Above- and belowground biomass allocation in Tibetan grasslands
Question: Optimal partitioning and isometric allocation are two important hypotheses in plant biomass allocation. We tested these two hypotheses at the community level, using field observations from Tibetan grasslands. Location: Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Methods: We investigated allocation bet...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of vegetation science Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 177 - 184 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.02.2009
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Question: Optimal partitioning and isometric allocation are two important hypotheses in plant biomass allocation. We tested these two hypotheses at the community level, using field observations from Tibetan grasslands. Location: Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Methods: We investigated allocation between above-and belowground biomass in alpine grasslands and its relationship with environmental factors using data collected from 141 sites across the plateau during 2001-2005. We used reduced major axis (RMA) regression and general linear models (GLM) to perform data analysis. Results: The median values of aboveground biomass (\[M_A \]), belowground biomass (\[M_B \]), and root: shoot (R: S) ratio in alpine grasslands were 59.7, 330.5gm⁻², and 5.8, respectively. About 90% of total root biomass occurred in the top 30 cm of soil, with a larger proportion in the alpine meadow than in the alpine steppe (96 versus 86%). As soil nitrogen and soil moisture increased, both\[M_A \]and\[M_B \]increased, but R: S ratio did not show a significant change.\[M_A \]scaled as 0.92 the power of\[M_B \], with 95% confidence intervals of 0.82-1.02. The slope of the isometric relationship between log\[M_A \]and log\[M_B \]did not differ significantly between alpine steppe and alpine meadow. The isometric relationship was also independent of soil nitrogen and soil moisture. Conclusions: Our results support the isometric allocation hypothesis for the\[M_A \]versus\[M_B \]relationship in Tibetan grasslands. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.05566.x ArticleID:JVS5566 istex:E5BF8998437BEB7DEDD920351DE2A11C765A3070 ark:/67375/WNG-8K07MDHD-4 Co‐ordinating Editor: S. Prober. |
ISSN: | 1100-9233 1654-1103 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.05566.x |