Automatic optimization of multichannel electrode configurations for robust fetal heart rate detection by Blind Source Separation
Objective. Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Sour...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering Vol. 70; no. 4; pp. 1 - 12 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
IEEE
01.04.2023
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objective. Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Source Separation (BSS) techniques. Yet effective and reliable separation of the fetal ECG remains challenging due to multiple noise sources and the effects of varying fetal position. In this work, we demonstrate that the adopted electrode configuration plays a key role in the effectiveness of BSS and propose guidelines for optimal electrode positioning. Moreover, a model is proposed to automatically predict the most suited configuration for accurate BSS-based fHR estimation with a minimal number of leads, to facilitate practical implementation. Methods. We compared fHR estimation accuracy with different electrode configurations on in-silico data, identifying the optimal configuration for a recent BSS method. Based on features extracted from raw signals, we proposed a support vector regression model to automatically identify the best electrode configuration in terms of fHR estimation accuracy and to dynamically adjust it to varying fetal presentation. Evaluation was performed on real and synthetic data. Results. Guidelines for the optimal electrode configuration are proposed by using 4 leads. Prediction of configuration quality shows 80.9% accuracy; the optimal configuration is recognized in 92.2% of the subjects. Conclusion. The proposed method successfully predicts the quality of the configurations, demonstrating the impact of the electrode configuration on the BSS performance. Significance. The method holds potential for long-term fetal monitoring, by dynamically choosing the optimal configuration. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Source Separation (BSS) techniques. Yet effective and reliable separation of the fetal ECG remains challenging due to multiple noise sources and the effects of varying fetal position. In this work, we demonstrate that the adopted electrode configuration plays a key role in the effectiveness of BSS and propose guidelines for optimal electrode positioning. Moreover, a model is proposed to automatically predict the most suited configuration for accurate BSS-based fHR estimation with a minimal number of leads, to facilitate practical implementation.OBJECTIVEFetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Source Separation (BSS) techniques. Yet effective and reliable separation of the fetal ECG remains challenging due to multiple noise sources and the effects of varying fetal position. In this work, we demonstrate that the adopted electrode configuration plays a key role in the effectiveness of BSS and propose guidelines for optimal electrode positioning. Moreover, a model is proposed to automatically predict the most suited configuration for accurate BSS-based fHR estimation with a minimal number of leads, to facilitate practical implementation.We compared fHR estimation accuracy with different electrode configurations on in-silico data, identifying the optimal configuration for a recent BSS method. Based on features extracted from raw signals, we proposed a support vector regression model to automatically identify the best electrode configuration in terms of fHR estimation accuracy and to dynamically adjust it to varying fetal presentation. Evaluation was performed on real and synthetic data.METHODSWe compared fHR estimation accuracy with different electrode configurations on in-silico data, identifying the optimal configuration for a recent BSS method. Based on features extracted from raw signals, we proposed a support vector regression model to automatically identify the best electrode configuration in terms of fHR estimation accuracy and to dynamically adjust it to varying fetal presentation. Evaluation was performed on real and synthetic data.Guidelines for the optimal electrode configuration are proposed by using 4 leads. Prediction of configuration quality shows 80.9% accuracy; the optimal configurat- ion is recognized in 92.2% of the subjects.RESULTSGuidelines for the optimal electrode configuration are proposed by using 4 leads. Prediction of configuration quality shows 80.9% accuracy; the optimal configurat- ion is recognized in 92.2% of the subjects.The proposed method successfully predicts the quality of the configurations, demonstrating the impact of the electrode configuration on the BSS performance.CONCLUSIONThe proposed method successfully predicts the quality of the configurations, demonstrating the impact of the electrode configuration on the BSS performance.The method holds potential for long-term fetal monitoring, by dynamically choosing the optimal configuration.SIGNIFICANCEThe method holds potential for long-term fetal monitoring, by dynamically choosing the optimal configuration. Objective. Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Source Separation (BSS) techniques. Yet effective and reliable separation of the fetal ECG remains challenging due to multiple noise sources and the effects of varying fetal position. In this work, we demonstrate that the adopted electrode configuration plays a key role in the effectiveness of BSS and propose guidelines for optimal electrode positioning. Moreover, a model is proposed to automatically predict the most suited configuration for accurate BSS-based fHR estimation with a minimal number of leads, to facilitate practical implementation. Methods. We compared fHR estimation accuracy with different electrode configurations on in-silico data, identifying the optimal configuration for a recent BSS method. Based on features extracted from raw signals, we proposed a support vector regression model to automatically identify the best electrode configuration in terms of fHR estimation accuracy and to dynamically adjust it to varying fetal presentation. Evaluation was performed on real and synthetic data. Results. Guidelines for the optimal electrode configuration are proposed by using 4 leads. Prediction of configuration quality shows 80.9% accuracy; the optimal configuration is recognized in 92.2% of the subjects. Conclusion. The proposed method successfully predicts the quality of the configurations, demonstrating the impact of the electrode configuration on the BSS performance. Significance. The method holds potential for long-term fetal monitoring, by dynamically choosing the optimal configuration. Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Source Separation (BSS) techniques. Yet effective and reliable separation of the fetal ECG remains challenging due to multiple noise sources and the effects of varying fetal position. In this work, we demonstrate that the adopted electrode configuration plays a key role in the effectiveness of BSS and propose guidelines for optimal electrode positioning. Moreover, a model is proposed to automatically predict the most suited configuration for accurate BSS-based fHR estimation with a minimal number of leads, to facilitate practical implementation. We compared fHR estimation accuracy with different electrode configurations on in-silico data, identifying the optimal configuration for a recent BSS method. Based on features extracted from raw signals, we proposed a support vector regression model to automatically identify the best electrode configuration in terms of fHR estimation accuracy and to dynamically adjust it to varying fetal presentation. Evaluation was performed on real and synthetic data. Guidelines for the optimal electrode configuration are proposed by using 4 leads. Prediction of configuration quality shows 80.9% accuracy; the optimal configurat- ion is recognized in 92.2% of the subjects. The proposed method successfully predicts the quality of the configurations, demonstrating the impact of the electrode configuration on the BSS performance. The method holds potential for long-term fetal monitoring, by dynamically choosing the optimal configuration. Objective. Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of traditional cardiotocography, multichannel electrophysiological recording was proposed as a viable alternative, which requires Blind Source Separation (BSS) techniques. Yet effective and reliable separation of the fetal ECG remains challenging due to multiple noise sources and the effects of varying fetal position. In this work, we demonstrate that the adopted electrode configuration plays a key role in the effectiveness of BSS and propose guidelines for optimal electrode positioning. Moreover, a model is proposed to automatically predict the most suited configuration for accurate BSS-based fHR estimation with a minimal number of leads, to facilitate practical implementation. Methods. We compared fHR estimation accuracy with different electrode configurations on in-silico data, identifying the optimal configuration for a recent BSS method. Based on features extracted from raw signals, we proposed a support vector regression model to automatically identify the best electrode configuration in terms of fHR estimation accuracy and to dynamically adjust it to varying fetal presentation. Evaluation was performed on real and synthetic data. Results. Guidelines for the optimal electrode configuration are proposed by using 4 leads. Prediction of configuration quality shows 80.9% accuracy; the optimal configurat- ion is recognized in 92.2% of the subjects. Conclusion. The proposed method successfully predicts the quality of the configurations, demonstrating the impact of the electrode configuration on the BSS performance. Significance. The method holds potential for long-term fetal monitoring, by dynamically choosing the optimal configuration. |
Author | Peri, E. Ouzounov, S. Galli, A. Mischi, M. Rabotti, C. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: A. orcidid: 0000-0003-2416-0220 surname: Galli fullname: Galli, A. organization: Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy – sequence: 2 givenname: E. surname: Peri fullname: Peri, E. organization: Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands – sequence: 3 givenname: C. surname: Rabotti fullname: Rabotti, C. organization: Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands – sequence: 4 givenname: S. orcidid: 0000-0003-1961-2317 surname: Ouzounov fullname: Ouzounov, S. organization: Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands – sequence: 5 givenname: M. orcidid: 0000-0002-1179-5385 surname: Mischi fullname: Mischi, M. organization: Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36201421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kT1PHDEQhq2IKBwkPyCKFFlKQ7OHP9a7dgmIkEhEFJB65bXHwWjXvtjeAqr89Pi4CwVFKo89zzsznvcIHYQYAKGPlKwpJer07vzH5ZoRxtacUSZk_watqBCyYYLTA7QihMpGMdUeoqOcH-q1lW33Dh3yjtWY0RX6c7aUOOviDY6b4mf_VOMYcHR4Xqb6fK9DgAnDBKakaAGbGJz_taRnLmMXE05xXHLBDoqe8D3oVHBNA7ZQqmpbbnzE55MPFt_GJRnAt7DRuwrv0Vunpwwf9ucx-vn18u7iW3N9c_X94uy6MVyx0higvR3BOqV0P3JqBBmJ5kY6rR1rO2l60WlOQShb84R3wqlWCcuYsEBbfoxOdnU3Kf5eIJdh9tnANOkAcckD6xnjtG6vr-iXV-hDnTrU6SolFe84lbJSn_fUMs5gh03ys06Pw7_dVoDuAJNizgncC0LJsPVv2Po3bP0b9v5VTf9KY3x53lNJ2k__VX7aKT0AvHRSinJeP_YX_lGpfw |
CODEN | IEBEAX |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1109_TIM_2023_3338710 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6579_ad3d27 crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering10020252 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bspc_2024_106477 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.procs.2020.08.060 10.1109/SCOReD.2013.7002642 10.1109/TSP.2005.861743 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.021 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2920356 10.1109/72.761722 10.1002/pd.5412 10.1007/978-981-15-7106-0_15 10.1111/psyp.12804 10.1088/0967-3334/31/7/005 10.1109/INFOP.2015.7489341 10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5 10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2943626 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020 10.1016/S0002-9378(15)33099-4 10.1109/CONECCT52877.2021.9622705 10.1155/2014/960980 10.1109/IJCNN.2002.1007589 10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1551 10.3390/s17051154 10.1088/0967-3334/28/4/004 10.1088/1674-1056/24/3/038702 10.2307/2286009 10.2174/1876536X01003010004 10.1088/0967-3334/33/7/1135 10.1002/047134608x.w1403 10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1607 10.3390/s21134298 10.1007/1-4020-3885-2_16 10.1109/4233.945288 10.1088/0967-3334/37/5/627 10.4324/9781351033909-14 10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1521 10.3390/technologies6020044 10.1007/978-3-642-55016-4_12 10.1088/0967-3334/30/3/005 10.1088/0143-0815/10/4B/002 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.066 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.052 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023 |
DBID | 97E ESBDL RIA RIE AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QF 7QO 7QQ 7SC 7SE 7SP 7SR 7TA 7TB 7U5 8BQ 8FD F28 FR3 H8D JG9 JQ2 KR7 L7M L~C L~D P64 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1109/TBME.2022.3212587 |
DatabaseName | IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005–Present IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present IEEE/IET Electronic Library CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Aluminium Industry Abstracts Biotechnology Research Abstracts Ceramic Abstracts Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Corrosion Abstracts Electronics & Communications Abstracts Engineered Materials Abstracts Materials Business File Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts METADEX Technology Research Database ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering Engineering Research Database Aerospace Database Materials Research Database ProQuest Computer Science Collection Civil Engineering Abstracts Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Materials Research Database Civil Engineering Abstracts Aluminium Industry Abstracts Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Electronics & Communications Abstracts ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Ceramic Abstracts Materials Business File METADEX Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Aerospace Database Engineered Materials Abstracts Biotechnology Research Abstracts Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts Engineering Research Database Corrosion Abstracts Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Materials Research Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: RIE name: IEEE/IET Electronic Library url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Engineering |
EISSN | 1558-2531 |
EndPage | 12 |
ExternalDocumentID | 36201421 10_1109_TBME_2022_3212587 9913322 |
Genre | orig-research Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Dutch grantid: NWO HTSM 14663 |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .55 .DC .GJ 0R~ 29I 4.4 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6IF 6IK 6IL 6IN 85S 97E AAJGR AARMG AASAJ AAWTH AAYJJ ABAZT ABJNI ABQJQ ABVLG ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACKIV ACNCT ACPRK ADZIZ AENEX AETIX AFFNX AFRAH AGQYO AGSQL AHBIQ AI. AIBXA AKJIK AKQYR ALLEH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ASUFR ATWAV BEFXN BFFAM BGNUA BKEBE BPEOZ CHZPO CS3 DU5 EBS EJD ESBDL F5P HZ~ H~9 IAAWW IBMZZ ICLAB IDIHD IEGSK IFIPE IFJZH IPLJI JAVBF LAI MS~ O9- OCL P2P RIA RIE RIL RNS TAE TN5 VH1 VJK X7M ZGI ZXP AAYXX CITATION RIG CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QF 7QO 7QQ 7SC 7SE 7SP 7SR 7TA 7TB 7U5 8BQ 8FD F28 FR3 H8D JG9 JQ2 KR7 L7M L~C L~D P64 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ce17dbedf99a7b31c50b0a3c8faaf2468c756a31e59d7b30365f9495d225de143 |
IEDL.DBID | RIE |
ISSN | 0018-9294 1558-2531 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 12:23:24 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 08:39:16 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:07:39 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:28:37 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:51 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 27 02:18:17 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c392t-ce17dbedf99a7b31c50b0a3c8faaf2468c756a31e59d7b30365f9495d225de143 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-2416-0220 0000-0002-1179-5385 0000-0003-1961-2317 0000-0001-8865-1219 0000-0002-1231-9372 |
OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9913322 |
PMID | 36201421 |
PQID | 2789363188 |
PQPubID | 85474 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2022_3212587 proquest_miscellaneous_2722311557 proquest_journals_2789363188 crossref_citationtrail_10_1109_TBME_2022_3212587 ieee_primary_9913322 pubmed_primary_36201421 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2023 text: 2023-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: New York |
PublicationTitle | IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | TBME |
PublicationTitleAlternate | IEEE Trans Biomed Eng |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | IEEE The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Publisher_xml | – name: IEEE – name: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
References | ref13 ref35 ref12 ref34 ref15 ref37 ref14 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref11 ref33 ref10 ref32 Vladimir (ref41) 1995 ref2 (ref38) 1994 ref1 ref17 ref39 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref42 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 |
References_xml | – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.08.060 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1109/SCOReD.2013.7002642 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1109/TSP.2005.861743 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.021 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2920356 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1109/72.761722 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1002/pd.5412 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-7106-0_15 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1111/psyp.12804 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/7/005 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1109/INFOP.2015.7489341 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9 – year: 1994 ident: ref38 article-title: American national standard for ambulatory electrocardiographs – volume-title: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory year: 1995 ident: ref41 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2943626 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(15)33099-4 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1109/CONECCT52877.2021.9622705 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1155/2014/960980 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1109/IJCNN.2002.1007589 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1551 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.3390/s17051154 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/4/004 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/24/3/038702 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.2307/2286009 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.2174/1876536X01003010004 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/7/1135 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1002/047134608x.w1403 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1607 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.3390/s21134298 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1007/1-4020-3885-2_16 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1109/4233.945288 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/5/627 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.4324/9781351033909-14 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/8/1521 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.3390/technologies6020044 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55016-4_12 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/30/3/005 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1088/0143-0815/10/4B/002 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.066 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.052 |
SSID | ssj0014846 |
Score | 2.4482777 |
Snippet | Objective. Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations... Fetal heart rate (fHR) evaluation is fundamental to guarantee timely medical intervention in case of pregnancy complications. Due to the limitations of... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref ieee |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | Accuracy automatic quality assessment Blind source separation Cardiotocography - methods Configuration management EKG Electrocardiography - methods electrode configuration electrode placement Electrodes Electrophysiological recording Estimation Feature extraction Female Fetal heart rate Fetal monitoring Fetal Monitoring - methods fetal position Fetuses Guidelines Heart rate Heart Rate, Fetal Humans Monitoring multi-channel measurements Noise Optimization prediction Pregnancy Pregnancy complications Regression models Signal to noise ratio Support vector machines Support Vector Regression |
Title | Automatic optimization of multichannel electrode configurations for robust fetal heart rate detection by Blind Source Separation |
URI | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9913322 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36201421 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2789363188 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2722311557 |
Volume | 70 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3NT9VAEJ8AB4MHVEB5imZNPBH66LbdtnsEAyEmzwuQcGu2u7PGiK3htQc48acz-_EaYtR4a7K7_cjMzv6mM_MbgE9ZpVETaku0MXVSSF0lykqTlKoqkVuDonaFwouv5flV8eVaXK_B4VQLg4g--Qzn7tLH8k2vR_er7IiwTE4KuA7r5LiFWq0pYlDUoSgn5bSBM1nECCZP5dHlyeKUPMEsm-dkqIXLnntyBvmmKn_Hl_6cOXsBi9UbhvSSH_NxaOf6_jfyxv_9hJewFQEnOw4a8grWsNuG509oCLfh2SIG2Hfg4Xgces_iynoyJj9jlSbrLfOph65OuMMbFrvnGGTkT9vv38agSEtGGJjd9u24HJhFAvbMdcwemCOkYAYHn_jVsfaOnRC-NezCxw7YBQYK8r7bhauz08vP50ls0pBoglZDopFXpkVjpVRVm3Mt0jZVua6tUjYrylpXolQ5RyENjdOBKawkr8yQITFIaO01bHR9h3vABDe00EpPEmZro-j8rmzKlcnbmmDeDNKV2BodGcxdI42bxnsyqWycpBsn6SZKegYH05Jfgb7jX5N3nMCmiVFWM9hf6UYTN_iycQXEeUkGsZ7Bx2mYtqaLt6gO-9HNIexFiFvQnd8EnZruTbiBdDbjb__8zHew6frahxShfdgYbkd8T-hnaD94tX8ERHsDLQ |
linkProvider | IEEE |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Jb9QwFH4qRWI5sLSlDBQwEidEptmcxMcWtRqg6aVTqbfIsZ8RoiRVJznAiZ_O8zJRhQBxi2Q7i972vbwN4E1aKlSE2iKldRXlQpWRNEJHhSwLTIxGXtlC4fq0WJznHy_4xQa8m2phENEln-HcXrpYvu7VaH-V7ROWyYgBb8Ftsvs89dVaU8wgr3xZTpyQCKciDzHMJBb7y8P6iHzBNJ1npKq5zZ-7YYXcWJW_I0xnaY4fQr1-R59g8nU-Du1c_fitfeP_fsQjeBAgJzvwPPIYNrDbgvs3GhFuwZ06hNi34efBOPSujyvrSZ18C3WarDfMJR_aSuEOL1mYn6ORkUdtvnwePSutGKFgdt2342pgBgnaMzsze2C2JQXTOLjUr46139khIVzNzlz0gJ2hb0Ledztwfny0fL-IwpiGSBG4GiKFSalb1EYIWbZZonjcxjJTlZHSpHlRqZIXMkuQC03rZDK5EeSXaVIlGgmvPYHNru_wKTCeaDpohGsTZiotyYKXJk6kztqKgN4M4jXZGhV6mNtRGpeN82Vi0VhKN5bSTaD0DN5OR658A49_bd62BJs2BlrNYG_NG00Q8VVjS4izglRiNYPX0zIJp424yA770e4h9EWYm9Oddz1PTfcm5EA8mybP_vzMV3B3saxPmpMPp5-ewz075d4nDO3B5nA94gvCQkP70onAL-p9Bnc |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic+Optimization+of+Multichannel+Electrode+Configurations+for+Robust+Fetal+Heart+Rate+Detection+by+Blind+Source+Separation&rft.jtitle=IEEE+transactions+on+biomedical+engineering&rft.au=Galli%2C+Alessandra&rft.au=Peri%2C+Elisabetta&rft.au=Rabotti%2C+Chiara&rft.au=Ouzounov%2C+Sotir&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.eissn=1558-2531&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1196&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109%2FTBME.2022.3212587&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F36201421&rft.externalDocID=36201421 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0018-9294&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0018-9294&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0018-9294&client=summon |