Spinal manipulation compared with back school and with individually delivered physiotherapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized trial with one-year follow-up

• Published in: Clinical rehabilitation Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 26 - 36
• Main Authors: Cecchi, Francesca, Molino-Lova, Raffaello, Chiti, Massimiliano, Pasquini, Guido, Paperini, Anita, Conti, Andrea A, Macchi, Claudio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2010; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Aged; Analgesics - therapeutic use; Back pain; Chronic Disease; Chronic low back pain; Chronic pain; Disability; Education; Ergonomics; Ergonomics - methods; Exercise; Exercise Therapy - methods; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Low Back Pain - drug therapy; Low Back Pain - rehabilitation; Low Back Pain - therapy; Male; Manipulation; Manipulation, Spinal - methods; Medicine; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Patient Education as Topic - methods; Patients; Physical therapy; Physical Therapy Modalities; Physiotherapy; Questionnaires; Rehabilitation; Severity of Illness Index; Spinal manipulation; Therapists; Italy
• DOI: 10.1177/0269215509342328
• ISSN: 0269-2155

Objective: To compare spinal manipulation, back school and individual physiotherapy in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Design: Randomized trial, 12-month follow-up. Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation department. Participants: 210 patients with chronic, non-specific low back pain, 140/210 women, age 59 ± 14 years. Interventions: Back school and individual physiotherapy scheduled 15 1-hour-sessions for 3 weeks. Back school included: group exercise, education/ ergonomics; individual physiotherapy: exercise, passive mobilization and soft-tissue treatment. Spinal manipulation, given according to Manual Medicine, scheduled 4 to 6 20’-sessions once-a-week. Outcome: Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (scoring 0-24) and Pain Rating Scale (scoring 0-6) were assessed at baseline, discharge 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: 205 patients completed the study. At discharge, disability score decreased by 3.7 ± 4.1 for back school, 4.4 ± 3.7 for individual physiotherapy, 6.7 ± 3.9 for manipulation; pain score reduction was 0.9 ± 1.1, 1.1 ± 1.0, 1.0 ± 1.1, respectively. At 12 months, disability score reduction was 4.2 ± 4.8 for back school, 4.0 ± 5.1 for individual physiotherapy, 5.9 ± 4.6 for manipulation; pain score reduction was 0.7 ± 1.2, 0.4 ± 1.3, and 1.5 ± 1.1, respectively. Spinal manipulation was associated with higher functional improvement and long-term pain relief than back school or individual physiotherapy, but received more further treatment at follow-ups (P<0.001); pain recurrences and drug intake were also reduced compared to back school (P <0.05) or individual physiotherapy (P <0.001). Conclusions: Spinal manipulation provided better short and long-term functional improvement, and more pain relief in the follow-up than either back school or individual physiotherapy.