A mega urban project and two competing accumulation strategies: negotiating discourses of the Songdo International Business District development
For the understanding of the accumulation strategy behind a mega urban development project, the distinction should be made between the two different strategies of capital accumulation, which we term the rentextraction strategy (RES) and the socio-economic transformation of space strategy (STSS). Thi...
Saved in:
Published in | International development planning review Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 299 - 317 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Liverpool University Press
01.06.2017
Liverpool University Press (UK) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | For the understanding of the accumulation strategy behind a mega urban development project, the distinction should be made between the two different strategies of capital accumulation, which we term the rentextraction strategy (RES) and the socio-economic transformation of space strategy (STSS). This distinction is important because each is preferred by actors at different scales, thereby creating conflicts between them. Local actors are likely to prefer RES because its benefits mainly fall in the local area. National actors often prefer STSS because it symbolises state-level commitment to a business-friendly economic environment. Negotiation between these two strategies constitutes a major part of the formation of accumulation strategy. We test this theoretical prediction against the case of Songdo International Business District in South Korea. We find that the history of the project is consistent with our theoretical prediction. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1474-6743 1478-3401 |
DOI: | 10.3828/idpr.2017.7 |