Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Sex in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

• Published in: Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine Vol. 8; p. 741679
• Main Authors: Souza Filho, Erito Marques de, Fernandes, Fernando de Amorim, Portela, Maria Gabriela Ribeiro, Newlands, Pedro Heliodoro, Carvalho, Lucas Nunes Dalbonio de, Santos, Tadeu Francisco dos, Santos, Alair Augusto Sarmet M. D. dos, Mesquita, Evandro Tinoco, Seixas, Flávio Luiz, Mesquita, Claudio Tinoco, Gismondi, Ronaldo Altenburg
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A 29.10.2021
• Subjects: Cardiovascular Medicine; general data protection regulation; health care; machine learning; myocardial perfusion imaging; sex
• ISSN: 2297-055X; 2297-055X
• DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.741679

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is an essential tool used to diagnose and manage patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Additionally, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) represents a milestone about individuals' data security concerns. On the other hand, Machine Learning (ML) has had several applications in the most diverse knowledge areas. It is conceived as a technology with huge potential to revolutionize health care. In this context, we developed ML models to evaluate their ability to distinguish an individual's sex from MPI assessment. We used 260 polar maps (140 men/120 women) to train ML algorithms from a database of patients referred to a university hospital for clinically indicated MPI from January 2016 to December 2018. We tested 07 different ML models, namely, Classification and Regression Tree (CART), Naive Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Adaptive Boosting (AB), Random Forests (RF) and, Gradient Boosting (GB). We used a cross-validation strategy. Our work demonstrated that ML algorithms could perform well in assessing the sex of patients undergoing myocardial scintigraphy exams. All the models had accuracy greater than 82%. However, only SVM achieved 90%. KNN, RF, AB, GB had, respectively, 88, 86, 85, 83%. Accuracy standard deviation was lower in KNN, AB, and RF (0.06). SVM and RF had had the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.93), followed by GB (0.92), KNN (0.91), AB, and NB (0.9). SVM and AB achieved the best precision. Our results bring some challenges regarding the autonomy of patients who wish to keep sex information confidential and certainly add greater complexity to the debate about what data should be considered sensitive to the light of the GDPR.