Can Receptor Potentials Be Detected With Threshold Tracking in Rat Cutaneous Nociceptive Terminals?
Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany Submitted 29 June 2004; accepted in final form 9 March 2005 Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and A -fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolar...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neurophysiology Vol. 94; no. 1; pp. 219 - 225 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Am Phys Soc
01.07.2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
Submitted 29 June 2004;
accepted in final form 9 March 2005
Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and A -fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in the isolated rat skinnerve preparation. Constant current pulses were delivered (1 Hz) through a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the receptive field, and the current amplitude was controlled by feedback with a laboratory computer programmed to serially determine the electrical threshold using the method of limits. During threshold tracking, the receptive fields of the fibers were heated (3246°C in 210 s) or superfused with modified synthetic interstitial fluid containing either 0, 20, 40, 50, or 60 mM [K + ], phosphate buffer to pH 5.2 or 6.1, or bradykinin (BK, 10 8 10 -5 M). High [K + ] e decreased the current threshold for activation by 614% over 120 s, whereas K + -free superfusion augmented the threshold by >5%, and after some delay, also induced ongoing discharge in 60% of units. pH 6.1 and 5.2 caused an increase in threshold of 6 and 18%, respectively, and 30% of the fibers were excited by low pH, although the change in threshold of pH responsive and unresponsive fibers did not differ significantly, suggesting a general excitability decrease induced by protons. Heat stimulation increased the mean threshold and conduction velocity of the fibers tested and resulted in activity in 78% of units. Additionally, for these units, activation was preceded by a significant decrease in threshold compared with the tracked thresholds of fibers unresponsive to heat. Bradykinin also led to a significant threshold decrease before activation. In conclusion, the technique of threshold tracking proved suitable to assess changes in excitability resulting from receptor currents evoked by noxious heat and bradykinin in the terminal arborization of cutaneous nociceptors.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. K. Sauer, Inst. für Physiologie and Pathophysiologie, Univ. Erlangen/Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 17, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (E-mail: sauer{at}physiologie1.uni-erlangen.de ) |
---|---|
AbstractList | Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and Aδ-fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in the isolated rat skin–nerve preparation. Constant current pulses were delivered (1 Hz) through a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the receptive field, and the current amplitude was controlled by feedback with a laboratory computer programmed to serially determine the electrical threshold using the method of limits. During threshold tracking, the receptive fields of the fibers were heated (32–46°C in 210 s) or superfused with modified synthetic interstitial fluid containing either 0, 20, 40, 50, or 60 mM [K
+
], phosphate buffer to pH 5.2 or 6.1, or bradykinin (BK, 10
−8
–10
-5
M). High [K
+
]
e
decreased the current threshold for activation by 6–14% over 120 s, whereas K
+
-free superfusion augmented the threshold by >5%, and after some delay, also induced ongoing discharge in 60% of units. pH 6.1 and 5.2 caused an increase in threshold of 6 and 18%, respectively, and 30% of the fibers were excited by low pH, although the change in threshold of pH responsive and unresponsive fibers did not differ significantly, suggesting a general excitability decrease induced by protons. Heat stimulation increased the mean threshold and conduction velocity of the fibers tested and resulted in activity in 78% of units. Additionally, for these units, activation was preceded by a significant decrease in threshold compared with the tracked thresholds of fibers unresponsive to heat. Bradykinin also led to a significant threshold decrease before activation. In conclusion, the technique of threshold tracking proved suitable to assess changes in excitability resulting from receptor currents evoked by noxious heat and bradykinin in the terminal arborization of cutaneous nociceptors. Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and Adelta-fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in the isolated rat skin-nerve preparation. Constant current pulses were delivered (1 Hz) through a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the receptive field, and the current amplitude was controlled by feedback with a laboratory computer programmed to serially determine the electrical threshold using the method of limits. During threshold tracking, the receptive fields of the fibers were heated (32-46 degrees C in 210 s) or superfused with modified synthetic interstitial fluid containing either 0, 20, 40, 50, or 60 mM [K+], phosphate buffer to pH 5.2 or 6.1, or bradykinin (BK, 10(-8)-10(-5) M). High [K+]e decreased the current threshold for activation by 6-14% over 120 s, whereas K+-free superfusion augmented the threshold by >5%, and after some delay, also induced ongoing discharge in 60% of units. pH 6.1 and 5.2 caused an increase in threshold of 6 and 18%, respectively, and 30% of the fibers were excited by low pH, although the change in threshold of pH responsive and unresponsive fibers did not differ significantly, suggesting a general excitability decrease induced by protons. Heat stimulation increased the mean threshold and conduction velocity of the fibers tested and resulted in activity in 78% of units. Additionally, for these units, activation was preceded by a significant decrease in threshold compared with the tracked thresholds of fibers unresponsive to heat. Bradykinin also led to a significant threshold decrease before activation. In conclusion, the technique of threshold tracking proved suitable to assess changes in excitability resulting from receptor currents evoked by noxious heat and bradykinin in the terminal arborization of cutaneous nociceptors. Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany Submitted 29 June 2004; accepted in final form 9 March 2005 Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and A -fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in the isolated rat skinnerve preparation. Constant current pulses were delivered (1 Hz) through a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the receptive field, and the current amplitude was controlled by feedback with a laboratory computer programmed to serially determine the electrical threshold using the method of limits. During threshold tracking, the receptive fields of the fibers were heated (3246°C in 210 s) or superfused with modified synthetic interstitial fluid containing either 0, 20, 40, 50, or 60 mM [K + ], phosphate buffer to pH 5.2 or 6.1, or bradykinin (BK, 10 8 10 -5 M). High [K + ] e decreased the current threshold for activation by 614% over 120 s, whereas K + -free superfusion augmented the threshold by >5%, and after some delay, also induced ongoing discharge in 60% of units. pH 6.1 and 5.2 caused an increase in threshold of 6 and 18%, respectively, and 30% of the fibers were excited by low pH, although the change in threshold of pH responsive and unresponsive fibers did not differ significantly, suggesting a general excitability decrease induced by protons. Heat stimulation increased the mean threshold and conduction velocity of the fibers tested and resulted in activity in 78% of units. Additionally, for these units, activation was preceded by a significant decrease in threshold compared with the tracked thresholds of fibers unresponsive to heat. Bradykinin also led to a significant threshold decrease before activation. In conclusion, the technique of threshold tracking proved suitable to assess changes in excitability resulting from receptor currents evoked by noxious heat and bradykinin in the terminal arborization of cutaneous nociceptors. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. K. Sauer, Inst. für Physiologie and Pathophysiologie, Univ. Erlangen/Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 17, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (E-mail: sauer{at}physiologie1.uni-erlangen.de ) Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and A delta -fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in the isolated rat skin-nerve preparation. Constant current pulses were delivered (1 Hz) through a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the receptive field, and the current amplitude was controlled by feedback with a laboratory computer programmed to serially determine the electrical threshold using the method of limits. During threshold tracking, the receptive fields of the fibers were heated (32-46 degree C in 210 s) or superfused with modified synthetic interstitial fluid containing either 0, 20, 40, 50, or 60 mM [K super(+)], phosphate buffer to pH 5.2 or 6.1, or bradykinin (BK, 10 super(-8)-10 super(-5) M). High [K super(+)] sub(e) decreased the current threshold for activation by 6-14% over 120 s, whereas K super(+)-free superfusion augmented the threshold by >5%, and after some delay, also induced ongoing discharge in 60% of units. pH 6.1 and 5.2 caused an increase in threshold of 6 and 18%, respectively, and 30% of the fibers were excited by low pH, although the change in threshold of pH responsive and unresponsive fibers did not differ significantly, suggesting a general excitability decrease induced by protons. Heat stimulation increased the mean threshold and conduction velocity of the fibers tested and resulted in activity in 78% of units. Additionally, for these units, activation was preceded by a significant decrease in threshold compared with the tracked thresholds of fibers unresponsive to heat. Bradykinin also led to a significant threshold decrease before activation. In conclusion, the technique of threshold tracking proved suitable to assess changes in excitability resulting from receptor currents evoked by noxious heat and bradykinin in the terminal arborization of cutaneous nociceptors. Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and Adelta-fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in the isolated rat skin-nerve preparation. Constant current pulses were delivered (1 Hz) through a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the receptive field, and the current amplitude was controlled by feedback with a laboratory computer programmed to serially determine the electrical threshold using the method of limits. During threshold tracking, the receptive fields of the fibers were heated (32-46 degrees C in 210 s) or superfused with modified synthetic interstitial fluid containing either 0, 20, 40, 50, or 60 mM [K+], phosphate buffer to pH 5.2 or 6.1, or bradykinin (BK, 10(-8)-10(-5) M). High [K+]e decreased the current threshold for activation by 6-14% over 120 s, whereas K+-free superfusion augmented the threshold by >5%, and after some delay, also induced ongoing discharge in 60% of units. pH 6.1 and 5.2 caused an increase in threshold of 6 and 18%, respectively, and 30% of the fibers were excited by low pH, although the change in threshold of pH responsive and unresponsive fibers did not differ significantly, suggesting a general excitability decrease induced by protons. Heat stimulation increased the mean threshold and conduction velocity of the fibers tested and resulted in activity in 78% of units. Additionally, for these units, activation was preceded by a significant decrease in threshold compared with the tracked thresholds of fibers unresponsive to heat. Bradykinin also led to a significant threshold decrease before activation. In conclusion, the technique of threshold tracking proved suitable to assess changes in excitability resulting from receptor currents evoked by noxious heat and bradykinin in the terminal arborization of cutaneous nociceptors. |
Author | Averbeck, B Sauer, S. K Carr, R. W Handwerker, H. O Weidner, C Nesnidal, U Reeh, P. W |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Sauer, S. K – sequence: 2 fullname: Weidner, C – sequence: 3 fullname: Carr, R. W – sequence: 4 fullname: Averbeck, B – sequence: 5 fullname: Nesnidal, U – sequence: 6 fullname: Reeh, P. W – sequence: 7 fullname: Handwerker, H. O |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15772238$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkEGP0zAQRi20iO0uHLkin7il2E6c2CcEhQWkFSAUxNFynEnjktpZ2wH673Fp0V6QOM1o9Obp03eFLpx3gNBTStaUcvZi59aE1JyvGSHVA7TKN1ZQLsUFWhGS95I0zSW6inFHCGk4YY_QJeVNw1gpVshstMNfwMCcfMCffQKXrJ4ifg34DSQwCXr8zaYRt2OAOPqpx23Q5rt1W2zzq054syTtwC8Rf_TGHlX2B-AWwt66rHr5GD0c8oQn53mNvt68bTfvi9tP7z5sXt0WppR1KnpDy76RuqtMz2pNOg5mgKHXjFJtdCXlACA7EHXNgIuqF7KSHS3BiKrmZV1eo-cn7xz83QIxqb2NBqbplE7VjRQVF-K_IG3KLBQsg8UJNMHHGGBQc7B7HQ6KEnWsX-2c-lO_Otaf-Wdn8dLtob-nz31ngJ2A0W7HnzaAmsdDtH7y24O6WaaphV8pS2WlqGJUqrkf7uP-6ykH-AuXvwF-VqLz |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_mus_20793 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pain_2010_08_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pain_2008_01_031 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2007_10_030 crossref_primary_10_1097_j_pain_0000000000000723 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2007_09_085 crossref_primary_10_1113_jphysiol_2007_130823 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1460_9568_2009_06747_x |
Cites_doi | 10.1085/jgp.20028628 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012771 10.1007/s002329900164 10.1152/jn.1992.68.2.581 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb11274.x 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15435 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008176 10.1126/science.288.5464.306 10.1007/BF00584354 10.1085/jgp.200308814 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-12-04793.2003 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.211bf.x 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90564-1 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10345.1998 10.1085/jgp.51.2.221 10.1002/cne.902920107 10.1007/BF00584839 10.1038/35082088 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008502 10.1152/jn.1990.63.4.887 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014491 10.1007/BF00584626 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0229g.x 10.1007/BF01870958 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-01-00086.1992 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80564-4 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00185.x 10.1016/0304-3940(86)90180-1 10.1016/0024-3205(69)90283-5 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016395 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-09-03314.1989 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018765 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7TK 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1152/jn.00655.2004 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1522-1598 |
EndPage | 225 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1152_jn_00655_2004 15772238 jn_94_1_219 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | - 0VX 1Z7 2WC 39C 3O- 4.4 41 53G 55 5GY 5VS AALRV ABFLS ABIVO ABPTK ABUFD ABZEH ACGFS ACNCT ADACO ADBBV ADBIT ADKLL AENEX AETEA AFFNX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL C1A CS3 DIK DL DU5 DZ E3Z EBS EJD F5P FH7 FRP GJ GX1 H13 H~9 KQ8 L7B MVM NEJ O0- OHT OK1 P2P RAP RHF RHI RPL SJN UHB UPT UQL WH7 WOQ WOW X X7M ZA5 ZY4 --- -DZ -~X .55 .GJ 18M 1CY 29L 41~ 476 8M5 ABCQX ABJNI ABKWE ABTAH ACGFO ADFNX ADIYS AFOSN AI. AIZAD BKKCC BTFSW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF EMOBN ITBOX NPM RPRKH TR2 VH1 W8F XJT XOL XSW YBH YQT YSK ZGI ZXP AAYXX CITATION 7TK 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-dc13d79ab4cd26a0b5ecfefda211aca499fee9be8662e584d8949b13ec8465363 |
ISSN | 0022-3077 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 23:36:55 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 09:07:52 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 19:24:15 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:44:47 EDT 2024 Mon May 06 12:25:55 EDT 2019 Tue Jan 05 17:53:15 EST 2021 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c396t-dc13d79ab4cd26a0b5ecfefda211aca499fee9be8662e584d8949b13ec8465363 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
PMID | 15772238 |
PQID | 17365382 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_67984588 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00655_2004 proquest_miscellaneous_17365382 pubmed_primary_15772238 highwire_physiology_jn_94_1_219 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20050701 2005-Jul 2005-07-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2005-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2005 text: 20050701 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of neurophysiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neurophysiol |
PublicationYear | 2005 |
Publisher | Am Phys Soc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Am Phys Soc |
References | R21 R20 R23 R22 R25 R24 R27 R26 R29 R28 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R30 R10 R32 R31 R12 R34 R11 R33 R14 R36 R13 R35 R16 R15 R18 R17 R19 |
References_xml | – ident: R8 doi: 10.1085/jgp.20028628 – ident: R28 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012771 – ident: R2 doi: 10.1007/s002329900164 – ident: R23 doi: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.2.581 – ident: R35 doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb11274.x – ident: R11 doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15435 – ident: R20 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008176 – ident: R10 doi: 10.1126/science.288.5464.306 – ident: R26 doi: 10.1007/BF00584354 – ident: R9 doi: 10.1085/jgp.200308814 – ident: R15 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-12-04793.2003 – ident: R6 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.211bf.x – ident: R3 doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90564-1 – ident: R14 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10345.1998 – ident: R17 doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.2.221 – ident: R16 doi: 10.1002/cne.902920107 – ident: R13 doi: 10.1007/BF00584839 – ident: R12 doi: 10.1038/35082088 – ident: R27 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008502 – ident: R24 doi: 10.1152/jn.1990.63.4.887 – ident: R18 – ident: R31 – ident: R22 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014491 – ident: R32 doi: 10.1007/BF00584626 – ident: R25 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0229g.x – ident: R29 – ident: R21 doi: 10.1007/BF01870958 – ident: R33 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-01-00086.1992 – ident: R19 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764 – ident: R34 doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80564-4 – ident: R36 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00185.x – ident: R30 doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(86)90180-1 – ident: R5 doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(69)90283-5 – ident: R1 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016395 – ident: R7 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-09-03314.1989 – ident: R4 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018765 |
SSID | ssj0007502 |
Score | 1.8772334 |
Snippet | Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
Submitted 29 June 2004;
accepted in final form 9 March 2005... Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and Adelta-fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing... Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and Aδ-fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in... Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and A delta -fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed highwire |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 219 |
SubjectTerms | Adaptation, Physiological - drug effects Afferent Pathways - drug effects Afferent Pathways - physiology Analysis of Variance Animals Bradykinin - pharmacology Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Electric Stimulation - methods Hot Temperature Hydrogen-Ion Concentration In Vitro Techniques Male Nerve Fibers - drug effects Nerve Fibers - physiology Neural Conduction - drug effects Neural Conduction - radiation effects Nociceptors - physiology Potassium - pharmacology Rats Rats, Wistar Reaction Time - drug effects Reaction Time - radiation effects Sensory Thresholds - drug effects Sensory Thresholds - physiology Sensory Thresholds - radiation effects Skin - drug effects Skin - innervation |
Title | Can Receptor Potentials Be Detected With Threshold Tracking in Rat Cutaneous Nociceptive Terminals? |
URI | http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/94/1/219 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15772238 https://search.proquest.com/docview/17365382 https://search.proquest.com/docview/67984588 |
Volume | 94 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9QwFLagXLggoCxDWXxAvUQD2ZzlhGZGrSooQ4GMOjfLW6QWmqmmGST49bznxEkDrVguURQ5VuLvy8t7z28h5GWagtoL1s44itFb5Qv4pFI4E3lcMl36mknMHX4_Tw4W8dslW_btrWx2SS1fqR9X5pX8D6pwDXDFLNl_QLabFC7AOeALR0AYjn-F8cz63zEwZbX2jlY1Rv5gOeQpBgPh7gBok8foaC0AsQvcaMJi5upLm8fySdTebAPaocE42DnAZGNcvhmvaEJkvl78Evd3SX21hTCtX2TgmP8sNm0rr96BemxOdJtX0_lkZ2LdRHZ7nZNnAusPWFvxPB14I1gXuTrIDvDb1iythG3aGA-YNBSXzZ83bFKgfxfqDIvEnlYYg8eYten7v5fbsZ9_4PuLw0Ne7C2Lm-RWCHIHBd67j33xeFCO-uLx8Iiu5CoLXw8mH6oormz09SaIVUWKu-ROCwKdNIS4R26Y6j7ZnlSiXp19p7v0qENlmyjgCHUcoT1H6NRQxxGKHKEdR6jjCD2BW0VNO47QSxyhHUfePCCL_b1idjBuG2uMVZQn9VirINJpLmSsdJgIXzKjSlNqEQaBUAKM4NKYXJosSUIDGqrO8jiXQWRUhuX4kugh2apWlXlMaIRNp6LEV5EtbSnzWEiw13Qgc5NlMRuRXbeW_Lypn8Kt3clCflpxu-jYCjUeEc-tNO_Jy9ERUwDQMDiPecCBMfxclyPy4qrRMKMbBSMcXBwkJm6DNUvFgzSCl8jC60fgziRmcI_Iowbn_tEZWKOg5T754-w75Hb_fTwlW_V6Y56B_lrL55aVPwEDUJ1I |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,27936,27937 |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can+Receptor+Potentials+Be+Detected+With+Threshold+Tracking+in+Rat+Cutaneous+Nociceptive+Terminals%3F&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Sauer%2C+S+K&rft.au=Weidner%2C+C&rft.au=Carr%2C+R+W&rft.au=Averbeck%2C+B&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=225&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00655.2004&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |