Examining the effects of perceived social support on momentary mood and symptom reports in asthma and arthritis patients
Objective: Social support has been linked to beneficial effects on health directly (main effect) and as a buffer to stress. Most research, however, has examined these relationships using global and retrospective assessments of health and stress, which may be subject to recall biases. This study used...
Saved in:
Published in | Psychology & health Vol. 29; no. 7; pp. 813 - 831 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Routledge
03.07.2014
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objective: Social support has been linked to beneficial effects on health directly (main effect) and as a buffer to stress. Most research, however, has examined these relationships using global and retrospective assessments of health and stress, which may be subject to recall biases. This study used ambulatory ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods to test the main and stress-buffering effects of social support on the daily health and well-being of asthma and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
Design: Community volunteers with asthma (n = 97) or RA (n = 31) responded to EMA prompts five times daily for one week.
Main outcomes: Baseline perceived social support was obtained, and then, participants reported mood, stress and symptoms using EMA. Multilevel mixed-modelling examined whether social support predicted mood and symptoms directly or via stress-reducing effects.
Results: Supporting a main effect, more perceived social support predicted decreased negative mood and stress severity. Supporting a stress-buffering effect, more perceived social support resulted in fewer reported symptoms when stress was present.
Conclusion: Results suggest perceived social support directly relates to better ambulatory status and dynamically buffers individuals against the negative effects of stressors, and highlight the importance of studying social support across different temporal and contextual levels. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objective: Social support has been linked to beneficial effects on health directly (main effect) and as a buffer to stress. Most research, however, has examined these relationships using global and retrospective assessments of health and stress, which may be subject to recall biases. This study used ambulatory ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods to test the main and stress-buffering effects of social support on the daily health and well-being of asthma and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
Design: Community volunteers with asthma (n = 97) or RA (n = 31) responded to EMA prompts five times daily for one week.
Main outcomes: Baseline perceived social support was obtained, and then, participants reported mood, stress and symptoms using EMA. Multilevel mixed-modelling examined whether social support predicted mood and symptoms directly or via stress-reducing effects.
Results: Supporting a main effect, more perceived social support predicted decreased negative mood and stress severity. Supporting a stress-buffering effect, more perceived social support resulted in fewer reported symptoms when stress was present.
Conclusion: Results suggest perceived social support directly relates to better ambulatory status and dynamically buffers individuals against the negative effects of stressors, and highlight the importance of studying social support across different temporal and contextual levels. Objective: Social support has been linked to beneficial effects on health directly (main effect) and as a buffer to stress. Most research, however, has examined these relationships using global and retrospective assessments of health and stress, which may be subject to recall biases. This study used ambulatory ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods to test the main and stress-buffering effects of social support on the daily health and well-being of asthma and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Design: Community volunteers with asthma (n = 97) or RA (n = 31) responded to EMA prompts five times daily for one week. Main outcomes: Baseline perceived social support was obtained, and then, participants reported mood, stress and symptoms using EMA. Multilevel mixed-modelling examined whether social support predicted mood and symptoms directly or via stress-reducing effects. Results: Supporting a main effect, more perceived social support predicted decreased negative mood and stress severity. Supporting a stress-buffering effect, more perceived social support resulted in fewer reported symptoms when stress was present. Conclusion: Results suggest perceived social support directly relates to better ambulatory status and dynamically buffers individuals against the negative effects of stressors, and highlight the importance of studying social support across different temporal and contextual levels. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Social support has been linked to beneficial effects on health directly (main effect) and as a buffer to stress. Most research, however, has examined these relationships using global and retrospective assessments of health and stress, which may be subject to recall biases. This study used ambulatory ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods to test the main and stress-buffering effects of social support on the daily health and well-being of asthma and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.OBJECTIVESocial support has been linked to beneficial effects on health directly (main effect) and as a buffer to stress. Most research, however, has examined these relationships using global and retrospective assessments of health and stress, which may be subject to recall biases. This study used ambulatory ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods to test the main and stress-buffering effects of social support on the daily health and well-being of asthma and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Community volunteers with asthma (n = 97) or RA (n = 31) responded to EMA prompts five times daily for one week.DESIGNCommunity volunteers with asthma (n = 97) or RA (n = 31) responded to EMA prompts five times daily for one week.Baseline perceived social support was obtained, and then, participants reported mood, stress and symptoms using EMA. Multilevel mixed-modelling examined whether social support predicted mood and symptoms directly or via stress-reducing effects.MAIN OUTCOMESBaseline perceived social support was obtained, and then, participants reported mood, stress and symptoms using EMA. Multilevel mixed-modelling examined whether social support predicted mood and symptoms directly or via stress-reducing effects.Supporting a main effect, more perceived social support predicted decreased negative mood and stress severity. Supporting a stress-buffering effect, more perceived social support resulted in fewer reported symptoms when stress was present.RESULTSSupporting a main effect, more perceived social support predicted decreased negative mood and stress severity. Supporting a stress-buffering effect, more perceived social support resulted in fewer reported symptoms when stress was present.Results suggest perceived social support directly relates to better ambulatory status and dynamically buffers individuals against the negative effects of stressors, and highlight the importance of studying social support across different temporal and contextual levels.CONCLUSIONResults suggest perceived social support directly relates to better ambulatory status and dynamically buffers individuals against the negative effects of stressors, and highlight the importance of studying social support across different temporal and contextual levels. Social support has been linked to beneficial effects on health directly (main effect) and as a buffer to stress. Most research, however, has examined these relationships using global and retrospective assessments of health and stress, which may be subject to recall biases. This study used ambulatory ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods to test the main and stress-buffering effects of social support on the daily health and well-being of asthma and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Community volunteers with asthma (n = 97) or RA (n = 31) responded to EMA prompts five times daily for one week. Baseline perceived social support was obtained, and then, participants reported mood, stress and symptoms using EMA. Multilevel mixed-modelling examined whether social support predicted mood and symptoms directly or via stress-reducing effects. Supporting a main effect, more perceived social support predicted decreased negative mood and stress severity. Supporting a stress-buffering effect, more perceived social support resulted in fewer reported symptoms when stress was present. Results suggest perceived social support directly relates to better ambulatory status and dynamically buffers individuals against the negative effects of stressors, and highlight the importance of studying social support across different temporal and contextual levels. |
Author | Smyth, Joshua M. Santuzzi, Alecia M. Zawadzki, Matthew J. Filipkowski, Kelly B. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Joshua M. surname: Smyth fullname: Smyth, Joshua M. email: jms1187@psu.edu organization: Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University – sequence: 2 givenname: Matthew J. surname: Zawadzki fullname: Zawadzki, Matthew J. organization: Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University – sequence: 3 givenname: Alecia M. surname: Santuzzi fullname: Santuzzi, Alecia M. organization: Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University – sequence: 4 givenname: Kelly B. surname: Filipkowski fullname: Filipkowski, Kelly B. organization: Department of Psychology, Misericordia University |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24568534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1URKcDb4CQJTZsMvhvEocNQlX5kSqxgbXlONeMq9gOtgOdt8dhOpsuYGVL9_uO7Huu0EWIARB6ScmOEkneEik7IkS7Y4SKnZQ95f0TtKGiaxvJGb1AmxVpVuYSXeV8RwhhQpBn6JKJfSv3XGzQ_c299i648AOXA2CwFkzJOFo8QzLgfsGIczROTzgv8xxTwTFgHz2EotOx3uKIdajQ0c8lepxghTJ2AetcDl7_nepUDskVl_Gsi6tufo6eWj1lePFwbtH3jzffrj83t18_fbn-cNsY3tPSdDBYQ-wgtOkEAOu4ZkYODEDzUUorWxhkP9h-JFwPdWYH0rUdWNKxUYwD36I3p9w5xZ8L5KK8ywamSQeIS1Z0zwgXQtTkLXr9CL2LSwr1dZWivex527NKvXqglsHDqObkfN2EOu-0Au9OgEkx5wRWGVfqr2MoSbtJUaLWAtW5QLUWqE4FVlk8ks_5_9HenzQXbExe_45pGlXRxykmm3QwLiv-z4Q_IzO0AQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_17547_kjsr_2020_28_4_269 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10865_018_00008_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10880_024_10046_0 crossref_primary_10_1002_jts_22324 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00296_017_3651_3 crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsaa034 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejon_2023_102496 crossref_primary_10_1177_0193945920957229 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13690_020_00476_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12160_015_9747_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12160_015_9723_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2016_03_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychsport_2018_04_009 crossref_primary_10_1080_13548506_2021_1946104 crossref_primary_10_20473_mkp_V37I22024_126_138 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_970336 crossref_primary_10_1177_0265407517691366 crossref_primary_10_2196_11398 crossref_primary_10_2196_39887 crossref_primary_10_1177_1073191118799460 crossref_primary_10_1093_geronb_gbac081 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10865_016_9790_2 crossref_primary_10_2196_53857 crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2017_1280545 crossref_primary_10_1177_02654075231185043 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41398_022_01799_z crossref_primary_10_1186_s40410_023_00208_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpain_2018_01_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpain_2020_10_002 crossref_primary_10_1080_10615806_2015_1134785 |
Cites_doi | 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.629 10.1081/CBI-120015956 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.023 10.3200/JACH.53.6.276-284 10.1097/00006842-199201000-00010 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.006 10.1002/art.1790100306 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144141c 10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.486 10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.198 10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181d2f0f1 10.1177/0265407509105522 10.1016/S0306-4530(98)00008-0 10.1177/135910530100600202 10.1037/a0018234 10.1007/BF00911821 10.1097/00006842-200001000-00009 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1020 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00036-6 10.1136/jech-2011-200278 10.12987/yale/9780300102185.001.0001 10.1177/1090198102251030 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00167-0 10.1023/A:1018787500151 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01781.x 10.1037/0278-6133.23.3.267 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x 10.1007/s12160-009-9153-0 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.06.013 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.110 10.1016/j.pain.2012.01.001 10.1001/jama.1979.03290420026019 10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_10 10.1037/0278-6133.19.3.274 10.1037/11589-000 10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.488 10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.258 10.1300/J013v39n01_06 10.1348/135910709X466063 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4 10.1080/14768320500098699 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199804)21:2 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 10.1007/s11199-011-0008-3 10.1037/0278-6133.9.3.266 10.1023/A:1023657221954 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014 2014 Taylor & Francis |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014 – notice: 2014 Taylor & Francis |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1080/08870446.2014.889139 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Psychology |
EISSN | 1476-8321 |
EndPage | 831 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3289175011 24568534 10_1080_08870446_2014_889139 889139 |
Genre | Article Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Feature |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NHLBI NIH HHS grantid: R01-HL067990 |
GroupedDBID | --- .7I .QK 04C 0BK 0R~ 123 29P 36B 4.4 5VS 6PF AAGZJ AAMFJ AAMIU AAPUL AATTQ AAWTL AAZMC ABCCY ABDBF ABFIM ABIVO ABJNI ABLIJ ABPEM ABRYG ABTAI ABXUL ABXYU ABZLS ACGEJ ACGFS ACHQT ACTIO ACTOA ACUHS ADAHI ADBBV ADCVX ADKVQ ADOJX ADXPE AECIN AEISY AEKEX AEOZL AEPSL AEYOC AEZRU AFHDM AGDLA AGMYJ AGRBW AHDZW AIJEM AJWEG AKBVH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AVBZW AWYRJ BEJHT BLEHA BMOTO BMSDO BOHLJ CCCUG CQ1 CS3 DGFLZ DKSSO DU5 DXH EAP EAS EBD EBS ECF ECT EHN EIHBH EJD EMK ENB ENC ENX EPL EPS EPT ESX E~B E~C F5P FEDTE FXNIP GTTXZ H13 HF~ HVGLF HZ~ IPNFZ KSSTO KYCEM M4Z NA5 NW- O9- PQQKQ Q~Q RIG RNANH ROSJB RSYQP S-F STATR TBQAZ TDBHL TEH TFH TFL TFW TN5 TNTFI TRJHH TUROJ TWZ UT5 UT9 VAE WQ9 YNT ~01 ~S~ AAGDL AAHIA AAYXX ADYSH AEFOU AFRVT AIYEW AMPGV CITATION .GJ 07M 1TA 4B3 53G AANPH ABVXC ABWZE ACIKQ ACPKE ACRBO ADEWX ADIUE ADXAZ AEXSR AIXGP ALLRG B0M C5A CAG CBZAQ CGR CKOZC COF CUY CVF C~T DGXZK ECM EFRLQ EGDCR EIF JLMOS L7Y LJTGL NPM OHT OVD QZZOY RBICI TASJS TBH TEORI UA1 UAP YYP 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-7ebfc0fb4ac74ee273a2c8b2eea3d88f86eb89bf9d03aba2cfb0767ef072d4db3 |
ISSN | 0887-0446 1476-8321 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 02:34:21 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 14 08:16:45 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:04:12 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:08:13 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:15:50 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 25 09:05:31 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Keywords | social support stress asthma arthritis ecological momentary assessment |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c391t-7ebfc0fb4ac74ee273a2c8b2eea3d88f86eb89bf9d03aba2cfb0767ef072d4db3 |
Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 24568534 |
PQID | 1519893692 |
PQPubID | 105361 |
PageCount | 19 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1520344427 crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_08870446_2014_889139 proquest_journals_1519893692 crossref_primary_10_1080_08870446_2014_889139 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_08870446_2014_889139 pubmed_primary_24568534 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2014-07-03 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-07-03 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2014 text: 2014-07-03 day: 03 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Psychology & health |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Psychol Health |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | Routledge Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Routledge – name: Taylor & Francis Ltd |
References | CIT0030 CIT0032 CIT0031 CIT0034 CIT0033 CIT0036 CIT0038 CIT0037 CIT0039 CIT0040 CIT0043 CIT0001 CIT0045 CIT0044 CIT0003 CIT0047 CIT0002 CIT0046 CIT0005 CIT0049 CIT0004 CIT0048 CIT0007 CIT0006 CIT0009 CIT0008 CIT0050 CIT0052 CIT0051 CIT0010 CIT0012 CIT0011 Smyth J. M. (CIT0035) 2012 CIT0014 CIT0013 CIT0016 CIT0015 CIT0018 CIT0017 CIT0019 CIT0020 CIT0023 CIT0022 Snijders T. (CIT0041) 1999 Lazarus R. S. (CIT0021) 1984 CIT0025 CIT0024 CIT0027 CIT0026 Spitzer S. B. (CIT0042) 1992; 54 CIT0029 CIT0028 |
References_xml | – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 – ident: CIT0040 doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.629 – ident: CIT0027 doi: 10.1081/CBI-120015956 – ident: CIT0047 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.023 – ident: CIT0016 doi: 10.3200/JACH.53.6.276-284 – volume: 54 start-page: 79 year: 1992 ident: CIT0042 publication-title: Psychosomatic Medicine doi: 10.1097/00006842-199201000-00010 – ident: CIT0018 doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.006 – ident: CIT0043 doi: 10.1002/art.1790100306 – ident: CIT0033 doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144141c – ident: CIT0009 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.486 – ident: CIT0030 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.198 – ident: CIT0029 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934 – ident: CIT0023 doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181d2f0f1 – ident: CIT0028 doi: 10.1177/0265407509105522 – ident: CIT0037 doi: 10.1016/S0306-4530(98)00008-0 – ident: CIT0036 doi: 10.1177/135910530100600202 – ident: CIT0005 doi: 10.1037/a0018234 – ident: CIT0049 doi: 10.1007/BF00911821 – ident: CIT0001 doi: 10.1097/00006842-200001000-00009 – ident: CIT0050 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1020 – ident: CIT0011 doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00036-6 – ident: CIT0010 doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200278 – ident: CIT0045 doi: 10.12987/yale/9780300102185.001.0001 – ident: CIT0012 doi: 10.1177/1090198102251030 – ident: CIT0002 doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00167-0 – ident: CIT0038 doi: 10.1023/A:1018787500151 – ident: CIT0044 doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01781.x – ident: CIT0013 doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.3.267 – ident: CIT0025 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x – start-page: 569 volume-title: Handbook of research methods for studying daily life year: 2012 ident: CIT0035 – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9153-0 – ident: CIT0034 doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.06.013 – ident: CIT0046 doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x – ident: CIT0031 doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.110 – ident: CIT0032 doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.01.001 – ident: CIT0022 doi: 10.1001/jama.1979.03290420026019 – ident: CIT0004 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_10 – ident: CIT0015 doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.3.274 – ident: CIT0024 doi: 10.1037/11589-000 – ident: CIT0048 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.488 – ident: CIT0052 doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.258 – ident: CIT0019 doi: 10.1300/J013v39n01_06 – volume-title: Multilevel analyses: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling year: 1999 ident: CIT0041 – ident: CIT0017 doi: 10.1348/135910709X466063 – volume-title: Stress, appraisal, and coping year: 1984 ident: CIT0021 – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4 – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.1080/14768320500098699 – ident: CIT0020 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199804)21:2 – ident: CIT0051 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 – ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0008-3 – ident: CIT0014 doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.9.3.266 – ident: CIT0039 doi: 10.1023/A:1023657221954 |
SSID | ssj0002440 |
Score | 2.2379587 |
Snippet | Objective: Social support has been linked to beneficial effects on health directly (main effect) and as a buffer to stress. Most research, however, has... Social support has been linked to beneficial effects on health directly (main effect) and as a buffer to stress. Most research, however, has examined these... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref informaworld |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 813 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Affect Arthritis Arthritis, Rheumatoid - complications Arthritis, Rheumatoid - psychology Asthma Asthma - complications Asthma - psychology ecological momentary assessment Female Humans Male Middle Aged Perception Retrospective Studies Self Report Severity of Illness Index Social Support Stress Stress, Psychological - prevention & control |
Title | Examining the effects of perceived social support on momentary mood and symptom reports in asthma and arthritis patients |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08870446.2014.889139 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24568534 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1519893692 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1520344427 |
Volume | 29 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9owFLYQfenLtPvYusmT9lZlysXk8thuoGrruheQ0F4iO3EEGkkQJGrh9-2H7ZzYMWHtustLFMWJCXwfx5_tcyHknYiYk3FQbl6QCov5NtjBYYbV3KNE2iJKh40z5pcr_2LKPs2Gs17vR8drqa7E-2R3Z1zJ_6AK1wBXjJL9B2RNp3ABzgFfOALCcPwrjEc3PG8KPPzqmrFCdxWwY2ZNfFOvUGjj1kBeNv7i6y2clU2i1tPNNl9VZW42EBbFKd9U85yrVK7rat6kPmqTsG66itZYUOV6o-IqD5ZO9UbDvOb7pddv_JqnO1UyW5cc72xQAdr1brfQATjwBfYPjnH953t5rcttf5bL5VZXjtZrFw5r_Fw9w7bJrTIiHV-m1gLijrMarJSFZoFvYXmlrgnXiyaKqkHHHocq0PXWOKEdK6F_7B49_BiQC1Ok7sfF1hfg6ms8nl5expPRbHLYqmQATFlBg9kYYH7kwmTF7ZOjs_OP52OjCEBC2W3GWfy8NoQTc7zf8QoHEukgge7vp0GNHJo8JA_0PIaeKVI-Ij1ZPCbHezI8ITeGnRTgpZqdtMyoYSdV7KSanbQsqGEnRXZS4B_V7KSanXRRUMXOptWwk7bsfEqm49Hkw4Wl63xYiRc5lRVIkSV2JhhPAiYlCGruJqFwpeReGoZZ6EsRRiKLUtvjAtoyYQd-IDM7cFOWCu8Z6RdlIV8QKoaC45TeCxIX6-gIEYGRcnzbSQMQ3sMB8dqfNk50EnysxbKMnTZXrgYkRkBiBciAWOaplUoC84f7wy5qcdXwPFMUj737Hz1pEY61pdnEoMqjECtvugPy1jTDOICbe7yQZY33uJi9k7nBgDxXzDDvis4NIMvZy_s7f0WO93_SE9Kv1rV8DZK7Em80o38CMA_WsQ |
linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Nb9QwELWgPdALlO-lBYzENSUbO-v4WKFWobQ9oK3EzbJjW0WQZNVkpS6_nhnHiWilggS3SI4jf4zHz56XN4S8N5LPvQbkxoQ1CV-k4Adzj9ncZeVSI20eyJhn54vygp98zUc2YRdplXiG9oNQRPDVuLjxMnqkxH3AlYGBSGRmcZhqlLa8T7ZzyRmcv7aXX07KcnLHsH-lo9wnVhr_n7vjOzf2pxvqpXdj0LAXHT8iZuzFQEH5frDuzUH185bA4391c5c8jEiVHg6m9Zjcc80TsjM5zM1Tcn10reuQYIICjKSRGkJbT1dIlwE_aulwJ0-79QqBPm0bWreBr361gafWUmge7Tb1qm9rGgMY9FtDdddf1jqUgnFfBuklGkVgu2fk4vho-bFMYiaHpGJy3ifCGV-l3nBdCe4cQCadVYXJnNPMFoUvFs4U0nhpU6YNlHmTioVwPhWZ5daw52SraRv3klCTG42HNiaqDDOlGCPBDOdwrrQCoFU-I2ycP1VFmXPMtvFDzUc11DisCodVDcM6I8lUazXIfPzl_eJ301B9uF7xQy4Uxf5cdX80IxX9RacAd8kCcytmM_JuKoaVjuEb3bh2je9kqM_IMzEjLwbzm9qK4WsAXvzVv7frLXlQLs9O1emn8897ZAdLAi2Z7ZOt_mrtXgP46s2buLx-AY7ZI9s |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9UwFA-6gexlzs9d3TSCr529Tdq0j6K7XKcOkQ32FpImYaL9YO2FXf96z0nTsg3mQN8KSUo-Tk5-SX75HULe6oLPnQLkxoTREc9i8IOpw2juRWljXZjUkzG_HmfLU350lp5decWPtErcQ7tBKML7apzcrXEjI-4dTgy8h0RiFoeRRmXL-2Qzg-UIbHzz5PvRcjl5Y1i-4lHtEwuNz-du-c-15emaeOntENQvRYuHRI2NGBgoPw9WvT4of9_Qd_yfVu6Q7YBT6fvBsB6Re7Z-TLYmd7l-Qi4PL1Xlw0tQAJE0EENo42iLZBnwooYOJ_K0W7UI82lT06rxbPWLNXw1hkLtaLeu2r6paLi-oD9qqrr-vFI-FUz73Asv0SAB2z0lp4vDkw_LKMRxiEpWzPtIWO3K2GmuSsGtBcCkkjLXibWKmTx3eWZ1XmhXmJgpDWlOxyIT1sUiMdxo9oxs1E1tdwnVqVa4ZWOiTDBOitYFGOEcdpVGALBKZ4SNwyfLIHKOsTZ-yfmohRq6VWK3yqFbZySaSrWDyMcd-fOrliF7f7jihkgokv296N5oRTJ4i04C6ipyjKyYzMibKRnmOV7eqNo2K8yToDojT8SMPB-sb6orXl4D7OIv_r1er8mDbx8X8sun488vyRYmeE4y2yMb_cXK7gPy6vWrMLn-ANkUIn8 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining+the+effects+of+perceived+social+support+on+momentary+mood+and+symptom+reports+in+asthma+and+arthritis+patients&rft.jtitle=Psychology+%26+health&rft.au=Smyth%2C+Joshua+M&rft.au=Zawadzki%2C+Matthew+J&rft.au=Santuzzi%2C+Alecia+M&rft.au=Filipkowski%2C+Kelly+B&rft.date=2014-07-03&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis+Ltd&rft.issn=0887-0446&rft.eissn=1476-8321&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F08870446.2014.889139&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=3289175011 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0887-0446&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0887-0446&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0887-0446&client=summon |