Results of a multicenter comparative study of single-dose cefotetan and multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in patients undergoing cesarean section
A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean section infection was evaluated in a multicenter trial of 269 women. No significant differences in clinical or bacteriologic response were det...
Saved in:
Published in | The American journal of surgery Vol. 155; no. 5; pp. 86 - 90 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
31.05.1988
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean section infection was evaluated in a multicenter trial of 269 women. No significant differences in clinical or bacteriologic response were detected between the two groups. A successful clinical response rate was achieved in 139 of 162 of the evaluable subjects given cefotetan (86 percent) and in 71 of 79 patients (90 percent) given cefoxitin. The respective satisfactory bacteriologic response rates were 91 percent (135 of 148 patients) and 93 percent (68 of 73 patients). The incidences of endometritis for cefotetan and cefoxitin (12 percent and 5 percent, respectively) and of postoperative wound infection (3 percent and 5 percent, respectively) were also not significantly different. Bactericidal levels of cefotetan were maintained in plasma in the immediate postpartum period. Both drugs were well tolerated. Single-dose prophylaxis with cefotetan was comparable to multiple doses of cefoxitin in reducing infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean section. |
---|---|
AbstractList | A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean section infection was evaluated in a multicenter trial of 269 women. No significant differences in clinical or bacteriologic response were detected between the two groups. A successful clinical response rate was achieved in 139 of 162 of the evaluable subjects given cefotetan (86 percent) and in 71 of 79 patients (90 percent) given cefoxitin. The respective satisfactory bacteriologic response rates were 91 percent (135 of 148 patients) and 93 percent (68 of 73 patients). The incidences of endometritis for cefotetan and cefoxitin (12 percent and 5 percent, respectively) and of postoperative wound infection (3 percent and 5 percent, respectively) were also not significantly different. Bactericidal levels of cefotetan were maintained in plasma in the immediate postpartum period. Both drugs were well tolerated. Single-dose prophylaxis with cefotetan was comparable to multiple doses of cefoxitin in reducing infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean section. A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean section infection was evaluated in a multicenter trial of 269 women. No significant differences in clinical or bacteriologic response were detected between the two groups. A successful clinical response rate was achieved in 139 of 162 of the evaluable subjects given cefotetan (86 percent) and in 71 of 79 patients (90 percent) given cefoxitin. The respective satisfactory bacteriologic response rates were 91 percent (135 of 148 patients) and 93 percent (68 of 73 patients). The incidences of endometritis for cefotetan and cefoxitin (12 percent and 5 percent, respectively) and of postoperative wound infection (3 percent and 5 percent, respectively) were also not significantly different. Bactericidal levels of cefotetan were maintained in plasma in the immediate postpartum period. Both drugs were well tolerated. Single-dose prophylaxis with cefotetan was comparable to multiple doses of cefoxitin in reducing infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean section.A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean section infection was evaluated in a multicenter trial of 269 women. No significant differences in clinical or bacteriologic response were detected between the two groups. A successful clinical response rate was achieved in 139 of 162 of the evaluable subjects given cefotetan (86 percent) and in 71 of 79 patients (90 percent) given cefoxitin. The respective satisfactory bacteriologic response rates were 91 percent (135 of 148 patients) and 93 percent (68 of 73 patients). The incidences of endometritis for cefotetan and cefoxitin (12 percent and 5 percent, respectively) and of postoperative wound infection (3 percent and 5 percent, respectively) were also not significantly different. Bactericidal levels of cefotetan were maintained in plasma in the immediate postpartum period. Both drugs were well tolerated. Single-dose prophylaxis with cefotetan was comparable to multiple doses of cefoxitin in reducing infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean section. A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean section infection was evaluated in a multicenter trial of 269 women. No significant differences in clinical or bacteriologic response were detected between the two groups. A successful clinical response rate was achieved in 139 of 162 of the evaluable subjects given cefotetan (86 percent) and in 71 of 79 patients (90 percent) given cefoxitin. The respective satisfactory bacteriologic response rates were 91 percent (135 of 148 patients) and 93 percent (68 of 73 patients). The incidences of endometritis for cefotetan and cefoxitin (12 percent and 5 percent, respectively) and of postoperative wound infection (3 percent and 5 percent, respectively) were also not significantly different. |
Author | McGregor, James A. Benigno, Benedict B. Poindexter, Alfred Cunningham, F. Gary Galask, Rudolph P. Makowski, Edgar Elliott, John P. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Rudolph P. surname: Galask fullname: Galask, Rudolph P. organization: Iowa City, Iowa, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Benedict B. surname: Benigno fullname: Benigno, Benedict B. organization: Atlanta, Georgia, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: F. Gary surname: Cunningham fullname: Cunningham, F. Gary organization: Dallas, Texas, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: John P. surname: Elliott fullname: Elliott, John P. organization: Phoenix, Arizona, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Edgar surname: Makowski fullname: Makowski, Edgar – sequence: 6 givenname: James A. surname: McGregor fullname: McGregor, James A. – sequence: 7 givenname: Alfred surname: Poindexter fullname: Poindexter, Alfred organization: Houston, Texas, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3287975$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFUd1uFCEYJaambquP0IQroxejMDA7TLwwpqnapEmTqteEgW8qZgZGPqbpvkift2x3NcabvQK-8wOcc0KOQgxAyBln7zjj6_ffGGN11a05e6PUW8XqmlXyGVlx1XYVV0ockdVfygtygvirHDmX4pgci7qw2mZFHm4AlzEjjQM1dCpbbyFkSNTGaTbJZH8HFPPiNlsK-nA7QuUiArUwxAzZBGqC20nnf7F7n33BkM4pzj83o7n3SMtkLp7lCqRLcJBuY7EsfDQJihWCzT6Gl-T5YEaEV_v1lPz4fPH9_Gt1df3l8vzTVWVFx3Nl2dBKIQYlgVshW9OtnVpL65zhNRgOYF3fKSjDtu-gB9sooXoxyMY2A1filLze-ZY3_l4As548WhhHEyAuqFtVN0wIdpDIG9k2oq0L8WxPXPoJnJ6Tn0za6H3iBf-ww22KiAkGbX022z_nZPyoOdPbevVTvXrbnVZKP9WrZVE3_6n_-B_SfdzpoIR55yFptKUEC86nkrh20R9weAQPc8Et |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_00006250_200101000_00028 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1445_2197_1998_tb04785_x crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD008726_pub3 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD008726_pub2 crossref_primary_10_1080_21548331_1990_11704116 crossref_primary_10_15406_ipcb_2021_07_00228 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD001136_pub2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsps_2023_101800 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90483-0 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90699-2 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90497-7 10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90830-5 10.1128/AAC.22.5.859 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90496-5 |
ContentType | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Copyright | 1988 Reed Publishing USA |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 1988 Reed Publishing USA |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QL C1K 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1879-1883 |
Editor | Fry, DE Barza, M Neu, HC (eds) |
Editor_xml | – fullname: Barza, M – fullname: Fry, DE – fullname: Neu, HC (eds) |
EndPage | 90 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3287975 10_1016_S0002_9610_88_80220_4 S0002961088802204 |
Genre | Comparative Study Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Conference Book |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .55 .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 123 1B1 1CY 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 23M 3V. 4.4 457 4CK 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 71M 7X7 85S 88E 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8P~ 9JM AABNK AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAWTL AAXUO ABBQC ABFNM ABLJU ABLVK ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABUWG ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACIUM ACIWK ACPRK ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADFRT ADMUD AEBSH AEKER AENEX AEVXI AFFNX AFKRA AFKWA AFRAH AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AHMBA AHPSJ AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJRQY AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN AZQEC BENPR BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CS3 DWQXO EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EMOBN EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 EX3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN FYUFA G-2 G-Q G8K GBLVA GNUQQ GUQSH HEK HMCUK HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IH2 IHE J1W J5H K-O KOM L7B LCYCR M1P M29 M2O M41 MO0 N4W N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OJ0 OV0 OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SPCBC SSH SSZ SV3 T5K TWZ UHU UKHRP UNMZH UV1 WH7 WOW WUQ X7M XPP YOC YQJ Z5R ZA5 ZCG ZGI ZXP ~G- AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABDPE ABWVN ACIEU ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFCTW AFJKZ AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALIPV ANKPU APXCP CITATION PHGZM PHGZT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QL C1K 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c0f7433f84e1c347a96d864cdda12ea1eecdb98ed867b9ebec5838b3f45c5f183 |
ISSN | 0002-9610 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 16:22:48 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 01:35:23 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 23:02:08 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:26 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:17:49 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:33:28 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c391t-c0f7433f84e1c347a96d864cdda12ea1eecdb98ed867b9ebec5838b3f45c5f183 |
Notes | SourceType-Books-1 ObjectType-Book-1 content type line 25 ObjectType-Conference-2 SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-2 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
PMID | 3287975 |
PQID | 15475372 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_78250330 proquest_miscellaneous_15475372 pubmed_primary_3287975 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_S0002_9610_88_80220_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0002_9610_88_80220_4 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S0002_9610_88_80220_4 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 1900 |
PublicationDate | 1988-05-31 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1988-05-31 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 1988 text: 1988-05-31 day: 31 |
PublicationDecade | 1980 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | The American journal of surgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Surg |
PublicationYear | 1988 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (bib9) 1975; 37 Ayers, Jones, Barry (bib5) 1982; 22 Bauer, Kirby, Sherris, Turck (bib8) 1966; 45 Stiver, Forward, Livingstone (bib2) 1983; 145 Varner, Weiner, Petzold, Galask (bib6) 1986; 154 Moro, Andrews (bib3) 1974; 44 Gall (bib4) 1979; 134 Harger, English (bib1) 1981; 141 McGregor, French, Makowski (bib7) 1986; 154 Ayers (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib5) 1982; 22 Harger (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib1) 1981; 141 Moro (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib3) 1974; 44 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib9) 1975; 37 Stiver (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib2) 1983; 145 McGregor (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib7) 1986; 154 Bauer (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib8) 1966; 45 Varner (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib6) 1986; 154 Gall (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib4) 1979; 134 |
References_xml | – volume: 22 start-page: 859 year: 1982 end-page: 877 ident: bib5 article-title: Cefotetan, a new cephamycin: comparison of in vitro antimicrobial activity with other cephems, beta-lactamase stability, and preliminary recommendations for disk diffusion testing publication-title: Antimicrob Agents Chemother – volume: 141 start-page: 752 year: 1981 end-page: 758 ident: bib1 article-title: Selection of patients for antiblotic prophylaxis in cesarean sections publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 154 start-page: 955 year: 1986 end-page: 960 ident: bib7 article-title: Single-dose cefotetan versus multidose cefoxitin for prophylaxis in cesarean section in high-risk patients publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 134 start-page: 506 year: 1979 end-page: 511 ident: bib4 article-title: The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 154 start-page: 951 year: 1986 end-page: 954 ident: bib6 article-title: Comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin as prophylaxis in cesarean section publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 37 start-page: 20527 year: 1975 end-page: 20529 ident: bib9 article-title: Standardized disc susceptibility test. Approved standard: ASM-2, performance standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests July 1975 publication-title: Fed Reg – volume: 145 start-page: 158 year: 1983 end-page: 163 ident: bib2 article-title: Multicenter comparison of cefoxitin versus cefazolin for prevention of infectious morbidity after nonelective cesarean section publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 45 start-page: 493 year: 1966 end-page: 496 ident: bib8 article-title: Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method publication-title: Am J Clin Pathol – volume: 44 start-page: 668 year: 1974 end-page: 692 ident: bib3 article-title: Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 44 start-page: 668 year: 1974 ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib3 article-title: Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 145 start-page: 158 year: 1983 ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib2 article-title: Multicenter comparison of cefoxitin versus cefazolin for prevention of infectious morbidity after nonelective cesarean section publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90483-0 – volume: 141 start-page: 752 year: 1981 ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib1 article-title: Selection of patients for antiblotic prophylaxis in cesarean sections publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90699-2 – volume: 154 start-page: 955 year: 1986 ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib7 article-title: Single-dose cefotetan versus multidose cefoxitin for prophylaxis in cesarean section in high-risk patients publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90497-7 – volume: 45 start-page: 493 year: 1966 ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib8 article-title: Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method publication-title: Am J Clin Pathol doi: 10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493 – volume: 37 start-page: 20527 year: 1975 ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib9 article-title: Standardized disc susceptibility test. Approved standard: ASM-2, performance standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests July 1975 publication-title: Fed Reg – volume: 134 start-page: 506 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib4 article-title: The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90830-5 – volume: 22 start-page: 859 year: 1982 ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib5 article-title: Cefotetan, a new cephamycin: comparison of in vitro antimicrobial activity with other cephems, beta-lactamase stability, and preliminary recommendations for disk diffusion testing publication-title: Antimicrob Agents Chemother doi: 10.1128/AAC.22.5.859 – volume: 154 start-page: 951 year: 1986 ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib6 article-title: Comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin as prophylaxis in cesarean section publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90496-5 |
SSID | ssj0001143 |
Score | 1.3784206 |
Snippet | A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 86 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Cefotetan Cefoxitin - administration & dosage Cefoxitin - therapeutic use Cephamycins - administration & dosage Cephamycins - therapeutic use Cesarean Section Clinical Trials as Topic Female Humans Pregnancy Premedication Random Allocation Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control |
Title | Results of a multicenter comparative study of single-dose cefotetan and multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in patients undergoing cesarean section |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3287975 https://www.proquest.com/docview/15475372 https://www.proquest.com/docview/78250330 |
Volume | 155 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Pb9MwFLZKd-EGYhPlpw8ggVBG0ji1c9ymlWkbA5VW7GY5tjNVqlLUpNLEjX-Cv5dnx4lT0aqCS1S5sRP1-_r8bL_vPYTeUEmjSMksiGUYBoQpFWSpGgWSiBQWLYSG9qD9883oYkYub5PbXu9XV11SZcfy51Zdyf-gCm2Aq1HJ_gOy7aDQAJ8BX7gCwnD9G-PtU40XhhTdLBBlR-3sCDHR5XpRR26IOo7QBGbqlQtDrxOAl02OabOFsNCBsuHsOl9WGrxIe9LQhCD67-7n1bwwBWvgFQG1hbif19Hpdc7W0tbaXd0trb5Xl2Jldv9LGwPWUvOT0XNayzzxkrNTXczvbG3wD6e-PPTZ2pZZcgLvsa8O1ok_uXSDqFrgB4i6o_gNG52OXLBrY6PrXL6OjMnJVuNf70N8awcAF52xt8PUqomdlmgj4fbNFz6eXV_z6fnt9AE6GMZAzj46OLmafL9qp3NYMMbNGsqM6mVgH_2j3jH23j1ml4OzawFjHZnpI3ToJZ74a8uox6iniyfot-MIXuZY4A5HcIcj2HLE3NLhCG45goEjeIMjuOUIFiXucARDS8MR7DmCG45gx5FDNBufT88uAle4I5BxGlWBDHNwTOOcER3JmFCRjhQbEamUiIZaRFpLlaVMQyPNUmNGzOF9FuckkUkOk8wR6hfLQj9FWKmISlurODMyasHCOKO5ICSnGbSkA0SaX5tLl9XeFFdZcB--CCBxAxJnjFuQOBmg47bbjzqty74OrIGSO9-09jk5sG9f19cN9BxstzmQE4VerksOyxeaxHS4-w7w302cQThARzVn2reNh4ymNHm2d_Dn6KH_m71A_Wq11i_Bka6yV47qfwA3gc0e |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.title=The+American+journal+of+surgery&rft.atitle=Results+of+a+multicenter+comparative+study+of+single-dose+cefotetan+and+multiple-dose+cefoxitin+as+prophylaxis+in+patients+undergoing+cesarean+section&rft.au=Galask%2C+R+P&rft.au=Benigno%2C+B+B&rft.au=Cunningham%2C+F+G&rft.au=Elliott%2C+J+P&rft.date=1988-05-31&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.volume=155&rft.issue=5A&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0002-9610%2888%2980220-4&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0002-9610&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0002-9610&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0002-9610&client=summon |