Mobile health app usability and quality rating scales: a systematic review
To review the rating scales used to evaluate usability and quality of mobile health applications, and to compare their purpose, content, and intended target users (i.e., patients, caregivers, or researchers). We conducted a systematic review of the literature in accordance with the PRISMA statement...
Saved in:
Published in | Disability and rehabilitation: Assistive technology Vol. 16; no. 7; p. 712 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
03.10.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
ISSN | 1748-3115 |
DOI | 10.1080/17483107.2019.1701103 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To review the rating scales used to evaluate usability and quality of mobile health applications, and to compare their purpose, content, and intended target users (i.e., patients, caregivers, or researchers).
We conducted a systematic review of the literature in accordance with the PRISMA statement on Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, IEEE Explore databases, as well as a review of the grey literature to identify rating scales used to evaluate usability and quality of mobile health applications (m-health apps), between January 1, 2000 and July 31, 2018. Two researchers screened the titles and abstracts of articles that met inclusion criteria, and retrieved usability and quality rating scales from the articles.
We identified 24 usability scales and 25 quality rating scales in 87 peer-reviewed articles. We identified only one quality rating scale designed for non-expert users (i.e., patients or caregivers). None of the studies used a theoretical framework for app evaluation to support the scales. The validity of existing quality rating scales is yet to be investigated.
Existing usability and quality rating scales are targeted at professionals, not end users who are patients or caregivers. Rating scales that are usable by all end-users would make mobile health apps accessible and meaningful to consumers.Implications for rehabilitationThe number of mobile health applications on app stores that can be used for rehabilitation is increasing.Most healthcare providers lack the training to identify m-health apps with high quality to be used in rehabilitation.This study has reviewed the current rating scales that can help clinicians and care providers rate the quality of m-health apps and identify the ones that are most appropriate for their practice. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To review the rating scales used to evaluate usability and quality of mobile health applications, and to compare their purpose, content, and intended target users (i.e., patients, caregivers, or researchers).
We conducted a systematic review of the literature in accordance with the PRISMA statement on Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, IEEE Explore databases, as well as a review of the grey literature to identify rating scales used to evaluate usability and quality of mobile health applications (m-health apps), between January 1, 2000 and July 31, 2018. Two researchers screened the titles and abstracts of articles that met inclusion criteria, and retrieved usability and quality rating scales from the articles.
We identified 24 usability scales and 25 quality rating scales in 87 peer-reviewed articles. We identified only one quality rating scale designed for non-expert users (i.e., patients or caregivers). None of the studies used a theoretical framework for app evaluation to support the scales. The validity of existing quality rating scales is yet to be investigated.
Existing usability and quality rating scales are targeted at professionals, not end users who are patients or caregivers. Rating scales that are usable by all end-users would make mobile health apps accessible and meaningful to consumers.Implications for rehabilitationThe number of mobile health applications on app stores that can be used for rehabilitation is increasing.Most healthcare providers lack the training to identify m-health apps with high quality to be used in rehabilitation.This study has reviewed the current rating scales that can help clinicians and care providers rate the quality of m-health apps and identify the ones that are most appropriate for their practice. |
Author | Neubauer, Noelannah Azad-Khaneghah, Peyman Miguel Cruz, Antonio Liu, Lili |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Peyman orcidid: 0000-0002-0263-0634 surname: Azad-Khaneghah fullname: Azad-Khaneghah, Peyman organization: Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada – sequence: 2 givenname: Noelannah surname: Neubauer fullname: Neubauer, Noelannah organization: Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada – sequence: 3 givenname: Antonio orcidid: 0000-0003-1618-8733 surname: Miguel Cruz fullname: Miguel Cruz, Antonio organization: Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada – sequence: 4 givenname: Lili surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Lili organization: Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910687$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNo1j8tOhEAQRTtG4zz0EzT9A2AVXXSDOzPxmTFudD3pbgoHAwzSjIa_F1-re3IWJ7kLcdjuWhbiDCFGyOACDWUKwcQJYB6jAURQB2L-7SOFmM7EIoQ3ANIJqWMxU5gj6MzMxcPjzlU1yy3bethK23VyH-ykqmGUti3k-97-cG-Hqn2Vwduaw6W0Moxh4GayXvb8UfHniTgqbR349G-X4uXm-nl1F62fbu9XV-vIq5yGyFEJ6FxqGIqU2GtDKZKiHMCUE1nKStbaeZewZcOp1p5R6zT3ujBEyVKc_3a7vWu42HR91dh-3PyfSr4Al09PWg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_2196_30340 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocab041 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41746_021_00506_4 crossref_primary_10_2196_52179 crossref_primary_10_1093_sxmrev_qead016 crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2025_2459895 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aej_2024_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1134_S0361768822080138 crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_5313027 crossref_primary_10_1177_14713012211065381 crossref_primary_10_3390_jtaer19040162 crossref_primary_10_2196_44469 crossref_primary_10_1080_15323269_2023_2289804 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41669_024_00519_1 crossref_primary_10_2196_36974 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare10102068 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_publhealth_052020_103738 crossref_primary_10_2196_55790 crossref_primary_10_2196_37980 crossref_primary_10_2196_51076 crossref_primary_10_2196_50839 crossref_primary_10_3390_app12105237 crossref_primary_10_1177_20552076241253539 crossref_primary_10_3390_app13106067 crossref_primary_10_1080_17483107_2024_2409810 crossref_primary_10_3389_ijph_2023_1606413 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_024_02738_2 crossref_primary_10_1177_0308022620914464 crossref_primary_10_12968_jowc_2022_31_Sup12_S29 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare12111057 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph191912956 crossref_primary_10_2196_27037 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_023_02252_x crossref_primary_10_2196_49449 crossref_primary_10_2196_21138 crossref_primary_10_2196_30480 crossref_primary_10_3390_electronics13010213 crossref_primary_10_2196_35538 crossref_primary_10_2196_58616 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamiaopen_ooad051 crossref_primary_10_1177_00084174221085451 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00766_023_00409_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_imu_2023_101322 crossref_primary_10_4103_jehp_jehp_1126_21 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_025_22102_x crossref_primary_10_2196_42225 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocab216 crossref_primary_10_2196_26577 crossref_primary_10_2196_22774 crossref_primary_10_3389_frhs_2024_1372871 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocad117 crossref_primary_10_2196_59454 crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2021_1876361 crossref_primary_10_2196_64525 crossref_primary_10_1093_jbcr_irab197 crossref_primary_10_2196_37521 crossref_primary_10_2196_29441 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10729_023_09647_2 crossref_primary_10_2196_47043 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2020_08_040 crossref_primary_10_2196_49982 crossref_primary_10_2196_26563 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2023_1220160 crossref_primary_10_1177_08445621241312394 crossref_primary_10_2196_39590 crossref_primary_10_26633_RPSP_2022_37 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM |
DOI | 10.1080/17483107.2019.1701103 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation |
EISSN | 1748-3115 |
ExternalDocumentID | 31910687 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 00X 03L 04C 0BK 0R~ 29G 2QV 34G 36B 39C 4.4 53G 5GY 6PF AALIY AALUX AAMIU AAPUL AAQRR AAWTL ABBKH ABEIZ ABGNL ABIVO ABJNI ABLCE ABLIJ ABLKL ABUPF ABXYU ACENM ACGFS ACIEZ ACVOX ACWGZ ADBBV ADCVX ADOJX ADRBQ ADVEQ ADYSH AECIN AEIQB AEOZL AEXKJ AFLJA AFOSN AFSUE AGDLA AGFJD AGRBW AGXXK AGYJP AIJEM AIRBT AKBVH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU ALYBC BABNJ BLEHA BMSDO BOHLJ CCCUG CGR COGVJ CS3 CUY CVF DKSSO EBD EBS ECM ECT EIF EIHBH EJD F5P H13 HZ~ KSSTO KWAYT KYCEM LJTGL M44 M4Z NPM O9- P2P RNANH RVRKI TBQAZ TDBHL TERGH TFDNU TFL TFW TUROJ V1S ~1N |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-b4f01bb57e0d54ec674514349007f514a48fe66bcb2eae7e566ce16659c6d7442 |
IngestDate | Wed Feb 19 02:26:04 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Keywords | quality evaluation E-health rating scales Mobile applications mobile health systematic review |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c394t-b4f01bb57e0d54ec674514349007f514a48fe66bcb2eae7e566ce16659c6d7442 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-1618-8733 0000-0002-0263-0634 |
PMID | 31910687 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_31910687 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-10-03 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-10-03 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2021 text: 2021-10-03 day: 03 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Disability and rehabilitation: Assistive technology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
SSID | ssj0046243 |
Score | 2.4937775 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | To review the rating scales used to evaluate usability and quality of mobile health applications, and to compare their purpose, content, and intended target... |
SourceID | pubmed |
SourceType | Index Database |
StartPage | 712 |
SubjectTerms | Delivery of Health Care Humans Mobile Applications Telemedicine |
Title | Mobile health app usability and quality rating scales: a systematic review |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910687 |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1NT9wwELWWIlVcUL-_Kx_aXlahSdaxY26IFiHa3UO1SNyQ7UxgJcgiSFSx_6b_lHEm2c2yUJVerCiWnCjveTwzmnlh7JOOMuNsDkEKaRIIm0FgExsGaC9tqFMNYV1EMxzJ_UNxcJQc9Xp_OlVLVWm33OzOvpL_QRXvIa6-S_YByM4XxRt4jfjiiAjj-E8YD6cWN3XTy-jlwfsVKeaWpKpEHZPXfY-yTxsgHlQCZ1YUnH93vdRvk6VlLpfUvOtUIu6kq7roqFxJze_MTBb8ODUFnJwaStrA9fmChCOorKmIKb6w1hTFIic9nJxUcNbfvaxmjbQB2pxpO_tzUlEe4WzSzVbEVC5HFgzIwirhE7LUwzk3wbJDNdWxp4pqrFfsPBVG-rXQPVW-Qk9veWX5iJ7Vwf7ivAYfLQ0Gv3S2_332lvx2O7XG1pTyln_k00F01AsZi0HbFpaGX-98nw32uF3jVuhSuzDjJ2yziT34DhHpKetB8Yx97upM8zGJTPAv_NcS6M_ZAZGNE9k4ko3PycaRJbwhGyeycSLbNjd8QTVOVHvBDve-j3f3g-ZHHIEbaFEGVuRhZG2iIMwSAU4q4f1sodHBzPHKiDQHKa2zMRhQgCGCg0jKRDuZKSHil-xRMS3gNeORGcRaOAUuzUTopYYwQlE6S0JwWa7FG_aKPtHxBamtHLcf7-29M-_YxoJq79l6jtsbPqCvWNqPNV430QRqJg |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mobile+health+app+usability+and+quality+rating+scales%3A+a+systematic+review&rft.jtitle=Disability+and+rehabilitation%3A+Assistive+technology&rft.au=Azad-Khaneghah%2C+Peyman&rft.au=Neubauer%2C+Noelannah&rft.au=Miguel+Cruz%2C+Antonio&rft.au=Liu%2C+Lili&rft.date=2021-10-03&rft.eissn=1748-3115&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F17483107.2019.1701103&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31910687&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31910687&rft.externalDocID=31910687 |