Accuracy of AFM measurements of the contour length of DNA fragments adsorbed on mica in air and in aqueous buffer
The measurement by atomic force microscope of the contour length of DNA fragments adsorbed on mica has been made as accurate as possible by revisiting the different steps of image acquisition and processing. In air, the DNA helical rise was estimated at 2.97±0.15 Å per base pair (bp) (mean±standard...
Saved in:
Published in | Ultramicroscopy Vol. 92; no. 3; pp. 151 - 158 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.08.2002
Elsevier Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The measurement by atomic force microscope of the contour length of DNA fragments adsorbed on mica has been made as accurate as possible by revisiting the different steps of image acquisition and processing. In air, the DNA helical rise was estimated at 2.97±0.15
Å per base pair (bp) (mean±standard deviation) by imaging a 648-bp DNA fragment and 2.95±0.14
Å per bp for a 1115-bp fragment. This confirms earlier observations suggesting that drying DNA fragments on mica in the presence of nickel induces limited conformational changes. At this point the exact nature of these conformational changes remains unknown. Simple hypotheses are the transconformation of stretches of the DNA molecules to the A-form of the double helix or alteration of the helix structure at the points of contact between DNA and mica. By contrast, in aqueous buffer, the measured helical rise was 3.14±0.15
Å per bp for the 648-bp fragment and 3.17±0.13
Å per bp for the 1115-bp fragment. Thus, measured helical rises do not depend on the fragment length and are significantly shorter than the 3.38
Å per bp measured by crystallography, but close to the 3.18
Å per bp found in NMR studies. These findings are discussed with respect to discrepancies in earlier results published in the literature. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0304-3991 1879-2723 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0304-3991(02)00128-6 |