Indication-specific accuracy of second-trimester genetic ultrasonography for the detection of trisomy 21

Objective: The object of this study was to determine whether there are any clinically significant indication-specific variations in the accuracy of second-trimester genetic ultrasonography and to provide a risk adjustment for fetal trisomy 21 according to the results of genetic ultrasonography. Stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 181; no. 5; pp. 1045 - 1048
Main Authors Vintzileos, Anthony M., Guzman, Edwin R., Smulian, John C., Day-Salvatore, Debra L., Knuppel, Robert A.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia, PA Mosby, Inc 01.11.1999
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objective: The object of this study was to determine whether there are any clinically significant indication-specific variations in the accuracy of second-trimester genetic ultrasonography and to provide a risk adjustment for fetal trisomy 21 according to the results of genetic ultrasonography. Study Design: From November 1, 1992, to September 30, 1998, a second-trimester genetic sonogram was offered to all pregnant women who were at an increased risk for fetal trisomy 21 (≥1:274) because of either advanced maternal age (≥35 years) or abnormal serum biochemical profile or both of these. Outcome information included the results of genetic amniocentesis if performed and the results of pediatric assessment and follow-up after birth. In determining diagnostic accuracy of the genetic sonogram the presence of ≥1 abnormal ultrasonographic marker was considered an abnormal test result. Results: A total of 1835 fetuses with known outcomes underwent genetic ultrasonography between 15 and 24 weeks’ gestation; of these 1792 had normal results, 34 had trisomy 21, and 9 had other chromosomal abnormalities. The likelihood of fetal trisomy 21 was reduced by 80% after a normal result of genetic ultrasonography. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of genetic ultrasonography for the detection of trisomy 21 were 82%, 91%, 15%, and 99.6%, respectively. There were no significant indication-specific variations in the accuracy of second-trimester ultrasonography. The sensitivity for the detection of fetal trisomy 21 ranged from 80% among women with advanced maternal age to 100% among women with both an abnormal biochemical profile and advanced maternal age. Conclusions: The likelihood of fetal trisomy 21 risk was reduced 80% after a normal result of genetic ultrasonography. In addition there were no significant indication-specific variations in the detection rate of genetic ultrasonography. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1045-8.)
AbstractList OBJECTIVEThe object of this study was to determine whether there are any clinically significant indication-specific variations in the accuracy of second-trimester genetic ultrasonography and to provide a risk adjustment for fetal trisomy 21 according to the results of genetic ultrasonography.STUDY DESIGNFrom November 1, 1992, to September 30, 1998, a second-trimester genetic sonogram was offered to all pregnant women who were at an increased risk for fetal trisomy 21 (>/=1:274) because of either advanced maternal age (>/=35 years) or abnormal serum biochemical profile or both of these. Outcome information included the results of genetic amniocentesis if performed and the results of pediatric assessment and follow-up after birth. In determining diagnostic accuracy of the genetic sonogram the presence of >/=1 abnormal ultrasonographic marker was considered an abnormal test result.RESULTSA total of 1835 fetuses with known outcomes underwent genetic ultrasonography between 15 and 24 weeks' gestation; of these 1792 had normal results, 34 had trisomy 21, and 9 had other chromosomal abnormalities. The likelihood of fetal trisomy 21 was reduced by 80% after a normal result of genetic ultrasonography. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of genetic ultrasonography for the detection of trisomy 21 were 82%, 91%, 15%, and 99.6%, respectively. There were no significant indication-specific variations in the accuracy of second-trimester ultrasonography. The sensitivity for the detection of fetal trisomy 21 ranged from 80% among women with advanced maternal age to 100% among women with both an abnormal biochemical profile and advanced maternal age.CONCLUSIONSThe likelihood of fetal trisomy 21 risk was reduced 80% after a normal result of genetic ultrasonography. In addition there were no significant indication-specific variations in the detection rate of genetic ultrasonography.
Objective: The object of this study was to determine whether there are any clinically significant indication-specific variations in the accuracy of second-trimester genetic ultrasonography and to provide a risk adjustment for fetal trisomy 21 according to the results of genetic ultrasonography. Study Design: From November 1, 1992, to September 30, 1998, a second-trimester genetic sonogram was offered to all pregnant women who were at an increased risk for fetal trisomy 21 (≥1:274) because of either advanced maternal age (≥35 years) or abnormal serum biochemical profile or both of these. Outcome information included the results of genetic amniocentesis if performed and the results of pediatric assessment and follow-up after birth. In determining diagnostic accuracy of the genetic sonogram the presence of ≥1 abnormal ultrasonographic marker was considered an abnormal test result. Results: A total of 1835 fetuses with known outcomes underwent genetic ultrasonography between 15 and 24 weeks’ gestation; of these 1792 had normal results, 34 had trisomy 21, and 9 had other chromosomal abnormalities. The likelihood of fetal trisomy 21 was reduced by 80% after a normal result of genetic ultrasonography. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of genetic ultrasonography for the detection of trisomy 21 were 82%, 91%, 15%, and 99.6%, respectively. There were no significant indication-specific variations in the accuracy of second-trimester ultrasonography. The sensitivity for the detection of fetal trisomy 21 ranged from 80% among women with advanced maternal age to 100% among women with both an abnormal biochemical profile and advanced maternal age. Conclusions: The likelihood of fetal trisomy 21 risk was reduced 80% after a normal result of genetic ultrasonography. In addition there were no significant indication-specific variations in the detection rate of genetic ultrasonography. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1045-8.)
The object of this study was to determine whether there are any clinically significant indication-specific variations in the accuracy of second-trimester genetic ultrasonography and to provide a risk adjustment for fetal trisomy 21 according to the results of genetic ultrasonography. From November 1, 1992, to September 30, 1998, a second-trimester genetic sonogram was offered to all pregnant women who were at an increased risk for fetal trisomy 21 (>/=1:274) because of either advanced maternal age (>/=35 years) or abnormal serum biochemical profile or both of these. Outcome information included the results of genetic amniocentesis if performed and the results of pediatric assessment and follow-up after birth. In determining diagnostic accuracy of the genetic sonogram the presence of >/=1 abnormal ultrasonographic marker was considered an abnormal test result. A total of 1835 fetuses with known outcomes underwent genetic ultrasonography between 15 and 24 weeks' gestation; of these 1792 had normal results, 34 had trisomy 21, and 9 had other chromosomal abnormalities. The likelihood of fetal trisomy 21 was reduced by 80% after a normal result of genetic ultrasonography. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of genetic ultrasonography for the detection of trisomy 21 were 82%, 91%, 15%, and 99.6%, respectively. There were no significant indication-specific variations in the accuracy of second-trimester ultrasonography. The sensitivity for the detection of fetal trisomy 21 ranged from 80% among women with advanced maternal age to 100% among women with both an abnormal biochemical profile and advanced maternal age. The likelihood of fetal trisomy 21 risk was reduced 80% after a normal result of genetic ultrasonography. In addition there were no significant indication-specific variations in the detection rate of genetic ultrasonography.
Author Guzman, Edwin R.
Smulian, John C.
Day-Salvatore, Debra L.
Vintzileos, Anthony M.
Knuppel, Robert A.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Anthony M.
  surname: Vintzileos
  fullname: Vintzileos, Anthony M.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Edwin R.
  surname: Guzman
  fullname: Guzman, Edwin R.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: John C.
  surname: Smulian
  fullname: Smulian, John C.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Debra L.
  surname: Day-Salvatore
  fullname: Day-Salvatore, Debra L.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Robert A.
  surname: Knuppel
  fullname: Knuppel, Robert A.
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1200126$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10561615$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkE1LxDAURYMoOn78BKULEV1Uk3SaNisR8QsEF-o6pC-vTqSTjEkrzL83dQZ15yoknPty39klm847JOSQ0XNGmbh4ppTyXBZVfSrlWUVpVeflBpkwKqtc1KLeJJMfZIfsxvg-Xrnk22SH0VIwwcoJmT04Y0H31rs8LhBsayHTAEPQsMx8m0UE70zeBzvH2GPI3tBhn6Ch64OO3vm3oBezZdb6kPUzzAz2COO8MZ1i0c-XGWf7ZKvVXcSD9blHXm9vXq7v88enu4frq8ccCkn73ExlWbWsqamcFjUwlJCallqkpWl64abhBROVrMS0NLRhRTNNeFFhw5nQbbFHTlZzF8F_DKmymtsI2HXaoR-iEpLXgnGewHIFQvAxBmzVIu2ow1IxqkbF6luxGv0pKdW3YlWm3NH6g6GZo_mTWjlNwPEa0BF01wbtwMZfjlPKuEjY5QrDZOPTYlARLDpAY0MSqIy3_zT5ApPemgw
CODEN AJOGAH
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semperi_2005_06_005
crossref_primary_10_1053_sper_2003_50012
crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2002_21_1_5
crossref_primary_10_1053_sper_2003_50016
crossref_primary_10_1002_ajmg_c_30116
crossref_primary_10_1053_sper_2003_50015
crossref_primary_10_1053_sper_2003_50014
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1637_4088_05_86232_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2017_06_014
crossref_primary_10_1097_00006250_200206000_00008
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0929_6441_09_60121_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_7652
crossref_primary_10_1067_mob_2002_126984
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0368_2315_05_82740_1
crossref_primary_10_1097_00006250_200305000_00014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2017_06_013
crossref_primary_10_1586_17474108_3_1_103
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1701_2163_16_34961_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0033_8389_03_00044_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0095_5108_05_70052_X
crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2003_22_1_33
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_1725
Cites_doi 10.7863/jum.1992.11.9.449
10.1016/0029-7844(94)00384-P
10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70134-6
10.1016/0029-7844(96)00053-1
10.1016/0029-7844(96)00058-0
10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00227-5
10.1016/0002-9378(95)90008-X
10.7863/jum.1995.14.4.297
ContentType Journal Article
Conference Proceeding
Copyright 1999 Mosby, Inc.
2000 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 1999 Mosby, Inc.
– notice: 2000 INIST-CNRS
DBID IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5
DatabaseName Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1097-6868
EndPage 1048
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_S0002_9378_99_70078_5
10561615
1200126
S0002937899700785
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
-ET
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.XZ
.~1
0R~
0SF
1B1
1CY
1P~
1~.
1~5
23M
2KS
354
3O-
4.4
457
4CK
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
7-5
85S
8F7
8P~
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKC
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAMNW
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAWTL
AAXUO
AAYJJ
ABBQC
ABCQX
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABPMR
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADOJD
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEKER
AENEX
AEVXI
AFCHL
AFCTW
AFFNX
AFKWA
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGNAY
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AI.
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJOXV
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
C45
C5W
CAG
COF
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EJD
EO8
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
G8K
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IH2
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
LPU
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
NCXOZ
NEJ
NQ-
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OBH
OCB
OGEVE
OHH
OHT
OMK
OQ.
OVD
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PH~
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
RXW
SDF
SEL
SES
SEW
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
TAE
TEORI
TWZ
UDS
UGJ
UHB
UHS
UHU
UKR
UNMZH
UV1
VH1
VVN
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X6Y
X7M
XFW
YFH
YOC
YYQ
YZZ
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
ZY1
~G-
~H1
08R
AAIAV
AAPBV
AAUGY
ABLVK
ABPIF
ABYKQ
AFDAS
AJBFU
AKALU
IQODW
LCYCR
ZA5
AAXKI
AFJKZ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ABDPE
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-d4957f1b809438c1e9c6165a610104382db2316797645d0b13b4f1b37eb216af3
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 0002-9378
IngestDate Sat Oct 26 01:43:55 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 26 17:04:01 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 08:37:52 EDT 2024
Sun Oct 29 17:10:11 EDT 2023
Wed Aug 14 03:47:56 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords trisomy 21 risk adjustment
Accuracy of genetic ultrasonography
Chromosomal aberration
Sonography
Second trimester
Human
Trisomy
Chromosome G21
Aneuploidy
Prenatal
Sensitivity
Specificity
Echography
Predictive value
Diagnosis
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MeetingName Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c390t-d4957f1b809438c1e9c6165a610104382db2316797645d0b13b4f1b37eb216af3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 10561615
PQID 69286122
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_69286122
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0002_9378_99_70078_5
pubmed_primary_10561615
pascalfrancis_primary_1200126
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S0002_9378_99_70078_5
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1999-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1999-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 1999
  text: 1999-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace Philadelphia, PA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Philadelphia, PA
– name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
PublicationTitleAlternate Am J Obstet Gynecol
PublicationYear 1999
Publisher Mosby, Inc
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Mosby, Inc
– name: Elsevier
References Vintzileos, Ananth, Fisher, Smulian, Day-Salvatore, Beazoglou (bib8) 1998; 179
Nadel, Bromley, Frigoletto, Benacerraf (bib5) 1995; 14
Vintzileos, Guzman, Smulian, McLean, Ananth (bib2) 1997; 90
Benacerraf, Neuberg, Bromley, Frigoletto (bib4) 1992; 11
DeVore, Alfi (bib6) 1995; 85
Vintzileos, Campbell, Rodis, Guzman, Smulian, Knuppel (bib1) 1996; 87
Vintzileos, Egan, Smulian, Campbell, Guzman, Rodis (bib3) 1996; 87
Vintzileos, Egan (bib7) 1995; 172
Vintzileos (10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib8) 1998; 179
Vintzileos (10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib3) 1996; 87
Vintzileos (10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib7) 1995; 172
Nadel (10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib5) 1995; 14
DeVore (10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib6) 1995; 85
Vintzileos (10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib1) 1996; 87
Vintzileos (10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib2) 1997; 90
Benacerraf (10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib4) 1992; 11
References_xml – volume: 87
  start-page: 948
  year: 1996
  end-page: 952
  ident: bib1
  article-title: The use of second-trimester genetic sonogram in guiding clinical management of patients at increased risk for fetal trisomy 21
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Knuppel
– volume: 85
  start-page: 378
  year: 1995
  end-page: 386
  ident: bib6
  article-title: The use of color Doppler ultrasound to identify fetuses at increased risk for trisomy 21: an alternative for high-risk patients who decline genetic amniocentesis
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Alfi
– volume: 11
  start-page: 449
  year: 1992
  end-page: 458
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Sonographic scoring index for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities
  publication-title: J Ultrasound Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Frigoletto
– volume: 179
  start-page: 1214
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1219
  ident: bib8
  article-title: An economic evaluation of second-trimester sonography for prenatal detection of Down Syndrome
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Beazoglou
– volume: 87
  start-page: 953
  year: 1996
  end-page: 958
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Adjusting the risk for trisomy 21 by a simple ultrasound method using fetal long-bone biometry
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Rodis
– volume: 14
  start-page: 297
  year: 1995
  end-page: 302
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Can the presumed risk of autosomal trisomy be decreased in fetuses of older women following a normal sonogram?
  publication-title: J Ultrasound Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Benacerraf
– volume: 172
  start-page: 837
  year: 1995
  end-page: 844
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Adjusting the risk for trisomy 21 on the basis of second trimester ultrasonography
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Egan
– volume: 90
  start-page: 187
  year: 1997
  end-page: 190
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Choice of second-trimester genetic sonogram for detection of trisomy 21
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Ananth
– volume: 11
  start-page: 449
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib4
  article-title: Sonographic scoring index for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities
  publication-title: J Ultrasound Med
  doi: 10.7863/jum.1992.11.9.449
  contributor:
    fullname: Benacerraf
– volume: 85
  start-page: 378
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib6
  article-title: The use of color Doppler ultrasound to identify fetuses at increased risk for trisomy 21: an alternative for high-risk patients who decline genetic amniocentesis
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00384-P
  contributor:
    fullname: DeVore
– volume: 179
  start-page: 1214
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib8
  article-title: An economic evaluation of second-trimester sonography for prenatal detection of Down Syndrome
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70134-6
  contributor:
    fullname: Vintzileos
– volume: 87
  start-page: 948
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib1
  article-title: The use of second-trimester genetic sonogram in guiding clinical management of patients at increased risk for fetal trisomy 21
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00053-1
  contributor:
    fullname: Vintzileos
– volume: 87
  start-page: 953
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib3
  article-title: Adjusting the risk for trisomy 21 by a simple ultrasound method using fetal long-bone biometry
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00058-0
  contributor:
    fullname: Vintzileos
– volume: 90
  start-page: 187
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib2
  article-title: Choice of second-trimester genetic sonogram for detection of trisomy 21
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00227-5
  contributor:
    fullname: Vintzileos
– volume: 172
  start-page: 837
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib7
  article-title: Adjusting the risk for trisomy 21 on the basis of second trimester ultrasonography
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90008-X
  contributor:
    fullname: Vintzileos
– volume: 14
  start-page: 297
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5_bib5
  article-title: Can the presumed risk of autosomal trisomy be decreased in fetuses of older women following a normal sonogram?
  publication-title: J Ultrasound Med
  doi: 10.7863/jum.1995.14.4.297
  contributor:
    fullname: Nadel
SSID ssj0002292
Score 1.7980886
Snippet Objective: The object of this study was to determine whether there are any clinically significant indication-specific variations in the accuracy of...
The object of this study was to determine whether there are any clinically significant indication-specific variations in the accuracy of second-trimester...
OBJECTIVEThe object of this study was to determine whether there are any clinically significant indication-specific variations in the accuracy of...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
pascalfrancis
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1045
SubjectTerms Accuracy of genetic ultrasonography
Adolescent
Adult
Amniocentesis
Biological and medical sciences
Chromosome Aberrations - diagnosis
Chromosome Aberrations - diagnostic imaging
Chromosome Aberrations - epidemiology
Chromosome Aberrations - genetics
Chromosome Disorders
Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy
Down Syndrome - diagnosis
Down Syndrome - diagnostic imaging
Down Syndrome - epidemiology
Down Syndrome - genetics
Female
Genetic Testing
Gestational Age
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Maternal Age
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Pilot Projects
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, Second - blood
Pregnancy Trimester, Second - genetics
Pregnancy, High-Risk
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
trisomy 21 risk adjustment
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Title Indication-specific accuracy of second-trimester genetic ultrasonography for the detection of trisomy 21
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70078-5
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10561615
https://search.proquest.com/docview/69286122
Volume 181
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB71ISEkhHizQIsPHODgNrbz8rGqqLag9kSl3iy_IipBdrWbPfTCb2fGcVh6qJC4WrEz8kxmvonnGwN8KKzyUurAJWY5vCQSl1PO8sY30jfCeSWJ4HxxWc-vyi_X1fUOnE5cGCqrzL5_9OnJW-eR47ybx8ubG-L4FhirGkwYGgp01S7sYziSaNr7J-df55d_HDLKIicUTBO2RJ5xkTT4UetPaR1e3ReiHi3tGjeuG2-8uB-SptB09gQeZ0zJTkaxn8JO7J_Bg4t8av4cvp_3If-a48SspOogZr3frKy_ZYuOrSkrDnygVv_UOIGhVRG5kW1-DCuLiDz3tWaIcBkiRhbikEq4epo90DWGP2-ZFC_g6uzzt9M5zzcscK90MfCA6VHTCddSfWHrRdS-FnVlEVOJdEQYnCSqPGKWsgqFE8qV-LhqMB8Xte3US9jrF318DSwi8gxBBFe0Xdn6woYYC-WU1J13hXQzOJo21SzHRhpmW2GGWjCkBaO1SVow1QzaaevNHYsw6Oz_NfXgjqq2L6QKMlnP4P2kOoNfEx2R2D4uNmtTa9ki5pMzeDVq9C9ZEWki_Hvz_2K9hYep6UNiMr6DvWG1iQcIaQZ3CLtHv8RhNtzfJpLwYQ
link.rule.ids 310,311,315,783,787,792,793,4510,23943,23944,24129,25153,27937,27938,45598,45692
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB5RKrVIFeqTbgvFhx7agyG28_KxQqClZTmBxM3yKypSm13tZg9c-ts74yTackCVuEa2M_JMZr6J5xsDfM6s8lLqwCVmOTwnEpdTzvLKV9JXwnklieA8uyyn1_n3m-JmC05GLgyVVQ6-v_fpyVsPT46H3Txe3N4SxzfDWFVhwlBRoCuewNOc2o2jUR_92dR5oCRyxMA0fEPj6ZdID79o_TWtwouHAtSLhV3htjX9fRcPA9IUmM5ewu6AKNm3XuhXsBXb1_BsNpyZv4Gf520Yfsxx4lVSbRCz3q-X1t-xecNWlBMH3lGjf2qbwNCmiNrI1r-6pUU8PnS1ZohvGeJFFmKXCrhamt3RJYa_75gUb-H67PTqZMqH-xW4VzrreMDkqGqEq6m6sPYial-KsrCIqEQ6IAxOElEeEUtehMwJ5XIcrirMxkVpG_UOttt5G98Di4g7QxDBZXWT1z6zIcZMOSV1410m3QSOxk01i76NhtnUl6EWDGnBaG2SFkwxgXrcenPPHgy6-v9NPbinqs0LqX5MlhM4HFVn8FuiAxLbxvl6ZUota0R8cgJ7vUb_kRVxJoK_D48X6xCeT69mF-bi_PLHR9hJ7R8Sp3EftrvlOh4guOncp2S8fwFMAfE6
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.title=American+journal+of+obstetrics+and+gynecology&rft.atitle=Indication-specific+accuracy+of+second-trimester+genetic+ultrasonography+for+the+detection+of+trisomy+21&rft.au=VINTZILEOS%2C+A.+M&rft.au=GUZMAN%2C+E.+R&rft.au=SMULIAN%2C+J.+C&rft.au=DAY-SALVATORE%2C+D.+L&rft.date=1999-11-01&rft.pub=Elsevier&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.volume=181&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1045&rft.epage=1048&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0002-9378%2899%2970078-5&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=1200126
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0002-9378&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0002-9378&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0002-9378&client=summon