Minority Dissent and Social Acceptance in Collaborative Learning Groups

The main aim of this paper is to test the extent to which social acceptance moderates the impact of minority dissent on group cognitive complexity (GCC). We hypothesize that divergent views expressed by a minority increase GCC especially when the group climate is open to divergent contributions (e.g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 8; p. 458
Main Authors Curşeu, Petru L., Schruijer, Sandra G. L., Fodor, Oana C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 28.03.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00458

Cover

More Information
Summary:The main aim of this paper is to test the extent to which social acceptance moderates the impact of minority dissent on group cognitive complexity (GCC). We hypothesize that divergent views expressed by a minority increase GCC especially when the group climate is open to divergent contributions (e.g., a socially accepting group climate). We also hypothesize that group size has a non-linear association with GCC in such a way that GCC increases as group size increases from low to average and then GCC decreases as group size further increases from average to high. We test these hypotheses in a sample of 537 students (258 women, with an average age of 23.35) organized in 92 groups that have worked together in the same group throughout the semester, and show that: (1) group size has a decreasing positive association with GCC, (2) both minority dissent and social acceptance are beneficial for GCC and (3) groups with the highest GCC are those that experience minority dissent and develop a socially accepting climate (in which group members can equally participate to the task), allowing the majority to process the dissenting views extensively.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: E. Michael Nussbaum, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA; Kevin L. Blankenship, Iowa State University, USA
This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Michael S. Dempsey, Boston University, USA
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00458