Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials

BackgroundThere is a lack of consensus regarding the best option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified as operative (open or percutaneous) or nonoperative (casting or functional bracing). Postoperative splinting can be performed with a rigid cast (pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of bone and joint surgery. American volume Vol. 87; no. 10; pp. 2202 - 2210
Main Authors Khan, Riaz J.K, Fick, Dan, Keogh, Angus, Crawford, John, Brammar, Tim, Parker, Martyn
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston, MA Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated 01.10.2005
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Incorporated
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery AMERICAN VOLUME
EditionAmerican volume
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract BackgroundThere is a lack of consensus regarding the best option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified as operative (open or percutaneous) or nonoperative (casting or functional bracing). Postoperative splinting can be performed with a rigid cast (proximal or distal to the knee) or a more mobile functional brace. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify and summarize the evidence from randomized, controlled trials on the effectiveness of different interventions for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.MethodsWe searched multiple databases (including EMBASE, CINAHL, and MEDLINE) as well as reference lists of articles and contacted authors. Keywords included Achilles tendon, rupture, and tendon injuries. Three reviewers extracted data and independently assessed trial quality with use of a ten-item scale.ResultsTwelve trials involving 800 patients were included. There was a variable level of methodological rigor and reporting of outcomes. Open operative treatment was associated with a lower risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment (relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.64). However, it was associated with a higher risk of other complications, including infection, adhesions, and disturbed skin sensibility (relative risk, 10.60; 95% confidence interval, 4.82 to 23.28). Percutaneous repair was associated with a lower complication rate compared with open operative repair (relative risk, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 7.62). Patients who had been managed with a functional brace postoperatively (allowing for early mobilization) had a lower complication rate compared with those who had been managed with a cast (relative risk, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 2.76). Because of the small number of patients involved, no definitive conclusions could be made regarding different nonoperative treatment regimens.ConclusionsOpen operative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures significantly reduces the risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment, but operative treatment is associated with a significantly higher risk of other complications. Operative risks may be reduced by performing surgery percutaneously. Postoperative splinting with use of a functional brace reduces the overall complication rate.Level of EvidenceTherapeutic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
AbstractList BackgroundThere is a lack of consensus regarding the best option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified as operative (open or percutaneous) or nonoperative (casting or functional bracing). Postoperative splinting can be performed with a rigid cast (proximal or distal to the knee) or a more mobile functional brace. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify and summarize the evidence from randomized, controlled trials on the effectiveness of different interventions for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.MethodsWe searched multiple databases (including EMBASE, CINAHL, and MEDLINE) as well as reference lists of articles and contacted authors. Keywords included Achilles tendon, rupture, and tendon injuries. Three reviewers extracted data and independently assessed trial quality with use of a ten-item scale.ResultsTwelve trials involving 800 patients were included. There was a variable level of methodological rigor and reporting of outcomes. Open operative treatment was associated with a lower risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment (relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.64). However, it was associated with a higher risk of other complications, including infection, adhesions, and disturbed skin sensibility (relative risk, 10.60; 95% confidence interval, 4.82 to 23.28). Percutaneous repair was associated with a lower complication rate compared with open operative repair (relative risk, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 7.62). Patients who had been managed with a functional brace postoperatively (allowing for early mobilization) had a lower complication rate compared with those who had been managed with a cast (relative risk, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 2.76). Because of the small number of patients involved, no definitive conclusions could be made regarding different nonoperative treatment regimens.ConclusionsOpen operative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures significantly reduces the risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment, but operative treatment is associated with a significantly higher risk of other complications. Operative risks may be reduced by performing surgery percutaneously. Postoperative splinting with use of a functional brace reduces the overall complication rate.Level of EvidenceTherapeutic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
BACKGROUNDThere is a lack of consensus regarding the best option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified as operative (open or percutaneous) or nonoperative (casting or functional bracing). Postoperative splinting can be performed with a rigid cast (proximal or distal to the knee) or a more mobile functional brace. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify and summarize the evidence from randomized, controlled trials on the effectiveness of different interventions for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.METHODSWe searched multiple databases (including EMBASE, CINAHL, and MEDLINE) as well as reference lists of articles and contacted authors. Keywords included Achilles tendon, rupture, and tendon injuries. Three reviewers extracted data and independently assessed trial quality with use of a ten-item scale.RESULTSTwelve trials involving 800 patients were included. There was a variable level of methodological rigor and reporting of outcomes. Open operative treatment was associated with a lower risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment (relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.64). However, it was associated with a higher risk of other complications, including infection, adhesions, and disturbed skin sensibility (relative risk, 10.60; 95% confidence interval, 4.82 to 23.28). Percutaneous repair was associated with a lower complication rate compared with open operative repair (relative risk, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 7.62). Patients who had been managed with a functional brace postoperatively (allowing for early mobilization) had a lower complication rate compared with those who had been managed with a cast (relative risk, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 2.76). Because of the small number of patients involved, no definitive conclusions could be made regarding different nonoperative treatment regimens.CONCLUSIONSOpen operative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures significantly reduces the risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment, but operative treatment is associated with a significantly higher risk of other complications. Operative risks may be reduced by performing surgery percutaneously. Postoperative splinting with use of a functional brace reduces the overall complication rate.LEVEL OF EVIDENCETherapeutic Level I.
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus regarding the best option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified as operative (open or percutaneous) or nonoperative (casting or functional bracing). Postoperative splinting can be performed with a rigid cast (proximal or distal to the knee) or a more mobile functional brace. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify and summarize the evidence from randomized, controlled trials on the effectiveness of different interventions for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. METHODS: We searched multiple databases (including EMBASE, CINAHL, and MEDLINE) as well as reference lists of articles and contacted authors. Keywords included Achilles tendon, rupture, and tendon injuries. Three reviewers extracted data and independently assessed trial quality with use of a ten-item scale. RESULTS: Twelve trials involving 800 patients were included. There was a variable level of methodological rigor and reporting of outcomes. Open operative treatment was associated with a lower risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment (relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.64). However, it was associated with a higher risk of other complications, including infection, adhesions, and disturbed skin sensibility (relative risk, 10.60; 95% confidence interval, 4.82 to 23.28). Percutaneous repair was associated with a lower complication rate compared with open operative repair (relative risk, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 7.62). Patients who had been managed with a functional brace postoperatively (allowing for early mobilization) had a lower complication rate compared with those who had been managed with a cast (relative risk, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 2.76). Because of the small number of patients involved, no definitive conclusions could be made regarding different nonoperative treatment regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Open operative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures significantly reduces the risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment, but operative treatment is associated with a significantly higher risk of other complications. Operative risks may be reduced by performing surgery percutaneously. Postoperative splinting with use of a functional brace reduces the overall complication rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I.
There is a lack of consensus regarding the best option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified as operative (open or percutaneous) or nonoperative (casting or functional bracing). Postoperative splinting can be performed with a rigid cast (proximal or distal to the knee) or a more mobile functional brace. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify and summarize the evidence from randomized, controlled trials on the effectiveness of different interventions for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. We searched multiple databases (including EMBASE, CINAHL, and MEDLINE) as well as reference lists of articles and contacted authors. Keywords included Achilles tendon, rupture, and tendon injuries. Three reviewers extracted data and independently assessed trial quality with use of a ten-item scale. Twelve trials involving 800 patients were included. There was a variable level of methodological rigor and reporting of outcomes. Open operative treatment was associated with a lower risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment (relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.64). However, it was associated with a higher risk of other complications, including infection, adhesions, and disturbed skin sensibility (relative risk, 10.60; 95% confidence interval, 4.82 to 23.28). Percutaneous repair was associated with a lower complication rate compared with open operative repair (relative risk, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 7.62). Patients who had been managed with a functional brace postoperatively (allowing for early mobilization) had a lower complication rate compared with those who had been managed with a cast (relative risk, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 2.76). Because of the small number of patients involved, no definitive conclusions could be made regarding different nonoperative treatment regimens. Open operative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures significantly reduces the risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment, but operative treatment is associated with a significantly higher risk of other complications. Operative risks may be reduced by performing surgery percutaneously. Postoperative splinting with use of a functional brace reduces the overall complication rate. Therapeutic Level I.
Author Parker, Martyn
Keogh, Angus
Crawford, John
Fick, Dan
Brammar, Tim
Khan, Riaz J.K
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom. E-mail address: riazkhan@aol.com 2 Department of Surgery and Pathology, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia 3 Addenbrookeʼs Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom 4 Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, PE3 6DA, United Kingdom
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom. E-mail address: riazkhan@aol.com 2 Department of Surgery and Pathology, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia 3 Addenbrookeʼs Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom 4 Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, PE3 6DA, United Kingdom
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Riaz
  surname: Khan
  middlename: J.K
  fullname: Khan, Riaz J.K
  organization: 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom. E-mail address: riazkhan@aol.com 2 Department of Surgery and Pathology, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia 3 Addenbrookeʼs Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom 4 Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, PE3 6DA, United Kingdom
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Dan
  surname: Fick
  fullname: Fick, Dan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Angus
  surname: Keogh
  fullname: Keogh, Angus
– sequence: 4
  givenname: John
  surname: Crawford
  fullname: Crawford, John
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Tim
  surname: Brammar
  fullname: Brammar, Tim
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Martyn
  surname: Parker
  fullname: Parker, Martyn
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18179344$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16203884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpd0U1r3DAQBmBRUppN2lvPxRTSU7zVhyXZvW02_UhIKaTbYxGyPGadytJWkgnpr6-cXQjkMoPgmUF6dYKOnHeA0FuCl5Rg8fH64vrn8nKJGa6aF2hBOOMlYbU4QguMKSkbxvkxOonxDmNcVVi-QsdEUMzqulqg35sAOo3gUuH7YmWmBLluB2shFhtwnXfF7bRLU4D4qVgV3yHpcuW0fYhDnEdudTbj8A-682LtXQo-j3bFJgzaxtfoZZ8bvDn0U_Try-fN-lt58-Pr1Xp1UxrWkLo0QlJqODNYC2ak5FVNG0lJ27W0lS3re0GIkFyytuuBkarlnOGaCdN3nRSYnaIP-7274P9OEJMah2jAWu3AT1GJWnBKHuH7Z_DOTyE_JyqKOeGkaWhG53tkgo8xQK92YRh1eFAEqzlzNWeuLtVj5pm_O-yc2hG6J3wIOYOzA9DRaNsH7cwQn1xNZMOq2VV7d-9tghD_2OkegtqCtmmr8Px9grKS4nzT-VTOpWb_AbWjmHI
CODEN JBJSA3
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_020_03461_z
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2016_04_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fas_2007_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_csm_2015_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_berh_2008_02_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fas_2009_02_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0276_1092_08_70404_8
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2013_12_007
crossref_primary_10_1080_00913847_2021_1969216
crossref_primary_10_2519_jospt_2010_3204
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cpm_2015_06_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2006_12_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2013_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fas_2009_10_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2006_06_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00167_013_2407_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_021_04213_3
crossref_primary_10_2519_jospt_2011_3333
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2007_11_422
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1445_2197_2007_04035_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcl_2006_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00167_012_2222_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00167_012_2007_5
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2288_11_39
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00167_010_1193_2
crossref_primary_10_1080_09638280701786815
crossref_primary_10_1302_0301_620X_104B8_BJJ_2021_1730_R2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00113_014_2627_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_recot_2016_06_004
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2007_08_015
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12506_012_0028_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1751_1097_2012_01179_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00167_012_2146_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fas_2013_06_012
crossref_primary_10_3928_01477447_20130724_23
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00113_017_0420_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcl_2009_08_004
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2013_03_027
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00113_011_2022_x
crossref_primary_10_1186_1758_2555_3_28
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foot_2012_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00113_010_1833_5
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2015_04_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physio_2011_04_349
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surge_2014_03_010
crossref_primary_10_1097_01720610_200908000_00010
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1134_2072_06_71440_2
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2016_01_033
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_015_0310_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_aor_13298
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fas_2014_05_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00590_013_1350_7
crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_25159
crossref_primary_10_1002_lsm_22066
crossref_primary_10_7547_1000270
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_otsr_2013_03_024
crossref_primary_10_1177_15563316231160458
crossref_primary_10_1111_sms_12209
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2015_04_037
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcl_2007_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_orthtr_2015_09_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fas_2008_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2008_10_033
crossref_primary_10_1136_bcr_2013_202657
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surge_2011_12_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ocl_2009_05_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_otsr_2014_09_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcl_2009_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvn_2007_02_004
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0838_2010_01154_x
crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_840369
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcot_2013_03_052
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcot_2014_09_406
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2294_1043
crossref_primary_10_14193_jkfas_2022_26_2_88
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10112370
crossref_primary_10_1136_bjsports_2015_094935
crossref_primary_10_1136_bjsports_2013_092756
crossref_primary_10_7863_ultra_16_01092
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jts_2008_03_001
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2011_05_004
crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_12910
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_recote_2016_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00590_011_0867_x
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2014_09_040
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_023_05827_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_recot_2012_07_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fas_2014_01_006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12178_008_9025_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12306_011_0158_z
crossref_primary_10_3928_01477447_20100826_21
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10943_022_01629_y
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2008_05_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fas_2010_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_014_2615_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_011_1431_3
crossref_primary_10_1002_term_1459
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ptsp_2009_01_003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12306_013_0251_6
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2014_07_009
crossref_primary_10_4236_ss_2014_52011
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2012_09_010
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_014_0132_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00167_013_2726_2
crossref_primary_10_14193_jkfas_2021_25_2_72
crossref_primary_10_26603_001c_117549
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fas_2012_11_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_sms_12253
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1525_1594_2012_01559_x
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2009_04_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00113_010_1809_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10039_010_1676_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12178_013_9185_8
crossref_primary_10_15417_issn_1852_7434_2021_86_3_1153
crossref_primary_10_3928_01477447_20160106_01
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00167_013_2423_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcl_2014_10_003
crossref_primary_10_15388_LietChirur_2020_19_29
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2007_03_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_recote_2012_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1002_bem_22314
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcl_2009_07_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2008_02_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foot_2013_11_003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_011_1357_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcl_2009_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fuspru_2009_08_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcl_2009_07_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcl_2013_02_009
crossref_primary_10_11622_smedj_2015150
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright 2005 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
2006 INIST-CNRS
Copyright Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Oct 2005
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright 2005 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
– notice: 2006 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Oct 2005
DBID IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7QL
7QO
7QP
7RV
7U9
7X7
7XB
88E
88I
8AF
8FD
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
H94
HCIFZ
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1P
M2P
M7N
NAPCQ
P64
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
DOI 10.2106/JBJS.D.03049
DatabaseName Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Science Database (Alumni Edition)
STEM Database
Technology Research Database
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
ProQuest Science Database
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest AP Science
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Science Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest Central Student
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1535-1386
Edition American volume
EndPage 2210
ExternalDocumentID 915783161
10_2106_JBJS_D_03049
16203884
18179344
00004623-200510000-00008
Genre Meta-Analysis
Comparative Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID .XZ
07C
08R
0R
123
1AW
1KJ
29K
2WC
34G
39C
3O-
3V.
4.4
53G
55
5RE
5RS
6NX
7RV
7X7
88E
88I
8AF
8F7
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
AAAXR
AAEJM
AAFTM
AAGJQ
AAMOA
AAWTL
AAXQO
ABFLS
ABPMR
ABPTK
ABUWG
ABXVJ
ACEWG
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACRZS
ADBIT
ADNKB
AFCHL
AFFNX
AFKRA
AFRAH
AFUWQ
AHMBA
AHULI
AIJEX
AJIOK
AJJEV
AJNYG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMJPA
AMKUR
ASCII
AZQEC
BBAFP
BENPR
BKEYQ
BOWHD
BPHCQ
BQLVK
BVXVI
C45
CS3
D-I
DUNZO
DWQXO
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EX3
F5P
FEDTE
FYUFA
GJ
GNUQQ
H1
H13
HCIFZ
HVGLF
H~9
IKYAY
JG8
K-O
L7B
M1P
M2P
M5
M5~
O9-
OBH
OCB
OGEVE
OHASI
OHH
OLW
OPUJH
OUVQU
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OXXIT
PCD
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PROAC
PSQYO
PZZ
Q2X
SJN
TJB
VH1
W1K
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
XZ
YCJ
YQJ
YRY
ZA5
ZGI
ZXP
ZY1
ZZ
~H1
.55
.GJ
08G
08P
0R~
1CY
36B
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAQKA
AAUGY
ABASU
ABDIG
ACCJW
ACILI
ACNWC
ADGGA
AEETU
AFDTB
AFMFG
AHOMT
AHVBC
AI.
AJNWD
AKALU
AKULP
ALMTX
AMNEI
AOHHW
CCPQU
DIWNM
EEVPB
FCALG
GNXGY
GQDEL
IKREB
IQODW
NAPCQ
OJAPA
RLZ
TEORI
TSPGW
UKHRP
VVN
YOC
ZZMQN
~ZZ
AAAAV
AAIQE
AASCR
ABJNI
ABVCZ
ACXJB
ADHPY
AHQNM
AINUH
AJZMW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
ERAAH
HLJTE
HMCUK
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7QL
7QO
7QP
7U9
7XB
8FD
8FK
C1K
FR3
H94
K9.
M7N
P64
Q9U
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3918-c6722c53c0a63c7754829721bdb2b7b3ff61167573bdfe314b5530836cfdd7603
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0021-9355
IngestDate Sat Aug 17 00:51:41 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 22:24:59 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 01:36:58 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:50:26 EDT 2024
Sun Oct 22 16:08:38 EDT 2023
Tue Feb 09 10:59:25 EST 2021
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Keywords Orthopedic surgery
Treatment
Tendo calcaneus
Acute
Tissue rupture
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3918-c6722c53c0a63c7754829721bdb2b7b3ff61167573bdfe314b5530836cfdd7603
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 16203884
PQID 205151992
PQPubID 289
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_68652160
proquest_journals_205151992
crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_D_03049
pubmed_primary_16203884
pascalfrancis_primary_18179344
wolterskluwer_health_00004623-200510000-00008
ProviderPackageCode ACEWG
AMKUR
C45
ABPMR
IKYAY
OVIDH
ASCII
AAMOA
OHH
OBH
OUVQU
ADNKB
JG8
OLW
BOWHD
AIJEX
AAXQO
OHASI
AJNYG
OGEVE
~H1
OVLEI
AAAXR
AJIOK
OPUJH
AAFTM
OCB
.XZ
DUNZO
OVDNE
5RS
AFCHL
AMJPA
M5~
ABXVJ
OXXIT
OVD
AHULI
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2005-October
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2005
  text: 2005-October
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Boston, MA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Boston, MA
– name: United States
– name: Needham
PublicationTitle Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
PublicationTitleAlternate J Bone Joint Surg Am
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Incorporated
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery AMERICAN VOLUME
Publisher_xml – name: Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
– name: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Incorporated
– name: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery AMERICAN VOLUME
References 16651595 - J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):1160; author reply 1160
References_xml
SSID ssj0004407
Score 2.4283862
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet BackgroundThere is a lack of consensus regarding the best option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified as...
There is a lack of consensus regarding the best option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified as operative...
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus regarding the best option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified as...
BACKGROUNDThere is a lack of consensus regarding the best option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified as...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
pascalfrancis
wolterskluwer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 2202
SubjectTerms Achilles Tendon - injuries
Acute Disease
Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Manipulation, Orthopedic
Medical sciences
Orthopedic Fixation Devices
Orthopedic Procedures
Orthopedic surgery
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Rupture
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Tendon Injuries - therapy
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
Treatment Outcome
Title Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials
URI http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00004623-200510000-00008
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16203884
https://www.proquest.com/docview/205151992
https://search.proquest.com/docview/68652160
Volume 87
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fb5swELa29mXSNHXaL9Yu88P2NneAwcBeJhqIkqghFRApmzQh25iXSkk2Wu3f3x2QZpGmvfCCbaE7--477vwdIR88rcCv25I50uPMM4HNpK0lC8F1Oqp2penoixeZmK68-dpfD7U57VBWubeJnaGutxr_kUOQDp4XayW_7n4ybBqFydWhg8ZjcurAe9zgwTo4XIv07KFjq8OQRryve4cYR3yeX82Ly-QS84LRkUd6upMtCKfpu1r8C3bCmN9bzGS3t10h-1_uaHJGng04ksa94p-TR2bzgvwo8zQukZ6fLic0Hq_KFJ5TCNjTgpZpliwzmq9usNKh-EJjukjLmMVZfP2tmBU4JY9hzGL2PU0-0fEyK_MlTE1omc_i6-IlWU3ScjxlQ_8EpnnkhEyLwHW1z7UtBddIdYf3aF1QgXJVoHjTCMzC-AFXdWO44ynsIRRyoZu6DoTNX5GTzXZj3hAaydpRUsmg4cZTtQkBdvBQ6kaZKDLct8jHvQyrXU-TUUF4gbKuUNZVUnWytsjoSMCHwSFaCs-zyPle4tVwmtrqQfcWef_wFo4B5jbkxmzv20qEAoCIsC3yulfTYWXhIuMNrMyO9Fb1F02rLkoCEIj2wu-yHawD0m__-yXn5MmexNV2LsjJ3a978w7gyZ0adZtwRE6v0uwm_wO-9toR
link.rule.ids 314,780,784,12056,21388,27924,27925,31719,31720,33744,33745,43310,43805,73745,74302
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lj9MwELagewAJIRCvsLDrA9zwksSOk3BB2SZVW9p0laTSgoQs23EuSG0hu-Lv40nSLZUQl1xiW9E39jwy428Qese0snbdlcSTjBJmQpdIV0sSWdPpqdqXpqMvXuZ8umbz6-B6qM1ph7LKvU7sFHW91fCP3Abp1vJCreTn3U8CTaMguTp00LiPToA4PRihk8ssvyoOFyOZO_Rs9QgQifeV7zbK4R_nl_PyIr2AzGB8ZJMe7WRr4Wn6vhb_cjztmN9byGW3P7pS9r8M0uQJejx4kjjpRf8U3TObZ-h7VWRJBQT9eDXByXhdZfY5tSF7VuIqy9NVjov1FdQ6lJ9wgpdZlZAkTxZfy1kJU4rEjlnOvmXpBzxe5VWxslNTXBWzZFE-R-tJVo2nZOigQDSNvYhoHvq-Dqh2JacayO7gJq1vhaB8FSraNBzyMEFIVd0Y6jEFXYQiynVT1yF36Qs02mw35hXCsaw9JZUMG2qYqk1kHQ8aSd0oE8eGBg56v8dQ7HqiDGEDDMBaANYiFR3WDjo7AvgwOAJdwZiDTveIi-E8teJO-g46v3trDwJkN-TGbG9bwSNuXRHuOuhlL6bDytwHzhu7MjmSm-ivmoouTrJuIGiMoMt3kM6Vfv3fLzlHD6bVciEWs_zLKXq4p3R1vTdodPPr1ry1zsqNOhu25B8cpdzN
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fb9MwELagkxASQiB-hcHmB3jDWxInTsILyppUbWnTKkmlMQlZduK8ILWFbuLf5y5JVyohXvIS24rO57vvcufvCPngVRr8uq2YozzOPBPYTNmVYiG4TkfXrjItffE8E-OVN732r3tKoV1fVrm3ia2hrjcV_iOHIB08L9ZKXjZ9VcQyGX3Z_mTYQAoTrX03jYfkBJyi7Q7IyVWaLfPDJUnP7vu3OgxJxbsqeIh4xOX0alpcJBeYJYyO_NOTrdqBqJqux8W_QCiM-b3BvPbuR1vW_pdzGj0jT3tUSeNODZ6TB2b9gnwv8zQukayfLkY0Hq7KFJ5jCN_TgpZpliwymq-WWPdQfKYxnadlzOIsnn0rJgVOyWMYM5_cpMknOlxkZb6AqQkt80k8K16S1Sgth2PWd1NgFY-ckFUicN3K55WtBK-Q-A5v1bqwIdrVgeZNIzAn4wdc143hjqexo1DIRdXUdSBs_ooM1pu1eUNopGpHK62ChhtP1yYEEMJDVTXaRJHhvkU-7mUotx1phoRgA2UtUdYyka2sLXJ2JODD4BDthudZ5HQvcdmfrZ281wSLnN-_hUOBmQ61Npu7nRShAFgibIu87rbpsLJwkf8GVmZH-ya7a6eyjZkAEqL18NvcB2th9dv_fsk5eQTaKGeT7Ospebxnd7Wdd2Rw--vOvAfccqvPeo38A-bB4Po
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment+of+Acute+Achilles+Tendon+Ruptures+A+Meta-Analysis+of+Randomized%2C+Controlled+Trials&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+bone+and+joint+surgery.+American+volume&rft.au=Khan%2C+Riaz+J.K.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106%2FJBJS.D.03049&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_2106_JBJS_D_03049
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-9355&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-9355&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-9355&client=summon