Clinical features and outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy in patients with retained lens fragments

To investigate the clinical features, visual acuity outcomes, and adverse events in patients with retained lens fragments managed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Retrospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series. Medical records of all patients who underwent PPV for retained lens fragments at B...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOphthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Vol. 110; no. 8; pp. 1567 - 1572
Main Authors Scott, Ingrid U, Flynn, Harry W, Smiddy, William E, Murray, Timothy G, Moore, Jeffrey K, Lemus, Dagmar R, Feuer, William J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.08.2003
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To investigate the clinical features, visual acuity outcomes, and adverse events in patients with retained lens fragments managed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Retrospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series. Medical records of all patients who underwent PPV for retained lens fragments at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute during the 12-year interval between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2001, were reviewed. The study included 343 eyes of 343 patients, with a median age of 76 years and a median follow-up after PPV of 8 months. The median interval between cataract surgery and PPV was 12 days. Visual acuity was ≥20/40 in 29 (9%) patients preoperatively and 190 (56%) at last follow-up ( P < 0.001). Visual acuity was ≤20/200 in 224 (66%) patients preoperatively and 67 (20%) at last follow-up ( P < 0.001). An intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥30 mmHg was present in 87 (25%) eyes preoperatively and 7 (2%) at last follow-up ( P < 0.001); the number of patients on antiglaucoma medications at these two time points was 135 (40%) and 96 (29%), respectively ( P = 0.001). Among the 148 (44%) patients with final vision <20/40, the primary cause of visual impairment was cystoid macular edema (CME) in 41 (29%), preexisting ocular disease in 34 (24%), corneal edema in 22 (15%), history of retinal detachment (RD) in 19 (13%), epiretinal membrane in 6 (4%), and other causes in 21 (15%). Significant predictors of better final visual acuity include better presenting visual acuity ( P < 0.001), presence of an intraocular lens (i.e., no aphakia) before PPV ( P = 0.026), no suprachoroidal hemorrhage ( P = 0.010), no serous choroidal detachment ( P = 0.037), no RD ( P = 0.005), no CME ( P = 0.038), and no additional surgery after the PPV ( P < 0.001). Timing of PPV (i.e., ≤1 week versus >1 to ≤4 weeks versus >4 to ≤12 weeks versus >12 weeks between cataract surgery and PPV) was not significantly associated with final visual acuity or IOP outcome; there was also no significant difference in acuity or IOP outcome between patients who underwent PPV on the same day as cataract surgery compared with all other patients. The most important predictor of final visual acuity after PPV for retained lens fragments is a less complicated clinical course (e.g., no suprachoroidal hemorrhage, no RD, no CME, and no additional surgery after PPV). The most common cause of decreased final vision was CME.
AbstractList To investigate the clinical features, visual acuity outcomes, and adverse events in patients with retained lens fragments managed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Retrospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series. Medical records of all patients who underwent PPV for retained lens fragments at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute during the 12-year interval between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2001, were reviewed. The study included 343 eyes of 343 patients, with a median age of 76 years and a median follow-up after PPV of 8 months. The median interval between cataract surgery and PPV was 12 days. Visual acuity was >or=20/40 in 29 (9%) patients preoperatively and 190 (56%) at last follow-up (P < 0.001). Visual acuity was <or=20/200 in 224 (66%) patients preoperatively and 67 (20%) at last follow-up (P < 0.001). An intraocular pressure (IOP) >or=30 mmHg was present in 87 (25%) eyes preoperatively and 7 (2%) at last follow-up (P < 0.001); the number of patients on antiglaucoma medications at these two time points was 135 (40%) and 96 (29%), respectively (P = 0.001). Among the 148 (44%) patients with final vision <20/40, the primary cause of visual impairment was cystoid macular edema (CME) in 41 (29%), preexisting ocular disease in 34 (24%), corneal edema in 22 (15%), history of retinal detachment (RD) in 19 (13%), epiretinal membrane in 6 (4%), and other causes in 21 (15%). Significant predictors of better final visual acuity include better presenting visual acuity (P < 0.001), presence of an intraocular lens (i.e., no aphakia) before PPV (P = 0.026), no suprachoroidal hemorrhage (P = 0.010), no serous choroidal detachment (P = 0.037), no RD (P = 0.005), no CME (P = 0.038), and no additional surgery after the PPV (P < 0.001). Timing of PPV (i.e., <or=1 week versus >1 to <or=4 weeks versus >4 to <or=12 weeks versus >12 weeks between cataract surgery and PPV) was not significantly associated with final visual acuity or IOP outcome; there was also no significant difference in acuity or IOP outcome between patients who underwent PPV on the same day as cataract surgery compared with all other patients. The most important predictor of final visual acuity after PPV for retained lens fragments is a less complicated clinical course (e.g., no suprachoroidal hemorrhage, no RD, no CME, and no additional surgery after PPV). The most common cause of decreased final vision was CME.
To investigate the clinical features, visual acuity outcomes, and adverse events in patients with retained lens fragments managed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Retrospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series. Medical records of all patients who underwent PPV for retained lens fragments at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute during the 12-year interval between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2001, were reviewed. The study included 343 eyes of 343 patients, with a median age of 76 years and a median follow-up after PPV of 8 months. The median interval between cataract surgery and PPV was 12 days. Visual acuity was ≥20/40 in 29 (9%) patients preoperatively and 190 (56%) at last follow-up ( P < 0.001). Visual acuity was ≤20/200 in 224 (66%) patients preoperatively and 67 (20%) at last follow-up ( P < 0.001). An intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥30 mmHg was present in 87 (25%) eyes preoperatively and 7 (2%) at last follow-up ( P < 0.001); the number of patients on antiglaucoma medications at these two time points was 135 (40%) and 96 (29%), respectively ( P = 0.001). Among the 148 (44%) patients with final vision <20/40, the primary cause of visual impairment was cystoid macular edema (CME) in 41 (29%), preexisting ocular disease in 34 (24%), corneal edema in 22 (15%), history of retinal detachment (RD) in 19 (13%), epiretinal membrane in 6 (4%), and other causes in 21 (15%). Significant predictors of better final visual acuity include better presenting visual acuity ( P < 0.001), presence of an intraocular lens (i.e., no aphakia) before PPV ( P = 0.026), no suprachoroidal hemorrhage ( P = 0.010), no serous choroidal detachment ( P = 0.037), no RD ( P = 0.005), no CME ( P = 0.038), and no additional surgery after the PPV ( P < 0.001). Timing of PPV (i.e., ≤1 week versus >1 to ≤4 weeks versus >4 to ≤12 weeks versus >12 weeks between cataract surgery and PPV) was not significantly associated with final visual acuity or IOP outcome; there was also no significant difference in acuity or IOP outcome between patients who underwent PPV on the same day as cataract surgery compared with all other patients. The most important predictor of final visual acuity after PPV for retained lens fragments is a less complicated clinical course (e.g., no suprachoroidal hemorrhage, no RD, no CME, and no additional surgery after PPV). The most common cause of decreased final vision was CME.
PURPOSETo investigate the clinical features, visual acuity outcomes, and adverse events in patients with retained lens fragments managed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).DESIGNRetrospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series.METHODSMedical records of all patients who underwent PPV for retained lens fragments at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute during the 12-year interval between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2001, were reviewed.RESULTSThe study included 343 eyes of 343 patients, with a median age of 76 years and a median follow-up after PPV of 8 months. The median interval between cataract surgery and PPV was 12 days. Visual acuity was >or=20/40 in 29 (9%) patients preoperatively and 190 (56%) at last follow-up (P < 0.001). Visual acuity was <or=20/200 in 224 (66%) patients preoperatively and 67 (20%) at last follow-up (P < 0.001). An intraocular pressure (IOP) >or=30 mmHg was present in 87 (25%) eyes preoperatively and 7 (2%) at last follow-up (P < 0.001); the number of patients on antiglaucoma medications at these two time points was 135 (40%) and 96 (29%), respectively (P = 0.001). Among the 148 (44%) patients with final vision <20/40, the primary cause of visual impairment was cystoid macular edema (CME) in 41 (29%), preexisting ocular disease in 34 (24%), corneal edema in 22 (15%), history of retinal detachment (RD) in 19 (13%), epiretinal membrane in 6 (4%), and other causes in 21 (15%). Significant predictors of better final visual acuity include better presenting visual acuity (P < 0.001), presence of an intraocular lens (i.e., no aphakia) before PPV (P = 0.026), no suprachoroidal hemorrhage (P = 0.010), no serous choroidal detachment (P = 0.037), no RD (P = 0.005), no CME (P = 0.038), and no additional surgery after the PPV (P < 0.001). Timing of PPV (i.e., <or=1 week versus >1 to <or=4 weeks versus >4 to <or=12 weeks versus >12 weeks between cataract surgery and PPV) was not significantly associated with final visual acuity or IOP outcome; there was also no significant difference in acuity or IOP outcome between patients who underwent PPV on the same day as cataract surgery compared with all other patients.CONCLUSIONSThe most important predictor of final visual acuity after PPV for retained lens fragments is a less complicated clinical course (e.g., no suprachoroidal hemorrhage, no RD, no CME, and no additional surgery after PPV). The most common cause of decreased final vision was CME.
Author Scott, Ingrid U
Flynn, Harry W
Murray, Timothy G
Lemus, Dagmar R
Moore, Jeffrey K
Smiddy, William E
Feuer, William J
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ingrid U
  surname: Scott
  fullname: Scott, Ingrid U
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Harry W
  surname: Flynn
  fullname: Flynn, Harry W
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: William E
  surname: Smiddy
  fullname: Smiddy, William E
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Timothy G
  surname: Murray
  fullname: Murray, Timothy G
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jeffrey K
  surname: Moore
  fullname: Moore, Jeffrey K
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Dagmar R
  surname: Lemus
  fullname: Lemus, Dagmar R
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
– sequence: 7
  givenname: William J
  surname: Feuer
  fullname: Feuer, William J
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15034989$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12917174$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkE1v3CAQQFGUKtls-hNScWmUHtyCwWBOUbRKP6RIPbQ5UwzjlMqGLeBU-fdls6vm2MuMRvNmGN4ZOg4xAEIXlLynhIoP32qgjeAtuSLsHSG87xt2hFa046rhkrJjtPqHnKKznH8RQoRg_ASd0lZRSSVfoR-byQdvzYRHMGVJkLEJDsel2DjXIo54a1LG28kEgx99SWBLnJ-wD7VRPISS8R9ffuIExfgADk8QMh6TeZh3zXP0ajRThteHvEb3H2-_bz43d18_fdnc3DWWKVoa2UknoHN0VGokY6-YMc6ZTnBhh5ZJQiwbFKOtdUopM3Cj1CAr3ktBekPYGl3u925T_L1ALnr22cJU74a4ZC1ZJ1rK2gp2e9CmmHOCUW-Tn0160pTonVr9rFbvvGnC9LNazercm8MDyzCDe5k6uKzA2wNgchVaDQTr8wvXEcZV_dgaXe85qDoePSSdbfVowfmdXO2i_88pfwFjkJg-
CODEN OPHTDG
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfo_2010_09_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2007_05_027
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2020_05_028
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2006_04_019
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0b013e31825a89c3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfo_2020_08_039
crossref_primary_10_5005_hoo_10101_41605
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_eye_6701708
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0000000000002405
crossref_primary_10_14260_jemds_2015_834
crossref_primary_10_1155_2013_971758
crossref_primary_10_1159_000434732
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2013_04_038
crossref_primary_10_1177_112067211002000115
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2006_10_034
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1444_0938_2010_00503_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_013_2293_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2013_12_025
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0b013e3182453309
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2008_10_026
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0b013e31820c8402
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_22_01839_6
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0000000000003476
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0b013e3182576d46
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_008_0879_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jamcollsurg_2005_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_017_0719_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2007_06_036
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2008_12_030
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S239100
crossref_primary_10_1097_00145756_200312000_00002
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1444_0938_2010_00516_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_17469899_2023_2281447
crossref_primary_10_3341_jkos_2012_53_1_68
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0b013e3181ff0d5a
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sjopt_2014_01_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0b013e3181cd47d5
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICU_0b013e3283436fc5
crossref_primary_10_1586_17469899_2_4_645
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0000000000001197
crossref_primary_10_1097_IIO_0000000000000322
crossref_primary_10_3928_23258160_20171130_08
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S391795
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12020436
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0000000000003971
crossref_primary_10_5301_EJO_2011_6483
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0000000000000214
crossref_primary_10_1097_IAE_0b013e3181c70111
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2011_02_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2007_07_037
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_023_02668_9
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74492-7
10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80313-0
10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01079-3
10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31805-6
10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80524-X
10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30577-0
10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30651-9
10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00020-4
10.1016/S0161-6420(78)35685-2
10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30232-2
10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00750-7
10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01223-8
10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30120-1
10.1016/S0161-6420(92)32003-2
10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76854-0
10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31094-3
10.3109/08820539309060216
10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31814-7
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2003 American Academy of Ophthalmology
2003 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2003 American Academy of Ophthalmology
– notice: 2003 INIST-CNRS
DBID IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3
DatabaseName Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1549-4713
EndPage 1572
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_S0161_6420_03_00488_3
12917174
15034989
S0161642003004883
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
0R~
123
1B1
1P~
1~5
29N
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIAV
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAXUO
ABCQX
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABOCM
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACNCT
ADMUD
ADPAM
AEFWE
AENEX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGZHU
AHPSJ
AITUG
AJUYK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALXNB
AMRAJ
BELOY
C5W
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
L7B
M27
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
NQ-
O9-
OF-
OPF
OQ~
P2P
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SDG
SEL
SES
SSZ
UHS
UNMZH
UV1
WH7
X7M
XH2
XPP
Z5R
ZA5
ZGI
ZXP
08R
AAUGY
ABPTK
IQODW
AFJKZ
AKRWK
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-757d6e5d1f99f0f893aadda5646cb23700c3b9312cd999ab4a99b7d1f87608a03
ISSN 0161-6420
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 10:15:09 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 26 18:54:13 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:39:25 EDT 2024
Sun Oct 22 16:09:28 EDT 2023
Fri Feb 23 02:26:56 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Keywords Human
Postoperative
Pars plana
Prognosis
Surgery
Visual acuity
Patient
Vitrectomy
Lens
Fragment
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c391t-757d6e5d1f99f0f893aadda5646cb23700c3b9312cd999ab4a99b7d1f87608a03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 12917174
PQID 73562132
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_73562132
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0161_6420_03_00488_3
pubmed_primary_12917174
pascalfrancis_primary_15034989
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S0161_6420_03_00488_3
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2003-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2003-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2003
  text: 2003-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace New York, NY
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York, NY
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
PublicationTitleAlternate Ophthalmology
PublicationYear 2003
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Elsevier
References Hutton, Snyder, Vaiser (BIB3) 1978; 85
Hansson, Larsson (BIB15) 2002; 28
Pande, Dabbs (BIB2) 1996; 22
Irvine, Flynn, Murray, Rubsamen (BIB18) 1992; 114
Fastenberg, Schwartz, Shakin, Golub (BIB4) 1991; 112
Lambrou, Steward (BIB7) 1992; 99
Leaming (BIB1) 1995; 21
Ross (BIB11) 1993; 28
Smiddy, Flynn (BIB8) 1993; 8
Rossetti, Doro (BIB16) 2002; 28
Kim, Flynn, Smiddy (BIB9) 1994; 101
Borne, Tasman, Regillo (BIB12) 1996; 103
Margherio, Margherio, Pendergast (BIB13) 1997; 104
Blodi, Flynn, Blodi (BIB5) 1992; 99
Vilar, Flynn, Smiddy (BIB10) 1997; 104
Kim, Flynn, Rubsamen (BIB19) 1996; 103
al-Khaier, Wong, Lois (BIB14) 2001; 27
Moore JK, Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, et al. Retinal detachment in eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for removal of retained lens fragments. Ophthalmology 2003;110:709–13
Gilliland, Hutton, Fuller (BIB6) 1992; 99
Irvine (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB18) 1992; 114
Hansson (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB15) 2002; 28
Pande (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB2) 1996; 22
Gilliland (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB6) 1992; 99
Borne (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB12) 1996; 103
Hutton (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB3) 1978; 85
Vilar (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB10) 1997; 104
10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB17
Smiddy (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB8) 1993; 8
al-Khaier (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB14) 2001; 27
Blodi (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB5) 1992; 99
Rossetti (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB16) 2002; 28
Margherio (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB13) 1997; 104
Kim (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB19) 1996; 103
Fastenberg (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB4) 1991; 112
Lambrou (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB7) 1992; 99
Leaming (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB1) 1995; 21
Kim (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB9) 1994; 101
Ross (10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB11) 1993; 28
References_xml – volume: 27
  start-page: 1199
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1206
  ident: BIB14
  article-title: Determinants of visual outcome after pars plana vitrectomy for posteriorly dislocated lens fragments in phacoemulsification
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Lois
– volume: 104
  start-page: 1426
  year: 1997
  end-page: 1432
  ident: BIB13
  article-title: Vitrectomy for retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  contributor:
    fullname: Pendergast
– volume: 28
  start-page: 163
  year: 1993
  end-page: 166
  ident: BIB11
  article-title: Management of dislocated lens fragments following phacoemulsification surgery
  publication-title: Can J Ophthalmol
  contributor:
    fullname: Ross
– volume: 114
  start-page: 610
  year: 1992
  end-page: 614
  ident: BIB18
  article-title: Retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification manifesting as marked intraocular inflammation with hypopyon
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  contributor:
    fullname: Rubsamen
– volume: 22
  start-page: 737
  year: 1996
  end-page: 742
  ident: BIB2
  article-title: Incidence of lens matter dislocation during phacoemulsification
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Dabbs
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1260
  year: 1992
  end-page: 1262
  ident: BIB7
  article-title: Management of dislocated lens fragments after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  contributor:
    fullname: Steward
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1007
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1011
  ident: BIB15
  article-title: Vitrectomy for retained lens fragments in the vitreous after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Larsson
– volume: 104
  start-page: 787
  year: 1997
  end-page: 791
  ident: BIB10
  article-title: Removal of retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification reverses secondary glaucoma and restores visual acuity
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  contributor:
    fullname: Smiddy
– volume: 103
  start-page: 971
  year: 1996
  end-page: 976
  ident: BIB12
  article-title: Outcomes of vitrectomy for retained lens fragments
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  contributor:
    fullname: Regillo
– volume: 112
  start-page: 535
  year: 1991
  end-page: 539
  ident: BIB4
  article-title: Management of dislocated nuclear fragments after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  contributor:
    fullname: Golub
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1263
  year: 1992
  end-page: 1269
  ident: BIB6
  article-title: Retained intravitreal lens fragments after cataract surgery
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  contributor:
    fullname: Fuller
– volume: 21
  start-page: 378
  year: 1995
  end-page: 385
  ident: BIB1
  article-title: Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members-1994 survey
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Leaming
– volume: 85
  start-page: 176
  year: 1978
  end-page: 189
  ident: BIB3
  article-title: Management of surgically dislocated intravitreal lens fragments by pars plana vitrectomy
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  contributor:
    fullname: Vaiser
– volume: 8
  start-page: 96
  year: 1993
  end-page: 103
  ident: BIB8
  article-title: Management of retained lens nuclear fragments and dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lenses after cataract surgery
  publication-title: Semin Ophthalmol
  contributor:
    fullname: Flynn
– volume: 28
  start-page: 310
  year: 2002
  end-page: 315
  ident: BIB16
  article-title: Retained intravitreal lens fragments after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Doro
– volume: 99
  start-page: 41
  year: 1992
  end-page: 44
  ident: BIB5
  article-title: Retained nuclei after cataract surgery
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  contributor:
    fullname: Blodi
– volume: 101
  start-page: 1827
  year: 1994
  end-page: 1832
  ident: BIB9
  article-title: Retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  contributor:
    fullname: Smiddy
– volume: 103
  start-page: 575
  year: 1996
  end-page: 578
  ident: BIB19
  article-title: Endophthalmitis in patients with retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  contributor:
    fullname: Rubsamen
– volume: 114
  start-page: 610
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB18
  article-title: Retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification manifesting as marked intraocular inflammation with hypopyon
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74492-7
  contributor:
    fullname: Irvine
– volume: 22
  start-page: 737
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB2
  article-title: Incidence of lens matter dislocation during phacoemulsification
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80313-0
  contributor:
    fullname: Pande
– volume: 28
  start-page: 310
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB16
  article-title: Retained intravitreal lens fragments after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01079-3
  contributor:
    fullname: Rossetti
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1260
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB7
  article-title: Management of dislocated lens fragments after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31805-6
  contributor:
    fullname: Lambrou
– volume: 21
  start-page: 378
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB1
  article-title: Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members-1994 survey
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80524-X
  contributor:
    fullname: Leaming
– volume: 103
  start-page: 971
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB12
  article-title: Outcomes of vitrectomy for retained lens fragments
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30577-0
  contributor:
    fullname: Borne
– volume: 103
  start-page: 575
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB19
  article-title: Endophthalmitis in patients with retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30651-9
  contributor:
    fullname: Kim
– ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB17
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00020-4
– volume: 85
  start-page: 176
  year: 1978
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB3
  article-title: Management of surgically dislocated intravitreal lens fragments by pars plana vitrectomy
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(78)35685-2
  contributor:
    fullname: Hutton
– volume: 104
  start-page: 787
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB10
  article-title: Removal of retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification reverses secondary glaucoma and restores visual acuity
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30232-2
  contributor:
    fullname: Vilar
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1199
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB14
  article-title: Determinants of visual outcome after pars plana vitrectomy for posteriorly dislocated lens fragments in phacoemulsification
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00750-7
  contributor:
    fullname: al-Khaier
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1007
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB15
  article-title: Vitrectomy for retained lens fragments in the vitreous after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01223-8
  contributor:
    fullname: Hansson
– volume: 104
  start-page: 1426
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB13
  article-title: Vitrectomy for retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30120-1
  contributor:
    fullname: Margherio
– volume: 99
  start-page: 41
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB5
  article-title: Retained nuclei after cataract surgery
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(92)32003-2
  contributor:
    fullname: Blodi
– volume: 28
  start-page: 163
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB11
  article-title: Management of dislocated lens fragments following phacoemulsification surgery
  publication-title: Can J Ophthalmol
  contributor:
    fullname: Ross
– volume: 112
  start-page: 535
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB4
  article-title: Management of dislocated nuclear fragments after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76854-0
  contributor:
    fullname: Fastenberg
– volume: 101
  start-page: 1827
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB9
  article-title: Retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31094-3
  contributor:
    fullname: Kim
– volume: 8
  start-page: 96
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB8
  article-title: Management of retained lens nuclear fragments and dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lenses after cataract surgery
  publication-title: Semin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.3109/08820539309060216
  contributor:
    fullname: Smiddy
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1263
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3_BIB6
  article-title: Retained intravitreal lens fragments after cataract surgery
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31814-7
  contributor:
    fullname: Gilliland
SSID ssj0006634
Score 2.0581667
Snippet To investigate the clinical features, visual acuity outcomes, and adverse events in patients with retained lens fragments managed by pars plana vitrectomy...
PURPOSETo investigate the clinical features, visual acuity outcomes, and adverse events in patients with retained lens fragments managed by pars plana...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
pascalfrancis
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1567
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cataract Extraction - adverse effects
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Intraoperative Complications
Lens Subluxation - etiology
Lens Subluxation - physiopathology
Lens Subluxation - surgery
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the eye and orbit
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity - physiology
Vitrectomy - methods
Title Clinical features and outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy in patients with retained lens fragments
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00488-3
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12917174
https://search.proquest.com/docview/73562132
Volume 110
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZKJyEkhLhTLsMPIIGqlCSO4_hxmkCFaSCxVewtOHG8VaJplaZI5e_wRzmO7SQDBoyXKIoS28n5cm4-F4SeFTLOGC-4F_NEepHIlJeIkHsg6UVMA-aHUucOH76Pp7Po3Qk9GQy-96KWNnU2yb_9Nq_kf6gK14CuOkv2EpRtB4ULcA70hSNQGI7_RON9l9aoiqY-p6m3vNzUMJkpJrsCu1V3ii7F-Ou81txtuWgy_Ww9VZvcpoMOQd2UY5BB67GqxOnC1XhymuuH1Vl9Jr4sTM2mxvFge22Z6PuynPS8Cke5DQR5W55WczmedTjZGo15KqpqO-57eKTh99YD1KVIABYqse0By_YDc74K0kbKte7LOPDA4vHP8V8b12qAlvS4KdiWrCeZA2q6_PzC9Y0D4qgd_bluuQXv3LAnj3Sizm3v_yQB27jEXshbHKR6qNQnaTNMSq6gnZBxSodoZ-_g46eDVuCD0mZLyJvpu0SxV92aXvjkpV3PRSrQ9ZVYA2aU6ahyscnTqD7HN9ENa7PgPQPAW2hQlLfR1UMblXEHfXY4xA6HGHCIHQ7xUmGNQ9zgEHc4xPMSOxxijUPscIg1DnGLw7to9ub18f7Us507vJzwoPYYZTIuqAwU58pXoBMLkKOCxlGcZyFhvp-TjJMgzCUYKCKLBOcZg9tBNvuJ8Mk9NCyXZfEAYZ4oGdACQBL6UaFUQmUUZ1yHIyYyl-EITdzHTFemQEv6RzKOUOI-eWq1TKM9pgCnvz26e45E3YRUl3lK-Ag9dTRLgU3rvTdRFsvNOmUEDI2AwHLvG1J2z4Y8YAGLHl72RR6ha90_9hgN62pTPAENuc52LUJ_AMoDtPM
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,27955,27956
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+features+and+outcomes+of+pars+plana+vitrectomy+in+patients+with+retained+lens+fragments&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology+%28Rochester%2C+Minn.%29&rft.au=Scott%2C+Ingrid+U&rft.au=Flynn%2C+Harry+W&rft.au=Smiddy%2C+William+E&rft.au=Murray%2C+Timothy+G&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1567&rft.epage=1572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0161-6420%2803%2900488-3&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_S0161_6420_03_00488_3
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0161-6420&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0161-6420&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0161-6420&client=summon