRKI RX1 SUPJJ SV3 TBQAZ TDBHL TEORI TERGH TFL TR2 TUROJ UB1 UEQFS V8K W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WIN WOHZO WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI XG1 XSB ZZTAW ~IA ~WT .Y3 2WC 31~ AAHHS AANHP AAORF ABEML ABWCV ACBWZ ACCFJ ACKZS ACRPL ACSCC ACYXJ ADFOM ADNMO ADZOD AEEZP AEIIZ AEQDE AFLEI AFZJQ AGDLA AHEFC AIWBW AJBDE AJVHN ALQZU ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BDRZF C1A CAG COF FEDTE H13 HF~ HVGLF KTM NUSFT PALCI RIWAO RJQFR WOQ AAGDL AAYXX ABWVI ADYSH AFRVT AMPGV CITATION NPM 7TK NAPCQ 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3980-9269f397bac6d67f65a27efa691db90b44b6a650483db4e079f48d174d36fe43 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0816-4622 1444-0938 |
IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 17:56:34 EDT 2025 Sun Sep 07 03:46:17 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:42:16 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:59:19 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:44 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:54:28 EST 2025 Wed Dec 25 09:07:14 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Topcon CT-80 NCT Goldmann applanation tonometer central corneal thickness |
Language | English |
License | 2017 Optometry Australia. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3980-9269f397bac6d67f65a27efa691db90b44b6a650483db4e079f48d174d36fe43 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
PMID | 29044716 |
PQID | 2007880961 |
PQPubID | 2045178 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1952531681 proquest_journals_2007880961 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1111_cxo_12620 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_cxo_12620 crossref_primary_10_1111_cxo_12620 wiley_primary_10_1111_cxo_12620_CXO12620 pubmed_primary_29044716 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 3/1/2018 March 2018 2018-03-01 2018-03-00 20180301 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2018 text: 3/1/2018 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Melbourne |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Melbourne – name: Australia – name: Chichester |
PublicationTitle | Clinical and experimental optometry |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Exp Optom |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Taylor & Francis – name: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd – name: Taylor & Francis Ltd |
References | 2005; 19 2002; 120 2006; 89 2009; 92 2011 2006; 54 1980; 24 2000; 44 2002; 43 2002; 22 1988; 12 1998; 105 1997; 6 2003; 136 2014; 7 1993; 115 2012; 32 2001; 85 2005; 89 53 Allingham RR (CIT0002) 2011 CIT0021 CIT0020 CIT0001 CIT0022 Gupta V (CIT0011) 2006; 54 Ehlers N (CIT0014); 53 Verdoorn C (CIT0009) 1988; 12 Bhan A (CIT0012) 2002; 43 Parker VA (CIT0010) 2001; 85 CIT0003 CIT0013 CIT0005 CIT0016 CIT0004 CIT0015 CIT0007 CIT0018 CIT0006 CIT0017 CIT0008 CIT0019 |
References_xml | – volume: 85 start-page: 1303 year: 2001 end-page: 1304 article-title: Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 with Goldmann applanation tonometry publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol – volume: 89 start-page: 851 year: 2005 end-page: 854 article-title: The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measures by pneumotonometry, non‐contact tonometry, the Tono‐Pen XL and Goldmann applanation tonometry publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol – volume: 19 start-page: 327 year: 2005 end-page: 332 article-title: Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers publication-title: Eye – volume: 22 start-page: 560 year: 2002 end-page: 564 article-title: Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550: a new noncontact tonometer publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt – volume: 105 start-page: 969 year: 1998 end-page: 973 article-title: Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in a Mongolian population publication-title: Ophthalmology – volume: 7 start-page: 86 year: 2014 end-page: 90 article-title: Clinical comparison of Pulsair non‐contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in Indian population publication-title: J Optom – volume: 85 start-page: 1301 year: 2001 end-page: 1304 article-title: Clinical comparison of Keeler Pulsair 3000 with Goldmann applanation tonometry publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol – volume: 54 start-page: 261 year: 2006 end-page: 265 article-title: Inter‐instrument agreement and influence of central corneal thickness on measurements with Goldmann, pneumotonometer and noncontact tonometer in glaucomatous eyes publication-title: Indian J Ophthalmol – volume: 53 start-page: 34 end-page: 43 article-title: Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol – volume: 43 start-page: 1389 year: 2002 end-page: 1392 article-title: Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer and Tono‐Pen publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci – volume: 115 start-page: 592 year: 1993 end-page: 596 article-title: The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol – volume: 89 start-page: 847 year: 2005 end-page: 850 article-title: A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol – volume: 89 start-page: 310 year: 2006 end-page: 314 article-title: Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of the Topcon CT80 non‐contact tonometer publication-title: Clin Exp Optom – start-page: 24 year: 2011 end-page: 40 – volume: 44 start-page: 367 year: 2000 end-page: 408 article-title: Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta‐analysis approach publication-title: Surv Ophthalmol – volume: 92 start-page: 14 year: 2009 end-page: 18 article-title: Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the Pascal dynamic contour, Canon TX‐10 non‐contact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in healthy subjects publication-title: Clin Exp Optom – volume: 120 start-page: 714 year: 2002 end-page: 720 article-title: The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open‐angle glaucoma publication-title: Arch Ophthalmol – volume: 24 start-page: 211 year: 1980 end-page: 219 article-title: The non‐contact tonometer. Its value and limitations publication-title: Surv Ophthalmol – volume: 12 start-page: 223 year: 1988 end-page: 225 article-title: Clinical evaluation of the Topcon CT10 tonometer publication-title: Int Ophthalmol – volume: 136 start-page: 603 year: 2003 end-page: 613 article-title: Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol – volume: 32 start-page: 547 year: 2012 end-page: 555 article-title: Influence of central corneal thickness on measured intraocular pressure differentials: Nidek RKT‐7700, Topcon CT‐80 NCTs and Goldmann Tonometer publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt – volume: 6 year: 1997 article-title: A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry publication-title: J Glaucoma – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.056614 – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00077.x – ident: CIT0005 doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1303 – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00068.x – ident: CIT0013 doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701458 – ident: CIT0017 doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.056622 – volume: 54 start-page: 261 year: 2006 ident: CIT0011 publication-title: Indian J Ophthalmol doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.27952 – ident: CIT0022 doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00424-0 – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(80)90042-9 – start-page: 24 volume-title: Shields Textbook of Glaucoma year: 2011 ident: CIT0002 – ident: CIT0004 doi: 10.1097/00061198-199702000-00009 – volume: 85 start-page: 1301 year: 2001 ident: CIT0010 publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1303 – ident: CIT0015 doi: 10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00110-7 – ident: CIT0018 doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96021-3 – volume: 43 start-page: 1389 year: 2002 ident: CIT0012 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci – volume: 12 start-page: 223 year: 1988 ident: CIT0009 publication-title: Int Ophthalmol doi: 10.1007/BF00133937 – ident: CIT0016 doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)71455-2 – ident: CIT0020 doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2013.06.002 – ident: CIT0021 doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00945.x – ident: CIT0001 doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.714 – ident: CIT0019 doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00299.x – volume: 53 start-page: 34 ident: CIT0014 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01135.x |
SSID | ssj0024394 |
Score | 2.2565293 |
Snippet | To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in... Background To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT‐80 non‐contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer... BackgroundTo compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT‐80 non‐contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley informaworld |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 206 |
SubjectTerms | central corneal thickness Cornea Eye Glaucoma Goldmann applanation tonometer Pressure Regression analysis Topcon CT-80 NCT Ultrasound |
Title | Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cxo.12620 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcxo.12620 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29044716 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2007880961 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1952531681 |
Volume | 101 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Pi9QwFA7LHhYv6vpzdJUoHrx0aNM0TfAko-siqCAjzEEoSfoCsrvtMtMB9bR_wh79-_xLfEnaOiMjiLdCXtu0fe_1S_Lle4Q8kwWARSSdgMuKhCtWJsaWCgOPKw3MSaYD2-K9OPnE3y6KxR55MeyFifoQ44Sbj4yQr32Aa7PaCHL7tZ1mXk4d82-WC6-b_-oj29DZC0UQfV2JhAvGelUhz-IZz9z6F20ple7Cm9vwNfx_jm-Qz0PPI-3kdLruzNR-_0PU8T8f7Sa53uNS-jI60iHZg-YWOXjXr7zfJj-izDFtHe35nBTHrQ3CTOoZ86c-Y9K2oV98WxvIrTRwbNdLoLqpqR0LHvprzNsLHIjT2fzn5ZVMadM2eOBp8xrv0fmNFtAtv1E_S0zftGf1uW4a6hfbdZy9_G1zh8yPX89nJ0lf1SGxuZJpophQDlGQ0VbUonSi0KwEp4XKaqNSw7kRGnEjl3ltOKSlclzWOHCqc-GA53fJPnYK7hOaljpH_Ce1zoE7DsoJBibVYJUsJaQT8nz4vJXtFc994Y2zahj54IuuwouekKej6UWU-dhllGz6SNWFORUXC6BU-Q77o8GJqj4zrHzZzxJzphLZhDwZmzGm_UKNbqBdr6pMFazwFcXQ5l50vrFXTKUcAYXAhwsu9PfuVrPFh3Dw4N9NH5JriAhlJNkdkf1uuYZHiLo68ziE1y-afCz4 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwELVKkYBL-SxdKGAQBy5ZJY7j2BIXtFAWaIuEgrQXFNmJLaGWpNpmJeDUn9Bjf19_CTPOB7tokRC3SJkkTjLjvBm_vCHkuUysLQBJB9ZFScAVSwNTpAoCjyttmZNMe7bFoZh-5u9nyWyDvOz_hWn1IYaCG0aGn68xwLEgvRTlxfd6HKGe-hVylQPQwNTr9Se2pLTn2yBiZ4mAC8Y6XSHk8QyHrnyNVrRK1yHOVQDrv0B7N8mXfuwt8eRovGjMuPj5h6zj_97cLbLVQVP6qvWl22TDVnfItYNu8f0uuWiVjmntaEfppJC6VoA0KZLmj3DSpHVFv-K-2vNbqafZLuaW6qqkxdDzEM-R1SeQi9NJdnl2LkNa1RVsIHNewzUa_NfCNvMfFAvF9G19XH7TVUVxvV23BczfNvdItvcmm0yDrrFDUMRKhoFiQjkAQkYXohSpE4lmqXVaqKg0KjScG6HhjXIZl4bbMFWOyxJypzIWzvJ4m2zCoOwOoWGqY4CAUuvYcsetcoJZE2pbKJlKG47Ii_795kUneo69N47zPvmBB537Bz0izwbTk1bpY51RsOwkeePLKq7tgZLHa-x3ey_Ku8nhFDt_pjBtKhGNyNNhN4Q1rtXoytaL0zxSCUuwqRjY3G-9bxgVUyEHTCHg5rwP_X24-WT20W88-HfTJ-T6NDvYz_ffHX54SG4AQJQt526XbDbzhX0EIKwxj32s_QJF6jEX |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9QwFA7rCosv3i-zrhrFB186tGmaJvgko-N6W0VGmAehJGkCsrvpMNsB9cmf4KO_z1_iSdLWGRlBfCv0tE3Sc9LvJF-_g9BDXhijAUknxmZFQgUpE6VLAYFHhTTEciID2-KIHX6gL-fFfAc97v-FifoQw4Kbj4wwX_sAX9R2Lcj152aceTn1c-g8ZYAkPCJ6T9aE9kIVRF9YIqGMkE5WyNN4hks3PkYbUqXbAOcmfg0foOkl9LFveuSdHI9XrRrrr3-oOv5n3y6jix0wxU-iJ11BO8ZdRXtvuq33a-hH1DnGjcUdoRND4uoAZ2JPmT_2UyZuHP7kzzWB3YoDyXa1NFi6Guuh4qG_x6xZQCaOJ7Of377zFLvGwYHnzUt4Ruv_tDDt8gv2y8T4eXNSn0rnsN9tl3H58rfNdTSbPptNDpOurEOic8HTRBAmLMAgJTWrWWlZIUlprGQiq5VIFaWKSQCOlOe1oiYthaW8hsypzpk1NL-BdqFR5hbCaSlzAIBcytxQS42wjBiVSqMFL7lJR-hR_3or3Ume-8obJ1Wf-sBAV2GgR-jBYLqIOh_bjJJ1H6nasKhiYwWUKt9if9A7UdVNDWe-7mcJk6Zg2QjdH05DUPudGulMszqrMlGQwpcUA5ub0fmGVhGRUkAUDDoXXOjvza0m87fhYP_fTe-hvXdPp9XrF0evbqMLgA55JNwdoN12uTJ3AIG16m6ItF-diy_G |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+central+corneal+thickness+on+intraocular+pressure+and+comparison+of+Topcon+CT%E2%80%9080+non%E2%80%90contact+tonometry+with+Goldmann+applanation+tonometry&rft.jtitle=Clinical+and+experimental+optometry&rft.au=Mansoori%2C+Tarannum&rft.au=Nagalla+Balakrishna&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis+Ltd&rft.issn=0816-4622&rft.eissn=1444-0938&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=212&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fcxo.12620&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0816-4622&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0816-4622&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0816-4622&client=summon |