Appraising cervical mucus: a new approach to evaluating contraceptives

Purpose: Timing of sample collection represents a major source of variability in studies evaluating the effects of administered agents on cervical mucus in naturally-cycling women. We sought to create and validate an artificial model of the cervical mucus cycle using exogenous E2 and P4 replacement...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European journal of contraception & reproductive health care Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 78 - 83
Main Authors Han, Leo, Padua, Emily, Edelman, Alison, Jensen, Jeffrey T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 01.02.2018
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose: Timing of sample collection represents a major source of variability in studies evaluating the effects of administered agents on cervical mucus in naturally-cycling women. We sought to create and validate an artificial model of the cervical mucus cycle using exogenous E2 and P4 replacement in ovarian suppressed women. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective experiment (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02969590) examining cervical mucus changes in six women during natural and artificial menstrual cycles [leuprolide acetate, estradiol transdermal patch (0.05-0.3 mg/day) and progesterone 200 mg/day]. We collected serum and mucus samples at each visit corresponding to early, mid and late follicular, ovulation and mid-luteal time points in the natural and artificial cycles. We evaluated mucus according to the modified Insler score described in the WHO laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Results: We enrolled healthy women between 27 and 40 years of age. All of the subjects achieved a mucus score of ≥10 both in the natural cycle and during peak estradiol replacement levels (0.3 mg/day) in the artificial cycle. During the simulated luteal phase, all mucus scores were ≤5 (median 3.5; range 1-5), similar to scores seen in the luteal phase of natural cycles (median 1; range 1-3). Conclusions: Our artificial cycle model (leuprolide acetate suppression) and dose escalation with estradiol patches produced favourable cervical mucus with mucus scores similar to those in the periovulatory phase of natural menstrual cycles. Additional studies are needed to validate the model for evaluation of mucus effects of contraceptive agents.
AbstractList Purpose: Timing of sample collection represents a major source of variability in studies evaluating the effects of administered agents on cervical mucus in naturally-cycling women. We sought to create and validate an artificial model of the cervical mucus cycle using exogenous E2 and P4 replacement in ovarian suppressed women. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective experiment (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02969590) examining cervical mucus changes in six women during natural and artificial menstrual cycles [leuprolide acetate, estradiol transdermal patch (0.05-0.3 mg/day) and progesterone 200 mg/day]. We collected serum and mucus samples at each visit corresponding to early, mid and late follicular, ovulation and mid-luteal time points in the natural and artificial cycles. We evaluated mucus according to the modified Insler score described in the WHO laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Results: We enrolled healthy women between 27 and 40 years of age. All of the subjects achieved a mucus score of ≥10 both in the natural cycle and during peak estradiol replacement levels (0.3 mg/day) in the artificial cycle. During the simulated luteal phase, all mucus scores were ≤5 (median 3.5; range 1-5), similar to scores seen in the luteal phase of natural cycles (median 1; range 1-3). Conclusions: Our artificial cycle model (leuprolide acetate suppression) and dose escalation with estradiol patches produced favourable cervical mucus with mucus scores similar to those in the periovulatory phase of natural menstrual cycles. Additional studies are needed to validate the model for evaluation of mucus effects of contraceptive agents.
Timing of sample collection represents a major source of variability in studies evaluating the effects of administered agents on cervical mucus in naturally-cycling women. We sought to create and validate an artificial model of the cervical mucus cycle using exogenous E2 and P4 replacement in ovarian suppressed women. We conducted a prospective experiment (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02969590) examining cervical mucus changes in six women during natural and artificial menstrual cycles [leuprolide acetate, estradiol transdermal patch (0.05-0.3 mg/day) and progesterone 200 mg/day]. We collected serum and mucus samples at each visit corresponding to early, mid and late follicular, ovulation and mid-luteal time points in the natural and artificial cycles. We evaluated mucus according to the modified Insler score described in the WHO laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. We enrolled healthy women between 27 and 40 years of age. All of the subjects achieved a mucus score of ≥10 both in the natural cycle and during peak estradiol replacement levels (0.3 mg/day) in the artificial cycle. During the simulated luteal phase, all mucus scores were ≤5 (median 3.5; range 1-5), similar to scores seen in the luteal phase of natural cycles (median 1; range 1-3). Our artificial cycle model (leuprolide acetate suppression) and dose escalation with estradiol patches produced favourable cervical mucus with mucus scores similar to those in the periovulatory phase of natural menstrual cycles. Additional studies are needed to validate the model for evaluation of mucus effects of contraceptive agents.
Timing of sample collection represents a major source of variability in studies evaluating the effects of administered agents on cervical mucus in naturally-cycling women. We sought to create and validate an artificial model of the cervical mucus cycle using exogenous E2 and P4 replacement in ovarian suppressed women.PURPOSETiming of sample collection represents a major source of variability in studies evaluating the effects of administered agents on cervical mucus in naturally-cycling women. We sought to create and validate an artificial model of the cervical mucus cycle using exogenous E2 and P4 replacement in ovarian suppressed women.We conducted a prospective experiment (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02969590) examining cervical mucus changes in six women during natural and artificial menstrual cycles [leuprolide acetate, estradiol transdermal patch (0.05-0.3 mg/day) and progesterone 200 mg/day]. We collected serum and mucus samples at each visit corresponding to early, mid and late follicular, ovulation and mid-luteal time points in the natural and artificial cycles. We evaluated mucus according to the modified Insler score described in the WHO laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe conducted a prospective experiment (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02969590) examining cervical mucus changes in six women during natural and artificial menstrual cycles [leuprolide acetate, estradiol transdermal patch (0.05-0.3 mg/day) and progesterone 200 mg/day]. We collected serum and mucus samples at each visit corresponding to early, mid and late follicular, ovulation and mid-luteal time points in the natural and artificial cycles. We evaluated mucus according to the modified Insler score described in the WHO laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen.We enrolled healthy women between 27 and 40 years of age. All of the subjects achieved a mucus score of ≥10 both in the natural cycle and during peak estradiol replacement levels (0.3 mg/day) in the artificial cycle. During the simulated luteal phase, all mucus scores were ≤5 (median 3.5; range 1-5), similar to scores seen in the luteal phase of natural cycles (median 1; range 1-3).RESULTSWe enrolled healthy women between 27 and 40 years of age. All of the subjects achieved a mucus score of ≥10 both in the natural cycle and during peak estradiol replacement levels (0.3 mg/day) in the artificial cycle. During the simulated luteal phase, all mucus scores were ≤5 (median 3.5; range 1-5), similar to scores seen in the luteal phase of natural cycles (median 1; range 1-3).Our artificial cycle model (leuprolide acetate suppression) and dose escalation with estradiol patches produced favourable cervical mucus with mucus scores similar to those in the periovulatory phase of natural menstrual cycles. Additional studies are needed to validate the model for evaluation of mucus effects of contraceptive agents.CONCLUSIONSOur artificial cycle model (leuprolide acetate suppression) and dose escalation with estradiol patches produced favourable cervical mucus with mucus scores similar to those in the periovulatory phase of natural menstrual cycles. Additional studies are needed to validate the model for evaluation of mucus effects of contraceptive agents.
Purpose: Timing of sample collection represents a major source of variability in studies evaluating the effects of administered agents on cervical mucus in naturally-cycling women. We sought to create and validate an artificial model of the cervical mucus cycle using exogenous E2 and P4 replacement in ovarian suppressed women.Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective experiment (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02969590) examining cervical mucus changes in six women during natural and artificial menstrual cycles [leuprolide acetate, estradiol transdermal patch (0.05–0.3 mg/day) and progesterone 200 mg/day]. We collected serum and mucus samples at each visit corresponding to early, mid and late follicular, ovulation and mid-luteal time points in the natural and artificial cycles. We evaluated mucus according to the modified Insler score described in the WHO laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen.Results: We enrolled healthy women between 27 and 40 years of age. All of the subjects achieved a mucus score of ≥10 both in the natural cycle and during peak estradiol replacement levels (0.3 mg/day) in the artificial cycle. During the simulated luteal phase, all mucus scores were ≤5 (median 3.5; range 1–5), similar to scores seen in the luteal phase of natural cycles (median 1; range 1–3).Conclusions: Our artificial cycle model (leuprolide acetate suppression) and dose escalation with estradiol patches produced favourable cervical mucus with mucus scores similar to those in the periovulatory phase of natural menstrual cycles. Additional studies are needed to validate the model for evaluation of mucus effects of contraceptive agents.
Author Edelman, Alison
Padua, Emily
Jensen, Jeffrey T.
Han, Leo
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Leo
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2018-6028
  surname: Han
  fullname: Han, Leo
  email: hanl@ohsu.edu
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Emily
  surname: Padua
  fullname: Padua, Emily
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Alison
  surname: Edelman
  fullname: Edelman, Alison
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jeffrey T.
  surname: Jensen
  fullname: Jensen, Jeffrey T.
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29457758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkUtv2zAQhInARWIn-QktBPTSi1w-Ram91AjyKBCgl-RMrNZUy0AiXVJykH8fOrYvObQn7uGb4e7Mgsx88JaQj4wuGa3pVyYqrlitl5yyesmk0EzIEzJnUouS6prP8pyZcgedkUVKT5RmRFSn5Iw3Ummt6jm5WW02EVxy_neBNm4dQl8ME07pWwGFt88FZCAA_inGUNgt9BOMb3DwYwS0m9FtbbogHzrok708vOfk8eb64equvP91-_NqdV-iaORYKqSKda1E7ETT2vUaOaWqQSWkZE2LoFSlW4624ZAhrQBFhbyrRNW2rRTinHzZ--ad_k42jWZwCW3fg7dhSibbSVlR0bCMfn6HPoUp-rydEbTWORbKeaY-HaipHezabKIbIL6YY0IZ-L4HMIaUou0MujFH8Ha-6w2jZteHOfZhdn2YQx9Zrd6pjx_8T_djr3O-C3GA5xD7tRnhpQ-xi-DR5Sv-bfEKo1WgSA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2022_03_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xfss_2023_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1080_13625187_2019_1605503
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0304552
crossref_primary_10_1002_prca_202100023
crossref_primary_10_1039_C8CS00948A
crossref_primary_10_1093_biolre_ioae121
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70520-9
10.1016/S0015-0282(16)38467-9
10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00476-7
10.1136/bmj.2.5554.730
10.1016/j.contraception.2012.09.034
10.1093/humupd/6.2.139
10.1016/S0015-0282(16)41835-2
10.1016/S0015-0282(16)38342-X
10.1136/bmj.2.5659.730
10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.168
10.2165/00003088-199018060-00004
10.1016/S0015-0282(16)43454-0
10.1210/jc.2008-0460
10.1093/humrep/10.1.85
10.1016/S0010-7824(96)00191-6
10.1016/S0015-0282(16)60497-1
10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53171-9
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1970.tb03409.x
10.1515/CCLM.2006.160
10.1016/0010-7824(91)90135-3
10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70120-1
10.1093/humrep/deg209
10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00477-9
10.1210/jcem-69-4-804
10.1016/j.contraception.2016.03.006
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.911
10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46095-4
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163386
10.1016/0002-9378(72)90617-5
10.1016/S0015-0282(16)43035-9
10.1016/S0015-0282(16)37083-2
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 The European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health 2018
2018 The European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 The European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health 2018
– notice: 2018 The European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1080/13625187.2018.1437134
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1473-0782
EndPage 83
ExternalDocumentID 29457758
10_1080_13625187_2018_1437134
1437134
Genre Research Article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
00X
03L
0BK
0R~
123
29G
36B
4.4
6PF
AALUX
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
AAWTL
ABBKH
ABDBF
ABEIZ
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABLKL
ABUPF
ABXYU
ACENM
ACGEJ
ACGFS
ACIEZ
ACUHS
ADCVX
ADRBQ
ADXPE
AECIN
AENEX
AEOZL
AFKVX
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AHMBA
AIJEM
AIRBT
AJWEG
AKBVH
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
ALYBC
AMDAE
BABNJ
BLEHA
BOHLJ
CCCUG
CS3
DKSSO
DU5
EAP
EAS
EBC
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPL
ESX
F5P
H13
HZ~
KRBQP
KSSTO
KWAYT
KYCEM
M4Z
O9-
RNANH
RRB
RVRKI
RWL
SV3
TAE
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TFDNU
TFL
TFW
TUROJ
TUS
UEQFS
V1S
~1N
AAGDL
AAYXX
ABWVI
ADYSH
AFRVT
AMPGV
CITATION
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8G5
AALIY
AAORF
AAPXX
ABUWG
ABWCV
ABZEW
ACKZS
ACOPL
ADBBV
ADFOM
ADFZZ
AEIIZ
AFKRA
AFLEI
AJVHN
AWYRJ
AZQEC
BENPR
BPHCQ
BRMBE
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CYYVM
CZDIS
DRXRE
DWQXO
DWTOO
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HMCUK
JENTW
LJTGL
M1P
M2O
M44
NPM
NUSFT
PADUT
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
QQXMO
S0X
UKHRP
K9.
TASJS
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-5c051fb4ccf39beddc20059c534419bca5567b2ce92a4cc75ac36c2f636bbb433
ISSN 1362-5187
1473-0782
IngestDate Tue Aug 05 11:38:12 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 02:41:50 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:59:22 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:00:29 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:08 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 25 09:04:54 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Cervical mucus
model
insler
contraception
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c394t-5c051fb4ccf39beddc20059c534419bca5567b2ce92a4cc75ac36c2f636bbb433
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0003-2018-6028
PMID 29457758
PQID 3087518022
PQPubID 44424
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2004460391
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_13625187_2018_1437134
pubmed_primary_29457758
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_13625187_2018_1437134
crossref_primary_10_1080_13625187_2018_1437134
proquest_journals_3087518022
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-Feb
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-Feb
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Carnforth
PublicationTitle The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis
– name: Taylor & Francis Ltd
References CIT0030
CIT0010
CIT0032
CIT0012
CIT0011
CIT0033
CIT0014
CIT0036
CIT0013
CIT0035
CIT0038
CIT0015
CIT0037
CIT0018
Cox HJ. (CIT0034) 1968; 6
CIT0017
CIT0039
Moghissi KS (CIT0004) 1973; 41
CIT0019
Slayden OD (CIT0031) 2001; 86
CIT0040
CIT0021
CIT0020
CIT0001
Lebech PE (CIT0016) 1970; 15
CIT0023
CIT0022
CIT0003
CIT0025
CIT0002
CIT0024
CIT0005
CIT0027
CIT0026
CIT0007
CIT0029
CIT0006
CIT0028
CIT0009
CIT0008
References_xml – ident: CIT0026
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70520-9
– ident: CIT0006
  doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)38467-9
– ident: CIT0012
  doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00476-7
– ident: CIT0009
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5554.730
– volume: 6
  start-page: 167
  year: 1968
  ident: CIT0034
  publication-title: J Reprod Fertil Suppl
– ident: CIT0011
  doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.09.034
– ident: CIT0027
  doi: 10.1093/humupd/6.2.139
– ident: CIT0036
  doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)41835-2
– ident: CIT0017
  doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)38342-X
– ident: CIT0007
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5659.730
– ident: CIT0002
– ident: CIT0013
  doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.168
– ident: CIT0033
  doi: 10.2165/00003088-199018060-00004
– ident: CIT0015
  doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)43454-0
– ident: CIT0024
  doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0460
– ident: CIT0038
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/10.1.85
– ident: CIT0018
  doi: 10.1016/S0010-7824(96)00191-6
– ident: CIT0039
  doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)60497-1
– ident: CIT0040
  doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53171-9
– ident: CIT0005
  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1970.tb03409.x
– ident: CIT0022
  doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.160
– ident: CIT0020
– volume: 15
  start-page: 65
  year: 1970
  ident: CIT0016
  publication-title: Int J Fertil
– volume: 86
  start-page: 2668
  year: 2001
  ident: CIT0031
  publication-title: J Clin Endocrinol Metab
– ident: CIT0019
  doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90135-3
– ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70120-1
– ident: CIT0037
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg209
– volume: 41
  start-page: 585
  year: 1973
  ident: CIT0004
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– ident: CIT0010
  doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00477-9
– ident: CIT0028
– ident: CIT0001
– ident: CIT0023
  doi: 10.1210/jcem-69-4-804
– ident: CIT0029
  doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.03.006
– ident: CIT0032
– ident: CIT0030
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.911
– ident: CIT0025
  doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46095-4
– ident: CIT0021
  doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163386
– ident: CIT0014
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90617-5
– ident: CIT0035
  doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)43035-9
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)37083-2
SSID ssj0013436
Score 2.1783683
Snippet Purpose: Timing of sample collection represents a major source of variability in studies evaluating the effects of administered agents on cervical mucus in...
Timing of sample collection represents a major source of variability in studies evaluating the effects of administered agents on cervical mucus in...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 78
SubjectTerms Birth control
Cervical mucus
contraception
insler
Menstruation
Title Appraising cervical mucus: a new approach to evaluating contraceptives
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13625187.2018.1437134
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29457758
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3087518022
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2004460391
Volume 23
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWVkJcEG-2FBQkrikktpM1ty3tanm0QmIr9RbFj0hFqyxqkx74L_xXZvzIQywUuESrZB1Hns_j8Xi-GUJeqdQIzWUSVzPBYsbLBOYc1TFYD1WpDCwoFPnOJ6fZ8ox9OOfnk8mPQdRS28gD9X0rr-R_pAr3QK7Ikv0HyXYvhRvwG-QLV5AwXP9KxmBCXpYXjjdr5zxSQVrVXjkKM1jMXc5wtDFDZm9Ls0Wnrg1pufZRhF973Ixc9N5cHbTwgMF8mDZdLAYfOT6lTXTdKzVHazCb_pxKt9ZYPUavSmfMa7P2ftj5GoObuqgeU3v_kOeb-Yhu76RIZiGu2cNq9Uu9kEHQEqpd5G7xxC-9xt1jOY3RgBnqasdNHmHSKV5XBygs4XTr4uCiKbEv7ArD-mawUFBk0_arYYgAWM6_FJ-PFsWn96cfb5HdFHYhoEZ354dHh4v-mIrZGpTd5weK2OzN663djIyfUWrc329wrKGzukfu-h1KNHdwu08mpn5Abp_4GIyHZNGjLgqoiyzq3kZlBJiLAuaiZhP1mIvGmHtEzhbHq3fL2FfjiBUVrIm5Av1dSaZURYU0Wit0SArFKVjUQqqS8yyXqTIiLeFPOS8VzVRaZTSTUjJKH5OdelObpyRKQDlwmadZqhUDA1FUmCJTp1pneQbDNiUsDFOhfKp6rJiyLhKf0TaMboGjW_jRnZKDrtk3l6vlpgZiKIOisTCtHEILekPb_SCwwk9GaIL1ITCnYjolL7vHoLDxFK6szaa9wrqvjGVYmGFKnjhBd1-bCsZz2MHv_fnlz8idfpLtk53msjXPwTZu5AuP0J88KbM-
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appraising+cervical+mucus%3A+a+new+approach+to+evaluating+contraceptives&rft.jtitle=The+European+journal+of+contraception+%26+reproductive+health+care&rft.au=Han%2C+Leo&rft.au=Padua%2C+Emily&rft.au=Edelman%2C+Alison&rft.au=Jensen%2C+Jeffrey+T&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis+Ltd&rft.issn=1362-5187&rft.eissn=1473-0782&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=83&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F13625187.2018.1437134&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1362-5187&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1362-5187&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1362-5187&client=summon