Dietary adherence and acceptability of five different diets, including vegan and vegetarian diets, for weight loss: The New DIETs study
The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months includ...
Saved in:
Published in | Eating behaviors : an international journal Vol. 19; pp. 33 - 38 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Ltd
01.12.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (−190.2±199.2mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, −2.3±200.3mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0±36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (−6.0±6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (−0.4±0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants.
•No differences for dietary adherence and acceptability across the five diets•No differences in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS scores across the five groups•Preferring or disliking the assigned diet did not impact adherence at six months.•Non-adherent vegans/veg lost more weight than non-adherent omnivores.•Non-adherent vegans/veg had lower cholesterol intake than non-adherent omnivores. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (−190.2±199.2mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, −2.3±200.3mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0±36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (−6.0±6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (−0.4±0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants.
•No differences for dietary adherence and acceptability across the five diets•No differences in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS scores across the five groups•Preferring or disliking the assigned diet did not impact adherence at six months.•Non-adherent vegans/veg lost more weight than non-adherent omnivores.•Non-adherent vegans/veg had lower cholesterol intake than non-adherent omnivores. The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (-190.2 ± 199.2 mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, -2.3 ± 200.3 mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0 ± 36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (-6.0 ± 6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (-0.4 ± 0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants. The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (−190.2±199.2mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, −2.3±200.3mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0±36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (−6.0±6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (−0.4±0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants. The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (-190.2 ± 199.2 mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, -2.3 ± 200.3 mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0 ± 36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (-6.0 ± 6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (-0.4 ± 0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants.The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (-190.2 ± 199.2 mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, -2.3 ± 200.3 mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0 ± 36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (-6.0 ± 6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (-0.4 ± 0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants. |
Author | Moore, Wendy J. McGrievy, Michael E. Turner-McGrievy, Gabrielle M. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Wendy J. surname: Moore fullname: Moore, Wendy J. email: wmoore@email.sc.edu organization: University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Discovery I, 915 Greene Street, Room 535, Columbia, SC 29208, United States – sequence: 2 givenname: Michael E. surname: McGrievy fullname: McGrievy, Michael E. email: mcgrievy@gmail.com organization: University of Akron, Department of Statistics, 302 East Buchtel Avenue, Akron, OH 44325, United States – sequence: 3 givenname: Gabrielle M. surname: Turner-McGrievy fullname: Turner-McGrievy, Gabrielle M. email: brie@sc.edu organization: University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Discovery I, 915 Greene Street, Room 529, Columbia, SC 29208, United States |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26164391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkc9u1DAYxC1URP_AGyDkIwcS_MWOk_SAVLUFKlVw2bvl2J93vcomi-3dap-A18ZhtxcO9GKP5d_MYeaSnI3TiIS8B1YCA_l5XaJOPa7KikFdMlkygFfkAtqGFw2v27OsRQNF_uXn5DLGNcu2rqvfkPNKghS8gwvy-85j0uFAtV1hwNEg1aOl2hjcJt37wacDnRx1fo_UeudmKGWFKX6ifjTDzvpxSfe41ONfa1Zzos_PE-WmQJ_QL1eJDlOM13SxQvoDn-jdw_0i0ph29vCWvHZ6iPjudF-Rxdf7xe334vHnt4fbm8fC8K5OBTZtg6IG28hGOlY7Jy1zUktdYdWhqBx0FlrGnRHQd9LaCqzQPWDNWiP4Ffl4jN2G6dcOY1IbHw0Ogx5x2kVV5Wq5YKKuXkSh4Rw6kY-Mfjihu36DVm2D3-RO1XPNGbg-AibkAgI6ZXzSyU9jCtoPCpiaN1VrddxUzZsqJlXeNJvFP-bn_BdsX442zHXuPQYVjZ8Htj6gScpO_v8BfwAnIr0z |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_j_pbj_0000000000000098 crossref_primary_10_1111_nbu_12235 crossref_primary_10_1111_nbu_12554 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e16091 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2016_00055 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jand_2016_09_025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2024_107280 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2023_107163 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu11102349 crossref_primary_10_1002_jimd_12223 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13679_019_00365_x crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD013501_pub2 crossref_primary_10_1002_osp4_70009 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13030817 crossref_primary_10_1093_eurjpc_zwac128 crossref_primary_10_29219_fnr_v63_1560 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2017_08_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42000_021_00345_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12986_024_00814_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nutres_2024_01_010 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu10020189 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40519_022_01407_5 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14051093 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1368980020001330 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0243530 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nut_2019_07_001 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2023_1281855 crossref_primary_10_4236_fns_2021_123020 crossref_primary_10_1177_15598276221130684 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13041220 crossref_primary_10_1177_09612033211063795 crossref_primary_10_1136_rmdopen_2023_004025 crossref_primary_10_1177_1559827620930962 crossref_primary_10_1177_00469580221090397 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40798_022_00532_w crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_848434 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2019_103788 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_orcp_2022_07_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjnut_2022_11_020 crossref_primary_10_1177_15598276241291490 crossref_primary_10_1080_07315724_2020_1778584 crossref_primary_10_1097_HJH_0000000000002604 crossref_primary_10_1002_eat_23335 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13124545 crossref_primary_10_1093_advances_nmab063 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00125_024_06272_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu9080848 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_18554_2 crossref_primary_10_1093_tbm_ibac080 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacc_2019_01_067 crossref_primary_10_2147_DMSO_S272802 |
Cites_doi | 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736H 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800536 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.11.007 10.1038/oby.2003.223 10.1038/oby.2007.270 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-ED1 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803706 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.049 10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.016 10.1521/jscp.1983.1.4.343 10.1097/00008483-200407000-00004 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801442 10.1016/j.nut.2014.09.002 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.007 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8 10.1007/s10654-006-0013-y 10.1016/S0022-3182(00)70590-5 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00095.x 10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.008 10.3148/71.4.2010.199 10.1108/00070700810887176 10.2105/AJPH.88.8.1216 10.1038/ijo.2009.107 10.1016/j.brat.2007.04.004 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 Elsevier Ltd Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 Elsevier Ltd – notice: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE AGRICOLA MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1873-7358 |
EndPage | 38 |
ExternalDocumentID | 26164391 10_1016_j_eatbeh_2015_06_011 S147101531500080X |
Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .~1 0R~ 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29G 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 6PF 7-5 71M 8P~ AACTN AADFP AADPK AAEDT AAEDW AAGJA AAGUQ AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AAWTL AAXLA AAXUO ABBQC ABCQJ ABFNM ABIVO ABJNI ABLVK ABMAC ABMZM ABOYX ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACHQT ACRLP ACXNI ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD AEBSH AEKER AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AFYLN AGHFR AGUBO AGWIK AGYEJ AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJRQY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LCYCR M41 MO0 MOBAO N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OKEIE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SPCBC SSB SSH SSN SSY SSZ T5K ~G- AAHBH AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACIEU ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EFKBS EIF NPM 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-e787e451d7676f05ff6d0f6a6a2e29e42f19d1803fc41b96dd21d4ab1e508c43 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 1471-0153 1873-7358 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 02:54:36 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 04:21:01 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:02:27 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:39:29 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:33 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:24:00 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Adherence Diets Vegetarian Vegan Acceptability Weight loss |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c395t-e787e451d7676f05ff6d0f6a6a2e29e42f19d1803fc41b96dd21d4ab1e508c43 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
PMID | 26164391 |
PQID | 1733194331 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2101340452 proquest_miscellaneous_1733194331 pubmed_primary_26164391 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_eatbeh_2015_06_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eatbeh_2015_06_011 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_eatbeh_2015_06_011 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | December 2015 2015-12-00 2015-Dec 20151201 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2015 text: December 2015 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Eating behaviors : an international journal |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Eat Behav |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
References | Barnard, Scialli, Bertron, Hurlock, Edmonds (bb0005) 2000; 32 Barnard, Cohen, Jenkins, Turner-McGrievy, Gloede, Green, Ferdowsian (bb0010) 2009; 89 Shay (bb0105) 2008; 43 Field, Colditz, Fox, Byers, Serdula, Bosch, Peterson (bb0060) 1998; 88 Lowe (bb0085) 2003; 11 Westerterp-Plantenga, Kempen, Saris (bb0155) 1998; 22 Karlsson, Persson, Sjostrom, Sullivan (bb0070) 2000; 24 Burke, Warziski, Styn, Music, Hudson, Sereika (bb0045) 2008; 32 Kristal, Peters, Potter (bb0075) 2005; 14 Turner-McGrievy, Davidson, Wilcox (bb0135) 2014; 73 Stunkard, Messick (bb0110) 1985; 29 Turner-McGrievy, Barnard, Scialli (bb0125) 2007; 15 Lowe, Butryn, Didie, Annunziato, Thomas, Crerand, Halford (bb0090) 2009; 53 Mendonca, Brehm (bb0100) 1983; 1 Forman, Hoffman, McGrath, Herbert, Brandsma, Lowe (bb0065) 2007; 45 U.S.News&WorldReport (Producer). (bb0150) 2015 Barnard, Gloede, Cohen, Jenkins, Turner-McGrievy, Green, Ferdowsian (bb0020) 2009; 109 Turner-McGrievy, Wirth, Shivappa, Wingard, Fayad, Wilcox, Hébert (bb0145) 2014; 35 Subar, Crafts, Zimmerman, Wilson, Mittl, Islam, Thompson (bb0115) 2010; 110 Lagerros, Mucci, Bellocco, Nyren, Balter, Balter (bb0080) 2006; 21 Berkow, Barnard, Eckart, Katcher (bb0040) 2010; 71 Turner-McGrievy, Davidson, Wingard, Wilcox, Frongillo (bb0140) 2015; 31 Cole (bb0055) 2008; 110 Barnard, Scialli, Turner-McGrievy, Lanou (bb0035) 2004; 24 Cappelleri, Bushmakin, Gerber, Leidy, Sexton, Karlsson, Lowe (bb0050) 2009; 33 Shay (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0105) 2008; 43 Subar (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0115) 2010; 110 Berkow (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0040) 2010; 71 Lowe (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0090) 2009; 53 Barnard (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0010) 2009; 89 Forman (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0065) 2007; 45 Karlsson (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0070) 2000; 24 Mendonca (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0100) 1983; 1 Field (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0060) 1998; 88 Lowe (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0085) 2003; 11 U.S.News&WorldReport (Producer). (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0150) Turner-McGrievy (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0135) 2014; 73 Barnard (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0035) 2004; 24 Stunkard (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0110) 1985; 29 Barnard (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0020) 2009; 109 Barnard (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0005) 2000; 32 Turner-McGrievy (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0125) 2007; 15 Cappelleri (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0050) 2009; 33 Turner-McGrievy (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0145) 2014; 35 Burke (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0045) 2008; 32 Kristal (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0075) 2005; 14 Westerterp-Plantenga (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0155) 1998; 22 Cole (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0055) 2008; 110 Lagerros (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0080) 2006; 21 Turner-McGrievy (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0140) 2015; 31 |
References_xml | – volume: 24 start-page: 1715 year: 2000 end-page: 1725 ident: bb0070 article-title: Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in obese men and women. Results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study publication-title: International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders – volume: 71 start-page: 199 year: 2010 end-page: 204 ident: bb0040 article-title: Four therapeutic diets: adherence and acceptability publication-title: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research – volume: 24 start-page: 229 year: 2004 end-page: 235 ident: bb0035 article-title: Acceptability of a low-fat vegan diet compares favorably to a step II diet in a randomized, controlled trial publication-title: Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation – volume: 11 start-page: 44S year: 2003 end-page: 59S ident: bb0085 article-title: Self-regulation of energy intake in the prevention and treatment of obesity: Is it feasible? publication-title: Obesity Research – volume: 89 start-page: 1588S year: 2009 end-page: 1596S ident: bb0010 article-title: A low-fat vegan diet and a conventional diabetes diet in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: A randomized, controlled, 74-wk clinical trial publication-title: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition – volume: 22 start-page: 1 year: 1998 end-page: 6 ident: bb0155 article-title: Determinants of weight maintenance in women after diet-induced weight reduction publication-title: International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders – volume: 14 start-page: 2826 year: 2005 end-page: 2828 ident: bb0075 article-title: Is it time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire? publication-title: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention – volume: 21 start-page: 227 year: 2006 end-page: 236 ident: bb0080 article-title: Validity and reliability of self-reported total energy expenditure using a novel instrument publication-title: European Journal of Epidemiology – volume: 29 start-page: 71 year: 1985 end-page: 83 ident: bb0110 article-title: The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger publication-title: Journal of Psychosomatic Research – volume: 1 start-page: 343 year: 1983 end-page: 358 ident: bb0100 article-title: Effects of choice on behavioral treatment of overweight children publication-title: Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology – volume: 73 start-page: 156 year: 2014 end-page: 162 ident: bb0135 article-title: Does the type of weight loss diet affect who participates in a behavioral weight loss intervention? A comparison of participants for a plant-based diet versus a standard diet trial publication-title: Appetite – volume: 35 start-page: 97 year: 2014 end-page: 106 ident: bb0145 article-title: Randomization to plant-based dietary approaches leads to larger short-term improvements in Dietary Inflammatory Index scores and macronutrient intake compared with diets that contain meat publication-title: Nutrition Research (New York) – volume: 43 start-page: 42 year: 2008 end-page: 52 ident: bb0105 article-title: A concept analysis: Adherence and weight loss publication-title: Nursing Forum – volume: 31 start-page: 350 year: 2015 end-page: 358 ident: bb0140 article-title: Comparative effectiveness of plant-based diets for weight loss: A randomized controlled trial of five different diets publication-title: Nutrition – volume: 53 start-page: 114 year: 2009 end-page: 118 ident: bb0090 article-title: The Power of Food Scale. A new measure of the psychological influence of the food environment publication-title: Appetite – volume: 33 start-page: 913 year: 2009 end-page: 922 ident: bb0050 article-title: Evaluating the Power of Food Scale in obese subjects and a general sample of individuals: Development and measurement properties publication-title: International Journal of Obesity – volume: 15 start-page: 2276 year: 2007 end-page: 2281 ident: bb0125 article-title: A two-year randomized weight loss trial comparing a vegan diet to a more moderate low-fat diet publication-title: Obesity (Silver Spring) – volume: 88 start-page: 1216 year: 1998 end-page: 1218 ident: bb0060 article-title: Comparison of 4 questionnaires for assessment of fruit and vegetable intake publication-title: American Journal of Public Health – volume: 32 start-page: 314 year: 2000 end-page: 319 ident: bb0005 article-title: Acceptability of a therapeutic low-fat, vegan diet in premenopausal women publication-title: Journal of Nutrition Education – volume: 110 start-page: 55 year: 2010 end-page: 64 ident: bb0115 article-title: Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-hour recall publication-title: Journal of the American Dietetic Association – volume: 32 start-page: 166 year: 2008 end-page: 176 ident: bb0045 article-title: A randomized clinical trial of a standard versus vegetarian diet for weight loss: The impact of treatment preference publication-title: International Journal of Obesity – year: 2015 ident: bb0150 article-title: Easiest diets to follow. – volume: 110 start-page: 706 year: 2008 end-page: 716 ident: bb0055 article-title: Asceticism and hedonism in research discourses of veg*anism publication-title: British Food Journal – volume: 109 start-page: 263 year: 2009 end-page: 272 ident: bb0020 article-title: A low-fat vegan diet elicits greater macronutrient changes, but is comparable in adherence and acceptability, compared with a more conventional diabetes diet among individuals with type 2 diabetes publication-title: Journal of the American Dietetic Association – volume: 45 start-page: 2372 year: 2007 end-page: 2386 ident: bb0065 article-title: A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: An analog study publication-title: Behaviour Research and Therapy – volume: 89 start-page: 1588S issue: 5 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0010 article-title: A low-fat vegan diet and a conventional diabetes diet in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: A randomized, controlled, 74-wk clinical trial publication-title: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736H – volume: 22 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0155 article-title: Determinants of weight maintenance in women after diet-induced weight reduction publication-title: International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800536 – ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0150 – volume: 35 start-page: 97 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0145 article-title: Randomization to plant-based dietary approaches leads to larger short-term improvements in Dietary Inflammatory Index scores and macronutrient intake compared with diets that contain meat publication-title: Nutrition Research (New York) doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.11.007 – volume: 11 start-page: 44S issue: Suppl. year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0085 article-title: Self-regulation of energy intake in the prevention and treatment of obesity: Is it feasible? publication-title: Obesity Research doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.223 – volume: 15 start-page: 2276 issue: 9 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0125 article-title: A two-year randomized weight loss trial comparing a vegan diet to a more moderate low-fat diet publication-title: Obesity (Silver Spring) doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.270 – volume: 14 start-page: 2826 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0075 article-title: Is it time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire? publication-title: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-ED1 – volume: 32 start-page: 166 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0045 article-title: A randomized clinical trial of a standard versus vegetarian diet for weight loss: The impact of treatment preference publication-title: International Journal of Obesity doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803706 – volume: 109 start-page: 263 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0020 article-title: A low-fat vegan diet elicits greater macronutrient changes, but is comparable in adherence and acceptability, compared with a more conventional diabetes diet among individuals with type 2 diabetes publication-title: Journal of the American Dietetic Association doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.049 – volume: 53 start-page: 114 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0090 article-title: The Power of Food Scale. A new measure of the psychological influence of the food environment publication-title: Appetite doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.016 – volume: 1 start-page: 343 issue: 4 year: 1983 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0100 article-title: Effects of choice on behavioral treatment of overweight children publication-title: Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology doi: 10.1521/jscp.1983.1.4.343 – volume: 24 start-page: 229 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0035 article-title: Acceptability of a low-fat vegan diet compares favorably to a step II diet in a randomized, controlled trial publication-title: Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation doi: 10.1097/00008483-200407000-00004 – volume: 24 start-page: 1715 issue: 12 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0070 article-title: Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in obese men and women. Results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study publication-title: International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801442 – volume: 31 start-page: 350 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0140 article-title: Comparative effectiveness of plant-based diets for weight loss: A randomized controlled trial of five different diets publication-title: Nutrition doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2014.09.002 – volume: 110 start-page: 55 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0115 article-title: Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-hour recall publication-title: Journal of the American Dietetic Association doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.007 – volume: 29 start-page: 71 issue: 1 year: 1985 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0110 article-title: The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger publication-title: Journal of Psychosomatic Research doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8 – volume: 21 start-page: 227 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0080 article-title: Validity and reliability of self-reported total energy expenditure using a novel instrument publication-title: European Journal of Epidemiology doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-0013-y – volume: 32 start-page: 314 issue: 6 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0005 article-title: Acceptability of a therapeutic low-fat, vegan diet in premenopausal women publication-title: Journal of Nutrition Education doi: 10.1016/S0022-3182(00)70590-5 – volume: 43 start-page: 42 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0105 article-title: A concept analysis: Adherence and weight loss publication-title: Nursing Forum doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00095.x – volume: 73 start-page: 156 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0135 article-title: Does the type of weight loss diet affect who participates in a behavioral weight loss intervention? A comparison of participants for a plant-based diet versus a standard diet trial publication-title: Appetite doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.008 – volume: 71 start-page: 199 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0040 article-title: Four therapeutic diets: adherence and acceptability publication-title: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research doi: 10.3148/71.4.2010.199 – volume: 110 start-page: 706 issue: 7 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0055 article-title: Asceticism and hedonism in research discourses of veg*anism publication-title: British Food Journal doi: 10.1108/00070700810887176 – volume: 88 start-page: 1216 issue: 8 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0060 article-title: Comparison of 4 questionnaires for assessment of fruit and vegetable intake publication-title: American Journal of Public Health doi: 10.2105/AJPH.88.8.1216 – volume: 33 start-page: 913 issue: 8 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0050 article-title: Evaluating the Power of Food Scale in obese subjects and a general sample of individuals: Development and measurement properties publication-title: International Journal of Obesity doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.107 – volume: 45 start-page: 2372 issue: 10 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0065 article-title: A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: An analog study publication-title: Behaviour Research and Therapy doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.04.004 |
SSID | ssj0016995 |
Score | 2.3341157 |
Snippet | The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 33 |
SubjectTerms | Acceptability Adherence Adult animal products cholesterol Diet - psychology Diet - statistics & numerical data Diet, Vegan - psychology Diet, Vegetarian - psychology Diets Female flexitarian diet food acceptability food frequency questionnaires Humans Male Middle Aged omnivores plant-based diet Surveys and Questionnaires Vegan vegan diet Vegetarian Weight Loss |
Title | Dietary adherence and acceptability of five different diets, including vegan and vegetarian diets, for weight loss: The New DIETs study |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26164391 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1733194331 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2101340452 |
Volume | 19 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaq9sIFgXgtj8pIHAmbiR2H9Fa1VAuIXlikvVmOPYZFq2zVzYJ66ZW_zYyTrMRhVYmbE42jkWc88zmehxBvjGuCxgKzvHQq0xEwayrQGXkqD6YpvUolNr5cmtk3_WlRLg7E2ZgLw2GVg-3vbXqy1sOb6bCa06vlcvoVyK6SM1NQJtyz4Ax2XbGWv7vdhXmAqVPnFSbOmHpMn0sxXmTuGuQrCShTFU-Afe5pH_xMbujigbg_4Ed52rP4UBxg-0j8OV9i565vpAs_-vQ96dogneeYlb4Q941cRxnJtMmxJUpHI-w2b-Wy9astuzD5C7-7Nk2lEX-RdGekInArf6f_qHJFnJ9IUjBJJlISoJxvZCpT-1jMLz7Mz2bZ0GEh86ouuwxpu6IuIVSmMjEvYzQhj8YZV2BRoy4i1AHe5yp6DU1tQiggaNcAEq7zWj0Rh-26xWdCel15k6Pi84euFRfKQ0-i98Z7AhV6ItS4rtYP1ce5CcbKjmFmP20vDcvSsBxtBzAR2W7WVV994w76ahSZ_UeLLDmIO2a-HiVsaYPxrYlrcb3dWOCuljUnlu2noXMzKM3V6Sfiaa8eO37piJrSm5__N28vxD1-6oNoXorD7nqLrwgKdc1x0vVjcXT68fPs8i8LlQhA |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9swDBa69LBdhg17ZU8N2HFCTOvhereiW5GubS7LgNwEWaK3DIFTNE6H_oL97VGyHWCHoMBugk0agkiRlEV-ZOyDcVVQmKPItJNC1YCiKkAJ8lQeTKW9TBAblzMz_a6-LvTigJ0MtTAxrbK3_Z1NT9a6fzLpV3NytVxOvgHZVXJmEnSKexb32GFEp9Ijdnh8dj6d7S4TTJmar0R6ERmGCrqU5kUWr8J4KwE6AXkC7PNQ-yLQ5IlOH7GHfQjJj7tZPmYH2Dxhfz4vsXXXt9yFn10FH3dN4M7HtJUOi_uWr2tek3XjQ1eUlkbYbj7yZeNX2-jF-A3-cE1ipVH8IqnPQEXxLf-dfqXyFc38Eycd42QlOcWU8w1PSLVP2fz0y_xkKvomC8LLUrcCacei0hAKU5g603VtQlYbZ1yOeYkqr6EMcJTJ2iuoShNCDkG5CpBCO6_kMzZq1g2-YNyrwpsMZTyCqFJGrDz0JH1vvKe4Qo2ZHNbV-h6APPbBWNkh0-yX7aRhozRsTLgDGDOx47rqADjuoC8Gkdl_FMmSj7iD8_0gYUt7LF6cuAbX242F2NiyjLVl-2no6AxSRYD6MXveqcduvnRKTRXOL_97bu_Y_en88sJenM3OX7EH8U2XU_OajdrrLb6hyKit3vaa_xcRFQrx |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dietary+adherence+and+acceptability+of+five+different+diets%2C+including+vegan+and+vegetarian+diets%2C+for+weight+loss%3A+The+New+DIETs+study&rft.jtitle=Eating+behaviors+%3A+an+international+journal&rft.au=Moore%2C+Wendy+J&rft.au=McGrievy%2C+Michael+E&rft.au=Turner-McGrievy%2C+Gabrielle+M&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.issn=1471-0153&rft.volume=19+p.33-38&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=38&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.eatbeh.2015.06.011&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-0153&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-0153&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-0153&client=summon |