Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners

Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurophysiology Vol. 125; no. 4; pp. 1213 - 1222
Main Authors Mepani, Anita M., Verhulst, Sarah, Hancock, Kenneth E., Garrett, Markus, Vasilkov, Viacheslav, Bennett, Kara, de Gruttola, Victor, Liberman, M. Charles, Maison, Stéphane F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Physiological Society 01.04.2021
SeriesSensory Processing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities. Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities.
AbstractList Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies. Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities.
Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities. Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities.
Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities.Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities.
Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities.
Author Mepani, Anita M.
Garrett, Markus
Bennett, Kara
Verhulst, Sarah
Hancock, Kenneth E.
de Gruttola, Victor
Maison, Stéphane F.
Liberman, M. Charles
Vasilkov, Viacheslav
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Anita M.
  surname: Mepani
  fullname: Mepani, Anita M.
  organization: Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Sarah
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6498-7719
  surname: Verhulst
  fullname: Verhulst, Sarah
  organization: Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Kenneth E.
  surname: Hancock
  fullname: Hancock, Kenneth E.
  organization: Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Markus
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0115-5288
  surname: Garrett
  fullname: Garrett, Markus
  organization: Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Viacheslav
  surname: Vasilkov
  fullname: Vasilkov, Viacheslav
  organization: Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Kara
  surname: Bennett
  fullname: Bennett, Kara
  organization: Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Victor
  surname: de Gruttola
  fullname: de Gruttola, Victor
  organization: Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 8
  givenname: M. Charles
  surname: Liberman
  fullname: Liberman, M. Charles
  organization: Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, Harvard Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Stéphane F.
  surname: Maison
  fullname: Maison, Stéphane F.
  organization: Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, Harvard Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33656936$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptUc1LwzAUD6LonB69So9eOl_TtWkugoz5AQMvehNClr64jCypSTfxv7d1TlQ85OWR9_sI73dM9p13SMhZBqMsK-jl0o0ASgojChT2yKB7o2lW8GqfDAC6PgfGjshxjEsAYAXQQ3KU52VR8rwckOep26D1DSbaW-vfjHtJAsbGu4gxaQLWRrVJbBDVIjUudd5ETBoM2oeVdAoT4xLX9zZdoAw935rYosMQT8iBljbi6dc9JE8308fJXTp7uL2fXM9SlVesTTlo3Z1K8UpzzXPJ6ZijZNmcz2sY97M5HSuWcSZLVVAcl1xmspDAi7rWZT4kV1vdZj1fYa3QtUFa0QSzkuFdeGnE74kzC_HiN6KiFaW0F7j4Egj-dY2xFSsTFVorHfp1FN1_GDDelQ56_tPr22S30g6QbwEq-BgDaqFMK1vje2tjRQaiD04snfgMTvTBdaz0D2sn_D_-A11MnIg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0006572
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2022_877588
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0014815
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_46741_5
crossref_primary_10_1044_2021_JSLHR_21_00064
crossref_primary_10_1089_ars_2021_0166
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0025136
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_1005148
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_13023_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2021_108333
crossref_primary_10_3390_life14040471
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0011694
crossref_primary_10_1097_AUD_0000000000001147
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13092725
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_81673_8
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0011510
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0016807
crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165241239541
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0009675
crossref_primary_10_1080_13543784_2023_2242253
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0021884
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2024_108967
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2022_108663
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0017002
crossref_primary_10_51445_sja_auditio_vol8_2024_103
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2022_108569
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0020845
crossref_primary_10_12677_MD_2022_121002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10162_025_00979_0
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_893542
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2024_120958
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0017328
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2022_869338
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2021_108408
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0034423
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00402_2021
crossref_primary_10_1044_2023_JSLHR_23_00234
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2022_1102294
crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0016853
Cites_doi 10.1007/s10162-019-00721-7
10.1097/AUD.0b013e31823d7917
10.1121/1.429605
10.1097/AUD.0000000000000711
10.1097/00003446-198309000-00005
10.1073/pnas.1903315116
10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.009
10.1177/2331216517737417
10.1016/j.heares.2020.108132
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009
10.1055/s-0040-1715963
10.1016/j.heares.2017.12.018
10.1152/jn.00016.2020
10.1097/AUD.0000000000000987
10.1097/00003446-199312000-00008
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1783-13.2013
10.1007/s10162-020-00776-x
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.02.031
10.1016/j.heares.2020.107922
10.1121/1.391011
10.1152/jn.1984.51.6.1326
10.1097/AUD.0000000000000804
10.1177/0891988715598236
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3240-17.2018
10.1097/AUD.0000000000000787
10.1007/s10162-020-00747-2
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.07.053
10.1080/010503901300007371
10.1097/AUD.0000000000000640
10.1152/jn.00326.2006
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.067
10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.014
10.1152/jn.00164.2013
10.1152/physrev.00029.2003
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3915-14.2015
10.1016/j.heares.2019.01.017
10.1007/s10162-015-0539-3
10.1121/1.418265
10.1016/0378-5955(95)00158-1
10.1152/jn.1996.76.4.2799
10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.008
10.1044/1059-0889(2002/004)
10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00056
10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347
10.1016/j.heares.2013.03.012
10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.014
10.1044/jshr.3101.87
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2021 the American Physiological Society 2021 American Physiological Society
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2021 the American Physiological Society 2021 American Physiological Society
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1152/jn.00620.2020
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
DocumentTitleAlternate COCHLEAR SYNAPTOPATHY AND EFRs
EISSN 1522-1598
EndPage 1222
ExternalDocumentID PMC8282226
33656936
10_1152_jn_00620_2020
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NIDCD NIH HHS
  grantid: P50 DC015857
– fundername: ; ;
  grantid: 678120
– fundername: ; ;
  grantid: P50 DC015857
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
.55
18M
29L
2WC
39C
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
AAYXX
ABCQX
ABHWK
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABKWE
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACNCT
ADBBV
ADFNX
ADHGD
ADIYS
AENEX
AFFNX
AFOSN
AIZAD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BKKCC
BTFSW
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EMOBN
F5P
H13
H~9
ITBOX
KQ8
L7B
OK1
P2P
RAP
RHI
RPL
RPRKH
SJN
TR2
UHB
UPT
W8F
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
XSW
YBH
YQT
YSK
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-90ff90f8c98f9f93a9249ea71b9bd04f90fb24c7197a6c52e469a1a5a095ddf63
ISSN 0022-3077
1522-1598
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:23:49 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 19:18:56 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:03:16 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:33:55 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:48:40 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords cochlea
envelope following responses
auditory nerve
cochlear synaptopathy
hearing in noise
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c387t-90ff90f8c98f9f93a9249ea71b9bd04f90fb24c7197a6c52e469a1a5a095ddf63
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-6498-7719
0000-0002-0115-5288
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8282226
PMID 33656936
PQID 2497079970
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8282226
proquest_miscellaneous_2497079970
pubmed_primary_33656936
crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_jn_00620_2020
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00620_2020
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Bethesda, MD
PublicationSeriesTitle Sensory Processing
PublicationTitle Journal of neurophysiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurophysiol
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher American Physiological Society
Publisher_xml – name: American Physiological Society
References B20
B21
B22
B23
B24
B25
B26
B27
B28
B29
B30
B32
B33
B34
B35
B36
B37
B38
B39
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B7
B8
B9
B40
B41
B43
B44
B45
B46
B47
B48
B49
Woellner RC (B6) 1955; 59
B50
B10
B11
B12
B13
B14
B15
B16
B17
B18
B19
Noffsinger D (B31) 1994; 5
References_xml – ident: B24
  doi: 10.1007/s10162-019-00721-7
– ident: B34
  doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31823d7917
– ident: B47
  doi: 10.1121/1.429605
– ident: B36
  doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000711
– ident: B10
  doi: 10.1097/00003446-198309000-00005
– volume: 5
  start-page: 231
  year: 1994
  ident: B31
  publication-title: J Am Acad Audiol
– ident: B38
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903315116
– ident: B13
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.009
– ident: B25
  doi: 10.1177/2331216517737417
– ident: B27
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108132
– ident: B1
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009
– ident: B43
  doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715963
– ident: B28
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.12.018
– ident: B12
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00016.2020
– ident: B16
  doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000987
– ident: B20
  doi: 10.1097/00003446-199312000-00008
– ident: B18
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1783-13.2013
– ident: B49
  doi: 10.1007/s10162-020-00776-x
– ident: B21
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.02.031
– ident: B37
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107922
– ident: B11
  doi: 10.1121/1.391011
– ident: B9
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1984.51.6.1326
– ident: B14
  doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000804
– ident: B40
  doi: 10.1177/0891988715598236
– ident: B30
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3240-17.2018
– ident: B15
  doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000787
– ident: B50
  doi: 10.1007/s10162-020-00747-2
– ident: B3
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.07.053
– ident: B46
  doi: 10.1080/010503901300007371
– ident: B39
  doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000640
– ident: B29
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00326.2006
– ident: B17
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.067
– ident: B45
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.014
– ident: B7
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00164.2013
– ident: B44
  doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2003
– ident: B23
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3915-14.2015
– ident: B33
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.01.017
– ident: B22
  doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0539-3
– ident: B48
  doi: 10.1121/1.418265
– ident: B4
  doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00158-1
– ident: B8
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.4.2799
– ident: B26
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.008
– ident: B32
  doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2002/004)
– ident: B41
  doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00056
– ident: B35
  doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347
– ident: B5
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.03.012
– volume: 59
  start-page: 147
  year: 1955
  ident: B6
  publication-title: Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol
– ident: B2
  doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.014
– ident: B19
  doi: 10.1044/jshr.3101.87
SSID ssj0007502
Score 2.5337274
Snippet Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced...
Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 1213
SubjectTerms Acoustic Stimulation
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aging - physiology
Audiometry
Auditory Threshold - physiology
Cochlea - physiology
Cochlear Nerve - physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Noise
Recognition, Psychology - physiology
Speech Perception - physiology
Young Adult
Title Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33656936
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2497079970
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8282226
Volume 125
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZguXBBwPIoLxkJ7aUE8nZ8rFCXCnYXkFq0B6TIcRw1q-Cs2lQIfj0zznsp0sKhVuS4TupvOp6xZz4T8spzwKhOJLfsAArfTrklpMctyRjMdn4CHgc6iqdn4WLlfzgPBhvtJrukSt7IX3vzSv4HVagDXDFL9h-Q7TqFCrgGfKEEhKG8FsZzbSJ-kLe7KMof6PVv6phXtcXs_zSX1XR7qZRcW7m2dJlvFRIVd6kCuZ5qvC4sPNgav18g7LoJi99jtRr-S7McMlqPP4VZzRwONZ2BjhD9GutXtVnvijqxZLT6vIAXaHRxkxvUJ0W87-OHMZdovDbhOoOQlkadgqsLBlOtYdWeulYH19nPjbD5A42KlHP7VX2A1LEXGiPzXBs8fdfu57R2H__sU3y8OjmJl_Pz5U1yywVfAo-5-Pilp5QHk8lsibev1RKxBu7bUedjw-UPb-RqUO3ASlneJXcaoOislpV75IbS98nhTIuq_P6THtHPHXKH5FsrPrQTH9qJD23Eh14RHzoQH5prOhYf2onPA7I6ni_fLazmsA1LehGrLG5nGXwiyaOMZ9wT6JgrwZyEJ6nt473E9SVzOBOhDFzlh1w4IhBgo6dpFnoPyYEutXpMqJ3hqoJgQRCB_y2YiHxfhIwrsGVlaqsJed2OZCwbJno8EKWIjUcauPGFjs3AxzjwE3LUNb-sKVj-1vBlC0sMShJ3voRW5W4bw09BJkgoJuRRDVPXleeBS8O9cELYCMCuARKwj-_ofG2I2COMwXbDJ9d47lNyu_-DPCMH1WannoM5WyUvjDj-BuCgpXw
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Envelope+following+responses+predict+speech-in-noise+performance+in+normal-hearing+listeners&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Mepani%2C+Anita+M&rft.au=Verhulst%2C+Sarah&rft.au=Hancock%2C+Kenneth+E&rft.au=Garrett%2C+Markus&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.issn=1522-1598&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1213&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00620.2020&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon