Results of a multicenter comparative study of single-dose cefotetan and multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in patients undergoing cesarean section

A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean section infection was evaluated in a multicenter trial of 269 women. No significant differences in clinical or bacteriologic response were det...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 155; no. 5; pp. 86 - 90
Main Authors Galask, Rudolph P., Benigno, Benedict B., Cunningham, F. Gary, Elliott, John P., Makowski, Edgar, McGregor, James A., Poindexter, Alfred
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 31.05.1988
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean section infection was evaluated in a multicenter trial of 269 women. No significant differences in clinical or bacteriologic response were detected between the two groups. A successful clinical response rate was achieved in 139 of 162 of the evaluable subjects given cefotetan (86 percent) and in 71 of 79 patients (90 percent) given cefoxitin. The respective satisfactory bacteriologic response rates were 91 percent (135 of 148 patients) and 93 percent (68 of 73 patients). The incidences of endometritis for cefotetan and cefoxitin (12 percent and 5 percent, respectively) and of postoperative wound infection (3 percent and 5 percent, respectively) were also not significantly different. Bactericidal levels of cefotetan were maintained in plasma in the immediate postpartum period. Both drugs were well tolerated. Single-dose prophylaxis with cefotetan was comparable to multiple doses of cefoxitin in reducing infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean section.
AbstractList A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean section infection was evaluated in a multicenter trial of 269 women. No significant differences in clinical or bacteriologic response were detected between the two groups. A successful clinical response rate was achieved in 139 of 162 of the evaluable subjects given cefotetan (86 percent) and in 71 of 79 patients (90 percent) given cefoxitin. The respective satisfactory bacteriologic response rates were 91 percent (135 of 148 patients) and 93 percent (68 of 73 patients). The incidences of endometritis for cefotetan and cefoxitin (12 percent and 5 percent, respectively) and of postoperative wound infection (3 percent and 5 percent, respectively) were also not significantly different. Bactericidal levels of cefotetan were maintained in plasma in the immediate postpartum period. Both drugs were well tolerated. Single-dose prophylaxis with cefotetan was comparable to multiple doses of cefoxitin in reducing infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean section.
A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean section infection was evaluated in a multicenter trial of 269 women. No significant differences in clinical or bacteriologic response were detected between the two groups. A successful clinical response rate was achieved in 139 of 162 of the evaluable subjects given cefotetan (86 percent) and in 71 of 79 patients (90 percent) given cefoxitin. The respective satisfactory bacteriologic response rates were 91 percent (135 of 148 patients) and 93 percent (68 of 73 patients). The incidences of endometritis for cefotetan and cefoxitin (12 percent and 5 percent, respectively) and of postoperative wound infection (3 percent and 5 percent, respectively) were also not significantly different. Bactericidal levels of cefotetan were maintained in plasma in the immediate postpartum period. Both drugs were well tolerated. Single-dose prophylaxis with cefotetan was comparable to multiple doses of cefoxitin in reducing infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean section.A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean section infection was evaluated in a multicenter trial of 269 women. No significant differences in clinical or bacteriologic response were detected between the two groups. A successful clinical response rate was achieved in 139 of 162 of the evaluable subjects given cefotetan (86 percent) and in 71 of 79 patients (90 percent) given cefoxitin. The respective satisfactory bacteriologic response rates were 91 percent (135 of 148 patients) and 93 percent (68 of 73 patients). The incidences of endometritis for cefotetan and cefoxitin (12 percent and 5 percent, respectively) and of postoperative wound infection (3 percent and 5 percent, respectively) were also not significantly different. Bactericidal levels of cefotetan were maintained in plasma in the immediate postpartum period. Both drugs were well tolerated. Single-dose prophylaxis with cefotetan was comparable to multiple doses of cefoxitin in reducing infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean section.
A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean section infection was evaluated in a multicenter trial of 269 women. No significant differences in clinical or bacteriologic response were detected between the two groups. A successful clinical response rate was achieved in 139 of 162 of the evaluable subjects given cefotetan (86 percent) and in 71 of 79 patients (90 percent) given cefoxitin. The respective satisfactory bacteriologic response rates were 91 percent (135 of 148 patients) and 93 percent (68 of 73 patients). The incidences of endometritis for cefotetan and cefoxitin (12 percent and 5 percent, respectively) and of postoperative wound infection (3 percent and 5 percent, respectively) were also not significantly different.
Author McGregor, James A.
Benigno, Benedict B.
Poindexter, Alfred
Cunningham, F. Gary
Galask, Rudolph P.
Makowski, Edgar
Elliott, John P.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Rudolph P.
  surname: Galask
  fullname: Galask, Rudolph P.
  organization: Iowa City, Iowa, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Benedict B.
  surname: Benigno
  fullname: Benigno, Benedict B.
  organization: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: F. Gary
  surname: Cunningham
  fullname: Cunningham, F. Gary
  organization: Dallas, Texas, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: John P.
  surname: Elliott
  fullname: Elliott, John P.
  organization: Phoenix, Arizona, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Edgar
  surname: Makowski
  fullname: Makowski, Edgar
– sequence: 6
  givenname: James A.
  surname: McGregor
  fullname: McGregor, James A.
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Alfred
  surname: Poindexter
  fullname: Poindexter, Alfred
  organization: Houston, Texas, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3287975$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFUd1uFCEYJaambquP0IQroxejMDA7TLwwpqnapEmTqteEgW8qZgZGPqbpvkift2x3NcabvQK-8wOcc0KOQgxAyBln7zjj6_ffGGN11a05e6PUW8XqmlXyGVlx1XYVV0ockdVfygtygvirHDmX4pgci7qw2mZFHm4AlzEjjQM1dCpbbyFkSNTGaTbJZH8HFPPiNlsK-nA7QuUiArUwxAzZBGqC20nnf7F7n33BkM4pzj83o7n3SMtkLp7lCqRLcJBuY7EsfDQJihWCzT6Gl-T5YEaEV_v1lPz4fPH9_Gt1df3l8vzTVWVFx3Nl2dBKIQYlgVshW9OtnVpL65zhNRgOYF3fKSjDtu-gB9sooXoxyMY2A1filLze-ZY3_l4As548WhhHEyAuqFtVN0wIdpDIG9k2oq0L8WxPXPoJnJ6Tn0za6H3iBf-ww22KiAkGbX022z_nZPyoOdPbevVTvXrbnVZKP9WrZVE3_6n_-B_SfdzpoIR55yFptKUEC86nkrh20R9weAQPc8Et
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_00006250_200101000_00028
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1445_2197_1998_tb04785_x
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD008726_pub3
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD008726_pub2
crossref_primary_10_1080_21548331_1990_11704116
crossref_primary_10_15406_ipcb_2021_07_00228
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD001136_pub2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsps_2023_101800
Cites_doi 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90483-0
10.1016/0002-9378(81)90699-2
10.1016/0002-9378(86)90497-7
10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493
10.1016/0002-9378(79)90830-5
10.1128/AAC.22.5.859
10.1016/0002-9378(86)90496-5
ContentType Journal Article
Conference Proceeding
Copyright 1988 Reed Publishing USA
Copyright_xml – notice: 1988 Reed Publishing USA
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QL
C1K
7X8
DOI 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1879-1883
Editor Fry, DE
Barza, M
Neu, HC (eds)
Editor_xml – fullname: Barza, M
– fullname: Fry, DE
– fullname: Neu, HC (eds)
EndPage 90
ExternalDocumentID 3287975
10_1016_S0002_9610_88_80220_4
S0002961088802204
Genre Comparative Study
Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Conference
Book
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
123
1B1
1CY
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
23M
3V.
4.4
457
4CK
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
6J9
7-5
71M
7X7
85S
88E
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAWTL
AAXUO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABLJU
ABLVK
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABUWG
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACIUM
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADFRT
ADMUD
AEBSH
AEKER
AENEX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFKRA
AFKWA
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHMBA
AHPSJ
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AJRQY
AJUYK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
AZQEC
BENPR
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CS3
DWQXO
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EMOBN
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
FYUFA
G-2
G-Q
G8K
GBLVA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HEK
HMCUK
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IH2
IHE
J1W
J5H
K-O
KOM
L7B
LCYCR
M1P
M29
M2O
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OJ0
OV0
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
SV3
T5K
TWZ
UHU
UKHRP
UNMZH
UV1
WH7
WOW
WUQ
X7M
XPP
YOC
YQJ
Z5R
ZA5
ZCG
ZGI
ZXP
~G-
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABDPE
ABWVN
ACIEU
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFCTW
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AGRNS
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALIPV
ANKPU
APXCP
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QL
C1K
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c0f7433f84e1c347a96d864cdda12ea1eecdb98ed867b9ebec5838b3f45c5f183
ISSN 0002-9610
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 16:22:48 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 01:35:23 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 23:02:08 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:26 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:17:49 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:33:28 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c391t-c0f7433f84e1c347a96d864cdda12ea1eecdb98ed867b9ebec5838b3f45c5f183
Notes SourceType-Books-1
ObjectType-Book-1
content type line 25
ObjectType-Conference-2
SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-2
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 3287975
PQID 15475372
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_78250330
proquest_miscellaneous_15475372
pubmed_primary_3287975
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_S0002_9610_88_80220_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0002_9610_88_80220_4
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S0002_9610_88_80220_4
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1988-05-31
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1988-05-31
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 1988
  text: 1988-05-31
  day: 31
PublicationDecade 1980
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle The American journal of surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Am J Surg
PublicationYear 1988
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (bib9) 1975; 37
Ayers, Jones, Barry (bib5) 1982; 22
Bauer, Kirby, Sherris, Turck (bib8) 1966; 45
Stiver, Forward, Livingstone (bib2) 1983; 145
Varner, Weiner, Petzold, Galask (bib6) 1986; 154
Moro, Andrews (bib3) 1974; 44
Gall (bib4) 1979; 134
Harger, English (bib1) 1981; 141
McGregor, French, Makowski (bib7) 1986; 154
Ayers (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib5) 1982; 22
Harger (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib1) 1981; 141
Moro (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib3) 1974; 44
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib9) 1975; 37
Stiver (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib2) 1983; 145
McGregor (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib7) 1986; 154
Bauer (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib8) 1966; 45
Varner (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib6) 1986; 154
Gall (10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib4) 1979; 134
References_xml – volume: 22
  start-page: 859
  year: 1982
  end-page: 877
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Cefotetan, a new cephamycin: comparison of in vitro antimicrobial activity with other cephems, beta-lactamase stability, and preliminary recommendations for disk diffusion testing
  publication-title: Antimicrob Agents Chemother
– volume: 141
  start-page: 752
  year: 1981
  end-page: 758
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Selection of patients for antiblotic prophylaxis in cesarean sections
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 154
  start-page: 955
  year: 1986
  end-page: 960
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Single-dose cefotetan versus multidose cefoxitin for prophylaxis in cesarean section in high-risk patients
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 134
  start-page: 506
  year: 1979
  end-page: 511
  ident: bib4
  article-title: The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 154
  start-page: 951
  year: 1986
  end-page: 954
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin as prophylaxis in cesarean section
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 37
  start-page: 20527
  year: 1975
  end-page: 20529
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Standardized disc susceptibility test. Approved standard: ASM-2, performance standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests July 1975
  publication-title: Fed Reg
– volume: 145
  start-page: 158
  year: 1983
  end-page: 163
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Multicenter comparison of cefoxitin versus cefazolin for prevention of infectious morbidity after nonelective cesarean section
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 45
  start-page: 493
  year: 1966
  end-page: 496
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method
  publication-title: Am J Clin Pathol
– volume: 44
  start-page: 668
  year: 1974
  end-page: 692
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 44
  start-page: 668
  year: 1974
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib3
  article-title: Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 145
  start-page: 158
  year: 1983
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib2
  article-title: Multicenter comparison of cefoxitin versus cefazolin for prevention of infectious morbidity after nonelective cesarean section
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90483-0
– volume: 141
  start-page: 752
  year: 1981
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib1
  article-title: Selection of patients for antiblotic prophylaxis in cesarean sections
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90699-2
– volume: 154
  start-page: 955
  year: 1986
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib7
  article-title: Single-dose cefotetan versus multidose cefoxitin for prophylaxis in cesarean section in high-risk patients
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90497-7
– volume: 45
  start-page: 493
  year: 1966
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib8
  article-title: Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method
  publication-title: Am J Clin Pathol
  doi: 10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493
– volume: 37
  start-page: 20527
  year: 1975
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib9
  article-title: Standardized disc susceptibility test. Approved standard: ASM-2, performance standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests July 1975
  publication-title: Fed Reg
– volume: 134
  start-page: 506
  year: 1979
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib4
  article-title: The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90830-5
– volume: 22
  start-page: 859
  year: 1982
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib5
  article-title: Cefotetan, a new cephamycin: comparison of in vitro antimicrobial activity with other cephems, beta-lactamase stability, and preliminary recommendations for disk diffusion testing
  publication-title: Antimicrob Agents Chemother
  doi: 10.1128/AAC.22.5.859
– volume: 154
  start-page: 951
  year: 1986
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4_bib6
  article-title: Comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin as prophylaxis in cesarean section
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90496-5
SSID ssj0001143
Score 1.3784206
Snippet A study to compare the prophylactic efficacy of a single 2 g dose of cefotetan with multiple 2 g doses of cefoxitin in reducing the incidence of postcesarean...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 86
SubjectTerms Adult
Cefotetan
Cefoxitin - administration & dosage
Cefoxitin - therapeutic use
Cephamycins - administration & dosage
Cephamycins - therapeutic use
Cesarean Section
Clinical Trials as Topic
Female
Humans
Pregnancy
Premedication
Random Allocation
Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control
Title Results of a multicenter comparative study of single-dose cefotetan and multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in patients undergoing cesarean section
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80220-4
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3287975
https://www.proquest.com/docview/15475372
https://www.proquest.com/docview/78250330
Volume 155
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Pb9MwFLZKd-EGYhPlpw8ggVBG0ji1c9ymlWkbA5VW7GY5tjNVqlLUpNLEjX-Cv5dnx4lT0aqCS1S5sRP1-_r8bL_vPYTeUEmjSMksiGUYBoQpFWSpGgWSiBQWLYSG9qD9883oYkYub5PbXu9XV11SZcfy51Zdyf-gCm2Aq1HJ_gOy7aDQAJ8BX7gCwnD9G-PtU40XhhTdLBBlR-3sCDHR5XpRR26IOo7QBGbqlQtDrxOAl02OabOFsNCBsuHsOl9WGrxIe9LQhCD67-7n1bwwBWvgFQG1hbif19Hpdc7W0tbaXd0trb5Xl2Jldv9LGwPWUvOT0XNayzzxkrNTXczvbG3wD6e-PPTZ2pZZcgLvsa8O1ok_uXSDqFrgB4i6o_gNG52OXLBrY6PrXL6OjMnJVuNf70N8awcAF52xt8PUqomdlmgj4fbNFz6eXV_z6fnt9AE6GMZAzj46OLmafL9qp3NYMMbNGsqM6mVgH_2j3jH23j1ml4OzawFjHZnpI3ToJZ74a8uox6iniyfot-MIXuZY4A5HcIcj2HLE3NLhCG45goEjeIMjuOUIFiXucARDS8MR7DmCG45gx5FDNBufT88uAle4I5BxGlWBDHNwTOOcER3JmFCRjhQbEamUiIZaRFpLlaVMQyPNUmNGzOF9FuckkUkOk8wR6hfLQj9FWKmISlurODMyasHCOKO5ICSnGbSkA0SaX5tLl9XeFFdZcB--CCBxAxJnjFuQOBmg47bbjzqty74OrIGSO9-09jk5sG9f19cN9BxstzmQE4VerksOyxeaxHS4-w7w302cQThARzVn2reNh4ymNHm2d_Dn6KH_m71A_Wq11i_Bka6yV47qfwA3gc0e
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.title=The+American+journal+of+surgery&rft.atitle=Results+of+a+multicenter+comparative+study+of+single-dose+cefotetan+and+multiple-dose+cefoxitin+as+prophylaxis+in+patients+undergoing+cesarean+section&rft.au=Galask%2C+R+P&rft.au=Benigno%2C+B+B&rft.au=Cunningham%2C+F+G&rft.au=Elliott%2C+J+P&rft.date=1988-05-31&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.volume=155&rft.issue=5A&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0002-9610%2888%2980220-4&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0002-9610&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0002-9610&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0002-9610&client=summon