Mammographic Breast Density Assessed with Fully Automated Method and its Risk for Breast Cancer
We evaluated the association between breast cancer and breast density (BD) measured using fully automated software. We also evaluated the performance of cancer risk models such as only clinical risk factors, density related measures, and both clinical risk factors and density-related measures for de...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of clinical imaging science Vol. 9; p. 43 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Scientific Scholar
11.10.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2156-7514 2156-7514 2156-5597 |
DOI | 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019 |
Cover
Abstract | We evaluated the association between breast cancer and breast density (BD) measured using fully automated software. We also evaluated the performance of cancer risk models such as only clinical risk factors, density related measures, and both clinical risk factors and density-related measures for determining cancer risk.
This is a retrospective case-control study. The data were collected from August 2015 to December 2018. Two hundred fifty women with breast cancer and 400 control subjects were included in this study. We evaluated the BD qualitatively using breast imaging-reporting and data system density and quantitatively using 3D slicer. We also collected clinical factors such as age, familial history of breast cancer, menopausal status, number of births, body mass index, and hormonal replacement therapy use. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) for BD to determine the risk of breast cancer. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the performance of cancer risk models.
The OR for the percentage BD for second, third, and fourth quartiles was 1.632 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.102-2.416), 2.756 (95% CI: 1.704-4.458), and 3.163 (95% CI: 1.356-5.61). The area under ROC curve for clinical risk factors only, mammographic density measures, combined mammographic, and clinical risk factors was 0.578 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.64), 0.684 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.75), and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.80), respectively.
Mammographic BD was found to be positively associated with breast cancer. The density related measures combined clinical risk factors, and density model had good discriminatory power in identifying the cancer risk. |
---|---|
AbstractList | We evaluated the association between breast cancer and breast density (BD) measured using fully automated software. We also evaluated the performance of cancer risk models such as only clinical risk factors, density related measures, and both clinical risk factors and density-related measures for determining cancer risk.OBJECTIVESWe evaluated the association between breast cancer and breast density (BD) measured using fully automated software. We also evaluated the performance of cancer risk models such as only clinical risk factors, density related measures, and both clinical risk factors and density-related measures for determining cancer risk.This is a retrospective case-control study. The data were collected from August 2015 to December 2018. Two hundred fifty women with breast cancer and 400 control subjects were included in this study. We evaluated the BD qualitatively using breast imaging-reporting and data system density and quantitatively using 3D slicer. We also collected clinical factors such as age, familial history of breast cancer, menopausal status, number of births, body mass index, and hormonal replacement therapy use. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) for BD to determine the risk of breast cancer. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the performance of cancer risk models.MATERIALS AND METHODSThis is a retrospective case-control study. The data were collected from August 2015 to December 2018. Two hundred fifty women with breast cancer and 400 control subjects were included in this study. We evaluated the BD qualitatively using breast imaging-reporting and data system density and quantitatively using 3D slicer. We also collected clinical factors such as age, familial history of breast cancer, menopausal status, number of births, body mass index, and hormonal replacement therapy use. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) for BD to determine the risk of breast cancer. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the performance of cancer risk models.The OR for the percentage BD for second, third, and fourth quartiles was 1.632 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.102-2.416), 2.756 (95% CI: 1.704-4.458), and 3.163 (95% CI: 1.356-5.61). The area under ROC curve for clinical risk factors only, mammographic density measures, combined mammographic, and clinical risk factors was 0.578 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.64), 0.684 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.75), and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.80), respectively.RESULTSThe OR for the percentage BD for second, third, and fourth quartiles was 1.632 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.102-2.416), 2.756 (95% CI: 1.704-4.458), and 3.163 (95% CI: 1.356-5.61). The area under ROC curve for clinical risk factors only, mammographic density measures, combined mammographic, and clinical risk factors was 0.578 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.64), 0.684 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.75), and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.80), respectively.Mammographic BD was found to be positively associated with breast cancer. The density related measures combined clinical risk factors, and density model had good discriminatory power in identifying the cancer risk.CONCLUSIONMammographic BD was found to be positively associated with breast cancer. The density related measures combined clinical risk factors, and density model had good discriminatory power in identifying the cancer risk. We evaluated the association between breast cancer and breast density (BD) measured using fully automated software. We also evaluated the performance of cancer risk models such as only clinical risk factors, density related measures, and both clinical risk factors and density-related measures for determining cancer risk. This is a retrospective case-control study. The data were collected from August 2015 to December 2018. Two hundred fifty women with breast cancer and 400 control subjects were included in this study. We evaluated the BD qualitatively using breast imaging-reporting and data system density and quantitatively using 3D slicer. We also collected clinical factors such as age, familial history of breast cancer, menopausal status, number of births, body mass index, and hormonal replacement therapy use. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) for BD to determine the risk of breast cancer. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the performance of cancer risk models. The OR for the percentage BD for second, third, and fourth quartiles was 1.632 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.102-2.416), 2.756 (95% CI: 1.704-4.458), and 3.163 (95% CI: 1.356-5.61). The area under ROC curve for clinical risk factors only, mammographic density measures, combined mammographic, and clinical risk factors was 0.578 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.64), 0.684 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.75), and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.80), respectively. Mammographic BD was found to be positively associated with breast cancer. The density related measures combined clinical risk factors, and density model had good discriminatory power in identifying the cancer risk. |
ArticleNumber | 43 |
Author | Ramzan, Ruqiya S., Nandish Priyanka Saikiran, Pendem Kamineni, Phani Deepika John, Arathy Mary |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Pendem surname: Saikiran fullname: Saikiran, Pendem organization: Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal, Karnataka, India – sequence: 2 givenname: Ruqiya surname: Ramzan fullname: Ramzan, Ruqiya organization: Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal, Karnataka, India – sequence: 3 givenname: Nandish surname: S. fullname: S., Nandish organization: School of Information Sciences, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal, Karnataka, India – sequence: 4 givenname: Phani Deepika surname: Kamineni fullname: Kamineni, Phani Deepika organization: Department of Radiodiagnosis, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India – sequence: 5 surname: Priyanka fullname: Priyanka organization: Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal, Karnataka, India – sequence: 6 givenname: Arathy Mary surname: John fullname: John, Arathy Mary organization: Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal, Karnataka, India |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkc1P3DAQxS20iAXKkSvysZeA7cTZ-FKJbvnUokr9OFsTZ7LrNom3tgPiv8cIFm0RliWPxm9-T5p3QCaDG5CQY85OhRRSnd3Ob37qGdOCcbVD9gWXZTaTvJhs1VNyFMIflk6hipLJPTLNeVkKJfk-0XfQ927pYb2yhn71CCHSbzgEGx_peQiYbkMfbFzRy7HrUm-MroeYmncYV66hMDTUxkB_2PCXts5vIHMYDPpPZLeFLuDR63tIfl9e_JpfZ4vvVzfz80Vm8moWs5ZjIw1KyYAJlbesUjkWsi6aZlYLXtSsAZMrBVgyBYUSUCEawWtTS1FVkB-SLy_c9Vj32BgcoodOr73twT9qB1b__zPYlV66e11WaS-cJ8DnV4B3_0YMUfc2GOw6GNCNQYucs1JWnMskPdn2ejPZbDUJ8heB8S4Ej602NkK07tnadpqnwJ7j09vxpans3dQG_LH-CfqLnPw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobme_2022_100392 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2020_109019 crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_29076 |
Cites_doi | 10.1093/jnci/87.21.1622 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.10.002 10.3390/diagnostics7020030 10.1093/jnci/dju078 10.1016/j.crad.2013.01.011 10.1093/aje/152.6.514 10.1186/s13058-017-0887-5 10.2214/AJR.10.6049 10.1038/bjc.2014.82 10.1093/aje/kwn063 10.1023/A:1007423824675 10.1186/s13058-015-0626-8 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002335 10.1155/2019/4910854 10.2214/AJR.16.17525 10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800257 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-1047 10.1148/radiol.2016152062 10.7326/M15-2934 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4120 10.1159/000211954 10.1056/NEJMoa062790 10.1186/bcr1750 10.1259/bjr.20150522 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0651 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science. 2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 2019 Journal of Clinical Imaging Science |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science. – notice: 2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 2019 Journal of Clinical Imaging Science |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2156-7514 2156-5597 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC6800411 31662951 10_25259_JCIS_70_2019 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 8FE 8FG AAKDD AAYXX ABDBF ABJNI ACGFS ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ AFKRA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS ARAPS BAWUL BENPR BGLVJ CITATION DIK EBD EOJEC ESX GX1 HCIFZ HYE IAO IHR ITC KQ8 M48 O5R O5S OBODZ OK1 P2P P62 PGMZT PIMPY PROAC RNS RPM TUS ABXLX CCPQU GROUPED_DOAJ IPNFZ M~E NPM RIG RMW 7X8 PHGZM PHGZT PQGLB PUEGO 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-f1ed5ce550a0293f0893e45b4dd7b214b0dac399ae609a492a8eec21bcb5288a3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2156-7514 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:18:18 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 21:54:31 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:55:07 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:09:55 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:49:14 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Body mass index Breast density Breast cancer Breast imaging-reporting and data system 3D slicer |
Language | English |
License | 2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c387t-f1ed5ce550a0293f0893e45b4dd7b214b0dac399ae609a492a8eec21bcb5288a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.25259/JCIS_70_2019 |
PMID | 31662951 |
PQID | 2310658115 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6800411 proquest_miscellaneous_2310658115 pubmed_primary_31662951 crossref_citationtrail_10_25259_JCIS_70_2019 crossref_primary_10_25259_JCIS_70_2019 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-10-11 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-10-11 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2019 text: 2019-10-11 day: 11 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of clinical imaging science |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Clin Imaging Sci |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | Scientific Scholar |
Publisher_xml | – name: Scientific Scholar |
References | McCormack (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-14) 2006; 15 Ghosh (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-25) 2010; 28 Seo (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-13) 2013; 68 Vachon (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-3) 2007; 16 Abdolell (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-5) 2016; 89 Ursin (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-8) 2006; 15 Wang (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-12) 2003; 180 Chen (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-11) 2015; 8 Boyd (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-1) 2007; 356 Youk (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-18) 2017; 209 Kelemen (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-23) 2008; 167 van den Brandt (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-2) 2000; 152 Sprague (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-17) 2016; 165 van Gils (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-15) 1998; 14 Byrne (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-9) 1995; 87 American College of Radiology (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-10) 2013; 5 Destounis (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-19) 2017; 7 Pettersson (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-6) 2014; 106 Burton (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-24) 2017; 14 Checka (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-27) 2012; 198 Evans (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-4) 2007; 9 Jeffers (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-20) 2017; 282 Li (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-26) 2019; 2019 Keller (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-22) 2015; 17 Schreer (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-7) 2009; 4 Sovio (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-21) 2014; 110 Kerlikowske (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-16) 2017; 19 |
References_xml | – volume: 87 start-page: 1622 year: 1995 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-9 article-title: Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: Effects with time, age, and menopause status publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.21.1622 – volume: 8 start-page: 435 year: 2015 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-11 article-title: Imaging breast density: Established and emerging modalities publication-title: Transl Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.10.002 – volume: 7 start-page: E30 year: 2017 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-19 article-title: Qualitative versus quantitative mammographic breast density assessment: Applications for the US and abroad publication-title: Diagnostics (Basel) doi: 10.3390/diagnostics7020030 – volume: 106 start-page: dju078 year: 2014 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-6 article-title: Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: A meta-analysis publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju078 – volume: 68 start-page: 690 year: 2013 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-13 article-title: Automated volumetric breast density estimation: A comparison with visual assessment publication-title: Clin Radiol doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.01.011 – volume: 152 start-page: 514 year: 2000 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-2 article-title: Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk publication-title: Am J Epidemiol doi: 10.1093/aje/152.6.514 – volume: 19 start-page: 97 year: 2017 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-16 article-title: Combining quantitative and qualitative breast density measures to assess breast cancer risk publication-title: Breast Cancer Res doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0887-5 – volume: 198 start-page: W292 year: 2012 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-27 article-title: The relationship of mammographic density and age: Implications for breast cancer screening publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6049 – volume: 110 start-page: 1908 year: 2014 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-21 article-title: Comparison of fully and semi-automated area-based methods for measuring mammographic density and predicting breast cancer risk publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.82 – volume: 167 start-page: 1027 year: 2008 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-23 article-title: Age-specific trends in mammographic density: The Minnesota breast cancer family study publication-title: Am J Epidemiol doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn063 – volume: 14 start-page: 315 year: 1998 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-15 article-title: Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: Masking bias or causality? publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol doi: 10.1023/A:1007423824675 – volume: 17 start-page: 117 year: 2015 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-22 article-title: Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available laboratory for breast radiodensity assessment (LIBRA) software tool: Comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography publication-title: Breast Cancer Res doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0626-8 – volume: 15 start-page: 1159 year: 2006 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-14 article-title: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034 – volume: 14 start-page: e1002335 year: 2017 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-24 article-title: Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide publication-title: PLoS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002335 – volume: 2019 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-26 article-title: Characteristics of mammographic breast density and associated factors for Chinese women: Results from an automated measurement publication-title: J Oncol doi: 10.1155/2019/4910854 – volume: 209 start-page: 703 year: 2017 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-18 article-title: Comparison of visual assessment of breast density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th editions with automated volumetric measurement publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17525 – volume: 5 volume-title: Vol year: 2013 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-10 article-title: American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS® Atlas) – volume: 180 start-page: 257 year: 2003 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-12 article-title: Automated assessment of the composition of breast tissue revealed on tissue-thickness-corrected mammography publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800257 – volume: 16 start-page: 43 year: 2007 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-3 article-title: Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-1047 – volume: 282 start-page: 348 year: 2017 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-20 article-title: Breast cancer risk and mammographic density assessed with semiautomated and fully automated methods and BI-RADS publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152062 – volume: 165 start-page: 457 year: 2016 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-17 article-title: Variation in mammographic breast density assessments among radiologists in clinical practice: A multicenter observational study publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/M15-2934 – volume: 28 start-page: 2207 year: 2010 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-25 article-title: Association between mammographic density and age-related lobular involution of the breast publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4120 – volume: 4 start-page: 89 year: 2009 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-7 article-title: Dense breast tissue as an important risk factor for breast cancer and implications for early detection publication-title: Breast Care (Basel) doi: 10.1159/000211954 – volume: 356 start-page: 227 year: 2007 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-1 article-title: Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062790 – volume: 9 start-page: 213 year: 2007 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-4 article-title: Breast cancer risk-assessment models publication-title: Breast Cancer Res doi: 10.1186/bcr1750 – volume: 89 start-page: 1059 year: 2016 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-5 article-title: Utility of relative and absolute measures of mammographic density vs clinical risk factors in evaluating breast cancer risk at time of screening mammography publication-title: Br J Radiol doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150522 – volume: 15 start-page: 1750 year: 2006 ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-8 article-title: Mammographic density, hormone therapy, and risk of breast cancer publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0651 |
SSID | ssj0000494605 |
Score | 2.1483245 |
Snippet | We evaluated the association between breast cancer and breast density (BD) measured using fully automated software. We also evaluated the performance of cancer... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 43 |
SubjectTerms | Original |
Title | Mammographic Breast Density Assessed with Fully Automated Method and its Risk for Breast Cancer |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662951 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2310658115 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6800411 |
Volume | 9 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT8MwDLZ4SIgL4s14TEFCnCg0faTpASEYjIdUDsCk3ao0ScUAdbB1Evv3OG03GI8Llx5SN6psR9_n2rUB9hSTCQITs6QjpYV4nFqhMAlXxl3Bhe_qoqoyumVXLe-m7bc_WwpVCuz_GtqZeVKt3svh-9vwBA_8sSlj9pG-H900ru_jwI4RzMJpmEVQYiYOiyqm_1QS4eovScQ4ZgXIE8qOmz93mIc5lzLmhD6dBKsfDPR7IeUXZGouwkJFKclp6QNLMKWzZZiLqqT5CsSRQGcrOlN3JDkzVeg5OTeF6_mQlElfrYj5IEtMQIprg7yLRBYXo2K-NBGZIp28T-46_WeCLHe0ScO4TG8VWs2Lh8aVVc1VsKTLg9xKqVa-1BibCBvRPrWRs2jPTzylgsShXmIrIZG4CM3sUHihI7jW0qGJTHyHc-GuwUzWzfQGkDTwg0RJxgUKIlvhGOFwKiSS0DSlKq3BwUiBsayajpvZFy8xBh-F6uOvqq_B_lj8tey28Zfg7sgaMZ4Hk-QQme4O-rHhq8iqkOjWYL20znirkVlrEEzYbSxgem1P3sk6j0XPbcZNZzK6-e8nt2DevLiBPUq3YSbvDfQO8pk8qcM0b17i9bJN64XXfgCWifYY |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mammographic+Breast+Density+Assessed+with+Fully+Automated+Method+and+its+Risk+for+Breast+Cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+clinical+imaging+science&rft.au=Saikiran%2C+Pendem&rft.au=Ramzan%2C+Ruqiya&rft.au=S.%2C+Nandish&rft.au=Kamineni%2C+Phani+Deepika&rft.date=2019-10-11&rft.pub=Scientific+Scholar&rft.issn=2156-7514&rft.eissn=2156-5597&rft.volume=9&rft_id=info:doi/10.25259%2FJCIS_70_2019&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31662951&rft.externalDocID=PMC6800411 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2156-7514&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2156-7514&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2156-7514&client=summon |