“You want the right amount of oversight”: interviews with data access committee members and experts on genomic data access
Purpose: Genomic data sharing is vital for optimizing the use of public-funded research data. Data access committees (DACs) have been introduced as a core component of governance in controlled-access models. However, the tasks, structure, and functionality of DACs often remain unstudied. This articl...
Saved in:
Published in | Genetics in medicine Vol. 18; no. 9; pp. 892 - 897 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Nature Publishing Group US
01.09.2016
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose:
Genomic data sharing is vital for optimizing the use of public-funded research data. Data access committees (DACs) have been introduced as a core component of governance in controlled-access models. However, the tasks, structure, and functionality of DACs often remain unstudied. This article investigates the role and adequacy of DACs in access reviews from the perspective of DAC members and experts.
Methods:
Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with both DAC members engaged in genomic data sharing via controlled-access databases and experts in the field.
Results:
The respondents indicated that protecting the privacy of data subjects along with recognition of data producers’ efforts are the main underlying reasons of access review and the controlled-access model. In reviewing the ethical basis and the scientific aspects of access requests, tools and mechanisms such as consent forms, data access agreements, and guidelines have been used. Nevertheless, DAC members and experts identified shortcomings associated with current approaches that may adversely impact the effectiveness and efficiency of access review.
Conclusion:
The identified shortcomings of current approaches to access review could be addressed via complementary mechanisms and alternative models of data sharing to facilitate access to data sets in a responsible fashion.
Genet Med
18
9, 892–897. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose:Genomic data sharing is vital for optimizing the use of public-funded research data. Data access committees (DACs) have been introduced as a core component of governance in controlled-access models. However, the tasks, structure, and functionality of DACs often remain unstudied. This article investigates the role and adequacy of DACs in access reviews from the perspective of DAC members and experts.Methods:Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with both DAC members engaged in genomic data sharing via controlled-access databases and experts in the field.Results:The respondents indicated that protecting the privacy of data subjects along with recognition of data producers' efforts are the main underlying reasons of access review and the controlled-access model. In reviewing the ethical basis and the scientific aspects of access requests, tools and mechanisms such as consent forms, data access agreements, and guidelines have been used. Nevertheless, DAC members and experts identified shortcomings associated with current approaches that may adversely impact the effectiveness and efficiency of access review.Conclusion:The identified shortcomings of current approaches to access review could be addressed via complementary mechanisms and alternative models of data sharing to facilitate access to data sets in a responsible fashion.Genet Med 18 9, 892-897. Purpose: Genomic data sharing is vital for optimizing the use of public-funded research data. Data access committees (DACs) have been introduced as a core component of governance in controlled-access models. However, the tasks, structure, and functionality of DACs often remain unstudied. This article investigates the role and adequacy of DACs in access reviews from the perspective of DAC members and experts. Methods: Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with both DAC members engaged in genomic data sharing via controlled-access databases and experts in the field. Results: The respondents indicated that protecting the privacy of data subjects along with recognition of data producers’ efforts are the main underlying reasons of access review and the controlled-access model. In reviewing the ethical basis and the scientific aspects of access requests, tools and mechanisms such as consent forms, data access agreements, and guidelines have been used. Nevertheless, DAC members and experts identified shortcomings associated with current approaches that may adversely impact the effectiveness and efficiency of access review. Conclusion: The identified shortcomings of current approaches to access review could be addressed via complementary mechanisms and alternative models of data sharing to facilitate access to data sets in a responsible fashion. Genet Med 18 9, 892–897. Genomic data sharing is vital for optimizing the use of public-funded research data. Data access committees (DACs) have been introduced as a core component of governance in controlled-access models. However, the tasks, structure, and functionality of DACs often remain unstudied. This article investigates the role and adequacy of DACs in access reviews from the perspective of DAC members and experts.PURPOSEGenomic data sharing is vital for optimizing the use of public-funded research data. Data access committees (DACs) have been introduced as a core component of governance in controlled-access models. However, the tasks, structure, and functionality of DACs often remain unstudied. This article investigates the role and adequacy of DACs in access reviews from the perspective of DAC members and experts.Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with both DAC members engaged in genomic data sharing via controlled-access databases and experts in the field.METHODSTwenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with both DAC members engaged in genomic data sharing via controlled-access databases and experts in the field.The respondents indicated that protecting the privacy of data subjects along with recognition of data producers' efforts are the main underlying reasons of access review and the controlled-access model. In reviewing the ethical basis and the scientific aspects of access requests, tools and mechanisms such as consent forms, data access agreements, and guidelines have been used. Nevertheless, DAC members and experts identified shortcomings associated with current approaches that may adversely impact the effectiveness and efficiency of access review.RESULTSThe respondents indicated that protecting the privacy of data subjects along with recognition of data producers' efforts are the main underlying reasons of access review and the controlled-access model. In reviewing the ethical basis and the scientific aspects of access requests, tools and mechanisms such as consent forms, data access agreements, and guidelines have been used. Nevertheless, DAC members and experts identified shortcomings associated with current approaches that may adversely impact the effectiveness and efficiency of access review.The identified shortcomings of current approaches to access review could be addressed via complementary mechanisms and alternative models of data sharing to facilitate access to data sets in a responsible fashion.Genet Med 18 9, 892-897.CONCLUSIONThe identified shortcomings of current approaches to access review could be addressed via complementary mechanisms and alternative models of data sharing to facilitate access to data sets in a responsible fashion.Genet Med 18 9, 892-897. Genomic data sharing is vital for optimizing the use of public-funded research data. Data access committees (DACs) have been introduced as a core component of governance in controlled-access models. However, the tasks, structure, and functionality of DACs often remain unstudied. This article investigates the role and adequacy of DACs in access reviews from the perspective of DAC members and experts. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with both DAC members engaged in genomic data sharing via controlled-access databases and experts in the field. The respondents indicated that protecting the privacy of data subjects along with recognition of data producers' efforts are the main underlying reasons of access review and the controlled-access model. In reviewing the ethical basis and the scientific aspects of access requests, tools and mechanisms such as consent forms, data access agreements, and guidelines have been used. Nevertheless, DAC members and experts identified shortcomings associated with current approaches that may adversely impact the effectiveness and efficiency of access review. The identified shortcomings of current approaches to access review could be addressed via complementary mechanisms and alternative models of data sharing to facilitate access to data sets in a responsible fashion.Genet Med 18 9, 892-897. |
Author | Borry, Pascal Shabani, Mahsa |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Mahsa orcidid: 0000-0001-7128-0474 surname: Shabani fullname: Shabani, Mahsa email: mahsa.shabani@med.kuleuven.be organization: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven – sequence: 2 givenname: Pascal orcidid: 0000-0002-4931-9560 surname: Borry fullname: Borry, Pascal organization: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26795589$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp10b1qHDEQB3ARHPyVdKmDII0L70UfK63WnTFxHDCkSYpUi1Y7eydzki6S1uc0wQ-SvJyfxDrOMcY4lcTw-w_DzAHa8cEDQu8omVHC1ce5dTNGqJhR1b5C-1RwUhEu5U75k1ZVXBKyhw5SuiKENpyRXbTHZNMKodp99Pvu9s-PMOG19hnnBeBo54uMtQtTKYQRh2uIaVO7u_17gq3PEK8trBNe27zAg84aa2MgJWyCczZnAOzA9SWFtR8w3Kwg5oSDx3PwwVnzNPQGvR71MsHbh_cQfT__9O3sorr8-vnL2ellZXgrcgUGemWUlg3pR024aHqlmdFSS9lALUY2yEaaQYxctANRbd0DU6TmA9OM9pofoqNt31UMPydIuXM2GVgutYcwpY4qKiXnNWsK_fCMXoUp-jJdUTWjNROSFvX-QU29g6FbRet0_NX922wBx1tgYkgpwvhIKOk2h-vK4brN4UrbDWfPuLFZZxt8jtou_xeqtqFUevs5xCejvuTvAVx0rdA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_2168479018783740 crossref_primary_10_1089_bio_2017_0045 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20105783 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13347_017_0288_9 crossref_primary_10_1038_ejhg_2016_111 crossref_primary_10_2196_63396 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41431_024_01543_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_022_04361_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41649_021_00180_4 crossref_primary_10_1177_1747016117711972 crossref_primary_10_17159_sajs_2023_14724 crossref_primary_10_1089_bio_2020_0171 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12910_023_00927_8 crossref_primary_10_2196_49822 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmoldx_2018_07_009 crossref_primary_10_1089_bio_2022_0205 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tig_2016_11_006 crossref_primary_10_1089_bio_2021_0172 crossref_primary_10_1177_20539517231163174 crossref_primary_10_1093_gigascience_giad114 crossref_primary_10_1038_ejhg_2016_115 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41649_019_00100_7 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0229578 crossref_primary_10_1089_bio_2022_0042 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics 2016 Copyright Nature Publishing Group Sep 2016 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics 2016 – notice: Copyright Nature Publishing Group Sep 2016 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1038/gim.2015.189 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central ProQuest One Proquest Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Biology |
EISSN | 1530-0366 |
EndPage | 897 |
ExternalDocumentID | 4257728561 26795589 10_1038_gim_2015_189 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .-D ..I .GJ 08G 39C 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 70F 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAKAS AALRI AAXUO AAYEP AAYWO ABAWZ ABJNI ABLJU ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACKTT ACRQY ACVFH ADBBV ADBIZ ADCNI ADVLN ADZCM AE3 AEJRE AENEX AEUPX AEXYK AFETI AFJKZ AFKRA AFPUW AFSHS AFTRI AGAYW AGCQF AHMBA AHSBF AHVBC AIGII AILAN AITUG AIZYK AJRNO AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALFFA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ APXCP AXYYD BENPR BKKNO BPHCQ BS7 BVXVI CCPQU CS3 DNIVK DU5 EBS EE. EFKBS EIOEI EJD EX3 F5P FDB FDQFY FERAY FIZPM FSGXE FYUFA H0~ HMCUK JF9 JG8 JK3 JSO K-O KD2 M1P M41 N9A NQJWS N~M OAG OAH ODA OK1 OLG OVD OWU OWV OWW OWX OWY OWZ P-K P2P PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO R58 RNT RNTTT ROL S4R SNYQT SOHCF SOJ SRMVM SWTZT T8P TAOOD TBHMF TDRGL TEORI TSG UKHRP VVN W3M WOQ WOW XXN XYM YFH ZFV AAYXX CITATION 3V. AAZLF ACZOJ ADHDB AWKKM CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NAO NPM SNX 7XB 8FK K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-eceb8c8a670bfa0357b8a2ca6a667e45f2d676cd5f359d0894be28043d2a21ba3 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1098-3600 1530-0366 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 10:14:46 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 03:45:02 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:27:00 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:20 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:59:08 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:06:55 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Keywords | genomics data access committee access review oversight data sharing |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c395t-eceb8c8a670bfa0357b8a2ca6a667e45f2d676cd5f359d0894be28043d2a21ba3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-7128-0474 0000-0002-4931-9560 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.nature.com/articles/gim2015189.pdf |
PMID | 26795589 |
PQID | 1842142561 |
PQPubID | 2043492 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1816633427 proquest_journals_1842142561 pubmed_primary_26795589 crossref_primary_10_1038_gim_2015_189 crossref_citationtrail_10_1038_gim_2015_189 springer_journals_10_1038_gim_2015_189 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20160900 2016-09-00 20160901 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 9 year: 2016 text: 20160900 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | New York |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York – name: United States – name: Bethesda |
PublicationSubtitle | Official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics |
PublicationTitle | Genetics in medicine |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Genet Med |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Genet Med |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Nature Publishing Group US Elsevier Limited |
Publisher_xml | – name: Nature Publishing Group US – name: Elsevier Limited |
References | JolyYDoveESKnoppersBMBobrowMChalmersDData sharing in the post-genomic world: the experience of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) Data Access Compliance Office (DACO)PLoS Comput Biol20128e10025491:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtVOnsLjJ10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002549 WallaceSEGayeAShoushOBurtonPRProtecting personal data in epidemiological research: DataSHIELD and UK lawPublic Health Genomics20141714915710.1159/000360255 LowranceWWAccess to collections of data and materials for health research. A report to the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust London2006MRC and Wellcome Trust ParkerMBullSJde VriesJAgbenyegaTDoumboOKKwiatkowskiDPEthical data release in genome-wide association studies in developing countriesPLoS Med20096e100014310.1371/journal.pmed.1000143 Expert Advisory Group on Data Access. Governance of Data Access. 2015. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@msh_peda/documents/web_document/wtp059343.pdf. KnoppersBMFramework for responsible sharing of genomic and health-related dataHUGO J20148310.1186/s11568-014-0003-1 KayeJHawkinsNData sharing policy design for consortia: challenges for sustainabilityGenome Med20146410.1186/gm523 HUGO Ethics Committee. Statement on Human Genomic Databases. 2002. http://www.eubios.info/HUGOHGD.htm. BurtonPRMurtaghMJBoydAData safe havens in health research and healthcareBioinformatics201531324132481:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xhs1Git7%2FP10.1093/bioinformatics/btv279 Pham-KanterGZinnerDECampbellEGCodifying collegiality: recent developments in data sharing policy in the life sciencesPLoS One20149e10845110.1371/journal.pone.0108451 ShabaniMKnoppersBMBorryPFrom the principles of genomic data sharing to the practices of data access committeesEMBO Mol Med201575075091:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXnsVWktbg%3D10.15252/emmm.201405002 LudmanEJFullertonSMSpanglerLGlad you asked: participants’ opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submissionJ Empir Res Hum Res Ethics2010591610.1525/jer.2010.5.3.9 SimpsonCLGoldenbergAJCulverhouseRPractical barriers and ethical challenges in genetic data sharingInt J Environ Res Public Health2014118383839810.3390/ijerph110808383 KnoppersBMChisholmRLKayeJP3G International Steering CommitteeA P3G generic access agreement for population genomic studiesNat Biotechnol2013313843851:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXnt1Sgt78%3D10.1038/nbt.2567 National Institutes of Health. Genomic Data Sharing Policy. 2014. https://gds.nih.gov/PDF/NIH_GDS_Policy.pdf. BobrowMFunders must encourage scientists to shareNature20155221291:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtFeitLvO10.1038/522129a ManolioTARodriguezLLBrooksLAbecasisGBallingerDDalyMDonnellyPFaraoneSVFrazerKGabrielSNew models of collaboration in genome-wide association studies: the Genetic Association Information NetworkNat Genet200739104510511:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXps12gtbc%3D10.1038/ng2127 PaltooDNRodriguezLLFeoloMNational Institutes of Health Genomic Data Sharing Governance CommitteesData use under the NIH GWAS data sharing policy and future directionsNat Genet20144693493810.1038/ng.3062 PiwowarHABecichMJBilofskyHCrowleyRScaBIG Data Sharing and Intellectual Capital WorkspaceTowards a data sharing culture: recommendations for leadership from academic health centersPLoS Med20085e18310.1371/journal.pmed.0050183 de VriesJWilliamsTNBojangKKwiatkowskiDPFitzpatrickRParkerMKnowing who to trust: exploring the role of ‘ethical metadata’ in mediating risk of harm in collaborative genomics research in AfricaBMC Med Ethics2014156210.1186/1472-6939-15-62 DykeSOHubbardTJDeveloping and implementing an institute-wide data sharing policyGenome Med201136010.1186/gm276 FecherBFriesikeSHebingMWhat drives academic data sharing?PLoS One201510e011805310.1371/journal.pone.0118053 KayeJHeeneyCHawkinsNde VriesJBoddingtonPData sharing in genomics–re-shaping scientific practiceNat Rev Genet2009103313351:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXksF2rsrc%3D10.1038/nrg2573 Wellcome Trust. Sharing Data from Large-scale Biological Research Projects: A System of Tripartite Responsibility. Report of a meeting organized by the Wellcome Trust. Fort Lauderdale, FL, 14–15 January 2003. https://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/WellcomeReport0303.pdf. ShabaniMBezuidenhoutLBorryPAttitudes of research participants and the general public towards genomic data sharing: a systematic literature reviewExpert Rev Mol Diagn201414105310651:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhslKktbfK10.1586/14737159.2014.961917 Sharing research data to improve public health: full joint statement by funders of health research. 2011. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Data-sharing/Public-health-and-epidemiology/WTDV030690.htm. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding. 2007. http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/38500813.pdf. BirneyEHudsonTJGreenEDPrepublication data sharingNature200946116817010.1038/461168a ErlichYWilliamsJBGlazerDRedefining genomic privacy: trust and empowermentPLoS Biol201412e100198310.1371/journal.pbio.1001983 International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing. Bermuda Principles. 1996. http://www.casimir.org.uk/storyfiles/64.0.summary_of_bermuda_principles.pdf. LappalainenIAlmeida-KingJKumanduriVThe European Genome-phenome Archive of human data consented for biomedical researchNat Genet2015476926951:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtFemt7jM10.1038/ng.3312 ArdeshirdavaniASoucheEDehaspeLVan HoudtJVermeeschJRMoreauYNGS-logistics: federated analysis of NGS sequence variants across multiple locationsGenome Med2014671253285404198698 Joly (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0050) 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0025 Kaye (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0090) Lowrance (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0045) 2006 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0080 Shabani (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0095) 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0140 Fecher (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0160) Ludman (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0120) P3G International Steering Committee (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0135) Dyke (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0055) Lappalainen (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0070) caBIG Data Sharing and Intellectual Capital Workspace (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0085) Manolio (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0060) Pham-Kanter (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0155) 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0010 Erlich (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0125) Burton (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0110) 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0015 Simpson (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0165) 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0035 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0030 Wallace (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0105) de Vries (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0130) Parker (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0065) Shabani (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0100) Bobrow (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0150) Kaye (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0040) National Institutes of Health Genomic Data Sharing Governance Committees (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0075) Ardeshirdavani (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0115) Knoppers (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0145) Birney (10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0020) |
References_xml | – reference: LudmanEJFullertonSMSpanglerLGlad you asked: participants’ opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submissionJ Empir Res Hum Res Ethics2010591610.1525/jer.2010.5.3.9 – reference: LowranceWWAccess to collections of data and materials for health research. A report to the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust London2006MRC and Wellcome Trust – reference: ParkerMBullSJde VriesJAgbenyegaTDoumboOKKwiatkowskiDPEthical data release in genome-wide association studies in developing countriesPLoS Med20096e100014310.1371/journal.pmed.1000143 – reference: KnoppersBMFramework for responsible sharing of genomic and health-related dataHUGO J20148310.1186/s11568-014-0003-1 – reference: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding. 2007. http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/38500813.pdf. – reference: SimpsonCLGoldenbergAJCulverhouseRPractical barriers and ethical challenges in genetic data sharingInt J Environ Res Public Health2014118383839810.3390/ijerph110808383 – reference: KnoppersBMChisholmRLKayeJP3G International Steering CommitteeA P3G generic access agreement for population genomic studiesNat Biotechnol2013313843851:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXnt1Sgt78%3D10.1038/nbt.2567 – reference: de VriesJWilliamsTNBojangKKwiatkowskiDPFitzpatrickRParkerMKnowing who to trust: exploring the role of ‘ethical metadata’ in mediating risk of harm in collaborative genomics research in AfricaBMC Med Ethics2014156210.1186/1472-6939-15-62 – reference: KayeJHeeneyCHawkinsNde VriesJBoddingtonPData sharing in genomics–re-shaping scientific practiceNat Rev Genet2009103313351:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXksF2rsrc%3D10.1038/nrg2573 – reference: International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing. Bermuda Principles. 1996. http://www.casimir.org.uk/storyfiles/64.0.summary_of_bermuda_principles.pdf. – reference: BurtonPRMurtaghMJBoydAData safe havens in health research and healthcareBioinformatics201531324132481:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xhs1Git7%2FP10.1093/bioinformatics/btv279 – reference: BobrowMFunders must encourage scientists to shareNature20155221291:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtFeitLvO10.1038/522129a – reference: ShabaniMBezuidenhoutLBorryPAttitudes of research participants and the general public towards genomic data sharing: a systematic literature reviewExpert Rev Mol Diagn201414105310651:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhslKktbfK10.1586/14737159.2014.961917 – reference: JolyYDoveESKnoppersBMBobrowMChalmersDData sharing in the post-genomic world: the experience of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) Data Access Compliance Office (DACO)PLoS Comput Biol20128e10025491:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtVOnsLjJ10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002549 – reference: DykeSOHubbardTJDeveloping and implementing an institute-wide data sharing policyGenome Med201136010.1186/gm276 – reference: KayeJHawkinsNData sharing policy design for consortia: challenges for sustainabilityGenome Med20146410.1186/gm523 – reference: ErlichYWilliamsJBGlazerDRedefining genomic privacy: trust and empowermentPLoS Biol201412e100198310.1371/journal.pbio.1001983 – reference: Wellcome Trust. Sharing Data from Large-scale Biological Research Projects: A System of Tripartite Responsibility. Report of a meeting organized by the Wellcome Trust. Fort Lauderdale, FL, 14–15 January 2003. https://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/WellcomeReport0303.pdf. – reference: Pham-KanterGZinnerDECampbellEGCodifying collegiality: recent developments in data sharing policy in the life sciencesPLoS One20149e10845110.1371/journal.pone.0108451 – reference: National Institutes of Health. Genomic Data Sharing Policy. 2014. https://gds.nih.gov/PDF/NIH_GDS_Policy.pdf. – reference: PiwowarHABecichMJBilofskyHCrowleyRScaBIG Data Sharing and Intellectual Capital WorkspaceTowards a data sharing culture: recommendations for leadership from academic health centersPLoS Med20085e18310.1371/journal.pmed.0050183 – reference: ArdeshirdavaniASoucheEDehaspeLVan HoudtJVermeeschJRMoreauYNGS-logistics: federated analysis of NGS sequence variants across multiple locationsGenome Med2014671253285404198698 – reference: Sharing research data to improve public health: full joint statement by funders of health research. 2011. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Data-sharing/Public-health-and-epidemiology/WTDV030690.htm. – reference: ManolioTARodriguezLLBrooksLAbecasisGBallingerDDalyMDonnellyPFaraoneSVFrazerKGabrielSNew models of collaboration in genome-wide association studies: the Genetic Association Information NetworkNat Genet200739104510511:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXps12gtbc%3D10.1038/ng2127 – reference: HUGO Ethics Committee. Statement on Human Genomic Databases. 2002. http://www.eubios.info/HUGOHGD.htm. – reference: Expert Advisory Group on Data Access. Governance of Data Access. 2015. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@msh_peda/documents/web_document/wtp059343.pdf. – reference: PaltooDNRodriguezLLFeoloMNational Institutes of Health Genomic Data Sharing Governance CommitteesData use under the NIH GWAS data sharing policy and future directionsNat Genet20144693493810.1038/ng.3062 – reference: LappalainenIAlmeida-KingJKumanduriVThe European Genome-phenome Archive of human data consented for biomedical researchNat Genet2015476926951:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtFemt7jM10.1038/ng.3312 – reference: WallaceSEGayeAShoushOBurtonPRProtecting personal data in epidemiological research: DataSHIELD and UK lawPublic Health Genomics20141714915710.1159/000360255 – reference: FecherBFriesikeSHebingMWhat drives academic data sharing?PLoS One201510e011805310.1371/journal.pone.0118053 – reference: BirneyEHudsonTJGreenEDPrepublication data sharingNature200946116817010.1038/461168a – reference: ShabaniMKnoppersBMBorryPFrom the principles of genomic data sharing to the practices of data access committeesEMBO Mol Med201575075091:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXnsVWktbg%3D10.15252/emmm.201405002 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0015 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0105 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0115 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0095 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0135 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0020 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0030 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0055 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0085 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0130 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0070 – year: 2006 ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0045 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0145 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0065 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0100 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0035 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0060 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0150 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0010 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0140 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0120 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0155 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0050 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0075 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0040 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0080 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0160 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0025 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0165 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0110 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0090 – ident: 10.1038/gim.2015.189_bb0125 |
SSID | ssj0017320 |
Score | 2.3043218 |
Snippet | Purpose:
Genomic data sharing is vital for optimizing the use of public-funded research data. Data access committees (DACs) have been introduced as a core... Genomic data sharing is vital for optimizing the use of public-funded research data. Data access committees (DACs) have been introduced as a core component of... Purpose:Genomic data sharing is vital for optimizing the use of public-funded research data. Data access committees (DACs) have been introduced as a core... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 892 |
SubjectTerms | 631/208/1516 631/208/212 706/648/697/129/2043 Biomedical Research Biomedicine Committee Membership Databases, Factual Genome, Human - genetics Genomics Human Genetics Humans Information Dissemination Laboratory Medicine original-research-article |
Title | “You want the right amount of oversight”: interviews with data access committee members and experts on genomic data access |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/gim.2015.189 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26795589 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1842142561 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1816633427 |
Volume | 18 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3daxQxEA_aovRFtH70tJZY1BdJ3c33-iIqLUVoEbFwb0s2m8BBb7ftbSn61zuTzZ0HVV93Z7Mhk2RmMpPfj5DX3AWYJzoyb3xgMhrPKs09i85ZHXnhtMTLySen-vhMfp2qaT5wW-SyyuWemDbqtvd4Rv4eIhFEBwNz__HikiFrFGZXM4XGXbKJ0GVY0mWmq4CrNIKPaASVZQIsey58LwQEfTO8hl6qgxIJ3tdN0i0_81aONJmeo4fkQfYZ6adRyY_IndBtk3sji-TPbXL_JOfHH5Nf-7B66Q2MFgXHjqbIm7o58kHQPtI-1WDAs_0PdJaKHRGJlOJZLMVSUeoSfSKFEZnPhiEEOg9IGLKgrmtpIgMYFrTvKCK7zmd-_aMn5Ozo8MeXY5bZFZgXlRpY8KGx3jptiia6QijTWMe9005rE6SKvNVG-1ZFoaq2sJVsAreFFC13vGyceEo2ur4LO4T6KlTWIpCVBW9ByMa2Mkjvy9LLYKKZkHfLAa59hh5HBozzOqXAha1BHTWqowZ1TMiblfTFCLnxD7ndpa7qvPAW9Z9pMiGvVq9hyWAexHWhv0aZEvwsITl07Nmo49WPuDaVUtj426XS1xr_Sy-e_78XL8gWSOqxKm2XbAxX1-EluDFDs5fm6h7Z_Hx4-u37bzI48rQ |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VrXhcEJTXQgFTUS5V2sR2bAcJIR6ttrS7QqiVeguO40grsUlhU1XlR_EbmcljWanArddk4lj-xvaMZzwfwEtuPeqJKgKnnQ9koV2QKO6CwlqjCh5aJely8niiRsfy00l8sgK_-rswlFbZr4nNQp1Xjs7Id9AToepguN2_Pf0eEGsURVd7Co1WLQ78xTm6bPM3-x8R303O93aPPoyCjlUgcCKJ68A7nxlnrNJhVthQxDozljurrFLay7jgudLK5XEh4iQPTSIzz00oRc4tjzIrsN1rsCoFujIDWH2_O_n8ZRG30IK39Q8SE6BA2KXahwLdzCldfI_i7Ygo5Zc3wUuW7aWobLPZ7d2B252Vyt61anUXVny5Btdb3sqLNbgx7iLy9-DnBq4X7BzxYWhKssbXZ3ZGDBSsKljVZH3gs43XbNqkV1LtU0anv4ySU5ltCBsZYjCb1rX3bOaJomTObJmzhn6gnrOqZFRLdjZ1yx_dh-MrGfkHMCir0j8C5hKfGEOlswzaJ0JmJpdeOhdFTnpd6CFs9QOcuq7YOXFufEuboLswKcKREhwpwjGEzYX0aVvk4x9y6z1WaTfV5-kfxRzCi8VrnKQUebGlr85IJkLLTkiOHXvYYrz4EVc6iWNq_FUP-lLjf-nF4__34jncHB2ND9PD_cnBE7iFX6k2J24dBvWPM_8Ujag6e9ZpLoOvVz1ZfgOebzBQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKERUXBOW1UMBUlAsKTfwOEkKIsmoprThQaW-p49jSSt2kZVNV5afx65hxkmWlArdeE8ex_M3YM57xfIS8YtaDnKiQOO18IoJ2Sa6YS4K1RgWWWiXwcvLBodo9El8mcrJCfg13YTCtclgT40JdNQ7PyLfBE8HqYLDdb4c-LeLbzvjD6VmCDFIYaR3oNDoR2feXF-C-zd_v7QDWW4yNP3__tJv0DAOJ47lsE-98aZyxSqdlsCmXujSWOausUtoLGViltHKVDFzmVWpyUXpmUsErZllWWg793iA3NZcZ6pieLJy9THPWVULITcLBquiT7lMODucUr8Bn8m2G5PLL2-EVG_dKfDZue-O75E5vr9KPnYDdIyu-Xie3OgbLy3WydtDH5u-Tn5uwctALQIqCUUmj10_tDLkoaBNoE_M_4NnmOzqNiZZYBZXiOTDFNFVqI3UjBTRm07b1ns48kpXMqa0rGokI2jltaopVZWdTt_zRA3J0LfP-kKzWTe0fE-pynxuDRbQMWCpclKYSXjiXZU54HfSIvBkmuHB92XNk3zgpYvidmwLgKBCOAuAYka1F69Ou3Mc_2m0MWBW90s-LPyI6Ii8Xr0FdMQZja9-cY5sMbDwuGAzsUYfx4kdM6VxK7Pz1APpS538ZxZP_j-IFWQMVKb7uHe4_JbfhI9Ulx22Q1fbHuX8G1lRbPo9iS8nxdevJb22fMyA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22You+want+the+right+amount+of+oversight%22%3A+interviews+with+data+access+committee+members+and+experts+on+genomic+data+access&rft.jtitle=Genetics+in+medicine&rft.au=Shabani%2C+Mahsa&rft.au=Borry%2C+Pascal&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.issn=1530-0366&rft.eissn=1530-0366&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=892&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038%2Fgim.2015.189&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1098-3600&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1098-3600&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1098-3600&client=summon |