Effects of affective arousal on choice behavior, reward prediction errors, and feedback-related negativities in human reward-based decision making

• Published in: Frontiers in psychology Vol. 6; p. 592
• Main Authors: Liu, Hong-Hsiang, Hsieh, Ming H., Hsu, Yung-Fong, Lai, Wen-Sung
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 18.05.2015
• Subjects: affective arousal; emotional faces; emotional regulation; Feedback-related negativity (FRN); Neuroscience; reinforcement learning model; Reward-based decision Making; reward-prediction error (RPE); feedback-related negativity (FRN); emotional faces; reinforcement learning model; reward-based decision making; emotional regulation; affective arousal
• ISSN: 1664-1078; 1664-1078
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00592

Emotional experience has a pervasive impact on choice behavior, yet the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Introducing facial-expression primes into a probabilistic learning task, we investigated how affective arousal regulates reward-related choice based on behavioral, model fitting, and feedback-related negativity (FRN) data. Sixty-six paid subjects were randomly assigned to the Neutral-Neutral (NN), Angry-Neutral (AN), and Happy-Neutral (HN) groups. A total of 960 trials were conducted. Subjects in each group were randomly exposed to half trials of the pre-determined emotional faces and another half of the neutral faces before choosing between two cards drawn from two decks with different assigned reward probabilities. Trial-by-trial data were fit with a standard reinforcement learning model using the Bayesian estimation approach. The temporal dynamics of brain activity were simultaneously recorded and analyzed using event-related potentials. Our analyses revealed that subjects in the NN group gained more reward values than those in the other two groups; they also exhibited comparatively differential estimated model-parameter values for reward prediction errors. Computing the difference wave of FRNs in reward vs. non-reward trials, we found that, compared to the NN group, subjects in the AN and HN groups had larger "General" FRNs (i.e., FRNs in no-reward trials minus FRNs in reward trials) and "Expected" FRNs (i.e., FRNs in expected reward-omission trials minus FRNs in expected reward-delivery trials), indicating an interruption in predicting reward. Further, both AN and HN groups appeared to be more sensitive to negative outcomes than the NN group. Collectively, our study suggests that affective arousal negatively regulates reward-related choice, probably through overweighting with negative feedback.