Sensitivity to change of the Beck Depression Inventory versus the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms
•comparison between sensitivity to change of disorder-specific instruments assessing depression•a head to head comparison of sensitivity to change using the Inventory Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) and the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II)•BDI-II is more sensitive to change...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of affective disorders Vol. 281; pp. 338 - 341 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
15.02.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •comparison between sensitivity to change of disorder-specific instruments assessing depression•a head to head comparison of sensitivity to change using the Inventory Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) and the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II)•BDI-II is more sensitive to change than IDS-SR in measuring treatment outcome.
Background: In a previous study which made a comparison between disorder-specific and generic instruments to assess outcome of treatments for depression, the Beck Depression Inventory, Second Edition (BDI-II) seemed to be more sensitive to change than the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms- Self Rating (IDS-SR).
Methods: A set with longitudinal data from Routine Outcome Monitoring (n=144) were analyzed with multilevel models with random intercepts. The sensitivity to change of two disorder-specific instruments, the BDI-II and the IDS-SR, were compared head to head.
Results: The BDI-II was more sensitive to change when measuring treatment outcome compared to the IDS-SR. The BDI-II decreases significantly more over time than the IDS-SR: the average decrease per week for the IDS-SR is -.012 (95%CI -0.015, -0.009) and for the BDI-II it is -.017 (95%CI -0.021, -0.014).
Limitations: Conclusions can only be preliminary due to a small sample size.
Conclusions: Treatment outcomes measured with questionnaires may differ depending on the degree of sensitivity to change of the instruments. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0165-0327 1573-2517 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.036 |