The Andrea Yates Effect: Priming Mental Illness Stereotypes Through Exemplification of Postpartum Disorders

• Published in: Health communication Vol. 32; no. 10; pp. 1284 - 1296
• Main Authors: Holman, Lynette, McKeever, Robert
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Routledge 03.10.2017; Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
• Subjects: Adult; Between-subjects design; Bootstrap method; Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis; Depression, Postpartum - psychology; Depression, Postpartum - therapy; Female; Humans; Indirect effects; Internet; Mental depression; Mental disorders; Mothers - psychology; Perceptions; Postpartum depression; Postpartum period; Pregnancy; Priming; Risk perception; Social Stigma; Stereotyped Behavior; Stereotypes; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 1041-0236; 1532-7027; 1532-7027
• DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1219929

In a randomized between-subjects design, participants (N = 80) were assigned to one of four conditions, 2 (pregnant, not pregnant) × 2 (extreme prime, moderate prime). It was hypothesized that primes involving moderate mental illness would be positively associated with increased perceived risk of developing postpartum depression. Hayes and Preacher's bootstrapping procedure was used to test the direct, indirect, and conditional indirect effects related to the hypothesized model. In addition, further analyses evaluated whether implicitly activated goals (to be healthy or to be a good mother) were positively associated with increased perceptions of risk and engagement of downstream avoidance behavioral intentions. Findings show that for pregnant participants, the effect of the prime condition on perceived personal risk of developing postpartum depression was mediated by perceptions about the target character's sanity. However, activated "healthy" and "good mother" goals are not influencing behavioral intentions.