Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners
Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neur...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neurophysiology Vol. 125; no. 4; pp. 1213 - 1222 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Physiological Society
01.04.2021
|
Series | Sensory Processing |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities.
Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies.
Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities. Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities. Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities. Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities.Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities. Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of the synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. Silencing these neurons is likely to degrade auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. Reduction of suprathreshold ABR amplitudes can be used to quantify synaptopathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy preferentially targets fibers with high thresholds and low spontaneous rate and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) might be a more robust measure of cochlear synaptopathy. A recent auditory model further suggests that modulation of carrier tones with rectangular envelopes should be less sensitive to cochlear amplifier dysfunction and, therefore, a better metric of cochlear neural damage than sinusoidal amplitude modulation. In this study, we measure performance scores on a variety of difficult word-recognition tasks among listeners with normal audiograms and assess correlations with EFR magnitudes to rectangular versus sinusoidal modulation. Higher harmonics of EFR magnitudes evoked by a rectangular-envelope stimulus were significantly correlated with word scores, whereas those evoked by sinusoidally modulated tones did not. These results support previous reports that individual differences in synaptopathy may be a source of speech recognition variability despite the presence of normal thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced degeneration of neural connections in the inner ear. This study examines electrophysiological responses to stimuli designed to improve detection of neural damage in subjects with normal hearing sensitivity. The resultant correlations with word recognition performance are consistent with a contribution of cochlear neural damage to deficits in hearing in noise abilities. |
Author | Mepani, Anita M. Garrett, Markus Bennett, Kara Verhulst, Sarah Hancock, Kenneth E. de Gruttola, Victor Maison, Stéphane F. Liberman, M. Charles Vasilkov, Viacheslav |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Anita M. surname: Mepani fullname: Mepani, Anita M. organization: Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts – sequence: 2 givenname: Sarah orcidid: 0000-0002-6498-7719 surname: Verhulst fullname: Verhulst, Sarah organization: Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium – sequence: 3 givenname: Kenneth E. surname: Hancock fullname: Hancock, Kenneth E. organization: Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts – sequence: 4 givenname: Markus orcidid: 0000-0002-0115-5288 surname: Garrett fullname: Garrett, Markus organization: Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany – sequence: 5 givenname: Viacheslav surname: Vasilkov fullname: Vasilkov, Viacheslav organization: Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium – sequence: 6 givenname: Kara surname: Bennett fullname: Bennett, Kara organization: Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts – sequence: 7 givenname: Victor surname: de Gruttola fullname: de Gruttola, Victor organization: Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts – sequence: 8 givenname: M. Charles surname: Liberman fullname: Liberman, M. Charles organization: Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, Harvard Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts – sequence: 9 givenname: Stéphane F. surname: Maison fullname: Maison, Stéphane F. organization: Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, Harvard Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33656936$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptUc1LwzAUD6LonB69So9eOl_TtWkugoz5AQMvehNClr64jCypSTfxv7d1TlQ85OWR9_sI73dM9p13SMhZBqMsK-jl0o0ASgojChT2yKB7o2lW8GqfDAC6PgfGjshxjEsAYAXQQ3KU52VR8rwckOep26D1DSbaW-vfjHtJAsbGu4gxaQLWRrVJbBDVIjUudd5ETBoM2oeVdAoT4xLX9zZdoAw935rYosMQT8iBljbi6dc9JE8308fJXTp7uL2fXM9SlVesTTlo3Z1K8UpzzXPJ6ZijZNmcz2sY97M5HSuWcSZLVVAcl1xmspDAi7rWZT4kV1vdZj1fYa3QtUFa0QSzkuFdeGnE74kzC_HiN6KiFaW0F7j4Egj-dY2xFSsTFVorHfp1FN1_GDDelQ56_tPr22S30g6QbwEq-BgDaqFMK1vje2tjRQaiD04snfgMTvTBdaz0D2sn_D_-A11MnIg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0006572 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2022_877588 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0014815 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_46741_5 crossref_primary_10_1044_2021_JSLHR_21_00064 crossref_primary_10_1089_ars_2021_0166 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0025136 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_1005148 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_13023_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2021_108333 crossref_primary_10_3390_life14040471 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0011694 crossref_primary_10_1097_AUD_0000000000001147 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13092725 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_81673_8 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0011510 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0016807 crossref_primary_10_1177_23312165241239541 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0009675 crossref_primary_10_1080_13543784_2023_2242253 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0021884 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2024_108967 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2022_108663 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0017002 crossref_primary_10_51445_sja_auditio_vol8_2024_103 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2022_108569 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0020845 crossref_primary_10_12677_MD_2022_121002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10162_025_00979_0 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_893542 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2024_120958 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0017328 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2022_869338 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2021_108408 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0034423 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00402_2021 crossref_primary_10_1044_2023_JSLHR_23_00234 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2022_1102294 crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0016853 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s10162-019-00721-7 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31823d7917 10.1121/1.429605 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000711 10.1097/00003446-198309000-00005 10.1073/pnas.1903315116 10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.009 10.1177/2331216517737417 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108132 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009 10.1055/s-0040-1715963 10.1016/j.heares.2017.12.018 10.1152/jn.00016.2020 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000987 10.1097/00003446-199312000-00008 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1783-13.2013 10.1007/s10162-020-00776-x 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.02.031 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107922 10.1121/1.391011 10.1152/jn.1984.51.6.1326 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000804 10.1177/0891988715598236 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3240-17.2018 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000787 10.1007/s10162-020-00747-2 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.07.053 10.1080/010503901300007371 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000640 10.1152/jn.00326.2006 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.067 10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.014 10.1152/jn.00164.2013 10.1152/physrev.00029.2003 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3915-14.2015 10.1016/j.heares.2019.01.017 10.1007/s10162-015-0539-3 10.1121/1.418265 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00158-1 10.1152/jn.1996.76.4.2799 10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.008 10.1044/1059-0889(2002/004) 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00056 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347 10.1016/j.heares.2013.03.012 10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.014 10.1044/jshr.3101.87 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2021 the American Physiological Society 2021 American Physiological Society |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2021 the American Physiological Society 2021 American Physiological Society |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1152/jn.00620.2020 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
DocumentTitleAlternate | COCHLEAR SYNAPTOPATHY AND EFRs |
EISSN | 1522-1598 |
EndPage | 1222 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC8282226 33656936 10_1152_jn_00620_2020 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NIDCD NIH HHS grantid: P50 DC015857 – fundername: ; ; grantid: 678120 – fundername: ; ; grantid: P50 DC015857 |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X .55 18M 29L 2WC 39C 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS AAYXX ABCQX ABHWK ABIVO ABJNI ABKWE ACGFO ACGFS ACNCT ADBBV ADFNX ADHGD ADIYS AENEX AFFNX AFOSN AIZAD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BKKCC BTFSW CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EMOBN F5P H13 H~9 ITBOX KQ8 L7B OK1 P2P RAP RHI RPL RPRKH SJN TR2 UHB UPT W8F WH7 WOQ WOW X7M XSW YBH YQT YSK CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-90ff90f8c98f9f93a9249ea71b9bd04f90fb24c7197a6c52e469a1a5a095ddf63 |
ISSN | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:23:49 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 19:18:56 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:03:16 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:33:55 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:48:40 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | cochlea envelope following responses auditory nerve cochlear synaptopathy hearing in noise |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c387t-90ff90f8c98f9f93a9249ea71b9bd04f90fb24c7197a6c52e469a1a5a095ddf63 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-6498-7719 0000-0002-0115-5288 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8282226 |
PMID | 33656936 |
PQID | 2497079970 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8282226 proquest_miscellaneous_2497079970 pubmed_primary_33656936 crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_jn_00620_2020 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00620_2020 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2021 text: 2021-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Bethesda, MD |
PublicationSeriesTitle | Sensory Processing |
PublicationTitle | Journal of neurophysiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neurophysiol |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | American Physiological Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Physiological Society |
References | B20 B21 B22 B23 B24 B25 B26 B27 B28 B29 B30 B32 B33 B34 B35 B36 B37 B38 B39 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B7 B8 B9 B40 B41 B43 B44 B45 B46 B47 B48 B49 Woellner RC (B6) 1955; 59 B50 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14 B15 B16 B17 B18 B19 Noffsinger D (B31) 1994; 5 |
References_xml | – ident: B24 doi: 10.1007/s10162-019-00721-7 – ident: B34 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31823d7917 – ident: B47 doi: 10.1121/1.429605 – ident: B36 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000711 – ident: B10 doi: 10.1097/00003446-198309000-00005 – volume: 5 start-page: 231 year: 1994 ident: B31 publication-title: J Am Acad Audiol – ident: B38 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903315116 – ident: B13 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.009 – ident: B25 doi: 10.1177/2331216517737417 – ident: B27 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108132 – ident: B1 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009 – ident: B43 doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715963 – ident: B28 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.12.018 – ident: B12 doi: 10.1152/jn.00016.2020 – ident: B16 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000987 – ident: B20 doi: 10.1097/00003446-199312000-00008 – ident: B18 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1783-13.2013 – ident: B49 doi: 10.1007/s10162-020-00776-x – ident: B21 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.02.031 – ident: B37 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107922 – ident: B11 doi: 10.1121/1.391011 – ident: B9 doi: 10.1152/jn.1984.51.6.1326 – ident: B14 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000804 – ident: B40 doi: 10.1177/0891988715598236 – ident: B30 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3240-17.2018 – ident: B15 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000787 – ident: B50 doi: 10.1007/s10162-020-00747-2 – ident: B3 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.07.053 – ident: B46 doi: 10.1080/010503901300007371 – ident: B39 doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000640 – ident: B29 doi: 10.1152/jn.00326.2006 – ident: B17 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.067 – ident: B45 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.014 – ident: B7 doi: 10.1152/jn.00164.2013 – ident: B44 doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2003 – ident: B23 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3915-14.2015 – ident: B33 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.01.017 – ident: B22 doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0539-3 – ident: B48 doi: 10.1121/1.418265 – ident: B4 doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00158-1 – ident: B8 doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.4.2799 – ident: B26 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.008 – ident: B32 doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2002/004) – ident: B41 doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00056 – ident: B35 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347 – ident: B5 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.03.012 – volume: 59 start-page: 147 year: 1955 ident: B6 publication-title: Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol – ident: B2 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.014 – ident: B19 doi: 10.1044/jshr.3101.87 |
SSID | ssj0007502 |
Score | 2.5337274 |
Snippet | Recent studies suggest that millions of people may be at risk of permanent impairment from cochlear synaptopathy, the age-related and noise-induced... Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 1213 |
SubjectTerms | Acoustic Stimulation Adolescent Adult Age Factors Aging - physiology Audiometry Auditory Threshold - physiology Cochlea - physiology Cochlear Nerve - physiology Female Humans Male Middle Aged Noise Recognition, Psychology - physiology Speech Perception - physiology Young Adult |
Title | Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33656936 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2497079970 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8282226 |
Volume | 125 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZguXBBwPIoLxkJ7aUE8nZ8rFCXCnYXkFq0B6TIcRw1q-Cs2lQIfj0zznsp0sKhVuS4TupvOp6xZz4T8spzwKhOJLfsAArfTrklpMctyRjMdn4CHgc6iqdn4WLlfzgPBhvtJrukSt7IX3vzSv4HVagDXDFL9h-Q7TqFCrgGfKEEhKG8FsZzbSJ-kLe7KMof6PVv6phXtcXs_zSX1XR7qZRcW7m2dJlvFRIVd6kCuZ5qvC4sPNgav18g7LoJi99jtRr-S7McMlqPP4VZzRwONZ2BjhD9GutXtVnvijqxZLT6vIAXaHRxkxvUJ0W87-OHMZdovDbhOoOQlkadgqsLBlOtYdWeulYH19nPjbD5A42KlHP7VX2A1LEXGiPzXBs8fdfu57R2H__sU3y8OjmJl_Pz5U1yywVfAo-5-Pilp5QHk8lsibev1RKxBu7bUedjw-UPb-RqUO3ASlneJXcaoOislpV75IbS98nhTIuq_P6THtHPHXKH5FsrPrQTH9qJD23Eh14RHzoQH5prOhYf2onPA7I6ni_fLazmsA1LehGrLG5nGXwiyaOMZ9wT6JgrwZyEJ6nt473E9SVzOBOhDFzlh1w4IhBgo6dpFnoPyYEutXpMqJ3hqoJgQRCB_y2YiHxfhIwrsGVlaqsJed2OZCwbJno8EKWIjUcauPGFjs3AxzjwE3LUNb-sKVj-1vBlC0sMShJ3voRW5W4bw09BJkgoJuRRDVPXleeBS8O9cELYCMCuARKwj-_ofG2I2COMwXbDJ9d47lNyu_-DPCMH1WannoM5WyUvjDj-BuCgpXw |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Envelope+following+responses+predict+speech-in-noise+performance+in+normal-hearing+listeners&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Mepani%2C+Anita+M&rft.au=Verhulst%2C+Sarah&rft.au=Hancock%2C+Kenneth+E&rft.au=Garrett%2C+Markus&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.issn=1522-1598&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1213&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00620.2020&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |