Spectral Properties of Induced and Evoked Gamma Oscillations in Human Early Visual Cortex to Moving and Stationary Stimuli
Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom Submitted 18 September 2008; accepted in final form 7 June 2009 In two experiments, magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to investigate the effects of motion on gamma oscillations in...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neurophysiology Vol. 102; no. 2; pp. 1241 - 1253 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Am Phys Soc
01.08.2009
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Submitted 18 September 2008;
accepted in final form 7 June 2009
In two experiments, magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to investigate the effects of motion on gamma oscillations in human early visual cortex. When presented centrally, but not peripherally, stationary and moving gratings elicited several evoked and induced response components in early visual cortex. Time-frequency analysis revealed two nonphase locked gamma power increases—an initial, rapidly adapting response and one sustained throughout stimulus presentation and varying in frequency across observers from 28 to 64 Hz. Stimulus motion raised the sustained gamma oscillation frequency by a mean of 10 Hz. The largest motion-induced frequency increases were in those observers with the lowest gamma response frequencies for stationary stimuli, suggesting a possible saturation mechanism. Moderate gamma amplitude increases to moving versus stationary stimuli were also observed but were not correlated with the magnitude of the frequency increase. At the same site in visual cortex, sustained alpha/beta power reductions and an onset evoked response were observed, but these effects did not change significantly with the presence of motion and did not correlate with the magnitude of gamma power changes. These findings suggest that early visual areas encode moving and stationary percepts via activity at higher and lower gamma frequencies, respectively.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. D. Singh, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK (E-mail: singhkd{at}cardiff.ac.uk ) |
---|---|
AbstractList | In two experiments, magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to investigate the effects of motion on gamma oscillations in human early visual cortex. When presented centrally, but not peripherally, stationary and moving gratings elicited several evoked and induced response components in early visual cortex. Time-frequency analysis revealed two nonphase locked gamma power increases-an initial, rapidly adapting response and one sustained throughout stimulus presentation and varying in frequency across observers from 28 to 64 Hz. Stimulus motion raised the sustained gamma oscillation frequency by a mean of approximately 10 Hz. The largest motion-induced frequency increases were in those observers with the lowest gamma response frequencies for stationary stimuli, suggesting a possible saturation mechanism. Moderate gamma amplitude increases to moving versus stationary stimuli were also observed but were not correlated with the magnitude of the frequency increase. At the same site in visual cortex, sustained alpha/beta power reductions and an onset evoked response were observed, but these effects did not change significantly with the presence of motion and did not correlate with the magnitude of gamma power changes. These findings suggest that early visual areas encode moving and stationary percepts via activity at higher and lower gamma frequencies, respectively. In two experiments, magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to investigate the effects of motion on gamma oscillations in human early visual cortex. When presented centrally, but not peripherally, stationary and moving gratings elicited several evoked and induced response components in early visual cortex. Time-frequency analysis revealed two nonphase locked gamma power increases—an initial, rapidly adapting response and one sustained throughout stimulus presentation and varying in frequency across observers from 28 to 64 Hz. Stimulus motion raised the sustained gamma oscillation frequency by a mean of ∼10 Hz. The largest motion-induced frequency increases were in those observers with the lowest gamma response frequencies for stationary stimuli, suggesting a possible saturation mechanism. Moderate gamma amplitude increases to moving versus stationary stimuli were also observed but were not correlated with the magnitude of the frequency increase. At the same site in visual cortex, sustained alpha/beta power reductions and an onset evoked response were observed, but these effects did not change significantly with the presence of motion and did not correlate with the magnitude of gamma power changes. These findings suggest that early visual areas encode moving and stationary percepts via activity at higher and lower gamma frequencies, respectively. Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom Submitted 18 September 2008; accepted in final form 7 June 2009 In two experiments, magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to investigate the effects of motion on gamma oscillations in human early visual cortex. When presented centrally, but not peripherally, stationary and moving gratings elicited several evoked and induced response components in early visual cortex. Time-frequency analysis revealed two nonphase locked gamma power increases—an initial, rapidly adapting response and one sustained throughout stimulus presentation and varying in frequency across observers from 28 to 64 Hz. Stimulus motion raised the sustained gamma oscillation frequency by a mean of 10 Hz. The largest motion-induced frequency increases were in those observers with the lowest gamma response frequencies for stationary stimuli, suggesting a possible saturation mechanism. Moderate gamma amplitude increases to moving versus stationary stimuli were also observed but were not correlated with the magnitude of the frequency increase. At the same site in visual cortex, sustained alpha/beta power reductions and an onset evoked response were observed, but these effects did not change significantly with the presence of motion and did not correlate with the magnitude of gamma power changes. These findings suggest that early visual areas encode moving and stationary percepts via activity at higher and lower gamma frequencies, respectively. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. D. Singh, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK (E-mail: singhkd{at}cardiff.ac.uk ) |
Author | Swettenham, J. B Singh, K. D Muthukumaraswamy, S. D |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Swettenham, J. B – sequence: 2 fullname: Muthukumaraswamy, S. D – sequence: 3 fullname: Singh, K. D |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19515947$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpFkM9r2zAYhsVIWZOux12HTqUXp59kq7KPI6RNICODbr0Kxf6cKLMlV7K7ZX_9lB-wk17Eowe974SMrLNIyGcGU8YEf9jbacEgy6YcIP9AxvGOJ0wU-YiMAWJOQcprMglhDwBSAP9IrlkhIpLJMfn70mHZe93Q79516HuDgbqaLm01lFhRbSs6f3e_YnzWbavpOpSmaXRvnA3UWLoYWm3pXPvmQF9NGKJp5nyPf2jv6Df3buz2JHnpT2-0P8Ro2qExn8hVrZuAt5fzhvx8mv-YLZLV-nk5-7pKyrSAPtlIrPNCYuzBIec6B1FxUZUIsWRRQi4Y41Uey22gfky1kCLlmktRbwossjq9IXdnb-fd24ChV60JJcYSFt0Q1KMUWZSzCCZnsPQuBI-16rxp448VA3UcW-2tOo2tjmNH_stFPGxarP7Tl3UjcH8Gdma7-208qm53CMY1bns4uhhwxRXjGUv_Aa6yiiU |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2019_116313 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2011_05_051 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainresbull_2017_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1021_16_2016 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_5592_11_2012 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_24069 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2013_04_108 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2009_11_045 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2015_12_021 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_23331 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2016_03_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2018_11_029 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2020_116927 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2015_09_034 crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhx055 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2010_11_053 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2013_03_003 crossref_primary_10_1186_s11689_015_9121_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jphysparis_2011_07_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2020_117189 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41398_021_01678_z crossref_primary_10_3389_fnsys_2022_908665 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11055_014_9889_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2010_12_029 crossref_primary_10_1523_ENEURO_0106_21_2021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_conb_2014_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1460_9568_2011_07777_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2024_120548 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_23283 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pcbi_1005938 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2018_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_4771_11_2012 crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bht121 crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhv027 crossref_primary_10_1126_sciadv_1500163 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2021_117748 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pbio_2004132 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2010_11_045 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_61961_9 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pcbi_1007566 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0281531 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2012_11_043 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13050792 crossref_primary_10_1038_npp_2014_58 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_21016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2012_01_028 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2012_12_038 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00607_2010 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0095541 crossref_primary_10_1038_npp_2013_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2017_10_069 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_21339 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0157374 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_018_26779_6 crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhaa372 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0228937 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejn_12900 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2063_13_2013 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnsys_2017_00022 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1321072111 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci6030027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2017_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2014_12_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2018_05_054 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2012_05_054 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2017_07_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2012_06_037 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00380_2021 crossref_primary_10_1038_npp_2014_166 crossref_primary_10_1177_1073858420958629 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2013_04_040 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mehy_2017_11_005 crossref_primary_10_1093_schbul_sbz066 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00232_2015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2011_02_072 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2270_17_2017 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_91381_2 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejn_13126 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2012_09_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2009_11_024 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pcbi_1009046 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01511 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpsycho_2010_12_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2014_02_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2021_118024 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4077802 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2015_02_062 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2020_117192 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0243237 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0057685 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.061 10.1002/hbm.1058 10.1073/pnas.0502366102 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4623-06.2007 10.1017/S0952523801182118 10.1002/hbm.10033 10.1371/journal.pone.0005163 10.1093/cercor/bhk025 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0009-08.2008 10.1002/hbm.20102 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040163 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.045 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6112 10.1212/WNL.49.2.416 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.024 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5807 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.07.009 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.027 10.1093/cercor/10.11.1117 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8 10.1017/S0952523801184038 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.008 10.1007/BF00202899 10.1007/s002210050577 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2005.09.002 10.1093/brain/awg109 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1990.tb00450.x 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030236 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01299-1 10.1016/S0074-7742(05)68006-3 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-10-04251.2003 10.1093/cercor/10.11.1105 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.002 10.1097/01.wco.0000162857.52520.68 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03495.x 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015776 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.050 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.108 10.1007/s10633-006-9043-8 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008574 10.1038/72961 10.1006/meth.2001.1238 10.1038/35094565 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.003011 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00173-3 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.009 10.1088/0031-9155/44/2/010 10.1093/cercor/bhg129 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.002 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2007.01.005 10.1007/s10072-004-0235-2 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00176-5 10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.001 10.1097/00001756-200504250-00022 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.052 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.033 10.1126/science.1055465 10.1038/338334a0 10.1152/jn.00919.2004 10.1152/jn.00195.2003 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00025.x 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-08-02914.1997 10.1167/8.1.14 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.043 10.1038/35084005 10.1167/8.10.5 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00249-0 10.1073/pnas.0400433101 10.1093/schbul/sbn070 10.1006/nimg.2000.0642 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.021 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-04-03215.1995 10.1073/pnas.0437896100 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00332-5 10.1098/rspb.1996.0064 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.020 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90039-B 10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.005 10.1152/jn.01095.2002 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90182-9 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.008 10.1016/j.tins.2007.02.001 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1152/jn.91044.2008 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1522-1598 |
EndPage | 1253 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1152_jn_91044_2008 19515947 jn_102_2_1241 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | - 0VX 29L 2WC 39C 3O- 4.4 41 53G 55 5GY 5VS AALRV ABFLS ABIVO ABPTK ABUFD ABZEH ACGFS ACNCT ADACO ADBBV ADKLL AENEX AETEA AFFNX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL C1A CS3 DIK DL DU5 DZ E3Z EBS EJD F5P FH7 FRP GX1 H~9 KQ8 L7B O0- OK1 P2P RAP RHF RHI RPL SJN UHB UPT UQL WH7 WOQ WOW X X7M ZA5 --- -DZ -~X .55 .GJ 18M 1CY 1Z7 41~ 476 8M5 ABCQX ABJNI ABKWE ABTAH ACGFO ADFNX ADIYS AFOSN AI. AIZAD BKKCC BTFSW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF EMOBN H13 ITBOX MVM NEJ NPM OHT RPRKH TR2 VH1 W8F XJT XOL XSW YBH YQT YSK ZGI ZXP ZY4 AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b7ef897e3072082a805d25dce05989c085112d8000b0f63a57532a275fb9e94f3 |
ISSN | 0022-3077 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 16 06:24:49 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 15:45:55 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:53:57 EDT 2024 Tue Jan 05 17:53:06 EST 2021 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c390t-b7ef897e3072082a805d25dce05989c085112d8000b0f63a57532a275fb9e94f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 19515947 |
PQID | 67543071 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_19515947 proquest_miscellaneous_67543071 highwire_physiology_jn_102_2_1241 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_91044_2008 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20090801 2009-Aug 2009-08-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2009-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2009 text: 20090801 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of neurophysiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neurophysiol |
PublicationYear | 2009 |
Publisher | Am Phys Soc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Am Phys Soc |
References | R61 R60 R63 R62 R21 R65 R20 R64 R23 R67 R22 R66 R25 R69 R24 R68 R27 R26 R29 R28 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R70 R72 R71 R30 R74 R73 R32 R76 R31 R75 R34 R78 R33 R77 R36 R35 R79 R38 R37 R39 R81 R80 R83 R82 R41 R85 R40 R84 R43 R87 R42 R86 R45 R44 R47 R46 R49 R48 R50 R52 R51 R10 R54 R53 R12 R56 R11 R55 R14 R13 R57 R16 R15 R59 R18 R17 R19 |
References_xml | – ident: R78 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.061 – ident: R60 doi: 10.1002/hbm.1058 – ident: R10 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502366102 – ident: R57 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4623-06.2007 – ident: R76 doi: 10.1017/S0952523801182118 – ident: R45 doi: 10.1002/hbm.10033 – ident: R40 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005163 – ident: R71 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhk025 – ident: R5 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0009-08.2008 – ident: R36 doi: 10.1002/hbm.20102 – ident: R69 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040163 – ident: R17 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.045 – ident: R49 doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6112 – ident: R6 doi: 10.1212/WNL.49.2.416 – ident: R84 doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.024 – ident: R85 doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5807 – ident: R38 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.07.009 – ident: R87 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.027 – ident: R52 doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.11.1117 – ident: R65 doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8 – ident: R68 doi: 10.1017/S0952523801184038 – ident: R42 doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.008 – ident: R13 doi: 10.1007/BF00202899 – ident: R50 doi: 10.1007/s002210050577 – ident: R80 doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2005.09.002 – ident: R63 doi: 10.1093/brain/awg109 – ident: R26 doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1990.tb00450.x – ident: R55 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030236 – ident: R79 doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01299-1 – ident: R35 doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(05)68006-3 – ident: R72 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-10-04251.2003 – ident: R19 doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.11.1105 – ident: R56 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.002 – ident: R64 doi: 10.1097/01.wco.0000162857.52520.68 – ident: R1 doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03495.x – ident: R18 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015776 – ident: R7 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.050 – ident: R66 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.108 – ident: R32 doi: 10.1007/s10633-006-9043-8 – ident: R11 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008574 – ident: R54 doi: 10.1038/72961 – ident: R82 doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1238 – ident: R15 doi: 10.1038/35094565 – ident: R73 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.003011 – ident: R53 – ident: R12 doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00173-3 – ident: R31 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.009 – ident: R41 doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/2/010 – ident: R24 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhg129 – ident: R30 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.002 – ident: R86 doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2007.01.005 – ident: R62 doi: 10.1007/s10072-004-0235-2 – ident: R28 doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00176-5 – ident: R43 doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.001 – ident: R67 – ident: R48 doi: 10.1097/00001756-200504250-00022 – ident: R59 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.052 – ident: R37 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.033 – ident: R22 doi: 10.1126/science.1055465 – ident: R27 doi: 10.1038/338334a0 – ident: R34 doi: 10.1152/jn.00919.2004 – ident: R46 doi: 10.1152/jn.00195.2003 – ident: R20 doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00025.x – ident: R29 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-08-02914.1997 – ident: R44 doi: 10.1167/8.1.14 – ident: R14 – ident: R39 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.043 – ident: R51 doi: 10.1038/35084005 – ident: R33 doi: 10.1167/8.10.5 – ident: R74 doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00249-0 – ident: R77 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400433101 – ident: R25 doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn070 – ident: R75 doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0642 – ident: R3 doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.021 – ident: R81 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-04-03215.1995 – ident: R83 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437896100 – ident: R70 doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00332-5 – ident: R2 doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0064 – ident: R23 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.020 – ident: R16 doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90039-B – ident: R21 doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.005 – ident: R8 doi: 10.1152/jn.01095.2002 – ident: R9 doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90182-9 – ident: R4 – ident: R47 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.008 – ident: R61 doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.02.001 |
SSID | ssj0007502 |
Score | 2.338147 |
Snippet | Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Submitted 18 September 2008;
accepted in... In two experiments, magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to investigate the effects of motion on gamma oscillations in human early visual cortex. When... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed highwire |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 1241 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Brain Mapping Evoked Potentials, Visual Female Humans Magnetoencephalography Male Motion Perception - physiology Periodicity Photic Stimulation Time Factors Visual Cortex - physiology Visual Perception - physiology Young Adult |
Title | Spectral Properties of Induced and Evoked Gamma Oscillations in Human Early Visual Cortex to Moving and Stationary Stimuli |
URI | http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/102/2/1241 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19515947 https://search.proquest.com/docview/67543071 |
Volume | 102 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwELWgXLggoHws5cNIqBeUknXiJD5WCFRRFYFopd4i27GBtklW3aQt_fWMx8l6F3Ul4BJFieVk895aM-OZN4S8yWyRKJvIyIhcRqnKdCS0AS_FqNT1F7EGC4UPPmd7R-mnY34ctmKwuqRTO_r6xrqS_0EVrgGurkr2H5BdTAoX4BzwhSMgDMe_wtg1j3eRCpdlNXMJ0oOCbFP1blvfxcTNRXsKp99lXcu3Trjy7Cykj_sGfQY1ji9-znvUCjnvzJWzSGsfa8DAut-vdwl2sCK4hKo1Ni2qY2KwZCVa_-3SJRQ1Y0l26PR80Hc_-lOX5S3nl7L2eWdLScjwAhj22R-ujeEJsUiOWykXiIdeLeOSG7MlbrGlBRTMjenNKzt3SrEnzQ7YNykGw4rlcQDMrEaYp8KZaF7G8w8p7fHWbXKH5YI7X33_axCXB-MpiMvDG4-SrJy9W3kuCs36mVatmVFher23glbL4X1yb4CG7nruPCC3TPOQbO42smvrX3SbfllgtUmuRzrRQCfaWjrQiQITqKcTRTrRZTrBKIp0okgn6ulEPZ1o11JPJ5wk0IkOdHpEjj5-OHy_Fw2tOSKdiLiLVG5sIXIDn4mBESmLmFeMV_Av56IQ2tvxFTgjsYptlkhwChImWc6tEkakNnlMNpq2MU8J5SZP9NRWSnGb2qwqNCsqnXGjCzW1Op6Q7fETlzOvwFKi58pZedKUCAs2U52Q1yMAZWC6GwN0K1npqDUhr0ZkSlhH3eaYbEzbz0twnFP4NTDiiQcsPGzA-tnaO1vkbqD-c7LRnffmBdiqnXqJDPsNOECYTQ |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,27957,27958 |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spectral+properties+of+induced+and+evoked+gamma+oscillations+in+human+early+visual+cortex+to+moving+and+stationary+stimuli&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Swettenham%2C+J+B&rft.au=Muthukumaraswamy%2C+S+D&rft.au=Singh%2C+K+D&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.91044.2008&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F19515947&rft.externalDocID=19515947 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |