Sensitivity to change of the Beck Depression Inventory versus the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms

•comparison between sensitivity to change of disorder-specific instruments assessing depression•a head to head comparison of sensitivity to change using the Inventory Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) and the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II)•BDI-II is more sensitive to change...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of affective disorders Vol. 281; pp. 338 - 341
Main Authors Meesters, Ybe, Sijbrandij, Jitske J., Visser, Ellen, de Beurs, Edwin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 15.02.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•comparison between sensitivity to change of disorder-specific instruments assessing depression•a head to head comparison of sensitivity to change using the Inventory Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) and the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II)•BDI-II is more sensitive to change than IDS-SR in measuring treatment outcome. Background: In a previous study which made a comparison between disorder-specific and generic instruments to assess outcome of treatments for depression, the Beck Depression Inventory, Second Edition (BDI-II) seemed to be more sensitive to change than the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms- Self Rating (IDS-SR). Methods: A set with longitudinal data from Routine Outcome Monitoring (n=144) were analyzed with multilevel models with random intercepts. The sensitivity to change of two disorder-specific instruments, the BDI-II and the IDS-SR, were compared head to head. Results: The BDI-II was more sensitive to change when measuring treatment outcome compared to the IDS-SR. The BDI-II decreases significantly more over time than the IDS-SR: the average decrease per week for the IDS-SR is -.012 (95%CI -0.015, -0.009) and for the BDI-II it is -.017 (95%CI -0.021, -0.014). Limitations: Conclusions can only be preliminary due to a small sample size. Conclusions: Treatment outcomes measured with questionnaires may differ depending on the degree of sensitivity to change of the instruments.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0165-0327
1573-2517
DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.036