Mammographic Breast Density Assessed with Fully Automated Method and its Risk for Breast Cancer

We evaluated the association between breast cancer and breast density (BD) measured using fully automated software. We also evaluated the performance of cancer risk models such as only clinical risk factors, density related measures, and both clinical risk factors and density-related measures for de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical imaging science Vol. 9; p. 43
Main Authors Saikiran, Pendem, Ramzan, Ruqiya, S., Nandish, Kamineni, Phani Deepika, Priyanka, John, Arathy Mary
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Scientific Scholar 11.10.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2156-7514
2156-7514
2156-5597
DOI10.25259/JCIS_70_2019

Cover

Abstract We evaluated the association between breast cancer and breast density (BD) measured using fully automated software. We also evaluated the performance of cancer risk models such as only clinical risk factors, density related measures, and both clinical risk factors and density-related measures for determining cancer risk. This is a retrospective case-control study. The data were collected from August 2015 to December 2018. Two hundred fifty women with breast cancer and 400 control subjects were included in this study. We evaluated the BD qualitatively using breast imaging-reporting and data system density and quantitatively using 3D slicer. We also collected clinical factors such as age, familial history of breast cancer, menopausal status, number of births, body mass index, and hormonal replacement therapy use. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) for BD to determine the risk of breast cancer. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the performance of cancer risk models. The OR for the percentage BD for second, third, and fourth quartiles was 1.632 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.102-2.416), 2.756 (95% CI: 1.704-4.458), and 3.163 (95% CI: 1.356-5.61). The area under ROC curve for clinical risk factors only, mammographic density measures, combined mammographic, and clinical risk factors was 0.578 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.64), 0.684 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.75), and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.80), respectively. Mammographic BD was found to be positively associated with breast cancer. The density related measures combined clinical risk factors, and density model had good discriminatory power in identifying the cancer risk.
AbstractList We evaluated the association between breast cancer and breast density (BD) measured using fully automated software. We also evaluated the performance of cancer risk models such as only clinical risk factors, density related measures, and both clinical risk factors and density-related measures for determining cancer risk.OBJECTIVESWe evaluated the association between breast cancer and breast density (BD) measured using fully automated software. We also evaluated the performance of cancer risk models such as only clinical risk factors, density related measures, and both clinical risk factors and density-related measures for determining cancer risk.This is a retrospective case-control study. The data were collected from August 2015 to December 2018. Two hundred fifty women with breast cancer and 400 control subjects were included in this study. We evaluated the BD qualitatively using breast imaging-reporting and data system density and quantitatively using 3D slicer. We also collected clinical factors such as age, familial history of breast cancer, menopausal status, number of births, body mass index, and hormonal replacement therapy use. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) for BD to determine the risk of breast cancer. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the performance of cancer risk models.MATERIALS AND METHODSThis is a retrospective case-control study. The data were collected from August 2015 to December 2018. Two hundred fifty women with breast cancer and 400 control subjects were included in this study. We evaluated the BD qualitatively using breast imaging-reporting and data system density and quantitatively using 3D slicer. We also collected clinical factors such as age, familial history of breast cancer, menopausal status, number of births, body mass index, and hormonal replacement therapy use. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) for BD to determine the risk of breast cancer. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the performance of cancer risk models.The OR for the percentage BD for second, third, and fourth quartiles was 1.632 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.102-2.416), 2.756 (95% CI: 1.704-4.458), and 3.163 (95% CI: 1.356-5.61). The area under ROC curve for clinical risk factors only, mammographic density measures, combined mammographic, and clinical risk factors was 0.578 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.64), 0.684 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.75), and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.80), respectively.RESULTSThe OR for the percentage BD for second, third, and fourth quartiles was 1.632 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.102-2.416), 2.756 (95% CI: 1.704-4.458), and 3.163 (95% CI: 1.356-5.61). The area under ROC curve for clinical risk factors only, mammographic density measures, combined mammographic, and clinical risk factors was 0.578 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.64), 0.684 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.75), and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.80), respectively.Mammographic BD was found to be positively associated with breast cancer. The density related measures combined clinical risk factors, and density model had good discriminatory power in identifying the cancer risk.CONCLUSIONMammographic BD was found to be positively associated with breast cancer. The density related measures combined clinical risk factors, and density model had good discriminatory power in identifying the cancer risk.
We evaluated the association between breast cancer and breast density (BD) measured using fully automated software. We also evaluated the performance of cancer risk models such as only clinical risk factors, density related measures, and both clinical risk factors and density-related measures for determining cancer risk. This is a retrospective case-control study. The data were collected from August 2015 to December 2018. Two hundred fifty women with breast cancer and 400 control subjects were included in this study. We evaluated the BD qualitatively using breast imaging-reporting and data system density and quantitatively using 3D slicer. We also collected clinical factors such as age, familial history of breast cancer, menopausal status, number of births, body mass index, and hormonal replacement therapy use. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) for BD to determine the risk of breast cancer. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the performance of cancer risk models. The OR for the percentage BD for second, third, and fourth quartiles was 1.632 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.102-2.416), 2.756 (95% CI: 1.704-4.458), and 3.163 (95% CI: 1.356-5.61). The area under ROC curve for clinical risk factors only, mammographic density measures, combined mammographic, and clinical risk factors was 0.578 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.64), 0.684 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.75), and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.80), respectively. Mammographic BD was found to be positively associated with breast cancer. The density related measures combined clinical risk factors, and density model had good discriminatory power in identifying the cancer risk.
ArticleNumber 43
Author Ramzan, Ruqiya
S., Nandish
Priyanka
Saikiran, Pendem
Kamineni, Phani Deepika
John, Arathy Mary
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Pendem
  surname: Saikiran
  fullname: Saikiran, Pendem
  organization: Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal, Karnataka, India
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ruqiya
  surname: Ramzan
  fullname: Ramzan, Ruqiya
  organization: Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal, Karnataka, India
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Nandish
  surname: S.
  fullname: S., Nandish
  organization: School of Information Sciences, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal, Karnataka, India
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Phani Deepika
  surname: Kamineni
  fullname: Kamineni, Phani Deepika
  organization: Department of Radiodiagnosis, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
– sequence: 5
  surname: Priyanka
  fullname: Priyanka
  organization: Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal, Karnataka, India
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Arathy Mary
  surname: John
  fullname: John, Arathy Mary
  organization: Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal, Karnataka, India
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkc1P3DAQxS20iAXKkSvysZeA7cTZ-FKJbvnUokr9OFsTZ7LrNom3tgPiv8cIFm0RliWPxm9-T5p3QCaDG5CQY85OhRRSnd3Ob37qGdOCcbVD9gWXZTaTvJhs1VNyFMIflk6hipLJPTLNeVkKJfk-0XfQ927pYb2yhn71CCHSbzgEGx_peQiYbkMfbFzRy7HrUm-MroeYmncYV66hMDTUxkB_2PCXts5vIHMYDPpPZLeFLuDR63tIfl9e_JpfZ4vvVzfz80Vm8moWs5ZjIw1KyYAJlbesUjkWsi6aZlYLXtSsAZMrBVgyBYUSUCEawWtTS1FVkB-SLy_c9Vj32BgcoodOr73twT9qB1b__zPYlV66e11WaS-cJ8DnV4B3_0YMUfc2GOw6GNCNQYucs1JWnMskPdn2ejPZbDUJ8heB8S4Ej602NkK07tnadpqnwJ7j09vxpans3dQG_LH-CfqLnPw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobme_2022_100392
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2020_109019
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_29076
Cites_doi 10.1093/jnci/87.21.1622
10.1016/j.tranon.2015.10.002
10.3390/diagnostics7020030
10.1093/jnci/dju078
10.1016/j.crad.2013.01.011
10.1093/aje/152.6.514
10.1186/s13058-017-0887-5
10.2214/AJR.10.6049
10.1038/bjc.2014.82
10.1093/aje/kwn063
10.1023/A:1007423824675
10.1186/s13058-015-0626-8
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034
10.1371/journal.pmed.1002335
10.1155/2019/4910854
10.2214/AJR.16.17525
10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800257
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-1047
10.1148/radiol.2016152062
10.7326/M15-2934
10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4120
10.1159/000211954
10.1056/NEJMoa062790
10.1186/bcr1750
10.1259/bjr.20150522
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0651
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science.
2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 2019 Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Copyright_xml – notice: 2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science.
– notice: 2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 2019 Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2156-7514
2156-5597
ExternalDocumentID PMC6800411
31662951
10_25259_JCIS_70_2019
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 53G
5VS
8FE
8FG
AAKDD
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABJNI
ACGFS
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AFKRA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
ARAPS
BAWUL
BENPR
BGLVJ
CITATION
DIK
EBD
EOJEC
ESX
GX1
HCIFZ
HYE
IAO
IHR
ITC
KQ8
M48
O5R
O5S
OBODZ
OK1
P2P
P62
PGMZT
PIMPY
PROAC
RNS
RPM
TUS
ABXLX
CCPQU
GROUPED_DOAJ
IPNFZ
M~E
NPM
RIG
RMW
7X8
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQGLB
PUEGO
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-f1ed5ce550a0293f0893e45b4dd7b214b0dac399ae609a492a8eec21bcb5288a3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2156-7514
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:18:18 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 21:54:31 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:55:07 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:09:55 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:49:14 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Keywords Body mass index
Breast density
Breast cancer
Breast imaging-reporting and data system
3D slicer
Language English
License 2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c387t-f1ed5ce550a0293f0893e45b4dd7b214b0dac399ae609a492a8eec21bcb5288a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.25259/JCIS_70_2019
PMID 31662951
PQID 2310658115
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6800411
proquest_miscellaneous_2310658115
pubmed_primary_31662951
crossref_citationtrail_10_25259_JCIS_70_2019
crossref_primary_10_25259_JCIS_70_2019
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-10-11
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-10-11
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-10-11
  day: 11
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of clinical imaging science
PublicationTitleAlternate J Clin Imaging Sci
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Scientific Scholar
Publisher_xml – name: Scientific Scholar
References McCormack (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-14) 2006; 15
Ghosh (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-25) 2010; 28
Seo (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-13) 2013; 68
Vachon (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-3) 2007; 16
Abdolell (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-5) 2016; 89
Ursin (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-8) 2006; 15
Wang (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-12) 2003; 180
Chen (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-11) 2015; 8
Boyd (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-1) 2007; 356
Youk (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-18) 2017; 209
Kelemen (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-23) 2008; 167
van den Brandt (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-2) 2000; 152
Sprague (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-17) 2016; 165
van Gils (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-15) 1998; 14
Byrne (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-9) 1995; 87
American College of Radiology (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-10) 2013; 5
Destounis (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-19) 2017; 7
Pettersson (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-6) 2014; 106
Burton (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-24) 2017; 14
Checka (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-27) 2012; 198
Evans (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-4) 2007; 9
Jeffers (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-20) 2017; 282
Li (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-26) 2019; 2019
Keller (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-22) 2015; 17
Schreer (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-7) 2009; 4
Sovio (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-21) 2014; 110
Kerlikowske (10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-16) 2017; 19
References_xml – volume: 87
  start-page: 1622
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-9
  article-title: Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: Effects with time, age, and menopause status
  publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.21.1622
– volume: 8
  start-page: 435
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-11
  article-title: Imaging breast density: Established and emerging modalities
  publication-title: Transl Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.10.002
– volume: 7
  start-page: E30
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-19
  article-title: Qualitative versus quantitative mammographic breast density assessment: Applications for the US and abroad
  publication-title: Diagnostics (Basel)
  doi: 10.3390/diagnostics7020030
– volume: 106
  start-page: dju078
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-6
  article-title: Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: A meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju078
– volume: 68
  start-page: 690
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-13
  article-title: Automated volumetric breast density estimation: A comparison with visual assessment
  publication-title: Clin Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.01.011
– volume: 152
  start-page: 514
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-2
  article-title: Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk
  publication-title: Am J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1093/aje/152.6.514
– volume: 19
  start-page: 97
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-16
  article-title: Combining quantitative and qualitative breast density measures to assess breast cancer risk
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0887-5
– volume: 198
  start-page: W292
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-27
  article-title: The relationship of mammographic density and age: Implications for breast cancer screening
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6049
– volume: 110
  start-page: 1908
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-21
  article-title: Comparison of fully and semi-automated area-based methods for measuring mammographic density and predicting breast cancer risk
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.82
– volume: 167
  start-page: 1027
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-23
  article-title: Age-specific trends in mammographic density: The Minnesota breast cancer family study
  publication-title: Am J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn063
– volume: 14
  start-page: 315
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-15
  article-title: Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: Masking bias or causality?
  publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1023/A:1007423824675
– volume: 17
  start-page: 117
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-22
  article-title: Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available laboratory for breast radiodensity assessment (LIBRA) software tool: Comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0626-8
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1159
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-14
  article-title: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034
– volume: 14
  start-page: e1002335
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-24
  article-title: Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide
  publication-title: PLoS Med
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002335
– volume: 2019
  start-page: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-26
  article-title: Characteristics of mammographic breast density and associated factors for Chinese women: Results from an automated measurement
  publication-title: J Oncol
  doi: 10.1155/2019/4910854
– volume: 209
  start-page: 703
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-18
  article-title: Comparison of visual assessment of breast density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th editions with automated volumetric measurement
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17525
– volume: 5
  volume-title: Vol
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-10
  article-title: American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS® Atlas)
– volume: 180
  start-page: 257
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-12
  article-title: Automated assessment of the composition of breast tissue revealed on tissue-thickness-corrected mammography
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800257
– volume: 16
  start-page: 43
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-3
  article-title: Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-1047
– volume: 282
  start-page: 348
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-20
  article-title: Breast cancer risk and mammographic density assessed with semiautomated and fully automated methods and BI-RADS
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152062
– volume: 165
  start-page: 457
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-17
  article-title: Variation in mammographic breast density assessments among radiologists in clinical practice: A multicenter observational study
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/M15-2934
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2207
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-25
  article-title: Association between mammographic density and age-related lobular involution of the breast
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4120
– volume: 4
  start-page: 89
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-7
  article-title: Dense breast tissue as an important risk factor for breast cancer and implications for early detection
  publication-title: Breast Care (Basel)
  doi: 10.1159/000211954
– volume: 356
  start-page: 227
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-1
  article-title: Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062790
– volume: 9
  start-page: 213
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-4
  article-title: Breast cancer risk-assessment models
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1186/bcr1750
– volume: 89
  start-page: 1059
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-5
  article-title: Utility of relative and absolute measures of mammographic density vs clinical risk factors in evaluating breast cancer risk at time of screening mammography
  publication-title: Br J Radiol
  doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150522
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1750
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.25259/JCIS_70_2019/ref-8
  article-title: Mammographic density, hormone therapy, and risk of breast cancer
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0651
SSID ssj0000494605
Score 2.1483245
Snippet We evaluated the association between breast cancer and breast density (BD) measured using fully automated software. We also evaluated the performance of cancer...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 43
SubjectTerms Original
Title Mammographic Breast Density Assessed with Fully Automated Method and its Risk for Breast Cancer
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662951
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2310658115
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6800411
Volume 9
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT8MwDLZ4SIgL4s14TEFCnCg0faTpASEYjIdUDsCk3ao0ScUAdbB1Evv3OG03GI8Llx5SN6psR9_n2rUB9hSTCQITs6QjpYV4nFqhMAlXxl3Bhe_qoqoyumVXLe-m7bc_WwpVCuz_GtqZeVKt3svh-9vwBA_8sSlj9pG-H900ru_jwI4RzMJpmEVQYiYOiyqm_1QS4eovScQ4ZgXIE8qOmz93mIc5lzLmhD6dBKsfDPR7IeUXZGouwkJFKclp6QNLMKWzZZiLqqT5CsSRQGcrOlN3JDkzVeg5OTeF6_mQlElfrYj5IEtMQIprg7yLRBYXo2K-NBGZIp28T-46_WeCLHe0ScO4TG8VWs2Lh8aVVc1VsKTLg9xKqVa-1BibCBvRPrWRs2jPTzylgsShXmIrIZG4CM3sUHihI7jW0qGJTHyHc-GuwUzWzfQGkDTwg0RJxgUKIlvhGOFwKiSS0DSlKq3BwUiBsayajpvZFy8xBh-F6uOvqq_B_lj8tey28Zfg7sgaMZ4Hk-QQme4O-rHhq8iqkOjWYL20znirkVlrEEzYbSxgem1P3sk6j0XPbcZNZzK6-e8nt2DevLiBPUq3YSbvDfQO8pk8qcM0b17i9bJN64XXfgCWifYY
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mammographic+Breast+Density+Assessed+with+Fully+Automated+Method+and+its+Risk+for+Breast+Cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+clinical+imaging+science&rft.au=Saikiran%2C+Pendem&rft.au=Ramzan%2C+Ruqiya&rft.au=S.%2C+Nandish&rft.au=Kamineni%2C+Phani+Deepika&rft.date=2019-10-11&rft.pub=Scientific+Scholar&rft.issn=2156-7514&rft.eissn=2156-5597&rft.volume=9&rft_id=info:doi/10.25259%2FJCIS_70_2019&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31662951&rft.externalDocID=PMC6800411
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2156-7514&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2156-7514&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2156-7514&client=summon