Task-Dependent Modulation of Multi-Digit Force Coordination Patterns

  1 Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287; and   2 Human Motor Control Group, Department of Physiology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom Rearick, Matthew P., Amparo Casares, and Marco Santello. Task-Dependent Modulat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurophysiology Vol. 89; no. 3; pp. 1317 - 1326
Main Authors Rearick, Matthew P, Casares, Amparo, Santello, Marco
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Am Phys Soc 01.03.2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract   1 Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287; and   2 Human Motor Control Group, Department of Physiology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom Rearick, Matthew P., Amparo Casares, and Marco Santello. Task-Dependent Modulation of Multi-Digit Force Coordination Patterns. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 1317-1326, 2003. When grasping and holding an object with five digits under a variety of task constraints, subjects use well-defined force coordination patterns, i.e., consistent force covariations and in-phase synchronization among all digit pairs. The question arises as to whether these force coordination patterns are default mechanisms for controlling multi-digit force production or whether they are specific to lifting and holding an object. To address this question, we asked subjects to grasp a manipulandum and exert forces with five digits simultaneously so as to match a force template measured from an actual object grasp, lift, and hold task (GLH). Unlike GLH, the force production task (FP) lacked the constraint of having to maintain object stability against gravity. The amplitude of individual finger forces and force covariations were similar for both tasks (with the exception of the little finger, which tended to produce less force in FP). Nonetheless, when multiple grip forces were not required to hold the manipulandum against gravity (FP), there was a significantly lower tendency for forces to be synchronized with higher intertrial variability of phase differences between forces exerted by all digit-pairs. Furthermore, the tendency for force phase differences to cluster at 0° was lower for FP than GLH. These results suggest that some aspects of the control of multi-digit grasping, i.e., force synchronization, are specific to object lift and hold rather than to the production of multi-digit forces. Modeling work suggests that motor unit synchronization might play an important role in the modulation of force synchronization patterns.
AbstractList When grasping and holding an object with five digits under a variety of task constraints, subjects use well-defined force coordination patterns, i.e., consistent force covariations and in-phase synchronization among all digit pairs. The question arises as to whether these force coordination patterns are default mechanisms for controlling multi-digit force production or whether they are specific to lifting and holding an object. To address this question, we asked subjects to grasp a manipulandum and exert forces with five digits simultaneously so as to match a force template measured from an actual object grasp, lift, and hold task (GLH). Unlike GLH, the force production task (FP) lacked the constraint of having to maintain object stability against gravity. The amplitude of individual finger forces and force covariations were similar for both tasks (with the exception of the little finger, which tended to produce less force in FP). Nonetheless, when multiple grip forces were not required to hold the manipulandum against gravity (FP), there was a significantly lower tendency for forces to be synchronized with higher intertrial variability of phase differences between forces exerted by all digit-pairs. Furthermore, the tendency for force phase differences to cluster at 0 degrees was lower for FP than GLH. These results suggest that some aspects of the control of multi-digit grasping, i.e., force synchronization, are specific to object lift and hold rather than to the production of multi-digit forces. Modeling work suggests that motor unit synchronization might play an important role in the modulation of force synchronization patterns.
When grasping and holding an object with five digits under a variety of task constraints, subjects use well-defined force coordination patterns, i.e., consistent force covariations and in-phase synchronization among all digit pairs. The question arises as to whether these force coordination patterns are default mechanisms for controlling multi-digit force production or whether they are specific to lifting and holding an object. To address this question, we asked subjects to grasp a manipulandum and exert forces with five digits simultaneously so as to match a force template measured from an actual object grasp, lift, and hold task (GLH). Unlike GLH, the force production task (FP) lacked the constraint of having to maintain object stability against gravity. The amplitude of individual finger forces and force covariations were similar for both tasks (with the exception of the little finger, which tended to produce less force in FP). Nonetheless, when multiple grip forces were not required to hold the manipulandum against gravity (FP), there was a significantly lower tendency for forces to be synchronized with higher intertrial variability of phase differences between forces exerted by all digit-pairs. Furthermore, the tendency for force phase differences to cluster at 0 degree was lower for FP than GLH. These results suggest that some aspects of the control of multi-digit grasping, i.e., force synchronization, are specific to object lift and hold rather than to the production of multi-digit forces. Modeling work suggests that motor unit synchronization might play an important role in the modulation of force synchronization patterns.
  1 Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287; and   2 Human Motor Control Group, Department of Physiology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom Rearick, Matthew P., Amparo Casares, and Marco Santello. Task-Dependent Modulation of Multi-Digit Force Coordination Patterns. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 1317-1326, 2003. When grasping and holding an object with five digits under a variety of task constraints, subjects use well-defined force coordination patterns, i.e., consistent force covariations and in-phase synchronization among all digit pairs. The question arises as to whether these force coordination patterns are default mechanisms for controlling multi-digit force production or whether they are specific to lifting and holding an object. To address this question, we asked subjects to grasp a manipulandum and exert forces with five digits simultaneously so as to match a force template measured from an actual object grasp, lift, and hold task (GLH). Unlike GLH, the force production task (FP) lacked the constraint of having to maintain object stability against gravity. The amplitude of individual finger forces and force covariations were similar for both tasks (with the exception of the little finger, which tended to produce less force in FP). Nonetheless, when multiple grip forces were not required to hold the manipulandum against gravity (FP), there was a significantly lower tendency for forces to be synchronized with higher intertrial variability of phase differences between forces exerted by all digit-pairs. Furthermore, the tendency for force phase differences to cluster at 0° was lower for FP than GLH. These results suggest that some aspects of the control of multi-digit grasping, i.e., force synchronization, are specific to object lift and hold rather than to the production of multi-digit forces. Modeling work suggests that motor unit synchronization might play an important role in the modulation of force synchronization patterns.
When grasping and holding an object with five digits under a variety of task constraints, subjects use well-defined force coordination patterns, i.e., consistent force covariations and in-phase synchronization among all digit pairs. The question arises as to whether these force coordination patterns are default mechanisms for controlling multi-digit force production or whether they are specific to lifting and holding an object. To address this question, we asked subjects to grasp a manipulandum and exert forces with five digits simultaneously so as to match a force template measured from an actual object grasp, lift, and hold task (GLH). Unlike GLH, the force production task (FP) lacked the constraint of having to maintain object stability against gravity. The amplitude of individual finger forces and force covariations were similar for both tasks (with the exception of the little finger, which tended to produce less force in FP). Nonetheless, when multiple grip forces were not required to hold the manipulandum against gravity (FP), there was a significantly lower tendency for forces to be synchronized with higher intertrial variability of phase differences between forces exerted by all digit-pairs. Furthermore, the tendency for force phase differences to cluster at 0 degrees was lower for FP than GLH. These results suggest that some aspects of the control of multi-digit grasping, i.e., force synchronization, are specific to object lift and hold rather than to the production of multi-digit forces. Modeling work suggests that motor unit synchronization might play an important role in the modulation of force synchronization patterns.When grasping and holding an object with five digits under a variety of task constraints, subjects use well-defined force coordination patterns, i.e., consistent force covariations and in-phase synchronization among all digit pairs. The question arises as to whether these force coordination patterns are default mechanisms for controlling multi-digit force production or whether they are specific to lifting and holding an object. To address this question, we asked subjects to grasp a manipulandum and exert forces with five digits simultaneously so as to match a force template measured from an actual object grasp, lift, and hold task (GLH). Unlike GLH, the force production task (FP) lacked the constraint of having to maintain object stability against gravity. The amplitude of individual finger forces and force covariations were similar for both tasks (with the exception of the little finger, which tended to produce less force in FP). Nonetheless, when multiple grip forces were not required to hold the manipulandum against gravity (FP), there was a significantly lower tendency for forces to be synchronized with higher intertrial variability of phase differences between forces exerted by all digit-pairs. Furthermore, the tendency for force phase differences to cluster at 0 degrees was lower for FP than GLH. These results suggest that some aspects of the control of multi-digit grasping, i.e., force synchronization, are specific to object lift and hold rather than to the production of multi-digit forces. Modeling work suggests that motor unit synchronization might play an important role in the modulation of force synchronization patterns.
When grasping and holding an object with five digits under a variety of task constraints, subjects use well-defined force coordination patterns, i.e., consistent force covariations and in-phase synchronization among all digit pairs. The question arises as to whether these force coordination patterns are default mechanisms for controlling multi-digit force production or whether they are specific to lifting and holding an object. To address this question, we asked subjects to grasp a manipulandum and exert forces with five digits simultaneously so as to match a force template measured from an actual object grasp, lift, and hold task (GLH). Unlike GLH, the force production task (FP) lacked the constraint of having to maintain object stability against gravity. The amplitude of individual finger forces and force covariations were similar for both tasks (with the exception of the little finger, which tended to produce less force in FP). Nonetheless, when multiple grip forces were not required to hold the manipulandum against gravity (FP), there was a significantly lower tendency for forces to be synchronized with higher intertrial variability of phase differences between forces exerted by all digit-pairs. Furthermore, the tendency for force phase differences to cluster at 0° was lower for FP than GLH. These results suggest that some aspects of the control of multi-digit grasping, i.e., force synchronization, are specific to object lift and hold rather than to the production of multi-digit forces. Modeling work suggests that motor unit synchronization might play an important role in the modulation of force synchronization patterns.
Author Santello, Marco
Casares, Amparo
Rearick, Matthew P
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Rearick, Matthew P
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Casares, Amparo
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Santello, Marco
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12626614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkU1vEzEQhi1URNPCkSvaEz1t8NeuvUeUNBSpFT2kZ8vrj8TBsRfbK8i_Z9ukPSBVnEYaPc-MZt4LcBZiMAB8RHCOUIO_7MIcwoajOYYQvwGzqYdr1HT8DMymDq4JZOwcXOS8gxCyBuJ34BzhFrctojOwXMv8s16awQRtQqnuoh69LC6GKtrqbvTF1Uu3caVaxaRMtYgxaReOxL0sxaSQ34O3VvpsPpzqJXhYXa8XN_Xtj2_fF19va0W6ttQUNhpS26vWEmyk0lT1FFvVd6jRFvWmV4a1iGnYUsg6TpnE3PRcIkSIsh25BJ-Pc4cUf40mF7F3WRnvZTBxzIIRyHnXNv8FEecIU0Yn8NMJHPu90WJIbi_TQTw_aALIEVAp5pyMFcqVp-tLks4LBMVjDGIXxFMM4jGGyar_sV4Gv8KftmzdZvvbJSOG7SG76OPmIFaj92vzp0wO7wQRiCAmBm0n6-p1a1rwQpO_foCouw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_005_0009_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_018_5231_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_004_1975_1
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0083632
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_006_0521_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12938_016_0212_z
crossref_primary_10_1123_jab_28_3_284
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00480_2004
crossref_primary_10_3390_s20051291
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2014_01050
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_016_4632_6
crossref_primary_10_1186_1743_0003_12_6
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00435_2016
crossref_primary_10_1080_13554790601126039
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_017_0305_3
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_01134_2004
crossref_primary_10_1109_TIM_2005_858123
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0109943
crossref_primary_10_1098_rsif_2020_1044
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00322_2020
crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_01063_2003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10055_024_01055_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinph_2012_04_013
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00516_2004
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_01265_2003
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_4512_07_2008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2018_07_023
crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2008_925691
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_020_06027_y
Cites_doi 10.1007/s002219900261
10.1080/00140139508925183
10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
10.1152/jn.1999.81.4.1706
10.1152/jn.2000.83.1.441
10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2393
10.1006/exnr.2002.8003
10.1152/jn.2001.86.5.2125
10.1152/jn.1991.66.6.2072
10.1007/s002210100838
10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011635
10.1023/A:1008810007672
10.1080/00140139208967813
10.1007/s00422-002-0320-7
10.1007/s00221-002-1024-x
10.1097/00001756-199807130-00003
10.1152/jn.1991.65.6.1381
10.1007/s002210050492
10.1007/s00221-001-0966-8
10.1152/jn.1993.70.6.2470
10.1007/s002210000420
10.1152/jn.1999.82.6.3488
10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.604
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-01-00284.1995
10.1126/science.8332915
10.1080/00140139608964455
10.1007/s00422-002-0321-6
10.1007/s002210050813
10.1007/s002210050343
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-22-08542.2000
10.1139/y94-075
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TK
7X8
DOI 10.1152/jn.00581.2002
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Neurosciences Abstracts

MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1522-1598
EndPage 1326
ExternalDocumentID 12626614
10_1152_jn_00581_2002
jn_89_3_1317
Genre Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NIAMS NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 AR-47301-01A2
– fundername: NINDS NIH HHS
  grantid: NS-07309
GroupedDBID -
08R
0VX
1Z7
2WC
39C
3O-
41
53G
55
5GY
5VS
AALRV
ABFLS
ABIVO
ABPTK
ABUFD
ABZEH
ACGFS
ACNCT
ADACO
ADBBV
ADBIT
ADKLL
AENEX
AETEA
AFFNX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CS3
DIK
DL
DU5
DZ
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FH7
FRP
GJ
GX1
H~9
KQ8
L7B
MVM
NEJ
O0-
OHT
OK1
P2P
RAP
RHF
RHI
RPL
SJN
UHB
UPT
UQL
VH1
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X
X7M
ZA5
ZGI
ZXP
ZY4
---
-DZ
-~X
.55
.GJ
18M
1CY
41~
AAYXX
ABCQX
ABHWK
ABJNI
ABKWE
ACGFO
ADFNX
ADHGD
ADIYS
AFOSN
AI.
AIZAD
BKKCC
BTFSW
CITATION
EMOBN
H13
ITBOX
RPRKH
TR2
W8F
XSW
YBH
YQT
YSK
29L
4.4
8M5
ABTAH
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
VXZ
XJT
XOL
7TK
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-405d04fbc6f32eacd4cb42fcb915df1bebce7617d064079847a28eb8a1133cf93
ISSN 0022-3077
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 12:42:14 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 02:15:14 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:34:49 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:16:57 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:11:09 EDT 2025
Tue Jan 05 17:54:12 EST 2021
Mon May 06 12:24:27 EDT 2019
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c396t-405d04fbc6f32eacd4cb42fcb915df1bebce7617d064079847a28eb8a1133cf93
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
PMID 12626614
PQID 18812474
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_73088965
crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_jn_00581_2002
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00581_2002
highwire_physiology_jn_89_3_1317
pubmed_primary_12626614
proquest_miscellaneous_18812474
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20030301
2003-03-01
2003-Mar
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2003-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2003
  text: 20030301
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of neurophysiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurophysiol
PublicationYear 2003
Publisher Am Phys Soc
Publisher_xml – name: Am Phys Soc
References B20
B21
B22
B23
B24
B25
B26
B27
B28
B29
Johansson RS (B13) 1998; 218
Fuglevand AJ (B7) 2002; 28
B30
B31
B10
B32
B11
B33
B12
B34
B14
B15
B16
B17
B18
B19
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B8
B9
References_xml – ident: B32
  doi: 10.1007/s002219900261
– ident: B15
  doi: 10.1080/00140139508925183
– ident: B19
  doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
– ident: B6
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.4.1706
– ident: B31
  doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.1.441
– ident: B5
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2393
– volume: 28
  start-page: 768.16
  year: 2002
  ident: B7
  publication-title: Soc Neurosci Abstr
– ident: B23
  doi: 10.1006/exnr.2002.8003
– ident: B28
  doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.5.2125
– ident: B4
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1991.66.6.2072
– ident: B24
  doi: 10.1007/s002210100838
– volume: 218
  start-page: 45
  year: 1998
  ident: B13
  publication-title: Sensory guidance of movement (Novartis Foundation Symposium)
– ident: B30
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011635
– ident: B9
  doi: 10.1023/A:1008810007672
– ident: B21
  doi: 10.1080/00140139208967813
– ident: B34
  doi: 10.1007/s00422-002-0320-7
– ident: B22
  doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1024-x
– ident: B11
  doi: 10.1097/00001756-199807130-00003
– ident: B26
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1991.65.6.1381
– ident: B18
  doi: 10.1007/s002210050492
– ident: B3
  doi: 10.1007/s00221-001-0966-8
– ident: B8
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.6.2470
– ident: B25
  doi: 10.1007/s002210000420
– ident: B20
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.6.3488
– ident: B2
  doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.604
– ident: B27
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-01-00284.1995
– ident: B29
  doi: 10.1126/science.8332915
– ident: B16
  doi: 10.1080/00140139608964455
– ident: B33
  doi: 10.1007/s00422-002-0321-6
– ident: B14
  doi: 10.1007/s002210050813
– ident: B17
  doi: 10.1007/s002210050343
– ident: B10
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-22-08542.2000
– ident: B12
  doi: 10.1139/y94-075
SSID ssj0007502
Score 1.9282612
Snippet   1 Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287; and   2 Human Motor Control Group, Department of...
When grasping and holding an object with five digits under a variety of task constraints, subjects use well-defined force coordination patterns, i.e.,...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
highwire
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1317
SubjectTerms Cerebral Cortex - physiology
Cortical Synchronization
Fingers - physiology
Gravity Sensing - physiology
Hand Strength - physiology
Humans
Title Task-Dependent Modulation of Multi-Digit Force Coordination Patterns
URI http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/89/3/1317
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12626614
https://www.proquest.com/docview/18812474
https://www.proquest.com/docview/73088965
Volume 89
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9QwFLagXLggoCxh9QH1QlPGcZKJj1WnowrasmWkuVnxVk2BpOqkB_j1PDvOeCLNiOUSRdGTFfnz8r1nv_ch9MaG9iUzIxuoUnGqpIkLTao4pwrYNaOCMZsofHaen8zS9_NsHhT1XHZJKw7kr415Jf-DKnwDXG2W7D8gu2oUPsA74AtPQBief4dxtfwWT7yMbWt1zbwYl7vYYq8KxpPFxaJ9O22updWnA09z0YX_bG1-GwtcbmGnrs6lC3sM4u5fYGJ47fWzkBp2VC1tGtMgNPq1cgkqTYi49rEFGi5Xrd_1H3mhFb9edpI_flzQtcWP0C4N02-k4OfmmxfpzBZ9vawPrKah89GTsBv1J_DnH_l0dnrKy-N5eRvdScALsMvYh8-hGDyQnVAMHn6yL6GaJe8GjQ8pR18GertL4ahFeR_d872ODzuAH6Bbun6Idg8BqObHT7yHP61g2EWTIeY4YI4bg9cwxw5zvI457jF_hGbT4_LoJPZKGLGkLG_Byc_UKDVC5oYmsFWqVIo0MVIwkilDhBZSj4GLKncuy4BxVEmhRVERQqk0jD5GO3VT66cIKyBkRqpcEynTLE2ZZEIaakilwRM14wjt953FpS8Tb9VKvnPnLmYJv6y561urYJpEaG9lftXVR9lmuN_3PA-jl9tASwnAg3HBOOV2DPErZSKEN5lDkyuzCL3uAeSwJtqDrqrWzc2Sk8LS1nG63QL2taJgeRahJx3y4eeT3HHWZ39s_Tm6G-bMC7TTXt_ol8BQW_HKjdPf8SeTDA
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Task-Dependent+Modulation+of+Multi-Digit+Force+Coordination+Patterns&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Rearick%2C+M+P&rft.au=Casares%2C+A&rft.au=Santello%2C+M&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1317&rft.epage=1326&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00581.2002&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon