The trauma pelvic X-ray: Not all pelvic fractures are created equally

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the initial pelvic X-ray in identifying significant pelvic fractures, which could result in changes in the management of the patient. Patients admitted to a level I trauma center (2010–2019) with a severe blunt pelvic fracture (AIS ≥3) were i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 224; no. 1; pp. 489 - 493
Main Authors Benjamin, Elizabeth R., Jakob, Dominik A., Myers, Lee, Liasidis, Panagiotis, Lewis, Meghan, Fu, Yong, Demetriades, Demetrios
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2022
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the initial pelvic X-ray in identifying significant pelvic fractures, which could result in changes in the management of the patient. Patients admitted to a level I trauma center (2010–2019) with a severe blunt pelvic fracture (AIS ≥3) were identified. Included in the analysis were patients who underwent emergency department pelvic X-ray followed by CT scan. A control group of patients without pelvic fractures was also included in the study. All investigations were reviewed by a blinded attending trauma radiologist. Pelvic X-ray findings and CT scan reports were compared according to the specific pelvic fracture location, and severity. Overall, pelvic X-ray was diagnosed 252 of the 285 pelvic fractures (sensitivity 88.4%) and wrongly diagnosed a facture in 3 of 97 patients without a fracture (specificity 96.9%). In 29/184 (15.8%) of patients with pelvic fracture AIS 3, the pelvic X-ray was read as normal, missing the fracture, compared with 4/101 (4.0%) in the AIS 4/5 group (p = 0.003). Pelvic X-ray had the lowest sensitivity in ischial (10.7%), iliac (28.7%), acetabular (42.4%), and sacral fractures (49.1%) and was best for detecting symphysis diastasis (89.8%). Pelvic X-ray is useful in identifying pubic symphysis diastasis. However, it misses or underestimates a significant number of fractures. CT scan evaluation should be performed in patients with a suspicious mechanism or clinical suspicion of pelvic fracture. •Pelvic X-ray in the trauma bay is useful in identifying severe pubic symphysis diastasis.•Pelvic X-ray misses or underestimates a significant number of fractures.•A pelvic X-ray should be performed in hemodynamically unstable patients or those with concern of severe pelvic fracture patterns that will require early intervention.•Routine pelvic X-ray in hemodynamically stable patients that will proceed to CT of the pelvis, is of little or no value.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.01.009