Computer-aided process planning based on automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
Abstract There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of engineering manufacture Vol. 224; no. 6; pp. 869 - 877 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, England
SAGE Publications
01.06.2010
Sage Publications SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Abstract
There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time-saving, accurate, and optimal evaluation of processes. The current study was aimed at fuzzy auto-evaluation, taking the processes for the parts as (a) subject investigated, (b) structuring evaluation system, and (c) method of processes in computer-aided production planning (CAPP) based on fuzzy mathematics. On analysis and comparison, the automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system was built based on the following factors: set, the weight set and assessment set, and the single factor: proposed comprehensive fuzzy evaluation. The membership degree was determined with fuzzy statistics, and the weight of various factors was determined by the fuzzy consistent matrix. A combination of theoretical analysis, practical experience, goals of evaluation, and factors set for processes was accomplished by extracting the factors that impacted evaluation of processes; weight set was established based on different weights that each factor impacting on the extent of technology programs gave; the assessment set was gained with a factor matrix which the expert group provided for every factor; the fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained with a matrix calculation according to the model M (∧, ∨). The process grade was determined according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The process evaluation would automatically be realized through the evaluation system with the VC++ program after weights of various factors from the experts in the field were added. The optimum process was eventually obtained by comparing the grades of these processes. Three feasible processes of a disc-like component, as an example, were evaluated through this evaluation system, realizing the automatic evaluation of processes and obtaining the best process. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract
There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time-saving, accurate, and optimal evaluation of processes. The current study was aimed at fuzzy auto-evaluation, taking the processes for the parts as (a) subject investigated, (b) structuring evaluation system, and (c) method of processes in computer-aided production planning (CAPP) based on fuzzy mathematics. On analysis and comparison, the automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system was built based on the following factors: set, the weight set and assessment set, and the single factor: proposed comprehensive fuzzy evaluation. The membership degree was determined with fuzzy statistics, and the weight of various factors was determined by the fuzzy consistent matrix. A combination of theoretical analysis, practical experience, goals of evaluation, and factors set for processes was accomplished by extracting the factors that impacted evaluation of processes; weight set was established based on different weights that each factor impacting on the extent of technology programs gave; the assessment set was gained with a factor matrix which the expert group provided for every factor; the fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained with a matrix calculation according to the model M (∧, ∨). The process grade was determined according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The process evaluation would automatically be realized through the evaluation system with the VC++ program after weights of various factors from the experts in the field were added. The optimum process was eventually obtained by comparing the grades of these processes. Three feasible processes of a disc-like component, as an example, were evaluated through this evaluation system, realizing the automatic evaluation of processes and obtaining the best process. There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time-saving, accurate, and optimal evaluation of processes. The current study was aimed at fuzzy auto-evaluation, taking the processes for the parts as (a) subject investigated, (b) structuring evaluation system, and (c) method of processes in computer-aided production planning (CAPP) based on fuzzy mathematics. On analysis and comparison, the automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system was built based on the following factors: set, the weight set and assessment set, and the single factor: proposed comprehensive fuzzy evaluation. The membership degree was determined with fuzzy statistics, and the weight of various factors was determined by the fuzzy consistent matrix. A combination of theoretical analysis, practical experience, goals of evaluation, and factors set for processes was accomplished by extracting the factors that impacted evaluation of processes; weight set was established based on different weights that each factor impacting on the extent of technology programs gave; the assessment set was gained with a factor matrix which the expert group provided for every factor; the fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained with a matrix calculation according to the model M (∧, ∨). The process grade was determined according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The process evaluation would automatically be realized through the evaluation system with the VC++ program after weights of various factors from the experts in the field were added. The optimum process was eventually obtained by comparing the grades of these processes. Three feasible processes of a disc-like component, as an example, were evaluated through this evaluation system, realizing the automatic evaluation of processes and obtaining the best process. There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time-saving, accurate, and optimal evaluation of processes. The current study was aimed at fuzzy auto-evaluation, taking the processes for the parts as (a) subject investigated, (b) structuring evaluation system, and (c) method of processes in computer-aided production planning (CAPP) based on fuzzy mathematics. On analysis and comparison, the automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system was built based on the following factors: set, the weight set and assessment set, and the single factor: proposed comprehensive fuzzy evaluation. The membership degree was determined with fuzzy statistics, and the weight of various factors was determined by the fuzzy consistent matrix. A combination of theoretical analysis, practical experience, goals of evaluation, and factors set for processes was accomplished by extracting the factors that impacted evaluation of processes; weight set was established based on different weights that each factor impacting on the extent of technology programs gave; the assessment set was gained with a factor matrix which the expert group provided for every factor; the fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained with a matrix calculation according to the model M(⋀,⋁). The process grade was determined according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The process evaluation would automatically be realized through the evaluation system with the VC++ program after weights of various factors from the experts in the field were added. The optimum process was eventually obtained by comparing the grades of these processes. Three feasible processes of a disc-like component, as an example, were evaluated through this evaluation system, realizing the automatic evaluation of processes and obtaining the best process. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time-saving, accurate, and optimal evaluation of processes. The current study was aimed at fuzzy auto-evaluation, taking the processes for the parts as (a) subject investigated, (b) structuring evaluation system, and (c) method of processes in computer-aided production planning (CAPP) based on fuzzy mathematics. On analysis and comparison, the automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system was built based on the following factors: set, the weight set and assessment set, and the single factor: proposed comprehensive fuzzy evaluation. The membership degree was determined with fuzzy statistics, and the weight of various factors was determined by the fuzzy consistent matrix. A combination of theoretical analysis, practical experience, goals of evaluation, and factors set for processes was accomplished by extracting the factors that impacted evaluation of processes; weight set was established based on different weights that each factor impacting on the extent of technology programs gave; the assessment set was gained with a factor matrix which the expert group provided for every factor; the fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained with a matrix calculation according to the model M({AND},V). The process grade was determined according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The process evaluation would automatically be realized through the evaluation system with the VC++ program after weights of various factors from the experts in the field were added. The optimum process was eventually obtained by comparing the grades of these processes. Three feasible processes of a disc-like component, as an example, were evaluated through this evaluation system, realizing the automatic evaluation of processes and obtaining the best process. Abstract There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes, complexity of the environment of manufacture, and variability of the market. It is essential to meet the need for an automatic, time-saving, accurate, and optimal evaluation of processes. The current study was aimed at fuzzy auto-evaluation, taking the processes for the parts as (a) subject investigated, (b) structuring evaluation system, and (c) method of processes in computer-aided production planning (CAPP) based on fuzzy mathematics. On analysis and comparison, the automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system was built based on the following factors: set, the weight set and assessment set, and the single factor: proposed comprehensive fuzzy evaluation. The membership degree was determined with fuzzy statistics, and the weight of various factors was determined by the fuzzy consistent matrix. A combination of theoretical analysis, practical experience, goals of evaluation, and factors set for processes was accomplished by extracting the factors that impacted evaluation of processes; weight set was established based on different weights that each factor impacting on the extent of technology programs gave; the assessment set was gained with a factor matrix which the expert group provided for every factor; the fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained with a matrix calculation according to the model M (⋀, ⋁). The process grade was determined according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The process evaluation would automatically be realized through the evaluation system with the VC++ program after weights of various factors from the experts in the field were added. The optimum process was eventually obtained by comparing the grades of these processes. Three feasible processes of a disc-like component, as an example, were evaluated through this evaluation system, realizing the automatic evaluation of processes and obtaining the best process. |
Author | Guo, H Gu, L Z Tang, W |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: W surname: Tang fullname: Tang, W – sequence: 2 givenname: L Z surname: Gu fullname: Gu, L Z – sequence: 3 givenname: H surname: Guo fullname: Guo, H |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23024586$$DView record in Pascal Francis |
BookMark | eNp9kc9LwzAYhoNMcJuevRZFvFiXNMmSHGXMXygi6Ll8S1ONdMlM2oH-9WZuiAw0hwTyPm94yDdAPeedQeiQ4HNSMDrCijOGObud3hNB1Q7qF5iRvFCC91B_leareA8NYnzDaQlK--hx4ueLrjUhB1uZKlsEr02M2aIB56x7yWYQ07V3GXStn0NrdVZ3n58fmU7FYF6Ni3ZpMrOEpkupd_tot4YmmoPNOUTPl9OnyXV-93B1M7m4yzVVvE27UELO5LiuZrLSSkvBFcdQEUkZZ0JLXnPMKdMEMGZmVlWFwgRqAePKUE6H6HT9blJ-70xsy7mN2jRJ3PgulpIpJhjlOJFHW-Sb74JLcqUUJGlgJhN0_BdEFJZKymSVqJMNBVFDUwdw2sZyEewcwkdZUFwwLseJG605HXyMwdQ_CMHlalzl1rhSg281tG2_P7QNYJt_emfrXoQX88v5D_wLTH2mPg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_0954405411404303 crossref_primary_10_1177_0954405415616786 crossref_primary_10_1177_0954405414535589 crossref_primary_10_1177_0954405415612369 crossref_primary_10_1177_0954405411416906 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11630_021_1496_2 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.05.013 10.1016/j.camwa.2007.01.011 10.1007/s00778-008-0124-z 10.1623/hysj.54.2.261 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.053 10.1007/s00477-006-0042-9 10.1016/j.compind.2008.09.009 10.1016/j.rcim.2008.03.001 10.1016/j.camwa.2005.04.015 10.1016/j.cam.2008.03.045 10.1016/j.fss.2008.11.009 10.1007/s00477-007-0197-z 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.026 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.07.035 10.1016/j.apm.2006.10.018 10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2003449 10.1080/0308107031000090765 10.1016/j.fss.2006.02.002 10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2010 Institution of Mechanical Engineers 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright Professional Engineering Publishing Ltd 2010 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2010 Institution of Mechanical Engineers – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright Professional Engineering Publishing Ltd 2010 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW 7TB 8FD F28 FR3 3V. 7XB 88I 8AF 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR BGLVJ CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ L6V M2P M7S PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS Q9U |
DOI | 10.1243/09544054JEM1739 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Technology Research Database ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering Engineering Research Database ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Science Database (Alumni Edition) STEM Database ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Technology Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Engineering Collection Science Database Engineering Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection ProQuest Central Basic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Engineering Research Database Technology Research Database Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest AP Science ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Engineering Collection ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) Engineering Collection Engineering Database ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic (New) |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef ProQuest Central Student Engineering Research Database Engineering Research Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering Applied Sciences Statistics Mathematics |
EISSN | 2041-2975 |
EndPage | 877 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2375103631 23024586 10_1243_09544054JEM1739 10.1243_09544054JEM1739 |
Genre | Feature |
GroupedDBID | -TN .DC 0R~ 123 29P 4.4 88I 8AF 8AO 8FE 8FG 8R4 8R5 8V8 AAFNC AAOTM AAPFT ABDPE ABIDT ABJCF ABUBZ ABUJY ABUWG ACGFS ACGOD ACIWK ADEBD ADQAE AEDFJ AEWDL AFKRA AFKRG AHDMH AIDUJ AJCXD AJUZI AKDDG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ARTOV AZQEC BENPR BGLVJ BPACV BPHCQ CAG CCPQU COF CS3 DWQXO EBS EJD FHBDP GNUQQ H13 HCIFZ HZ~ I6U IL9 J8X L6V L7B M2P M2Q M7S O9- P.B PHGZM PHGZT PQQKQ PROAC PTHSS Q1R Q2X Q7S SAUOL SC5 SCNPE SFC ~33 AAYXX CITATION 6TJ AALXP AAQDB ACKIV ACRPL ADNMO ADYCS AFWMB AGQPQ ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN FEDTE HVGLF IQODW PQGLB PRI 7TB 8FD F28 FR3 3V. 7XB 8FK PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-c37978b86fdb8dc9c875950ad1834547c85f50534c1a004ebdd2901af7a6de353 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 0954-4054 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 18:46:36 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 08:52:58 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 03:07:42 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:11:40 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:24:10 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:08 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:46:24 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | CAPP factors set comprehensive evaluation fuzzy Statistical analysis Probabilistic approach Process planning Variability Markets Maximum principle Modeling Optimization Weight Fuzzy logic Production management Minimum time Computer aided design Production process |
Language | English |
License | https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c395t-c37978b86fdb8dc9c875950ad1834547c85f50534c1a004ebdd2901af7a6de353 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 |
PQID | 871797048 |
PQPubID | 36148 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_849474350 proquest_journals_871797048 proquest_journals_1908988454 pascalfrancis_primary_23024586 crossref_primary_10_1243_09544054JEM1739 crossref_citationtrail_10_1243_09544054JEM1739 sage_journals_10_1243_09544054JEM1739 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2010-06-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2010 text: 2010-06-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | London, England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London, England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of engineering manufacture |
PublicationYear | 2010 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications Sage Publications SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC |
Publisher_xml | – name: SAGE Publications – name: Sage Publications – name: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC |
References | Ertugrul, Karakasoglu 2008; 39 Schnaitter, Spiegel, Polyzotis 2009; 18 Xu, Li 2009; 25 Gutierrez, Jegat 2005; 30 Demirci 2003; 32 Ozger 2009; 54 Khabbaz, Manshadi 2009; 30 Gentili 2007; 336 Novak, Perfilieva 2009; 160 Waiyagan, Bohez 2009; 60 Sadiq, Tesfamariam 2009; 23 Jaganathan, Erinjeri, Ker 2007; 32 Thavaneswaran, Appadoo, Paseka 2009; 49 Tesfamariam, Sadiq 2006; 21 Saravanan, Ramachandran 2009; 36 Gao, Liu, Lam 2009; 39 Zhu, Liu 2005; 50 Stefanini, Sorini, Guerra 2006; 157 Thiagarajah, Appadoo, Thavaneswaran 2007; 53 Solidifier, Pasha 2009; 223 Asady, Zendehnam 2007; 31 bibr21-09544054JEM1739 bibr13-09544054JEM1739 bibr9-09544054JEM1739 bibr2-09544054JEM1739 bibr17-09544054JEM1739 bibr5-09544054JEM1739 bibr8-09544054JEM1739 bibr16-09544054JEM1739 bibr4-09544054JEM1739 bibr1-09544054JEM1739 bibr10-09544054JEM1739 bibr19-09544054JEM1739 bibr7-09544054JEM1739 bibr15-09544054JEM1739 bibr11-09544054JEM1739 Jaganathan S. (bibr6-09544054JEM1739) 2007; 32 bibr14-09544054JEM1739 bibr20-09544054JEM1739 bibr12-09544054JEM1739 bibr3-09544054JEM1739 Gutierrez J. (bibr18-09544054JEM1739) 2005; 30 |
References_xml | – volume: 336 start-page: 64 issue: 1 year: 2007 end-page: 73 article-title: ‘Boolean and fuzzy logic implemented at the molecular level’ publication-title: Chem. Phys – volume: 30 start-page: 687 issue: 3 year: 2009 end-page: 697 article-title: ‘A simplified fuzzy logic approach for materials selection in mechanical engineering design’ publication-title: Mater. Des. – volume: 223 start-page: 1028 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 1042 article-title: ‘The possibilistic moments of fuzzy numbers and their applications’ publication-title: J. Comp. Appl. Math. – volume: 25 start-page: 529 issue: 3 year: 2009 end-page: 535 article-title: ‘Modeling of process parameter selection with mathematical logic for process planning’ publication-title: Robotics and Computer-Integrated Mfg – volume: 50 start-page: 719 issue: 5–6 year: 2005 end-page: 727 article-title: ‘Some inequalities of random fuzzy variables with application to moment convergence’ publication-title: Computers and Math. Applic. – volume: 39 start-page: 306 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 317 article-title: ‘Stability analysis and stabilization for discrete-time fuzzy systems with time-varying delay’ publication-title: IEEE Trans Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B—Cybernetics – volume: 30 start-page: 261 issue: 5 year: 2005 article-title: ‘The use of the theory of fuzzy logic in satellite image classification of mix cover: An urban case in Merida, Venezuela’ publication-title: Interciencia – volume: 36 start-page: 10854 issue: 8 year: 2009 end-page: 10862 article-title: ‘A case study on classification of features by fast single-shot multiclass PSVM using Morlet wavelet for fault diagnosis of spur bevel gear box’ publication-title: Expert Systems with Applic. – volume: 54 start-page: 261 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 273 article-title: ‘Comparison of fuzzy inference systems for streamflow prediction’ publication-title: Hydrological Sci. J. – volume: 32 start-page: 1253 issue: 11–12 year: 2007 end-page: 1262 article-title: ‘Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based group decision support system to select and evaluate new manufacturing technologies’ publication-title: Mfg Technol. – volume: 60 start-page: 296 issue: 5 year: 2009 end-page: 316 article-title: ‘Intelligent feature based process planning for five-axis mill-turn parts’ publication-title: Computers in Ind. – volume: 32 start-page: 123 issue: 2 year: 2003 end-page: 155 article-title: ‘Foundations of fuzzy functions and vague algebra based on many-valued equivalence relations. Part I: Fuzzy functions and their applications’ publication-title: Int. J. General Systems – volume: 53 start-page: 831 issue: 5 year: 2007 end-page: 841 article-title: ‘Option valuation model with adaptive fuzzy numbers’ publication-title: Computers and Math. with Applic. – volume: 21 start-page: 35 issue: 1 year: 2006 end-page: 50 article-title: ‘Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP)’ publication-title: Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assessment – volume: 160 start-page: 1003 issue: 8 year: 2009 end-page: 1004 article-title: ‘Formal methods for fuzzy mathematics, approximation and reasoning—part II’ publication-title: Fuzzy Sets Systems – volume: 39 start-page: 783 issue: 7–8 year: 2008 end-page: 795 article-title: ‘Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection’ publication-title: Int. J. Advd Mfg Technol. – volume: 23 start-page: 75 issue: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 91 article-title: ‘Environmental decision-making under uncertainty using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP)’ publication-title: Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assessment – volume: 49 start-page: 352 issue: 1–2 year: 2009 end-page: 368 article-title: ‘Weighted possibilistic moments of fuzzy numbers with applications to GARCH modeling and option pricing’ publication-title: Mathl Computer Modeling – volume: 31 start-page: 2589 issue: 11 year: 2007 end-page: 2598 article-title: ‘Ranking fuzzy numbers by distance minimization’ publication-title: Appl. Mathl Modeling – volume: 157 start-page: 2423 issue: 18 year: 2006 end-page: 2455 article-title: ‘Parametric representation of fuzzy numbers and application to fuzzy calculus’ publication-title: Fuzzy Sets Systems – volume: 18 start-page: 521 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 542 article-title: ‘Depth estimation for ranking query optimization’ publication-title: VLDB J. – ident: bibr21-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.05.013 – ident: bibr8-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2007.01.011 – ident: bibr13-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1007/s00778-008-0124-z – ident: bibr20-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1623/hysj.54.2.261 – ident: bibr4-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.053 – ident: bibr15-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1007/s00477-006-0042-9 – ident: bibr2-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2008.09.009 – ident: bibr3-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2008.03.001 – ident: bibr16-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2005.04.015 – ident: bibr10-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2008.03.045 – ident: bibr1-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2008.11.009 – ident: bibr19-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1007/s00477-007-0197-z – ident: bibr5-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.026 – ident: bibr11-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.07.035 – volume: 32 start-page: 1253 issue: 11 year: 2007 ident: bibr6-09544054JEM1739 publication-title: Mfg Technol. – ident: bibr17-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2006.10.018 – ident: bibr12-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2003449 – ident: bibr7-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1080/0308107031000090765 – volume: 30 start-page: 261 issue: 5 year: 2005 ident: bibr18-09544054JEM1739 publication-title: Interciencia – ident: bibr9-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2006.02.002 – ident: bibr14-09544054JEM1739 doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8 |
SSID | ssj0000733 |
Score | 1.8785839 |
Snippet | Abstract
There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing... There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing processes,... Abstract There is strong contradiction in the traditional evaluation of processes in terms of diversity of manufactured goods, discreteness of manufacturing... |
SourceID | proquest pascalfrancis crossref sage |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 869 |
SubjectTerms | Applied sciences Assessments Automation Complexity Computer aided testing Construction Exact sciences and technology Feasibility studies Fuzzy Fuzzy logic Fuzzy set theory Fuzzy sets Fuzzy systems Manufacturing Markets Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Mathematics Matrices (mathematics) Matrix methods Mechanical engineering. Machine design Optimization Process planning Production planning Quality Statistics Technology assessment |
Title | Computer-aided process planning based on automatic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation |
URI | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1243/09544054JEM1739 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1908988454 https://www.proquest.com/docview/871797048 https://www.proquest.com/docview/849474350 |
Volume | 224 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT-MwEB7xuLBCCJZdER6VD6y0lyxtYzvOCQFqQUhFgEDiFvmRiANKAm0P8OuZaZxQlsclUvxI7LE9D3s8H8C-46JrXF-EtisTNFBoo0kTM8RWO5QXmku64Dy6kGe3_PxO3HnfnLF3q2x44oxRu9LSHvkBKvZxEuN8O6weQwKNosNVj6CxCMvIgRXaXsvHg4vL6zdWHDdY8pzawX1snz6PDiiNks4Ho15MUOFzYmm10mOkUF5DW7zTPefcvWYSaLgOa151ZEf1WG_AQlb8hB9zAQXxbdRGYR1vwlUD2RBSHEjHqvpSAKs8UBEjEeZYWTA9nZSzWiyfvrw8M3I0f8rua-d29hYR_BfcDgc3J2ehh1AIbZSICT6RaMoomTujnE0smieJ6GqHK5lCeVklctSBIm57GpdLZpyjg1Wdx1q6LBLRb1gqyiLbAqZtFsfS5iZSkhvpEtWzKOM0GrlGmbwbwL-Ggqn18cUJ5uIhJTsDSZ7-R_IA_rYVqjq0xtdFO--GpC2PBlSfCyUD2G3GKPWLcJz26ExTKexnADsfs9sZFQBrc3Fx0YmJLrJyikV4wlHFEti5PzTwc9_-vKHb3_5oB1Zq5wPaxNmFpcnTNNtDnWZiOrCohqcdP39fAWKK8rs |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9wwEB4hOFBUodKCCFDqQ5F6CewmjuMcqqpqWZbHIlUCiVvwK-JQJYHdFYL_xH_sTF4sbeHGJVIS24k943nY4_kAPlse9bQNIt_0RIIOCi00KRKG-NcW9YXigg44j07F8JwfXUQXc_DQnoWhsMpWJlaC2haG1sj30LCPkxj57Vt57RNoFG2utggaNVccu7tb9NjGXw9_Inl3gmCwf_Zj6DegAr4Jk2iCV2xGaikyq6U1iUGDPYl6yiJvU3IrI6MMrYKQm75CBnLaWtpqVFmshHUVSARK_AUehglNKDk4eBT8cYtcz6nXvMkkFPBwj57Ro6P9UT8mYPIZJfi2VGOkR1YDaTyxdGeCyyp9N3gHy42hyr7XnLUCcy5_D0sz6QvxbtTlfB1_gF8tQIRPWSctK-sjCKxsYJEYKUzLipyp6aSoarFsen9_xyis_cZd1aH07DH_-Cqcv8rYrsF8XuRuHZgyLo6FyXQoBdfCJrJvUKMqdKm11FnPg912BFPTZDMnUI3fKXk1OOTpX0PuwZeuQlkn8ni-6PYTknTl0V0LeCSFB1stjdJmyo_TPu2gSon99GDz39cd_3rAurc4lWl_RuWumGIRnnA06CLs3A4Rfqbt___oxosf-gSLw7PRSXpyeHq8CW_qsAdaPtqC-cnN1H1Ea2qityseZnD52pPmD-9RLPI |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ZT9tAEB6hIKFWFYIewlzdhyL1xcVx1uv1A0K0JOJoIloViTd3L4sHZLskUQX_rP-OmfggtNA3XizZu75mZufYnZ0P4IPlUaBtGPkmEAkGKDTRpEgZ4ldbtBeKC9rgPByJo3N-chFdLMCfZi8MpVU2OnGmqG1haI58Fx37OImpymxWZ0WcHQ72y18-AUjRQmuDplFJyKm7-Y3R23jv-BBZvROGg_6PL0d-DTDgm14STfCIj5RaisxqaU1i0HlPokBZlHMqdGVklKGH0OOmq1CYnLaWlh1VFith3QwwArX_YoxBUdCBxc_90dn3ezMQNzj2nGjA67pCIe_t0jW6dNIfdmOCKZ8zia9KNUbuZBWsxgO_dy7VbGb9BiuwXLut7KCSs1VYcPlreDlXzBDPhm0F2PEb-NbARfhUg9KystqQwMoaJImR-bSsyJmaTorZXSyb3t7eMEpyv3aXVWI9u69G_hbOn4W676CTF7lbA6aMi2NhMt2TgmthE9k1aF8VBtha6izw4FNDwdTUtc0JYuMqpRgHSZ7-RXIPPrY3lFVZj6e7bj9gSdsfg7eQR1J4sNnwKK0VwDjt0nqqlPifHmz829xKswesbcWBTas1KnfFFLvwhKN7F-HP7RDj5579-Ieu__dF72EJB0z69Xh0ugEvqhwImkvahM7keuq20LWa6O1aiBn8fO5xcwcwFzKE |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computer-aided+process+planning+based+on+automatic+fuzzy+comprehensive+evaluation&rft.jtitle=Proceedings+of+the+Institution+of+Mechanical+Engineers.+Part+B%2C+Journal+of+engineering+manufacture&rft.au=Tang%2C+W&rft.au=Gu%2C+L+Z&rft.au=Guo%2C+H&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.pub=SAGE+PUBLICATIONS%2C+INC&rft.issn=0954-4054&rft.eissn=2041-2975&rft.volume=224&rft.issue=B6&rft.spage=869&rft_id=info:doi/10.1243%2F09544054JEM1739&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=2375103631 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0954-4054&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0954-4054&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0954-4054&client=summon |