Computer-aided process planning based on automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

Abstract There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of engineering manufacture Vol. 224; no. 6; pp. 869 - 877
Main Authors Tang, W, Gu, L Z, Guo, H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.06.2010
Sage Publications
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Abstract There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time-saving, accurate, and optimal evaluation of processes. The current study was aimed at fuzzy auto-evaluation, taking the processes for the parts as (a) subject investigated, (b) structuring evaluation system, and (c) method of processes in computer-aided production planning (CAPP) based on fuzzy mathematics. On analysis and comparison, the automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system was built based on the following factors: set, the weight set and assessment set, and the single factor: proposed comprehensive fuzzy evaluation. The membership degree was determined with fuzzy statistics, and the weight of various factors was determined by the fuzzy consistent matrix. A combination of theoretical analysis, practical experience, goals of evaluation, and factors set for processes was accomplished by extracting the factors that impacted evaluation of processes; weight set was established based on different weights that each factor impacting on the extent of technology programs gave; the assessment set was gained with a factor matrix which the expert group provided for every factor; the fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained with a matrix calculation according to the model M (∧, ∨). The process grade was determined according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The process evaluation would automatically be realized through the evaluation system with the VC++ program after weights of various factors from the experts in the field were added. The optimum process was eventually obtained by comparing the grades of these processes. Three feasible processes of a disc-like component, as an example, were evaluated through this evaluation system, realizing the automatic evaluation of processes and obtaining the best process.
AbstractList Abstract There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time-saving, accurate, and optimal evaluation of processes. The current study was aimed at fuzzy auto-evaluation, taking the processes for the parts as (a) subject investigated, (b) structuring evaluation system, and (c) method of processes in computer-aided production planning (CAPP) based on fuzzy mathematics. On analysis and comparison, the automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system was built based on the following factors: set, the weight set and assessment set, and the single factor: proposed comprehensive fuzzy evaluation. The membership degree was determined with fuzzy statistics, and the weight of various factors was determined by the fuzzy consistent matrix. A combination of theoretical analysis, practical experience, goals of evaluation, and factors set for processes was accomplished by extracting the factors that impacted evaluation of processes; weight set was established based on different weights that each factor impacting on the extent of technology programs gave; the assessment set was gained with a factor matrix which the expert group provided for every factor; the fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained with a matrix calculation according to the model M (∧, ∨). The process grade was determined according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The process evaluation would automatically be realized through the evaluation system with the VC++ program after weights of various factors from the experts in the field were added. The optimum process was eventually obtained by comparing the grades of these processes. Three feasible processes of a disc-like component, as an example, were evaluated through this evaluation system, realizing the automatic evaluation of processes and obtaining the best process.
There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time-saving, accurate, and optimal evaluation of processes. The current study was aimed at fuzzy auto-evaluation, taking the processes for the parts as (a) subject investigated, (b) structuring evaluation system, and (c) method of processes in computer-aided production planning (CAPP) based on fuzzy mathematics. On analysis and comparison, the automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system was built based on the following factors: set, the weight set and assessment set, and the single factor: proposed comprehensive fuzzy evaluation. The membership degree was determined with fuzzy statistics, and the weight of various factors was determined by the fuzzy consistent matrix. A combination of theoretical analysis, practical experience, goals of evaluation, and factors set for processes was accomplished by extracting the factors that impacted evaluation of processes; weight set was established based on different weights that each factor impacting on the extent of technology programs gave; the assessment set was gained with a factor matrix which the expert group provided for every factor; the fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained with a matrix calculation according to the model M (∧, ∨). The process grade was determined according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The process evaluation would automatically be realized through the evaluation system with the VC++ program after weights of various factors from the experts in the field were added. The optimum process was eventually obtained by comparing the grades of these processes. Three feasible processes of a disc-like component, as an example, were evaluated through this evaluation system, realizing the automatic evaluation of processes and obtaining the best process.
There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time-saving, accurate, and optimal evaluation of processes. The current study was aimed at fuzzy auto-evaluation, taking the processes for the parts as (a) subject investigated, (b) structuring evaluation system, and (c) method of processes in computer-aided production planning (CAPP) based on fuzzy mathematics. On analysis and comparison, the automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system was built based on the following factors: set, the weight set and assessment set, and the single factor: proposed comprehensive fuzzy evaluation. The membership degree was determined with fuzzy statistics, and the weight of various factors was determined by the fuzzy consistent matrix. A combination of theoretical analysis, practical experience, goals of evaluation, and factors set for processes was accomplished by extracting the factors that impacted evaluation of processes; weight set was established based on different weights that each factor impacting on the extent of technology programs gave; the assessment set was gained with a factor matrix which the expert group provided for every factor; the fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained with a matrix calculation according to the model M(⋀,⋁). The process grade was determined according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The process evaluation would automatically be realized through the evaluation system with the VC++ program after weights of various factors from the experts in the field were added. The optimum process was eventually obtained by comparing the grades of these processes. Three feasible processes of a disc-like component, as an example, were evaluated through this evaluation system, realizing the automatic evaluation of processes and obtaining the best process. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time-saving, accurate, and optimal evaluation of processes. The current study was aimed at fuzzy auto-evaluation, taking the processes for the parts as (a) subject investigated, (b) structuring evaluation system, and (c) method of processes in computer-aided production planning (CAPP) based on fuzzy mathematics. On analysis and comparison, the automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system was built based on the following factors: set, the weight set and assessment set, and the single factor: proposed comprehensive fuzzy evaluation. The membership degree was determined with fuzzy statistics, and the weight of various factors was determined by the fuzzy consistent matrix. A combination of theoretical analysis, practical experience, goals of evaluation, and factors set for processes was accomplished by extracting the factors that impacted evaluation of processes; weight set was established based on different weights that each factor impacting on the extent of technology programs gave; the assessment set was gained with a factor matrix which the expert group provided for every factor; the fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained with a matrix calculation according to the model M({AND},V). The process grade was determined according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The process evaluation would automatically be realized through the evaluation system with the VC++ program after weights of various factors from the experts in the field were added. The optimum process was eventually obtained by comparing the grades of these processes. Three feasible processes of a disc-like component, as an example, were evaluated through this evaluation system, realizing the automatic evaluation of processes and obtaining the best process.
Abstract There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time-saving, accurate, and optimal evaluation of processes. The current study was aimed at fuzzy auto-evaluation, taking the processes for the parts as (a) subject investigated, (b) structuring evaluation system, and (c) method of processes in computer-aided production planning (CAPP) based on fuzzy mathematics. On analysis and comparison, the automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system was built based on the following factors: set, the weight set and assessment set, and the single factor: proposed comprehensive fuzzy evaluation. The membership degree was determined with fuzzy statistics, and the weight of various factors was determined by the fuzzy consistent matrix. A combination of theoretical analysis, practical experience, goals of evaluation, and factors set for processes was accomplished by extracting the factors that impacted evaluation of processes; weight set was established based on different weights that each factor impacting on the extent of technology programs gave; the assessment set was gained with a factor matrix which the expert group provided for every factor; the fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained with a matrix calculation according to the model M (⋀, ⋁). The process grade was determined according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The process evaluation would automatically be realized through the evaluation system with the VC++ program after weights of various factors from the experts in the field were added. The optimum process was eventually obtained by comparing the grades of these processes. Three feasible processes of a disc-like component, as an example, were evaluated through this evaluation system, realizing the automatic evaluation of processes and obtaining the best process.
Author Guo, H
Gu, L Z
Tang, W
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: W
  surname: Tang
  fullname: Tang, W
– sequence: 2
  givenname: L Z
  surname: Gu
  fullname: Gu, L Z
– sequence: 3
  givenname: H
  surname: Guo
  fullname: Guo, H
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23024586$$DView record in Pascal Francis
BookMark eNp9kc9LwzAYhoNMcJuevRZFvFiXNMmSHGXMXygi6Ll8S1ONdMlM2oH-9WZuiAw0hwTyPm94yDdAPeedQeiQ4HNSMDrCijOGObud3hNB1Q7qF5iRvFCC91B_leareA8NYnzDaQlK--hx4ueLrjUhB1uZKlsEr02M2aIB56x7yWYQ07V3GXStn0NrdVZ3n58fmU7FYF6Ni3ZpMrOEpkupd_tot4YmmoPNOUTPl9OnyXV-93B1M7m4yzVVvE27UELO5LiuZrLSSkvBFcdQEUkZZ0JLXnPMKdMEMGZmVlWFwgRqAePKUE6H6HT9blJ-70xsy7mN2jRJ3PgulpIpJhjlOJFHW-Sb74JLcqUUJGlgJhN0_BdEFJZKymSVqJMNBVFDUwdw2sZyEewcwkdZUFwwLseJG605HXyMwdQ_CMHlalzl1rhSg281tG2_P7QNYJt_emfrXoQX88v5D_wLTH2mPg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_0954405411404303
crossref_primary_10_1177_0954405415616786
crossref_primary_10_1177_0954405414535589
crossref_primary_10_1177_0954405415612369
crossref_primary_10_1177_0954405411416906
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11630_021_1496_2
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.05.013
10.1016/j.camwa.2007.01.011
10.1007/s00778-008-0124-z
10.1623/hysj.54.2.261
10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.053
10.1007/s00477-006-0042-9
10.1016/j.compind.2008.09.009
10.1016/j.rcim.2008.03.001
10.1016/j.camwa.2005.04.015
10.1016/j.cam.2008.03.045
10.1016/j.fss.2008.11.009
10.1007/s00477-007-0197-z
10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.026
10.1016/j.mcm.2008.07.035
10.1016/j.apm.2006.10.018
10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2003449
10.1080/0308107031000090765
10.1016/j.fss.2006.02.002
10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2010 Institution of Mechanical Engineers
2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright Professional Engineering Publishing Ltd 2010
Copyright_xml – notice: 2010 Institution of Mechanical Engineers
– notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright Professional Engineering Publishing Ltd 2010
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
7TB
8FD
F28
FR3
3V.
7XB
88I
8AF
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FK
ABJCF
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
BGLVJ
CCPQU
DWQXO
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
L6V
M2P
M7S
PHGZM
PHGZT
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PTHSS
Q9U
DOI 10.1243/09544054JEM1739
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
Technology Research Database
ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Science Database (Alumni Edition)
STEM Database
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Science Database
Engineering Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Engineering Research Database
Technology Research Database
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest AP Science
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
Engineering Collection
Engineering Database
ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Science Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic (New)
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
ProQuest Central Student
Engineering Research Database
Engineering Research Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Applied Sciences
Statistics
Mathematics
EISSN 2041-2975
EndPage 877
ExternalDocumentID 2375103631
23024586
10_1243_09544054JEM1739
10.1243_09544054JEM1739
Genre Feature
GroupedDBID -TN
.DC
0R~
123
29P
4.4
88I
8AF
8AO
8FE
8FG
8R4
8R5
8V8
AAFNC
AAOTM
AAPFT
ABDPE
ABIDT
ABJCF
ABUBZ
ABUJY
ABUWG
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIWK
ADEBD
ADQAE
AEDFJ
AEWDL
AFKRA
AFKRG
AHDMH
AIDUJ
AJCXD
AJUZI
AKDDG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ARTOV
AZQEC
BENPR
BGLVJ
BPACV
BPHCQ
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
DWQXO
EBS
EJD
FHBDP
GNUQQ
H13
HCIFZ
HZ~
I6U
IL9
J8X
L6V
L7B
M2P
M2Q
M7S
O9-
P.B
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PTHSS
Q1R
Q2X
Q7S
SAUOL
SC5
SCNPE
SFC
~33
AAYXX
CITATION
6TJ
AALXP
AAQDB
ACKIV
ACRPL
ADNMO
ADYCS
AFWMB
AGQPQ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
FEDTE
HVGLF
IQODW
PQGLB
PRI
7TB
8FD
F28
FR3
3V.
7XB
8FK
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-c37978b86fdb8dc9c875950ad1834547c85f50534c1a004ebdd2901af7a6de353
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0954-4054
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 18:46:36 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 08:52:58 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 03:07:42 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:11:40 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 05:24:10 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:08 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:46:24 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords CAPP
factors set
comprehensive evaluation
fuzzy
Statistical analysis
Probabilistic approach
Process planning
Variability
Markets
Maximum principle
Modeling
Optimization
Weight
Fuzzy logic
Production management
Minimum time
Computer aided design
Production process
Language English
License https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license
CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c395t-c37978b86fdb8dc9c875950ad1834547c85f50534c1a004ebdd2901af7a6de353
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
PQID 871797048
PQPubID 36148
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_849474350
proquest_journals_871797048
proquest_journals_1908988454
pascalfrancis_primary_23024586
crossref_primary_10_1243_09544054JEM1739
crossref_citationtrail_10_1243_09544054JEM1739
sage_journals_10_1243_09544054JEM1739
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2010-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2010
  text: 2010-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London, England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London, England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of engineering manufacture
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher SAGE Publications
Sage Publications
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Publisher_xml – name: SAGE Publications
– name: Sage Publications
– name: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
References Ertugrul, Karakasoglu 2008; 39
Schnaitter, Spiegel, Polyzotis 2009; 18
Xu, Li 2009; 25
Gutierrez, Jegat 2005; 30
Demirci 2003; 32
Ozger 2009; 54
Khabbaz, Manshadi 2009; 30
Gentili 2007; 336
Novak, Perfilieva 2009; 160
Waiyagan, Bohez 2009; 60
Sadiq, Tesfamariam 2009; 23
Jaganathan, Erinjeri, Ker 2007; 32
Thavaneswaran, Appadoo, Paseka 2009; 49
Tesfamariam, Sadiq 2006; 21
Saravanan, Ramachandran 2009; 36
Gao, Liu, Lam 2009; 39
Zhu, Liu 2005; 50
Stefanini, Sorini, Guerra 2006; 157
Thiagarajah, Appadoo, Thavaneswaran 2007; 53
Solidifier, Pasha 2009; 223
Asady, Zendehnam 2007; 31
bibr21-09544054JEM1739
bibr13-09544054JEM1739
bibr9-09544054JEM1739
bibr2-09544054JEM1739
bibr17-09544054JEM1739
bibr5-09544054JEM1739
bibr8-09544054JEM1739
bibr16-09544054JEM1739
bibr4-09544054JEM1739
bibr1-09544054JEM1739
bibr10-09544054JEM1739
bibr19-09544054JEM1739
bibr7-09544054JEM1739
bibr15-09544054JEM1739
bibr11-09544054JEM1739
Jaganathan S. (bibr6-09544054JEM1739) 2007; 32
bibr14-09544054JEM1739
bibr20-09544054JEM1739
bibr12-09544054JEM1739
bibr3-09544054JEM1739
Gutierrez J. (bibr18-09544054JEM1739) 2005; 30
References_xml – volume: 336
  start-page: 64
  issue: 1
  year: 2007
  end-page: 73
  article-title: ‘Boolean and fuzzy logic implemented at the molecular level’
  publication-title: Chem. Phys
– volume: 30
  start-page: 687
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  end-page: 697
  article-title: ‘A simplified fuzzy logic approach for materials selection in mechanical engineering design’
  publication-title: Mater. Des.
– volume: 223
  start-page: 1028
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1042
  article-title: ‘The possibilistic moments of fuzzy numbers and their applications’
  publication-title: J. Comp. Appl. Math.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 529
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  end-page: 535
  article-title: ‘Modeling of process parameter selection with mathematical logic for process planning’
  publication-title: Robotics and Computer-Integrated Mfg
– volume: 50
  start-page: 719
  issue: 5–6
  year: 2005
  end-page: 727
  article-title: ‘Some inequalities of random fuzzy variables with application to moment convergence’
  publication-title: Computers and Math. Applic.
– volume: 39
  start-page: 306
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 317
  article-title: ‘Stability analysis and stabilization for discrete-time fuzzy systems with time-varying delay’
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B—Cybernetics
– volume: 30
  start-page: 261
  issue: 5
  year: 2005
  article-title: ‘The use of the theory of fuzzy logic in satellite image classification of mix cover: An urban case in Merida, Venezuela’
  publication-title: Interciencia
– volume: 36
  start-page: 10854
  issue: 8
  year: 2009
  end-page: 10862
  article-title: ‘A case study on classification of features by fast single-shot multiclass PSVM using Morlet wavelet for fault diagnosis of spur bevel gear box’
  publication-title: Expert Systems with Applic.
– volume: 54
  start-page: 261
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 273
  article-title: ‘Comparison of fuzzy inference systems for streamflow prediction’
  publication-title: Hydrological Sci. J.
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1253
  issue: 11–12
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1262
  article-title: ‘Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based group decision support system to select and evaluate new manufacturing technologies’
  publication-title: Mfg Technol.
– volume: 60
  start-page: 296
  issue: 5
  year: 2009
  end-page: 316
  article-title: ‘Intelligent feature based process planning for five-axis mill-turn parts’
  publication-title: Computers in Ind.
– volume: 32
  start-page: 123
  issue: 2
  year: 2003
  end-page: 155
  article-title: ‘Foundations of fuzzy functions and vague algebra based on many-valued equivalence relations. Part I: Fuzzy functions and their applications’
  publication-title: Int. J. General Systems
– volume: 53
  start-page: 831
  issue: 5
  year: 2007
  end-page: 841
  article-title: ‘Option valuation model with adaptive fuzzy numbers’
  publication-title: Computers and Math. with Applic.
– volume: 21
  start-page: 35
  issue: 1
  year: 2006
  end-page: 50
  article-title: ‘Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP)’
  publication-title: Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assessment
– volume: 160
  start-page: 1003
  issue: 8
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1004
  article-title: ‘Formal methods for fuzzy mathematics, approximation and reasoning—part II’
  publication-title: Fuzzy Sets Systems
– volume: 39
  start-page: 783
  issue: 7–8
  year: 2008
  end-page: 795
  article-title: ‘Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection’
  publication-title: Int. J. Advd Mfg Technol.
– volume: 23
  start-page: 75
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 91
  article-title: ‘Environmental decision-making under uncertainty using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP)’
  publication-title: Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assessment
– volume: 49
  start-page: 352
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 368
  article-title: ‘Weighted possibilistic moments of fuzzy numbers with applications to GARCH modeling and option pricing’
  publication-title: Mathl Computer Modeling
– volume: 31
  start-page: 2589
  issue: 11
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2598
  article-title: ‘Ranking fuzzy numbers by distance minimization’
  publication-title: Appl. Mathl Modeling
– volume: 157
  start-page: 2423
  issue: 18
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2455
  article-title: ‘Parametric representation of fuzzy numbers and application to fuzzy calculus’
  publication-title: Fuzzy Sets Systems
– volume: 18
  start-page: 521
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 542
  article-title: ‘Depth estimation for ranking query optimization’
  publication-title: VLDB J.
– ident: bibr21-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.05.013
– ident: bibr8-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2007.01.011
– ident: bibr13-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1007/s00778-008-0124-z
– ident: bibr20-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1623/hysj.54.2.261
– ident: bibr4-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.053
– ident: bibr15-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1007/s00477-006-0042-9
– ident: bibr2-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2008.09.009
– ident: bibr3-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2008.03.001
– ident: bibr16-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2005.04.015
– ident: bibr10-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2008.03.045
– ident: bibr1-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2008.11.009
– ident: bibr19-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1007/s00477-007-0197-z
– ident: bibr5-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.026
– ident: bibr11-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.07.035
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1253
  issue: 11
  year: 2007
  ident: bibr6-09544054JEM1739
  publication-title: Mfg Technol.
– ident: bibr17-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2006.10.018
– ident: bibr12-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2003449
– ident: bibr7-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1080/0308107031000090765
– volume: 30
  start-page: 261
  issue: 5
  year: 2005
  ident: bibr18-09544054JEM1739
  publication-title: Interciencia
– ident: bibr9-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2006.02.002
– ident: bibr14-09544054JEM1739
  doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8
SSID ssj0000733
Score 1.8785839
Snippet Abstract There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing...
There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes,...
Abstract There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing...
SourceID proquest
pascalfrancis
crossref
sage
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 869
SubjectTerms Applied sciences
Assessments
Automation
Complexity
Computer aided testing
Construction
Exact sciences and technology
Feasibility studies
Fuzzy
Fuzzy logic
Fuzzy set theory
Fuzzy sets
Fuzzy systems
Manufacturing
Markets
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Mathematics
Matrices (mathematics)
Matrix methods
Mechanical engineering. Machine design
Optimization
Process planning
Production planning
Quality
Statistics
Technology assessment
Title Computer-aided process planning based on automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
URI https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1243/09544054JEM1739
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1908988454
https://www.proquest.com/docview/871797048
https://www.proquest.com/docview/849474350
Volume 224
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT-MwEB7xuLBCCJZdER6VD6y0lyxtYzvOCQFqQUhFgEDiFvmRiANKAm0P8OuZaZxQlsclUvxI7LE9D3s8H8C-46JrXF-EtisTNFBoo0kTM8RWO5QXmku64Dy6kGe3_PxO3HnfnLF3q2x44oxRu9LSHvkBKvZxEuN8O6weQwKNosNVj6CxCMvIgRXaXsvHg4vL6zdWHDdY8pzawX1snz6PDiiNks4Ho15MUOFzYmm10mOkUF5DW7zTPefcvWYSaLgOa151ZEf1WG_AQlb8hB9zAQXxbdRGYR1vwlUD2RBSHEjHqvpSAKs8UBEjEeZYWTA9nZSzWiyfvrw8M3I0f8rua-d29hYR_BfcDgc3J2ehh1AIbZSICT6RaMoomTujnE0smieJ6GqHK5lCeVklctSBIm57GpdLZpyjg1Wdx1q6LBLRb1gqyiLbAqZtFsfS5iZSkhvpEtWzKOM0GrlGmbwbwL-Ggqn18cUJ5uIhJTsDSZ7-R_IA_rYVqjq0xtdFO--GpC2PBlSfCyUD2G3GKPWLcJz26ExTKexnADsfs9sZFQBrc3Fx0YmJLrJyikV4wlHFEti5PzTwc9_-vKHb3_5oB1Zq5wPaxNmFpcnTNNtDnWZiOrCohqcdP39fAWKK8rs
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9wwEB4hOFBUodKCCFDqQ5F6CewmjuMcqqpqWZbHIlUCiVvwK-JQJYHdFYL_xH_sTF4sbeHGJVIS24k943nY4_kAPlse9bQNIt_0RIIOCi00KRKG-NcW9YXigg44j07F8JwfXUQXc_DQnoWhsMpWJlaC2haG1sj30LCPkxj57Vt57RNoFG2utggaNVccu7tb9NjGXw9_Inl3gmCwf_Zj6DegAr4Jk2iCV2xGaikyq6U1iUGDPYl6yiJvU3IrI6MMrYKQm75CBnLaWtpqVFmshHUVSARK_AUehglNKDk4eBT8cYtcz6nXvMkkFPBwj57Ro6P9UT8mYPIZJfi2VGOkR1YDaTyxdGeCyyp9N3gHy42hyr7XnLUCcy5_D0sz6QvxbtTlfB1_gF8tQIRPWSctK-sjCKxsYJEYKUzLipyp6aSoarFsen9_xyis_cZd1aH07DH_-Cqcv8rYrsF8XuRuHZgyLo6FyXQoBdfCJrJvUKMqdKm11FnPg912BFPTZDMnUI3fKXk1OOTpX0PuwZeuQlkn8ni-6PYTknTl0V0LeCSFB1stjdJmyo_TPu2gSon99GDz39cd_3rAurc4lWl_RuWumGIRnnA06CLs3A4Rfqbt___oxosf-gSLw7PRSXpyeHq8CW_qsAdaPtqC-cnN1H1Ea2qityseZnD52pPmD-9RLPI
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ZT9tAEB6hIKFWFYIewlzdhyL1xcVx1uv1A0K0JOJoIloViTd3L4sHZLskUQX_rP-OmfggtNA3XizZu75mZufYnZ0P4IPlUaBtGPkmEAkGKDTRpEgZ4ldbtBeKC9rgPByJo3N-chFdLMCfZi8MpVU2OnGmqG1haI58Fx37OImpymxWZ0WcHQ72y18-AUjRQmuDplFJyKm7-Y3R23jv-BBZvROGg_6PL0d-DTDgm14STfCIj5RaisxqaU1i0HlPokBZlHMqdGVklKGH0OOmq1CYnLaWlh1VFith3QwwArX_YoxBUdCBxc_90dn3ezMQNzj2nGjA67pCIe_t0jW6dNIfdmOCKZ8zia9KNUbuZBWsxgO_dy7VbGb9BiuwXLut7KCSs1VYcPlreDlXzBDPhm0F2PEb-NbARfhUg9KystqQwMoaJImR-bSsyJmaTorZXSyb3t7eMEpyv3aXVWI9u69G_hbOn4W676CTF7lbA6aMi2NhMt2TgmthE9k1aF8VBtha6izw4FNDwdTUtc0JYuMqpRgHSZ7-RXIPPrY3lFVZj6e7bj9gSdsfg7eQR1J4sNnwKK0VwDjt0nqqlPifHmz829xKswesbcWBTas1KnfFFLvwhKN7F-HP7RDj5579-Ieu__dF72EJB0z69Xh0ugEvqhwImkvahM7keuq20LWa6O1aiBn8fO5xcwcwFzKE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computer-aided+process+planning+based+on+automatic+fuzzy+comprehensive+evaluation&rft.jtitle=Proceedings+of+the+Institution+of+Mechanical+Engineers.+Part+B%2C+Journal+of+engineering+manufacture&rft.au=Tang%2C+W&rft.au=Gu%2C+L+Z&rft.au=Guo%2C+H&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.pub=SAGE+PUBLICATIONS%2C+INC&rft.issn=0954-4054&rft.eissn=2041-2975&rft.volume=224&rft.issue=B6&rft.spage=869&rft_id=info:doi/10.1243%2F09544054JEM1739&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=2375103631
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0954-4054&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0954-4054&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0954-4054&client=summon