Safety of intradermal skin tests for inhalants and foods: a prospective study

Background Intradermal skin testing is a useful allergy diagnostic tool. Although considered safe when properly performed, systemic reactions have been reported. This is the first large, prospective study to record and evaluate all systemic reactions from intradermal skin testing (IDT) to inhalant o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational forum of allergy & rhinology Vol. 3; no. 3; pp. 171 - 176
Main Authors Gordon, Bruce R., Hurst, David S., Fornadley, John A., Hunsaker, Darrell H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Intradermal skin testing is a useful allergy diagnostic tool. Although considered safe when properly performed, systemic reactions have been reported. This is the first large, prospective study to record and evaluate all systemic reactions from intradermal skin testing (IDT) to inhalant or food antigens. Methods A 24‐month prospective study by 40 physician practices, recording all IDT tests, including reactions, symptoms, severity, time after injection, and reaction treatments. Results Eighty systemic reactions (22 major) occurred among 20,530 patients (878,583 wheals). Nine had epinephrine treatment, 4 were observed in an emergency department, and there were no hospitalizations or fatalities. The overall systemic reaction risk was 0.009%. The risk of having a major reaction was 0.003%, or 1 reaction per 933 patients. Conclusion Intradermal skin tests for inhalants or foods, when performed with appropriate precautions, have a safety profile comparable to skin prick tests.
Bibliography:American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Foundation
ark:/67375/WNG-9FS5SFST-5
ArticleID:ALR21091
istex:3B73FDB1112D44635C07607244610EA7E301BF35
Potential conflict of interest: None provided.
Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Foundation, September 9, 2011, San Francisco, CA
Funding sources for the study: American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Foundation.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2042-6976
2042-6984
DOI:10.1002/alr.21091