Time course differences for statin-induced pleiotropic effects in hypercholesterolemic patients

Background: It is unclear whether there are temporal differences for the pleiotropic effects for different members of the statin class. The present study investigated differences in the short- and intermediate-term pleiotropic effects of statins in hypercholesterolemic patients. Methods: Thirty-five...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of cardiology Vol. 94; no. 1; pp. 111 - 117
Main Authors Sakabe, Koichi, Fukuda, Nobuo, Wakayama, Katsunori, Nada, Teru, Shinohara, Hisanori, Tamura, Yoshiyuki
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Shannon Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.03.2004
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: It is unclear whether there are temporal differences for the pleiotropic effects for different members of the statin class. The present study investigated differences in the short- and intermediate-term pleiotropic effects of statins in hypercholesterolemic patients. Methods: Thirty-five hypercholesterolemic patients were randomly treated with either atorvastatin or cerivastatin for 3 months. We measured fasting lipid concentrations, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), fibrinolytic parameters, and flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery (FMD) at baseline and after 2 weeks and 3 months of therapy. Results: After 2 weeks of therapy, atorvastatin decreased the low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, small, dense LDL cholesterol (34±22 vs. 18±20%, P<0.01), remnant-like particles (RLP) cholesterol (8.8±6.0 vs. 5.1±2.6 mg/ml, P<0.01), and TBARS (3.3±1.0 vs. 3.1±0.9 nmol/ml, P<0.05), and cerivastatin decreased LDL cholesterol. After 3 months of therapy, atorvastatin decreased small dense LDL cholesterol (8±13%, P<0.0001) additionally, and cerivastatin decreased small, dense LDL cholesterol (51±11 vs. 12±22%, P<0.0001) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (68±32 vs. 51±21 ng/ml, P<0.05). FMD increased significantly in both groups after 2 weeks, although the relative change in FMD was greater with cerivastatin therapy after 2 weeks than atorvastatin therapy (60±78 vs. 23±26%, P<0.05). However, FMD was the same for both groups after 3 months (58±65 vs. 66±61%, NS), because atorvastatin additionally increased FMD. There was no correlation between these pleiotropic effects and the improvement in the lipid profile for either group. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the degree of pleiotropic effect as well as the time course for the effect are different among members of the statin class of drugs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-5273
1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.08.001