Dietary adherence and acceptability of five different diets, including vegan and vegetarian diets, for weight loss: The New DIETs study

The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months includ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEating behaviors : an international journal Vol. 19; pp. 33 - 38
Main Authors Moore, Wendy J., McGrievy, Michael E., Turner-McGrievy, Gabrielle M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (−190.2±199.2mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, −2.3±200.3mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0±36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (−6.0±6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (−0.4±0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants. •No differences for dietary adherence and acceptability across the five diets•No differences in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS scores across the five groups•Preferring or disliking the assigned diet did not impact adherence at six months.•Non-adherent vegans/veg lost more weight than non-adherent omnivores.•Non-adherent vegans/veg had lower cholesterol intake than non-adherent omnivores.
AbstractList The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (−190.2±199.2mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, −2.3±200.3mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0±36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (−6.0±6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (−0.4±0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants. •No differences for dietary adherence and acceptability across the five diets•No differences in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS scores across the five groups•Preferring or disliking the assigned diet did not impact adherence at six months.•Non-adherent vegans/veg lost more weight than non-adherent omnivores.•Non-adherent vegans/veg had lower cholesterol intake than non-adherent omnivores.
The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (-190.2 ± 199.2 mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, -2.3 ± 200.3 mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0 ± 36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (-6.0 ± 6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (-0.4 ± 0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants.
The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (−190.2±199.2mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, −2.3±200.3mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0±36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (−6.0±6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (−0.4±0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants.
The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (-190.2 ± 199.2 mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, -2.3 ± 200.3 mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0 ± 36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (-6.0 ± 6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (-0.4 ± 0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants.The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four plant-based diets (vegan, vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, semi-vegetarian) or an omnivore diet. Primary outcomes at two- and six months included dietary adherence (24-hour dietary recalls), weight loss and changes in animal product intake (mg cholesterol) by adherence status, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Power of Food Scale (PFS), dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire), and impact of diet preference on adherence. No differences were found in dietary adherence or changes in FAQ, TFEQ, or PFS among the groups. At six months, non-adherent vegan and vegetarian participants (n=16) had a significantly greater decrease in cholesterol intake (-190.2 ± 199.2 mg) than non-adherent pesco-vegetarian/semi-vegetarian (n=15, -2.3 ± 200.3 mg, P=0.02) or omnivore participants (n=7, 17.0 ± 36.0, P=0.04). Non-adherent vegan/vegetarian participants lost significantly more weight at six months (-6.0 ± 6.7%) than non-adherent omnivore participants (-0.4 ± 0.6%, P=0.04). Dietary preference had no impact on adherence at six months. Due to equal rates of adherence and acceptability among the diet groups, instructing participants to follow vegan or vegetarian diets may have a greater impact on weight loss and animal product intake than providing instruction in more moderate approaches even among non-adherent participants.
Author Moore, Wendy J.
McGrievy, Michael E.
Turner-McGrievy, Gabrielle M.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Wendy J.
  surname: Moore
  fullname: Moore, Wendy J.
  email: wmoore@email.sc.edu
  organization: University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Discovery I, 915 Greene Street, Room 535, Columbia, SC 29208, United States
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Michael E.
  surname: McGrievy
  fullname: McGrievy, Michael E.
  email: mcgrievy@gmail.com
  organization: University of Akron, Department of Statistics, 302 East Buchtel Avenue, Akron, OH 44325, United States
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Gabrielle M.
  surname: Turner-McGrievy
  fullname: Turner-McGrievy, Gabrielle M.
  email: brie@sc.edu
  organization: University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Discovery I, 915 Greene Street, Room 529, Columbia, SC 29208, United States
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26164391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkc9u1DAYxC1URP_AGyDkIwcS_MWOk_SAVLUFKlVw2bvl2J93vcomi-3dap-A18ZhtxcO9GKP5d_MYeaSnI3TiIS8B1YCA_l5XaJOPa7KikFdMlkygFfkAtqGFw2v27OsRQNF_uXn5DLGNcu2rqvfkPNKghS8gwvy-85j0uFAtV1hwNEg1aOl2hjcJt37wacDnRx1fo_UeudmKGWFKX6ifjTDzvpxSfe41ONfa1Zzos_PE-WmQJ_QL1eJDlOM13SxQvoDn-jdw_0i0ph29vCWvHZ6iPjudF-Rxdf7xe334vHnt4fbm8fC8K5OBTZtg6IG28hGOlY7Jy1zUktdYdWhqBx0FlrGnRHQd9LaCqzQPWDNWiP4Ffl4jN2G6dcOY1IbHw0Ogx5x2kVV5Wq5YKKuXkSh4Rw6kY-Mfjihu36DVm2D3-RO1XPNGbg-AibkAgI6ZXzSyU9jCtoPCpiaN1VrddxUzZsqJlXeNJvFP-bn_BdsX442zHXuPQYVjZ8Htj6gScpO_v8BfwAnIr0z
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_j_pbj_0000000000000098
crossref_primary_10_1111_nbu_12235
crossref_primary_10_1111_nbu_12554
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e16091
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2016_00055
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jand_2016_09_025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2024_107280
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2023_107163
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu11102349
crossref_primary_10_1002_jimd_12223
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13679_019_00365_x
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD013501_pub2
crossref_primary_10_1002_osp4_70009
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13030817
crossref_primary_10_1093_eurjpc_zwac128
crossref_primary_10_29219_fnr_v63_1560
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2017_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42000_021_00345_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12986_024_00814_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nutres_2024_01_010
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu10020189
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40519_022_01407_5
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14051093
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1368980020001330
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0243530
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nut_2019_07_001
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2023_1281855
crossref_primary_10_4236_fns_2021_123020
crossref_primary_10_1177_15598276221130684
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13041220
crossref_primary_10_1177_09612033211063795
crossref_primary_10_1136_rmdopen_2023_004025
crossref_primary_10_1177_1559827620930962
crossref_primary_10_1177_00469580221090397
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40798_022_00532_w
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_848434
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2019_103788
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_orcp_2022_07_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjnut_2022_11_020
crossref_primary_10_1177_15598276241291490
crossref_primary_10_1080_07315724_2020_1778584
crossref_primary_10_1097_HJH_0000000000002604
crossref_primary_10_1002_eat_23335
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13124545
crossref_primary_10_1093_advances_nmab063
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00125_024_06272_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu9080848
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_18554_2
crossref_primary_10_1093_tbm_ibac080
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacc_2019_01_067
crossref_primary_10_2147_DMSO_S272802
Cites_doi 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736H
10.1038/sj.ijo.0800536
10.1016/j.nutres.2014.11.007
10.1038/oby.2003.223
10.1038/oby.2007.270
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-ED1
10.1038/sj.ijo.0803706
10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.049
10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.016
10.1521/jscp.1983.1.4.343
10.1097/00008483-200407000-00004
10.1038/sj.ijo.0801442
10.1016/j.nut.2014.09.002
10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.007
10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8
10.1007/s10654-006-0013-y
10.1016/S0022-3182(00)70590-5
10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00095.x
10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.008
10.3148/71.4.2010.199
10.1108/00070700810887176
10.2105/AJPH.88.8.1216
10.1038/ijo.2009.107
10.1016/j.brat.2007.04.004
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
AGRICOLA
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1873-7358
EndPage 38
ExternalDocumentID 26164391
10_1016_j_eatbeh_2015_06_011
S147101531500080X
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
29G
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
6PF
7-5
71M
8P~
AACTN
AADFP
AADPK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAGJA
AAGUQ
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAWTL
AAXLA
AAXUO
ABBQC
ABCQJ
ABFNM
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLVK
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOYX
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACRLP
ACXNI
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
AEBSH
AEKER
AFKWA
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AFYLN
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGWIK
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AJRQY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LCYCR
M41
MO0
MOBAO
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OKEIE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSB
SSH
SSN
SSY
SSZ
T5K
~G-
AAHBH
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABWVN
ACIEU
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AGRNS
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EFKBS
EIF
NPM
7X8
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-e787e451d7676f05ff6d0f6a6a2e29e42f19d1803fc41b96dd21d4ab1e508c43
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 1471-0153
1873-7358
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 02:54:36 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 04:21:01 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:27 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:39:29 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:33 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:24:00 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Adherence
Diets
Vegetarian
Vegan
Acceptability
Weight loss
Language English
License Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c395t-e787e451d7676f05ff6d0f6a6a2e29e42f19d1803fc41b96dd21d4ab1e508c43
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 26164391
PQID 1733194331
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2101340452
proquest_miscellaneous_1733194331
pubmed_primary_26164391
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_eatbeh_2015_06_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eatbeh_2015_06_011
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_eatbeh_2015_06_011
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate December 2015
2015-12-00
2015-Dec
20151201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2015
  text: December 2015
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Eating behaviors : an international journal
PublicationTitleAlternate Eat Behav
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References Barnard, Scialli, Bertron, Hurlock, Edmonds (bb0005) 2000; 32
Barnard, Cohen, Jenkins, Turner-McGrievy, Gloede, Green, Ferdowsian (bb0010) 2009; 89
Shay (bb0105) 2008; 43
Field, Colditz, Fox, Byers, Serdula, Bosch, Peterson (bb0060) 1998; 88
Lowe (bb0085) 2003; 11
Westerterp-Plantenga, Kempen, Saris (bb0155) 1998; 22
Karlsson, Persson, Sjostrom, Sullivan (bb0070) 2000; 24
Burke, Warziski, Styn, Music, Hudson, Sereika (bb0045) 2008; 32
Kristal, Peters, Potter (bb0075) 2005; 14
Turner-McGrievy, Davidson, Wilcox (bb0135) 2014; 73
Stunkard, Messick (bb0110) 1985; 29
Turner-McGrievy, Barnard, Scialli (bb0125) 2007; 15
Lowe, Butryn, Didie, Annunziato, Thomas, Crerand, Halford (bb0090) 2009; 53
Mendonca, Brehm (bb0100) 1983; 1
Forman, Hoffman, McGrath, Herbert, Brandsma, Lowe (bb0065) 2007; 45
U.S.News&WorldReport (Producer). (bb0150) 2015
Barnard, Gloede, Cohen, Jenkins, Turner-McGrievy, Green, Ferdowsian (bb0020) 2009; 109
Turner-McGrievy, Wirth, Shivappa, Wingard, Fayad, Wilcox, Hébert (bb0145) 2014; 35
Subar, Crafts, Zimmerman, Wilson, Mittl, Islam, Thompson (bb0115) 2010; 110
Lagerros, Mucci, Bellocco, Nyren, Balter, Balter (bb0080) 2006; 21
Berkow, Barnard, Eckart, Katcher (bb0040) 2010; 71
Turner-McGrievy, Davidson, Wingard, Wilcox, Frongillo (bb0140) 2015; 31
Cole (bb0055) 2008; 110
Barnard, Scialli, Turner-McGrievy, Lanou (bb0035) 2004; 24
Cappelleri, Bushmakin, Gerber, Leidy, Sexton, Karlsson, Lowe (bb0050) 2009; 33
Shay (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0105) 2008; 43
Subar (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0115) 2010; 110
Berkow (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0040) 2010; 71
Lowe (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0090) 2009; 53
Barnard (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0010) 2009; 89
Forman (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0065) 2007; 45
Karlsson (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0070) 2000; 24
Mendonca (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0100) 1983; 1
Field (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0060) 1998; 88
Lowe (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0085) 2003; 11
U.S.News&WorldReport (Producer). (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0150)
Turner-McGrievy (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0135) 2014; 73
Barnard (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0035) 2004; 24
Stunkard (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0110) 1985; 29
Barnard (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0020) 2009; 109
Barnard (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0005) 2000; 32
Turner-McGrievy (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0125) 2007; 15
Cappelleri (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0050) 2009; 33
Turner-McGrievy (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0145) 2014; 35
Burke (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0045) 2008; 32
Kristal (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0075) 2005; 14
Westerterp-Plantenga (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0155) 1998; 22
Cole (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0055) 2008; 110
Lagerros (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0080) 2006; 21
Turner-McGrievy (10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0140) 2015; 31
References_xml – volume: 24
  start-page: 1715
  year: 2000
  end-page: 1725
  ident: bb0070
  article-title: Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in obese men and women. Results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study
  publication-title: International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders
– volume: 71
  start-page: 199
  year: 2010
  end-page: 204
  ident: bb0040
  article-title: Four therapeutic diets: adherence and acceptability
  publication-title: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
– volume: 24
  start-page: 229
  year: 2004
  end-page: 235
  ident: bb0035
  article-title: Acceptability of a low-fat vegan diet compares favorably to a step II diet in a randomized, controlled trial
  publication-title: Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation
– volume: 11
  start-page: 44S
  year: 2003
  end-page: 59S
  ident: bb0085
  article-title: Self-regulation of energy intake in the prevention and treatment of obesity: Is it feasible?
  publication-title: Obesity Research
– volume: 89
  start-page: 1588S
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1596S
  ident: bb0010
  article-title: A low-fat vegan diet and a conventional diabetes diet in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: A randomized, controlled, 74-wk clinical trial
  publication-title: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1
  year: 1998
  end-page: 6
  ident: bb0155
  article-title: Determinants of weight maintenance in women after diet-induced weight reduction
  publication-title: International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders
– volume: 14
  start-page: 2826
  year: 2005
  end-page: 2828
  ident: bb0075
  article-title: Is it time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire?
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
– volume: 21
  start-page: 227
  year: 2006
  end-page: 236
  ident: bb0080
  article-title: Validity and reliability of self-reported total energy expenditure using a novel instrument
  publication-title: European Journal of Epidemiology
– volume: 29
  start-page: 71
  year: 1985
  end-page: 83
  ident: bb0110
  article-title: The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
  publication-title: Journal of Psychosomatic Research
– volume: 1
  start-page: 343
  year: 1983
  end-page: 358
  ident: bb0100
  article-title: Effects of choice on behavioral treatment of overweight children
  publication-title: Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
– volume: 73
  start-page: 156
  year: 2014
  end-page: 162
  ident: bb0135
  article-title: Does the type of weight loss diet affect who participates in a behavioral weight loss intervention? A comparison of participants for a plant-based diet versus a standard diet trial
  publication-title: Appetite
– volume: 35
  start-page: 97
  year: 2014
  end-page: 106
  ident: bb0145
  article-title: Randomization to plant-based dietary approaches leads to larger short-term improvements in Dietary Inflammatory Index scores and macronutrient intake compared with diets that contain meat
  publication-title: Nutrition Research (New York)
– volume: 43
  start-page: 42
  year: 2008
  end-page: 52
  ident: bb0105
  article-title: A concept analysis: Adherence and weight loss
  publication-title: Nursing Forum
– volume: 31
  start-page: 350
  year: 2015
  end-page: 358
  ident: bb0140
  article-title: Comparative effectiveness of plant-based diets for weight loss: A randomized controlled trial of five different diets
  publication-title: Nutrition
– volume: 53
  start-page: 114
  year: 2009
  end-page: 118
  ident: bb0090
  article-title: The Power of Food Scale. A new measure of the psychological influence of the food environment
  publication-title: Appetite
– volume: 33
  start-page: 913
  year: 2009
  end-page: 922
  ident: bb0050
  article-title: Evaluating the Power of Food Scale in obese subjects and a general sample of individuals: Development and measurement properties
  publication-title: International Journal of Obesity
– volume: 15
  start-page: 2276
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2281
  ident: bb0125
  article-title: A two-year randomized weight loss trial comparing a vegan diet to a more moderate low-fat diet
  publication-title: Obesity (Silver Spring)
– volume: 88
  start-page: 1216
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1218
  ident: bb0060
  article-title: Comparison of 4 questionnaires for assessment of fruit and vegetable intake
  publication-title: American Journal of Public Health
– volume: 32
  start-page: 314
  year: 2000
  end-page: 319
  ident: bb0005
  article-title: Acceptability of a therapeutic low-fat, vegan diet in premenopausal women
  publication-title: Journal of Nutrition Education
– volume: 110
  start-page: 55
  year: 2010
  end-page: 64
  ident: bb0115
  article-title: Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-hour recall
  publication-title: Journal of the American Dietetic Association
– volume: 32
  start-page: 166
  year: 2008
  end-page: 176
  ident: bb0045
  article-title: A randomized clinical trial of a standard versus vegetarian diet for weight loss: The impact of treatment preference
  publication-title: International Journal of Obesity
– year: 2015
  ident: bb0150
  article-title: Easiest diets to follow.
– volume: 110
  start-page: 706
  year: 2008
  end-page: 716
  ident: bb0055
  article-title: Asceticism and hedonism in research discourses of veg*anism
  publication-title: British Food Journal
– volume: 109
  start-page: 263
  year: 2009
  end-page: 272
  ident: bb0020
  article-title: A low-fat vegan diet elicits greater macronutrient changes, but is comparable in adherence and acceptability, compared with a more conventional diabetes diet among individuals with type 2 diabetes
  publication-title: Journal of the American Dietetic Association
– volume: 45
  start-page: 2372
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2386
  ident: bb0065
  article-title: A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: An analog study
  publication-title: Behaviour Research and Therapy
– volume: 89
  start-page: 1588S
  issue: 5
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0010
  article-title: A low-fat vegan diet and a conventional diabetes diet in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: A randomized, controlled, 74-wk clinical trial
  publication-title: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736H
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0155
  article-title: Determinants of weight maintenance in women after diet-induced weight reduction
  publication-title: International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders
  doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800536
– ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0150
– volume: 35
  start-page: 97
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0145
  article-title: Randomization to plant-based dietary approaches leads to larger short-term improvements in Dietary Inflammatory Index scores and macronutrient intake compared with diets that contain meat
  publication-title: Nutrition Research (New York)
  doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.11.007
– volume: 11
  start-page: 44S
  issue: Suppl.
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0085
  article-title: Self-regulation of energy intake in the prevention and treatment of obesity: Is it feasible?
  publication-title: Obesity Research
  doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.223
– volume: 15
  start-page: 2276
  issue: 9
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0125
  article-title: A two-year randomized weight loss trial comparing a vegan diet to a more moderate low-fat diet
  publication-title: Obesity (Silver Spring)
  doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.270
– volume: 14
  start-page: 2826
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0075
  article-title: Is it time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire?
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-ED1
– volume: 32
  start-page: 166
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0045
  article-title: A randomized clinical trial of a standard versus vegetarian diet for weight loss: The impact of treatment preference
  publication-title: International Journal of Obesity
  doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803706
– volume: 109
  start-page: 263
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0020
  article-title: A low-fat vegan diet elicits greater macronutrient changes, but is comparable in adherence and acceptability, compared with a more conventional diabetes diet among individuals with type 2 diabetes
  publication-title: Journal of the American Dietetic Association
  doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.049
– volume: 53
  start-page: 114
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0090
  article-title: The Power of Food Scale. A new measure of the psychological influence of the food environment
  publication-title: Appetite
  doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.016
– volume: 1
  start-page: 343
  issue: 4
  year: 1983
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0100
  article-title: Effects of choice on behavioral treatment of overweight children
  publication-title: Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
  doi: 10.1521/jscp.1983.1.4.343
– volume: 24
  start-page: 229
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0035
  article-title: Acceptability of a low-fat vegan diet compares favorably to a step II diet in a randomized, controlled trial
  publication-title: Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation
  doi: 10.1097/00008483-200407000-00004
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1715
  issue: 12
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0070
  article-title: Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in obese men and women. Results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study
  publication-title: International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders
  doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801442
– volume: 31
  start-page: 350
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0140
  article-title: Comparative effectiveness of plant-based diets for weight loss: A randomized controlled trial of five different diets
  publication-title: Nutrition
  doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2014.09.002
– volume: 110
  start-page: 55
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0115
  article-title: Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-hour recall
  publication-title: Journal of the American Dietetic Association
  doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.007
– volume: 29
  start-page: 71
  issue: 1
  year: 1985
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0110
  article-title: The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
  publication-title: Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8
– volume: 21
  start-page: 227
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0080
  article-title: Validity and reliability of self-reported total energy expenditure using a novel instrument
  publication-title: European Journal of Epidemiology
  doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-0013-y
– volume: 32
  start-page: 314
  issue: 6
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0005
  article-title: Acceptability of a therapeutic low-fat, vegan diet in premenopausal women
  publication-title: Journal of Nutrition Education
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3182(00)70590-5
– volume: 43
  start-page: 42
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0105
  article-title: A concept analysis: Adherence and weight loss
  publication-title: Nursing Forum
  doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00095.x
– volume: 73
  start-page: 156
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0135
  article-title: Does the type of weight loss diet affect who participates in a behavioral weight loss intervention? A comparison of participants for a plant-based diet versus a standard diet trial
  publication-title: Appetite
  doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.008
– volume: 71
  start-page: 199
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0040
  article-title: Four therapeutic diets: adherence and acceptability
  publication-title: Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
  doi: 10.3148/71.4.2010.199
– volume: 110
  start-page: 706
  issue: 7
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0055
  article-title: Asceticism and hedonism in research discourses of veg*anism
  publication-title: British Food Journal
  doi: 10.1108/00070700810887176
– volume: 88
  start-page: 1216
  issue: 8
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0060
  article-title: Comparison of 4 questionnaires for assessment of fruit and vegetable intake
  publication-title: American Journal of Public Health
  doi: 10.2105/AJPH.88.8.1216
– volume: 33
  start-page: 913
  issue: 8
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0050
  article-title: Evaluating the Power of Food Scale in obese subjects and a general sample of individuals: Development and measurement properties
  publication-title: International Journal of Obesity
  doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.107
– volume: 45
  start-page: 2372
  issue: 10
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011_bb0065
  article-title: A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: An analog study
  publication-title: Behaviour Research and Therapy
  doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.04.004
SSID ssj0016995
Score 2.3341157
Snippet The goal of the present study was to examine dietary adherence and acceptability among participants from the New DIETs study who were randomized to one of four...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 33
SubjectTerms Acceptability
Adherence
Adult
animal products
cholesterol
Diet - psychology
Diet - statistics & numerical data
Diet, Vegan - psychology
Diet, Vegetarian - psychology
Diets
Female
flexitarian diet
food acceptability
food frequency questionnaires
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
omnivores
plant-based diet
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vegan
vegan diet
Vegetarian
Weight Loss
Title Dietary adherence and acceptability of five different diets, including vegan and vegetarian diets, for weight loss: The New DIETs study
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26164391
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1733194331
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2101340452
Volume 19
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaq9sIFgXgtj8pIHAmbiR2H9Fa1VAuIXlikvVmOPYZFq2zVzYJ66ZW_zYyTrMRhVYmbE42jkWc88zmehxBvjGuCxgKzvHQq0xEwayrQGXkqD6YpvUolNr5cmtk3_WlRLg7E2ZgLw2GVg-3vbXqy1sOb6bCa06vlcvoVyK6SM1NQJtyz4Ax2XbGWv7vdhXmAqVPnFSbOmHpMn0sxXmTuGuQrCShTFU-Afe5pH_xMbujigbg_4Ed52rP4UBxg-0j8OV9i565vpAs_-vQ96dogneeYlb4Q941cRxnJtMmxJUpHI-w2b-Wy9astuzD5C7-7Nk2lEX-RdGekInArf6f_qHJFnJ9IUjBJJlISoJxvZCpT-1jMLz7Mz2bZ0GEh86ouuwxpu6IuIVSmMjEvYzQhj8YZV2BRoy4i1AHe5yp6DU1tQiggaNcAEq7zWj0Rh-26xWdCel15k6Pi84euFRfKQ0-i98Z7AhV6ItS4rtYP1ce5CcbKjmFmP20vDcvSsBxtBzAR2W7WVV994w76ahSZ_UeLLDmIO2a-HiVsaYPxrYlrcb3dWOCuljUnlu2noXMzKM3V6Sfiaa8eO37piJrSm5__N28vxD1-6oNoXorD7nqLrwgKdc1x0vVjcXT68fPs8i8LlQhA
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9swDBa69LBdhg17ZU8N2HFCTOvhereiW5GubS7LgNwEWaK3DIFTNE6H_oL97VGyHWCHoMBugk0agkiRlEV-ZOyDcVVQmKPItJNC1YCiKkAJ8lQeTKW9TBAblzMz_a6-LvTigJ0MtTAxrbK3_Z1NT9a6fzLpV3NytVxOvgHZVXJmEnSKexb32GFEp9Ijdnh8dj6d7S4TTJmar0R6ERmGCrqU5kUWr8J4KwE6AXkC7PNQ-yLQ5IlOH7GHfQjJj7tZPmYH2Dxhfz4vsXXXt9yFn10FH3dN4M7HtJUOi_uWr2tek3XjQ1eUlkbYbj7yZeNX2-jF-A3-cE1ipVH8IqnPQEXxLf-dfqXyFc38Eycd42QlOcWU8w1PSLVP2fz0y_xkKvomC8LLUrcCacei0hAKU5g603VtQlYbZ1yOeYkqr6EMcJTJ2iuoShNCDkG5CpBCO6_kMzZq1g2-YNyrwpsMZTyCqFJGrDz0JH1vvKe4Qo2ZHNbV-h6APPbBWNkh0-yX7aRhozRsTLgDGDOx47rqADjuoC8Gkdl_FMmSj7iD8_0gYUt7LF6cuAbX242F2NiyjLVl-2no6AxSRYD6MXveqcduvnRKTRXOL_97bu_Y_en88sJenM3OX7EH8U2XU_OajdrrLb6hyKit3vaa_xcRFQrx
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dietary+adherence+and+acceptability+of+five+different+diets%2C+including+vegan+and+vegetarian+diets%2C+for+weight+loss%3A+The+New+DIETs+study&rft.jtitle=Eating+behaviors+%3A+an+international+journal&rft.au=Moore%2C+Wendy+J&rft.au=McGrievy%2C+Michael+E&rft.au=Turner-McGrievy%2C+Gabrielle+M&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.issn=1471-0153&rft.volume=19+p.33-38&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=38&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.eatbeh.2015.06.011&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-0153&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-0153&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-0153&client=summon