Automatic optimization of multichannel electrode configurations for robust fetal heart rate detection by Blind Source Separation

Objective. Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Sour...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on biomedical engineering Vol. 70; no. 4; pp. 1 - 12
Main Authors Galli, A., Peri, E., Rabotti, C., Ouzounov, S., Mischi, M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.04.2023
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objective. Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Source Separation (BSS) techniques. Yet effective and reliable separation of the fetal ECG remains challenging due to multiple noise sources and the effects of varying fetal position. In this work, we demonstrate that the adopted electrode configuration plays a key role in the effectiveness of BSS and propose guidelines for optimal electrode positioning. Moreover, a model is proposed to automatically predict the most suited configuration for accurate BSS-based fHR estimation with a minimal number of leads, to facilitate practical implementation. Methods. We compared fHR estimation accuracy with different electrode configurations on in-silico data, identifying the optimal configuration for a recent BSS method. Based on features extracted from raw signals, we proposed a support vector regression model to automatically identify the best electrode configuration in terms of fHR estimation accuracy and to dynamically adjust it to varying fetal presentation. Evaluation was performed on real and synthetic data. Results. Guidelines for the optimal electrode configuration are proposed by using 4 leads. Prediction of configuration quality shows 80.9% accuracy; the optimal configuration is recognized in 92.2% of the subjects. Conclusion. The proposed method successfully predicts the quality of the configurations, demonstrating the impact of the electrode configuration on the BSS performance. Significance. The method holds potential for long-term fetal monitoring, by dynamically choosing the optimal configuration.
AbstractList Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Source Separation (BSS) techniques. Yet effective and reliable separation of the fetal ECG remains challenging due to multiple noise sources and the effects of varying fetal position. In this work, we demonstrate that the adopted electrode configuration plays a key role in the effectiveness of BSS and propose guidelines for optimal electrode positioning. Moreover, a model is proposed to automatically predict the most suited configuration for accurate BSS-based fHR estimation with a minimal number of leads, to facilitate practical implementation.OBJECTIVEFetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Source Separation (BSS) techniques. Yet effective and reliable separation of the fetal ECG remains challenging due to multiple noise sources and the effects of varying fetal position. In this work, we demonstrate that the adopted electrode configuration plays a key role in the effectiveness of BSS and propose guidelines for optimal electrode positioning. Moreover, a model is proposed to automatically predict the most suited configuration for accurate BSS-based fHR estimation with a minimal number of leads, to facilitate practical implementation.We compared fHR estimation accuracy with different electrode configurations on in-silico data, identifying the optimal configuration for a recent BSS method. Based on features extracted from raw signals, we proposed a support vector regression model to automatically identify the best electrode configuration in terms of fHR estimation accuracy and to dynamically adjust it to varying fetal presentation. Evaluation was performed on real and synthetic data.METHODSWe compared fHR estimation accuracy with different electrode configurations on in-silico data, identifying the optimal configuration for a recent BSS method. Based on features extracted from raw signals, we proposed a support vector regression model to automatically identify the best electrode configuration in terms of fHR estimation accuracy and to dynamically adjust it to varying fetal presentation. Evaluation was performed on real and synthetic data.Guidelines for the optimal electrode configuration are proposed by using 4 leads. Prediction of configuration quality shows 80.9% accuracy; the optimal configurat- ion is recognized in 92.2% of the subjects.RESULTSGuidelines for the optimal electrode configuration are proposed by using 4 leads. Prediction of configuration quality shows 80.9% accuracy; the optimal configurat- ion is recognized in 92.2% of the subjects.The proposed method successfully predicts the quality of the configurations, demonstrating the impact of the electrode configuration on the BSS performance.CONCLUSIONThe proposed method successfully predicts the quality of the configurations, demonstrating the impact of the electrode configuration on the BSS performance.The method holds potential for long-term fetal monitoring, by dynamically choosing the optimal configuration.SIGNIFICANCEThe method holds potential for long-term fetal monitoring, by dynamically choosing the optimal configuration.
Objective. Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Source Separation (BSS) techniques. Yet effective and reliable separation of the fetal ECG remains challenging due to multiple noise sources and the effects of varying fetal position. In this work, we demonstrate that the adopted electrode configuration plays a key role in the effectiveness of BSS and propose guidelines for optimal electrode positioning. Moreover, a model is proposed to automatically predict the most suited configuration for accurate BSS-based fHR estimation with a minimal number of leads, to facilitate practical implementation. Methods. We compared fHR estimation accuracy with different electrode configurations on in-silico data, identifying the optimal configuration for a recent BSS method. Based on features extracted from raw signals, we proposed a support vector regression model to automatically identify the best electrode configuration in terms of fHR estimation accuracy and to dynamically adjust it to varying fetal presentation. Evaluation was performed on real and synthetic data. Results. Guidelines for the optimal electrode configuration are proposed by using 4 leads. Prediction of configuration quality shows 80.9% accuracy; the optimal configuration is recognized in 92.2% of the subjects. Conclusion. The proposed method successfully predicts the quality of the configurations, demonstrating the impact of the electrode configuration on the BSS performance. Significance. The method holds potential for long-term fetal monitoring, by dynamically choosing the optimal configuration.
Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Source Separation (BSS) techniques. Yet effective and reliable separation of the fetal ECG remains challenging due to multiple noise sources and the effects of varying fetal position. In this work, we demonstrate that the adopted electrode configuration plays a key role in the effectiveness of BSS and propose guidelines for optimal electrode positioning. Moreover, a model is proposed to automatically predict the most suited configuration for accurate BSS-based fHR estimation with a minimal number of leads, to facilitate practical implementation. We compared fHR estimation accuracy with different electrode configurations on in-silico data, identifying the optimal configuration for a recent BSS method. Based on features extracted from raw signals, we proposed a support vector regression model to automatically identify the best electrode configuration in terms of fHR estimation accuracy and to dynamically adjust it to varying fetal presentation. Evaluation was performed on real and synthetic data. Guidelines for the optimal electrode configuration are proposed by using 4 leads. Prediction of configuration quality shows 80.9% accuracy; the optimal configurat- ion is recognized in 92.2% of the subjects. The proposed method successfully predicts the quality of the configurations, demonstrating the impact of the electrode configuration on the BSS performance. The method holds potential for long-term fetal monitoring, by dynamically choosing the optimal configuration.
Objective. Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Source Separation (BSS) techniques. Yet effective and reliable separation of the fetal ECG remains challenging due to multiple noise sources and the effects of varying fetal position. In this work, we demonstrate that the adopted electrode configuration plays a key role in the effectiveness of BSS and propose guidelines for optimal electrode positioning. Moreover, a model is proposed to automatically predict the most suited configuration for accurate BSS-based fHR estimation with a minimal number of leads, to facilitate practical implementation. Methods. We compared fHR estimation accuracy with different electrode configurations on in-silico data, identifying the optimal configuration for a recent BSS method. Based on features extracted from raw signals, we proposed a support vector regression model to automatically identify the best electrode configuration in terms of fHR estimation accuracy and to dynamically adjust it to varying fetal presentation. Evaluation was performed on real and synthetic data. Results. Guidelines for the optimal electrode configuration are proposed by using 4 leads. Prediction of configuration quality shows 80.9% accuracy; the optimal configurat- ion is recognized in 92.2% of the subjects. Conclusion. The proposed method successfully predicts the quality of the configurations, demonstrating the impact of the electrode configuration on the BSS performance. Significance. The method holds potential for long-term fetal monitoring, by dynamically choosing the optimal configuration.
Author Peri, E.
Ouzounov, S.
Galli, A.
Mischi, M.
Rabotti, C.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: A.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2416-0220
  surname: Galli
  fullname: Galli, A.
  organization: Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
– sequence: 2
  givenname: E.
  surname: Peri
  fullname: Peri, E.
  organization: Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
– sequence: 3
  givenname: C.
  surname: Rabotti
  fullname: Rabotti, C.
  organization: Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
– sequence: 4
  givenname: S.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1961-2317
  surname: Ouzounov
  fullname: Ouzounov, S.
  organization: Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
– sequence: 5
  givenname: M.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1179-5385
  surname: Mischi
  fullname: Mischi, M.
  organization: Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36201421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kT1PHDEQhq2IKBwkPyCKFFlKQ7OHP9a7dgmIkEhEFJB65bXHwWjXvtjeAqr89Pi4CwVFKo89zzsznvcIHYQYAKGPlKwpJer07vzH5ZoRxtacUSZk_watqBCyYYLTA7QihMpGMdUeoqOcH-q1lW33Dh3yjtWY0RX6c7aUOOviDY6b4mf_VOMYcHR4Xqb6fK9DgAnDBKakaAGbGJz_taRnLmMXE05xXHLBDoqe8D3oVHBNA7ZQqmpbbnzE55MPFt_GJRnAt7DRuwrv0Vunpwwf9ucx-vn18u7iW3N9c_X94uy6MVyx0higvR3BOqV0P3JqBBmJ5kY6rR1rO2l60WlOQShb84R3wqlWCcuYsEBbfoxOdnU3Kf5eIJdh9tnANOkAcckD6xnjtG6vr-iXV-hDnTrU6SolFe84lbJSn_fUMs5gh03ys06Pw7_dVoDuAJNizgncC0LJsPVv2Po3bP0b9v5VTf9KY3x53lNJ2k__VX7aKT0AvHRSinJeP_YX_lGpfw
CODEN IEBEAX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1109_TIM_2023_3338710
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6579_ad3d27
crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering10020252
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bspc_2024_106477
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.procs.2020.08.060
10.1109/SCOReD.2013.7002642
10.1109/TSP.2005.861743
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.021
10.1109/JBHI.2019.2920356
10.1109/72.761722
10.1002/pd.5412
10.1007/978-981-15-7106-0_15
10.1111/psyp.12804
10.1088/0967-3334/31/7/005
10.1109/INFOP.2015.7489341
10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5
10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9
10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2943626
10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020
10.1016/S0002-9378(15)33099-4
10.1109/CONECCT52877.2021.9622705
10.1155/2014/960980
10.1109/IJCNN.2002.1007589
10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1551
10.3390/s17051154
10.1088/0967-3334/28/4/004
10.1088/1674-1056/24/3/038702
10.2307/2286009
10.2174/1876536X01003010004
10.1088/0967-3334/33/7/1135
10.1002/047134608x.w1403
10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1607
10.3390/s21134298
10.1007/1-4020-3885-2_16
10.1109/4233.945288
10.1088/0967-3334/37/5/627
10.4324/9781351033909-14
10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1521
10.3390/technologies6020044
10.1007/978-3-642-55016-4_12
10.1088/0967-3334/30/3/005
10.1088/0143-0815/10/4B/002
10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.066
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.052
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023
DBID 97E
ESBDL
RIA
RIE
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QF
7QO
7QQ
7SC
7SE
7SP
7SR
7TA
7TB
7U5
8BQ
8FD
F28
FR3
H8D
JG9
JQ2
KR7
L7M
L~C
L~D
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1109/TBME.2022.3212587
DatabaseName IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005–Present
IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals
IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present
IEEE/IET Electronic Library
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Aluminium Industry Abstracts
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Ceramic Abstracts
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
Corrosion Abstracts
Electronics & Communications Abstracts
Engineered Materials Abstracts
Materials Business File
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts
METADEX
Technology Research Database
ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering
Engineering Research Database
Aerospace Database
Materials Research Database
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Civil Engineering Abstracts
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Materials Research Database
Civil Engineering Abstracts
Aluminium Industry Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
Electronics & Communications Abstracts
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
Ceramic Abstracts
Materials Business File
METADEX
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
Aerospace Database
Engineered Materials Abstracts
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Corrosion Abstracts
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Materials Research Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: RIE
  name: IEEE/IET Electronic Library
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Engineering
EISSN 1558-2531
EndPage 12
ExternalDocumentID 36201421
10_1109_TBME_2022_3212587
9913322
Genre orig-research
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Dutch
  grantid: NWO HTSM 14663
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.55
.DC
.GJ
0R~
29I
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6IF
6IK
6IL
6IN
85S
97E
AAJGR
AARMG
AASAJ
AAWTH
AAYJJ
ABAZT
ABJNI
ABQJQ
ABVLG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACKIV
ACNCT
ACPRK
ADZIZ
AENEX
AETIX
AFFNX
AFRAH
AGQYO
AGSQL
AHBIQ
AI.
AIBXA
AKJIK
AKQYR
ALLEH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ASUFR
ATWAV
BEFXN
BFFAM
BGNUA
BKEBE
BPEOZ
CHZPO
CS3
DU5
EBS
EJD
ESBDL
F5P
HZ~
H~9
IAAWW
IBMZZ
ICLAB
IDIHD
IEGSK
IFIPE
IFJZH
IPLJI
JAVBF
LAI
MS~
O9-
OCL
P2P
RIA
RIE
RIL
RNS
TAE
TN5
VH1
VJK
X7M
ZGI
ZXP
AAYXX
CITATION
RIG
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QF
7QO
7QQ
7SC
7SE
7SP
7SR
7TA
7TB
7U5
8BQ
8FD
F28
FR3
H8D
JG9
JQ2
KR7
L7M
L~C
L~D
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ce17dbedf99a7b31c50b0a3c8faaf2468c756a31e59d7b30365f9495d225de143
IEDL.DBID RIE
ISSN 0018-9294
1558-2531
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 12:23:24 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 08:39:16 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:07:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:28:37 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:51 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 27 02:18:17 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c392t-ce17dbedf99a7b31c50b0a3c8faaf2468c756a31e59d7b30365f9495d225de143
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-2416-0220
0000-0002-1179-5385
0000-0003-1961-2317
0000-0001-8865-1219
0000-0002-1231-9372
OpenAccessLink https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9913322
PMID 36201421
PQID 2789363188
PQPubID 85474
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2022_3212587
proquest_miscellaneous_2722311557
proquest_journals_2789363188
crossref_citationtrail_10_1109_TBME_2022_3212587
ieee_primary_9913322
pubmed_primary_36201421
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: New York
PublicationTitle IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering
PublicationTitleAbbrev TBME
PublicationTitleAlternate IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher IEEE
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Publisher_xml – name: IEEE
– name: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
References ref13
ref35
ref12
ref34
ref15
ref37
ref14
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref11
ref33
ref10
ref32
Vladimir (ref41) 1995
ref2
(ref38) 1994
ref1
ref17
ref39
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref42
ref22
ref21
ref28
ref27
ref29
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref40
References_xml – ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.08.060
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1109/SCOReD.2013.7002642
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1109/TSP.2005.861743
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.021
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2920356
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1109/72.761722
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1002/pd.5412
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-7106-0_15
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1111/psyp.12804
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/7/005
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1109/INFOP.2015.7489341
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9
– year: 1994
  ident: ref38
  article-title: American national standard for ambulatory electrocardiographs
– volume-title: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
  year: 1995
  ident: ref41
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2943626
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(15)33099-4
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1109/CONECCT52877.2021.9622705
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1155/2014/960980
– ident: ref42
  doi: 10.1109/IJCNN.2002.1007589
– ident: ref33
  doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1551
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.3390/s17051154
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/4/004
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/24/3/038702
– ident: ref39
  doi: 10.2307/2286009
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.2174/1876536X01003010004
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/7/1135
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.1002/047134608x.w1403
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1607
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.3390/s21134298
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1007/1-4020-3885-2_16
– ident: ref27
  doi: 10.1109/4233.945288
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/5/627
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.4324/9781351033909-14
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1521
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.3390/technologies6020044
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55016-4_12
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/30/3/005
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.1088/0143-0815/10/4B/002
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.066
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.052
SSID ssj0014846
Score 2.4482777
Snippet Objective. Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations...
Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
ieee
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Accuracy
automatic quality assessment
Blind source separation
Cardiotocography - methods
Configuration management
EKG
Electrocardiography - methods
electrode configuration
electrode placement
Electrodes
Electrophysiological recording
Estimation
Feature extraction
Female
Fetal heart rate
Fetal monitoring
Fetal Monitoring - methods
fetal position
Fetuses
Guidelines
Heart rate
Heart Rate, Fetal
Humans
Monitoring
multi-channel measurements
Noise
Optimization
prediction
Pregnancy
Pregnancy complications
Regression models
Signal to noise ratio
Support vector machines
Support Vector Regression
Title Automatic optimization of multichannel electrode configurations for robust fetal heart rate detection by Blind Source Separation
URI https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9913322
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36201421
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2789363188
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2722311557
Volume 70
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3NT9VAEJ8AB4MHVEB5imZNPBH66LbdtnsEAyEmzwuQcGu2u7PGiK3htQc48acz-_EaYtR4a7K7_cjMzv6mM_MbgE9ZpVETaku0MXVSSF0lykqTlKoqkVuDonaFwouv5flV8eVaXK_B4VQLg4g--Qzn7tLH8k2vR_er7IiwTE4KuA7r5LiFWq0pYlDUoSgn5bSBM1nECCZP5dHlyeKUPMEsm-dkqIXLnntyBvmmKn_Hl_6cOXsBi9UbhvSSH_NxaOf6_jfyxv_9hJewFQEnOw4a8grWsNuG509oCLfh2SIG2Hfg4Xgces_iynoyJj9jlSbrLfOph65OuMMbFrvnGGTkT9vv38agSEtGGJjd9u24HJhFAvbMdcwemCOkYAYHn_jVsfaOnRC-NezCxw7YBQYK8r7bhauz08vP50ls0pBoglZDopFXpkVjpVRVm3Mt0jZVua6tUjYrylpXolQ5RyENjdOBKawkr8yQITFIaO01bHR9h3vABDe00EpPEmZro-j8rmzKlcnbmmDeDNKV2BodGcxdI42bxnsyqWycpBsn6SZKegYH05Jfgb7jX5N3nMCmiVFWM9hf6UYTN_iycQXEeUkGsZ7Bx2mYtqaLt6gO-9HNIexFiFvQnd8EnZruTbiBdDbjb__8zHew6frahxShfdgYbkd8T-hnaD94tX8ERHsDLQ
linkProvider IEEE
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Jb9QwFH4qRWI5sLSlDBQwEidEptmcxMcWtRqg6aVTqbfIsZ8RoiRVJznAiZ_O8zJRhQBxi2Q7i972vbwN4E1aKlSE2iKldRXlQpWRNEJHhSwLTIxGXtlC4fq0WJznHy_4xQa8m2phENEln-HcXrpYvu7VaH-V7ROWyYgBb8Ftsvs89dVaU8wgr3xZTpyQCKciDzHMJBb7y8P6iHzBNJ1npKq5zZ-7YYXcWJW_I0xnaY4fQr1-R59g8nU-Du1c_fitfeP_fsQjeBAgJzvwPPIYNrDbgvs3GhFuwZ06hNi34efBOPSujyvrSZ18C3WarDfMJR_aSuEOL1mYn6ORkUdtvnwePSutGKFgdt2342pgBgnaMzsze2C2JQXTOLjUr46139khIVzNzlz0gJ2hb0Ledztwfny0fL-IwpiGSBG4GiKFSalb1EYIWbZZonjcxjJTlZHSpHlRqZIXMkuQC03rZDK5EeSXaVIlGgmvPYHNru_wKTCeaDpohGsTZiotyYKXJk6kztqKgN4M4jXZGhV6mNtRGpeN82Vi0VhKN5bSTaD0DN5OR658A49_bd62BJs2BlrNYG_NG00Q8VVjS4izglRiNYPX0zIJp424yA770e4h9EWYm9Oddz1PTfcm5EA8mybP_vzMV3B3saxPmpMPp5-ewz075d4nDO3B5nA94gvCQkP70onAL-p9Bnc
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic+Optimization+of+Multichannel+Electrode+Configurations+for+Robust+Fetal+Heart+Rate+Detection+by+Blind+Source+Separation&rft.jtitle=IEEE+transactions+on+biomedical+engineering&rft.au=Galli%2C+Alessandra&rft.au=Peri%2C+Elisabetta&rft.au=Rabotti%2C+Chiara&rft.au=Ouzounov%2C+Sotir&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.eissn=1558-2531&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1196&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109%2FTBME.2022.3212587&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F36201421&rft.externalDocID=36201421
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0018-9294&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0018-9294&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0018-9294&client=summon