Can Receptor Potentials Be Detected With Threshold Tracking in Rat Cutaneous Nociceptive Terminals?

Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany Submitted 29 June 2004; accepted in final form 9 March 2005 Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and A -fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurophysiology Vol. 94; no. 1; pp. 219 - 225
Main Authors Sauer, S. K, Weidner, C, Carr, R. W, Averbeck, B, Nesnidal, U, Reeh, P. W, Handwerker, H. O
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Am Phys Soc 01.07.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany Submitted 29 June 2004; accepted in final form 9 March 2005 Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and A -fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in the isolated rat skin–nerve preparation. Constant current pulses were delivered (1 Hz) through a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the receptive field, and the current amplitude was controlled by feedback with a laboratory computer programmed to serially determine the electrical threshold using the method of limits. During threshold tracking, the receptive fields of the fibers were heated (32–46°C in 210 s) or superfused with modified synthetic interstitial fluid containing either 0, 20, 40, 50, or 60 mM [K + ], phosphate buffer to pH 5.2 or 6.1, or bradykinin (BK, 10 –8 –10 -5 M). High [K + ] e decreased the current threshold for activation by 6–14% over 120 s, whereas K + -free superfusion augmented the threshold by >5%, and after some delay, also induced ongoing discharge in 60% of units. pH 6.1 and 5.2 caused an increase in threshold of 6 and 18%, respectively, and 30% of the fibers were excited by low pH, although the change in threshold of pH responsive and unresponsive fibers did not differ significantly, suggesting a general excitability decrease induced by protons. Heat stimulation increased the mean threshold and conduction velocity of the fibers tested and resulted in activity in 78% of units. Additionally, for these units, activation was preceded by a significant decrease in threshold compared with the tracked thresholds of fibers unresponsive to heat. Bradykinin also led to a significant threshold decrease before activation. In conclusion, the technique of threshold tracking proved suitable to assess changes in excitability resulting from receptor currents evoked by noxious heat and bradykinin in the terminal arborization of cutaneous nociceptors. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. K. Sauer, Inst. für Physiologie and Pathophysiologie, Univ. Erlangen/Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 17, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (E-mail: sauer{at}physiologie1.uni-erlangen.de )
AbstractList Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and Aδ-fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in the isolated rat skin–nerve preparation. Constant current pulses were delivered (1 Hz) through a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the receptive field, and the current amplitude was controlled by feedback with a laboratory computer programmed to serially determine the electrical threshold using the method of limits. During threshold tracking, the receptive fields of the fibers were heated (32–46°C in 210 s) or superfused with modified synthetic interstitial fluid containing either 0, 20, 40, 50, or 60 mM [K + ], phosphate buffer to pH 5.2 or 6.1, or bradykinin (BK, 10 −8 –10 -5 M). High [K + ] e decreased the current threshold for activation by 6–14% over 120 s, whereas K + -free superfusion augmented the threshold by >5%, and after some delay, also induced ongoing discharge in 60% of units. pH 6.1 and 5.2 caused an increase in threshold of 6 and 18%, respectively, and 30% of the fibers were excited by low pH, although the change in threshold of pH responsive and unresponsive fibers did not differ significantly, suggesting a general excitability decrease induced by protons. Heat stimulation increased the mean threshold and conduction velocity of the fibers tested and resulted in activity in 78% of units. Additionally, for these units, activation was preceded by a significant decrease in threshold compared with the tracked thresholds of fibers unresponsive to heat. Bradykinin also led to a significant threshold decrease before activation. In conclusion, the technique of threshold tracking proved suitable to assess changes in excitability resulting from receptor currents evoked by noxious heat and bradykinin in the terminal arborization of cutaneous nociceptors.
Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and Adelta-fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in the isolated rat skin-nerve preparation. Constant current pulses were delivered (1 Hz) through a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the receptive field, and the current amplitude was controlled by feedback with a laboratory computer programmed to serially determine the electrical threshold using the method of limits. During threshold tracking, the receptive fields of the fibers were heated (32-46 degrees C in 210 s) or superfused with modified synthetic interstitial fluid containing either 0, 20, 40, 50, or 60 mM [K+], phosphate buffer to pH 5.2 or 6.1, or bradykinin (BK, 10(-8)-10(-5) M). High [K+]e decreased the current threshold for activation by 6-14% over 120 s, whereas K+-free superfusion augmented the threshold by >5%, and after some delay, also induced ongoing discharge in 60% of units. pH 6.1 and 5.2 caused an increase in threshold of 6 and 18%, respectively, and 30% of the fibers were excited by low pH, although the change in threshold of pH responsive and unresponsive fibers did not differ significantly, suggesting a general excitability decrease induced by protons. Heat stimulation increased the mean threshold and conduction velocity of the fibers tested and resulted in activity in 78% of units. Additionally, for these units, activation was preceded by a significant decrease in threshold compared with the tracked thresholds of fibers unresponsive to heat. Bradykinin also led to a significant threshold decrease before activation. In conclusion, the technique of threshold tracking proved suitable to assess changes in excitability resulting from receptor currents evoked by noxious heat and bradykinin in the terminal arborization of cutaneous nociceptors.
Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany Submitted 29 June 2004; accepted in final form 9 March 2005 Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and A -fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in the isolated rat skin–nerve preparation. Constant current pulses were delivered (1 Hz) through a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the receptive field, and the current amplitude was controlled by feedback with a laboratory computer programmed to serially determine the electrical threshold using the method of limits. During threshold tracking, the receptive fields of the fibers were heated (32–46°C in 210 s) or superfused with modified synthetic interstitial fluid containing either 0, 20, 40, 50, or 60 mM [K + ], phosphate buffer to pH 5.2 or 6.1, or bradykinin (BK, 10 –8 –10 -5 M). High [K + ] e decreased the current threshold for activation by 6–14% over 120 s, whereas K + -free superfusion augmented the threshold by >5%, and after some delay, also induced ongoing discharge in 60% of units. pH 6.1 and 5.2 caused an increase in threshold of 6 and 18%, respectively, and 30% of the fibers were excited by low pH, although the change in threshold of pH responsive and unresponsive fibers did not differ significantly, suggesting a general excitability decrease induced by protons. Heat stimulation increased the mean threshold and conduction velocity of the fibers tested and resulted in activity in 78% of units. Additionally, for these units, activation was preceded by a significant decrease in threshold compared with the tracked thresholds of fibers unresponsive to heat. Bradykinin also led to a significant threshold decrease before activation. In conclusion, the technique of threshold tracking proved suitable to assess changes in excitability resulting from receptor currents evoked by noxious heat and bradykinin in the terminal arborization of cutaneous nociceptors. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. K. Sauer, Inst. für Physiologie and Pathophysiologie, Univ. Erlangen/Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 17, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (E-mail: sauer{at}physiologie1.uni-erlangen.de )
Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and A delta -fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in the isolated rat skin-nerve preparation. Constant current pulses were delivered (1 Hz) through a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the receptive field, and the current amplitude was controlled by feedback with a laboratory computer programmed to serially determine the electrical threshold using the method of limits. During threshold tracking, the receptive fields of the fibers were heated (32-46 degree C in 210 s) or superfused with modified synthetic interstitial fluid containing either 0, 20, 40, 50, or 60 mM [K super(+)], phosphate buffer to pH 5.2 or 6.1, or bradykinin (BK, 10 super(-8)-10 super(-5) M). High [K super(+)] sub(e) decreased the current threshold for activation by 6-14% over 120 s, whereas K super(+)-free superfusion augmented the threshold by >5%, and after some delay, also induced ongoing discharge in 60% of units. pH 6.1 and 5.2 caused an increase in threshold of 6 and 18%, respectively, and 30% of the fibers were excited by low pH, although the change in threshold of pH responsive and unresponsive fibers did not differ significantly, suggesting a general excitability decrease induced by protons. Heat stimulation increased the mean threshold and conduction velocity of the fibers tested and resulted in activity in 78% of units. Additionally, for these units, activation was preceded by a significant decrease in threshold compared with the tracked thresholds of fibers unresponsive to heat. Bradykinin also led to a significant threshold decrease before activation. In conclusion, the technique of threshold tracking proved suitable to assess changes in excitability resulting from receptor currents evoked by noxious heat and bradykinin in the terminal arborization of cutaneous nociceptors.
Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and Adelta-fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in the isolated rat skin-nerve preparation. Constant current pulses were delivered (1 Hz) through a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the receptive field, and the current amplitude was controlled by feedback with a laboratory computer programmed to serially determine the electrical threshold using the method of limits. During threshold tracking, the receptive fields of the fibers were heated (32-46 degrees C in 210 s) or superfused with modified synthetic interstitial fluid containing either 0, 20, 40, 50, or 60 mM [K+], phosphate buffer to pH 5.2 or 6.1, or bradykinin (BK, 10(-8)-10(-5) M). High [K+]e decreased the current threshold for activation by 6-14% over 120 s, whereas K+-free superfusion augmented the threshold by >5%, and after some delay, also induced ongoing discharge in 60% of units. pH 6.1 and 5.2 caused an increase in threshold of 6 and 18%, respectively, and 30% of the fibers were excited by low pH, although the change in threshold of pH responsive and unresponsive fibers did not differ significantly, suggesting a general excitability decrease induced by protons. Heat stimulation increased the mean threshold and conduction velocity of the fibers tested and resulted in activity in 78% of units. Additionally, for these units, activation was preceded by a significant decrease in threshold compared with the tracked thresholds of fibers unresponsive to heat. Bradykinin also led to a significant threshold decrease before activation. In conclusion, the technique of threshold tracking proved suitable to assess changes in excitability resulting from receptor currents evoked by noxious heat and bradykinin in the terminal arborization of cutaneous nociceptors.
Author Averbeck, B
Sauer, S. K
Carr, R. W
Handwerker, H. O
Weidner, C
Nesnidal, U
Reeh, P. W
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Sauer, S. K
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Weidner, C
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Carr, R. W
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Averbeck, B
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Nesnidal, U
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Reeh, P. W
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Handwerker, H. O
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15772238$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkEGP0zAQRi20iO0uHLkin7il2E6c2CcEhQWkFSAUxNFynEnjktpZ2wH673Fp0V6QOM1o9Obp03eFLpx3gNBTStaUcvZi59aE1JyvGSHVA7TKN1ZQLsUFWhGS95I0zSW6inFHCGk4YY_QJeVNw1gpVshstMNfwMCcfMCffQKXrJ4ifg34DSQwCXr8zaYRt2OAOPqpx23Q5rt1W2zzq054syTtwC8Rf_TGHlX2B-AWwt66rHr5GD0c8oQn53mNvt68bTfvi9tP7z5sXt0WppR1KnpDy76RuqtMz2pNOg5mgKHXjFJtdCXlACA7EHXNgIuqF7KSHS3BiKrmZV1eo-cn7xz83QIxqb2NBqbplE7VjRQVF-K_IG3KLBQsg8UJNMHHGGBQc7B7HQ6KEnWsX-2c-lO_Otaf-Wdn8dLtob-nz31ngJ2A0W7HnzaAmsdDtH7y24O6WaaphV8pS2WlqGJUqrkf7uP-6ykH-AuXvwF-VqLz
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_mus_20793
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pain_2010_08_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pain_2008_01_031
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2007_10_030
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_pain_0000000000000723
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2007_09_085
crossref_primary_10_1113_jphysiol_2007_130823
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1460_9568_2009_06747_x
Cites_doi 10.1085/jgp.20028628
10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012771
10.1007/s002329900164
10.1152/jn.1992.68.2.581
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb11274.x
10.1073/pnas.93.26.15435
10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008176
10.1126/science.288.5464.306
10.1007/BF00584354
10.1085/jgp.200308814
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-12-04793.2003
10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.211bf.x
10.1016/0006-8993(88)90564-1
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10345.1998
10.1085/jgp.51.2.221
10.1002/cne.902920107
10.1007/BF00584839
10.1038/35082088
10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008502
10.1152/jn.1990.63.4.887
10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014491
10.1007/BF00584626
10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0229g.x
10.1007/BF01870958
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-01-00086.1992
10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764
10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80564-4
10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00185.x
10.1016/0304-3940(86)90180-1
10.1016/0024-3205(69)90283-5
10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016395
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-09-03314.1989
10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018765
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7TK
7X8
DOI 10.1152/jn.00655.2004
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic

Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1522-1598
EndPage 225
ExternalDocumentID 10_1152_jn_00655_2004
15772238
jn_94_1_219
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID -
0VX
1Z7
2WC
39C
3O-
4.4
41
53G
55
5GY
5VS
AALRV
ABFLS
ABIVO
ABPTK
ABUFD
ABZEH
ACGFS
ACNCT
ADACO
ADBBV
ADBIT
ADKLL
AENEX
AETEA
AFFNX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CS3
DIK
DL
DU5
DZ
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FH7
FRP
GJ
GX1
H13
H~9
KQ8
L7B
MVM
NEJ
O0-
OHT
OK1
P2P
RAP
RHF
RHI
RPL
SJN
UHB
UPT
UQL
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X
X7M
ZA5
ZY4
---
-DZ
-~X
.55
.GJ
18M
1CY
29L
41~
476
8M5
ABCQX
ABJNI
ABKWE
ABTAH
ACGFO
ADFNX
ADIYS
AFOSN
AI.
AIZAD
BKKCC
BTFSW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
EMOBN
ITBOX
NPM
RPRKH
TR2
VH1
W8F
XJT
XOL
XSW
YBH
YQT
YSK
ZGI
ZXP
AAYXX
CITATION
7TK
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-dc13d79ab4cd26a0b5ecfefda211aca499fee9be8662e584d8949b13ec8465363
ISSN 0022-3077
IngestDate Fri Oct 25 23:36:55 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 25 09:07:52 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 26 19:24:15 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:44:47 EDT 2024
Mon May 06 12:25:55 EDT 2019
Tue Jan 05 17:53:15 EST 2021
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c396t-dc13d79ab4cd26a0b5ecfefda211aca499fee9be8662e584d8949b13ec8465363
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
PMID 15772238
PQID 17365382
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_67984588
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00655_2004
proquest_miscellaneous_17365382
pubmed_primary_15772238
highwire_physiology_jn_94_1_219
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20050701
2005-Jul
2005-07-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2005
  text: 20050701
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of neurophysiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurophysiol
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher Am Phys Soc
Publisher_xml – name: Am Phys Soc
References R21
R20
R23
R22
R25
R24
R27
R26
R29
R28
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R30
R10
R32
R31
R12
R34
R11
R33
R14
R36
R13
R35
R16
R15
R18
R17
R19
References_xml – ident: R8
  doi: 10.1085/jgp.20028628
– ident: R28
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012771
– ident: R2
  doi: 10.1007/s002329900164
– ident: R23
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.2.581
– ident: R35
  doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb11274.x
– ident: R11
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15435
– ident: R20
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008176
– ident: R10
  doi: 10.1126/science.288.5464.306
– ident: R26
  doi: 10.1007/BF00584354
– ident: R9
  doi: 10.1085/jgp.200308814
– ident: R15
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-12-04793.2003
– ident: R6
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.211bf.x
– ident: R3
  doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90564-1
– ident: R14
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10345.1998
– ident: R17
  doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.2.221
– ident: R16
  doi: 10.1002/cne.902920107
– ident: R13
  doi: 10.1007/BF00584839
– ident: R12
  doi: 10.1038/35082088
– ident: R27
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008502
– ident: R24
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1990.63.4.887
– ident: R18
– ident: R31
– ident: R22
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014491
– ident: R32
  doi: 10.1007/BF00584626
– ident: R25
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0229g.x
– ident: R29
– ident: R21
  doi: 10.1007/BF01870958
– ident: R33
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-01-00086.1992
– ident: R19
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764
– ident: R34
  doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80564-4
– ident: R36
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00185.x
– ident: R30
  doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(86)90180-1
– ident: R5
  doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(69)90283-5
– ident: R1
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016395
– ident: R7
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-09-03314.1989
– ident: R4
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018765
SSID ssj0007502
Score 1.8772334
Snippet Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany Submitted 29 June 2004; accepted in final form 9 March 2005...
Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and Adelta-fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing...
Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and Aδ-fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing stimuli in...
Threshold tracking of individual polymodal C- and A delta -fiber terminals was used to assess membrane potential changes induced by de- or hyperpolarizing...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
highwire
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 219
SubjectTerms Adaptation, Physiological - drug effects
Afferent Pathways - drug effects
Afferent Pathways - physiology
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Bradykinin - pharmacology
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Electric Stimulation - methods
Hot Temperature
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
In Vitro Techniques
Male
Nerve Fibers - drug effects
Nerve Fibers - physiology
Neural Conduction - drug effects
Neural Conduction - radiation effects
Nociceptors - physiology
Potassium - pharmacology
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Reaction Time - drug effects
Reaction Time - radiation effects
Sensory Thresholds - drug effects
Sensory Thresholds - physiology
Sensory Thresholds - radiation effects
Skin - drug effects
Skin - innervation
Title Can Receptor Potentials Be Detected With Threshold Tracking in Rat Cutaneous Nociceptive Terminals?
URI http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/94/1/219
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15772238
https://search.proquest.com/docview/17365382
https://search.proquest.com/docview/67984588
Volume 94
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9QwFLagXLggoCxDWXxAvUQD2ZzlhGZGrSooQ4GMOjfLW6QWmqmmGST49bznxEkDrVguURQ5VuLvy8t7z28h5GWagtoL1s44itFb5Qv4pFI4E3lcMl36mknMHX4_Tw4W8dslW_btrWx2SS1fqR9X5pX8D6pwDXDFLNl_QLabFC7AOeALR0AYjn-F8cz63zEwZbX2jlY1Rv5gOeQpBgPh7gBok8foaC0AsQvcaMJi5upLm8fySdTebAPaocE42DnAZGNcvhmvaEJkvl78Evd3SX21hTCtX2TgmP8sNm0rr96BemxOdJtX0_lkZ2LdRHZ7nZNnAusPWFvxPB14I1gXuTrIDvDb1iythG3aGA-YNBSXzZ83bFKgfxfqDIvEnlYYg8eYten7v5fbsZ9_4PuLw0Ne7C2Lm-RWCHIHBd67j33xeFCO-uLx8Iiu5CoLXw8mH6oormz09SaIVUWKu-ROCwKdNIS4R26Y6j7ZnlSiXp19p7v0qENlmyjgCHUcoT1H6NRQxxGKHKEdR6jjCD2BW0VNO47QSxyhHUfePCCL_b1idjBuG2uMVZQn9VirINJpLmSsdJgIXzKjSlNqEQaBUAKM4NKYXJosSUIDGqrO8jiXQWRUhuX4kugh2apWlXlMaIRNp6LEV5EtbSnzWEiw13Qgc5NlMRuRXbeW_Lypn8Kt3clCflpxu-jYCjUeEc-tNO_Jy9ERUwDQMDiPecCBMfxclyPy4qrRMKMbBSMcXBwkJm6DNUvFgzSCl8jC60fgziRmcI_Iowbn_tEZWKOg5T754-w75Hb_fTwlW_V6Y56B_lrL55aVPwEDUJ1I
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,27936,27937
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can+Receptor+Potentials+Be+Detected+With+Threshold+Tracking+in+Rat+Cutaneous+Nociceptive+Terminals%3F&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Sauer%2C+S+K&rft.au=Weidner%2C+C&rft.au=Carr%2C+R+W&rft.au=Averbeck%2C+B&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=225&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00655.2004&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon