Symmetry of generalized rivalry network models determines patterns of interocular grouping in four-location binocular rivalry

Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possibl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurophysiology Vol. 122; no. 5; pp. 1989 - 1999
Main Authors Golubitsky, Martin, Zhao, Yukai, Wang, Yunjiao, Lu, Zhong-Lin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Physiological Society 01.11.2019
Series50 Years of Modeling Neural Activity: Celebrating Jack Cowan's Career
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possible perceptual states in 12 experiments with four retinal locations. Percepts in binocular rivalry involving more than three locations have not been empirically investigated due to the difficulty in reporting simultaneous percepts at multiple locations. Here, we develop a novel reporting procedure in which the stimulus disappears when the subject is cued to report the simultaneously perceived colors in all four retinal locations. This procedure ensures that simultaneous rather than sequential percepts are reported. The procedure was applied in 12 experiments with six binocular rivalry stimulus configurations, all consisting of dichoptic displays of red and green squares at four locations. We call configurations with an even or odd number of red squares even or odd configurations, respectively. In experiments using even stimulus configurations, we found that even percepts were more frequently observed than odd percepts, whereas in experiments using odd stimulus configurations even and odd percepts were observed with equal probability. The generalized rivalry network models in which couplings depend on stimulus features and spatial configurations was in better agreement with the empirical results. We conclude that the excitatory coupling strength in the horizontal and vertical configurations are different and the coupling strengths between the same color and between different colors are different. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Wilson network models of interocular groupings during binocular rivalry are constructed by considering features that indicate equal coupling strengths. Network symmetries, based on equal couplings, predict percepts. For a four-location rivalry experiment with red or green squares at each location, we analyze different possible Wilson networks. In our experiments we develop a novel reporting procedure and show that networks in which stimulus features and spatial configurations are distinguished best agree with experiments.
AbstractList Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possible perceptual states in 12 experiments with four retinal locations. Percepts in binocular rivalry involving more than three locations have not been empirically investigated due to the difficulty in reporting simultaneous percepts at multiple locations. Here, we develop a novel reporting procedure in which the stimulus disappears when the subject is cued to report the simultaneously perceived colors in all four retinal locations. This procedure ensures that simultaneous rather than sequential percepts are reported. The procedure was applied in 12 experiments with six binocular rivalry stimulus configurations, all consisting of dichoptic displays of red and green squares at four locations. We call configurations with an even or odd number of red squares even or odd configurations, respectively. In experiments using even stimulus configurations, we found that even percepts were more frequently observed than odd percepts, whereas in experiments using odd stimulus configurations even and odd percepts were observed with equal probability. The generalized rivalry network models in which couplings depend on stimulus features and spatial configurations was in better agreement with the empirical results. We conclude that the excitatory coupling strength in the horizontal and vertical configurations are different and the coupling strengths between the same color and between different colors are different. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Wilson network models of interocular groupings during binocular rivalry are constructed by considering features that indicate equal coupling strengths. Network symmetries, based on equal couplings, predict percepts. For a four-location rivalry experiment with red or green squares at each location, we analyze different possible Wilson networks. In our experiments we develop a novel reporting procedure and show that networks in which stimulus features and spatial configurations are distinguished best agree with experiments.
Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possible perceptual states in 12 experiments with four retinal locations. Percepts in binocular rivalry involving more than three locations have not been empirically investigated due to the difficulty in reporting simultaneous percepts at multiple locations. Here, we develop a novel reporting procedure in which the stimulus disappears when the subject is cued to report the simultaneously perceived colors in all four retinal locations. This procedure ensures that simultaneous rather than sequential percepts are reported. The procedure was applied in 12 experiments with six binocular rivalry stimulus configurations, all consisting of dichoptic displays of red and green squares at four locations. We call configurations with an even or odd number of red squares even or odd configurations, respectively. In experiments using even stimulus configurations, we found that even percepts were more frequently observed than odd percepts, whereas in experiments using odd stimulus configurations even and odd percepts were observed with equal probability. The generalized rivalry network models in which couplings depend on stimulus features and spatial configurations was in better agreement with the empirical results. We conclude that the excitatory coupling strength in the horizontal and vertical configurations are different and the coupling strengths between the same color and between different colors are different. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Wilson network models of interocular groupings during binocular rivalry are constructed by considering features that indicate equal coupling strengths. Network symmetries, based on equal couplings, predict percepts. For a four-location rivalry experiment with red or green squares at each location, we analyze different possible Wilson networks. In our experiments we develop a novel reporting procedure and show that networks in which stimulus features and spatial configurations are distinguished best agree with experiments.
Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possible perceptual states in 12 experiments with four retinal locations. Percepts in binocular rivalry involving more than three locations have not been empirically investigated due to the difficulty in reporting simultaneous percepts at multiple locations. Here, we develop a novel reporting procedure in which the stimulus disappears when the subject is cued to report the simultaneously perceived colors in all four retinal locations. This procedure ensures that simultaneous rather than sequential percepts are reported. The procedure was applied in 12 experiments with six binocular rivalry stimulus configurations, all consisting of dichoptic displays of red and green squares at four locations. We call configurations with an even or odd number of red squares or configurations, respectively. In experiments using even stimulus configurations, we found that even percepts were more frequently observed than odd percepts, whereas in experiments using odd stimulus configurations even and odd percepts were observed with equal probability. The generalized rivalry network models in which couplings depend on stimulus features and spatial configurations was in better agreement with the empirical results. We conclude that the excitatory coupling strength in the horizontal and vertical configurations are different and the coupling strengths between the same color and between different colors are different. Wilson network models of interocular groupings during binocular rivalry are constructed by considering features that indicate equal coupling strengths. Network symmetries, based on equal couplings, predict percepts. For a four-location rivalry experiment with red or green squares at each location, we analyze different possible Wilson networks. In our experiments we develop a novel reporting procedure and show that networks in which stimulus features and spatial configurations are distinguished best agree with experiments.
Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possible perceptual states in 12 experiments with four retinal locations. Percepts in binocular rivalry involving more than three locations have not been empirically investigated due to the difficulty in reporting simultaneous percepts at multiple locations. Here, we develop a novel reporting procedure in which the stimulus disappears when the subject is cued to report the simultaneously perceived colors in all four retinal locations. This procedure ensures that simultaneous rather than sequential percepts are reported. The procedure was applied in 12 experiments with six binocular rivalry stimulus configurations, all consisting of dichoptic displays of red and green squares at four locations. We call configurations with an even or odd number of red squares even or odd configurations, respectively. In experiments using even stimulus configurations, we found that even percepts were more frequently observed than odd percepts, whereas in experiments using odd stimulus configurations even and odd percepts were observed with equal probability. The generalized rivalry network models in which couplings depend on stimulus features and spatial configurations was in better agreement with the empirical results. We conclude that the excitatory coupling strength in the horizontal and vertical configurations are different and the coupling strengths between the same color and between different colors are different.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Wilson network models of interocular groupings during binocular rivalry are constructed by considering features that indicate equal coupling strengths. Network symmetries, based on equal couplings, predict percepts. For a four-location rivalry experiment with red or green squares at each location, we analyze different possible Wilson networks. In our experiments we develop a novel reporting procedure and show that networks in which stimulus features and spatial configurations are distinguished best agree with experiments.Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possible perceptual states in 12 experiments with four retinal locations. Percepts in binocular rivalry involving more than three locations have not been empirically investigated due to the difficulty in reporting simultaneous percepts at multiple locations. Here, we develop a novel reporting procedure in which the stimulus disappears when the subject is cued to report the simultaneously perceived colors in all four retinal locations. This procedure ensures that simultaneous rather than sequential percepts are reported. The procedure was applied in 12 experiments with six binocular rivalry stimulus configurations, all consisting of dichoptic displays of red and green squares at four locations. We call configurations with an even or odd number of red squares even or odd configurations, respectively. In experiments using even stimulus configurations, we found that even percepts were more frequently observed than odd percepts, whereas in experiments using odd stimulus configurations even and odd percepts were observed with equal probability. The generalized rivalry network models in which couplings depend on stimulus features and spatial configurations was in better agreement with the empirical results. We conclude that the excitatory coupling strength in the horizontal and vertical configurations are different and the coupling strengths between the same color and between different colors are different.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Wilson network models of interocular groupings during binocular rivalry are constructed by considering features that indicate equal coupling strengths. Network symmetries, based on equal couplings, predict percepts. For a four-location rivalry experiment with red or green squares at each location, we analyze different possible Wilson networks. In our experiments we develop a novel reporting procedure and show that networks in which stimulus features and spatial configurations are distinguished best agree with experiments.
Author Zhao, Yukai
Golubitsky, Martin
Wang, Yunjiao
Lu, Zhong-Lin
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Martin
  surname: Golubitsky
  fullname: Golubitsky, Martin
  organization: Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yukai
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8924-3356
  surname: Zhao
  fullname: Zhao, Yukai
  organization: Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yunjiao
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Yunjiao
  organization: Department of Mathematics, Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Zhong-Lin
  surname: Lu
  fullname: Lu, Zhong-Lin
  organization: Division of Arts and Sciences, NYU Shanghai, Shanghai, China, Center for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, NYU-ECNU Institute of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Shanghai, China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptUU2LFDEQDbLizq4evUqOXnqsJJPu9EWQxS9Y8KCeQzpdGTN2J2OSXhnB_25md1ZUPOVReR9UvQtyFmJAQp4yWDMm-YtdWANshFpzYP0Dsqoz3jDZqzOyAqhYQNedk4ucdwDQSeCPyLlgUgiAdkV-fjzMM5Z0oNHRLQZMZvI_cKTJ35ipjgOW7zF9pXMcccp0xIJp9gEz3ZtScchHpQ8VRrtMJtFtisveh20dUheX1EzRmuJjoIMPJ87J_TF56MyU8cnpvSSf37z-dPWuuf7w9v3Vq-vGCtWVpmuh5cqwAYSDUTg3cAlDK7hUrucbxdRgHFozCtF3qhtAOYXWjnIcpTBsIy7Jyzvf_TLMOFoMpe6p98nPJh10NF7__RP8F72NN7pVXd-3bTV4fjJI8duCuejZZ4vTZALGJWvO-xotW6kq9dmfWb9D7m9eCeKOYFPMOaHT1pfbA9VoP2kG-tis3gV926w-NltVzT-qe-P_838BfqypsA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10827_020_00743_8
crossref_primary_10_3389_fncom_2023_1137015
crossref_primary_10_1142_S0218127421300196
crossref_primary_10_1142_S0218127422300336
crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_23_10_15
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00146-7
10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.010
10.1152/jn.00228.2011
10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.007
10.1016/j.visres.2016.12.017
10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00113-7
10.3389/fnhum.2011.00088
10.1137/070705842
10.1016/j.visres.2007.07.007
10.3758/BF03210465
10.1186/2190-8567-4-12
10.1007/978-3-0348-8167-8
10.1142/S1793005709001301
10.1080/14689360701450410
10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.003
10.1162/089976603322518777
10.1073/pnas.93.26.15508
10.1023/A:1017925416289
10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.014
10.1137/110858392
10.1017/S0952523800004971
10.1186/2190-8567-3-6
10.1016/j.visres.2004.04.017
10.1002/wcs.151
10.1080/14786443208647909
10.1017/S0952523806233145
10.1016/j.visres.2017.07.016
10.3390/sym11060799
10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.015
10.1038/380621a0
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.021
10.1068/p230771
10.1090/S0273-0979-06-01108-6
10.1152/jn.00557.2005
10.1023/A:1014942129705
10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.019
10.1364/JOSAA.26.002612
10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.057
10.1167/8.5.16
10.1080/713754296
10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.009
10.1088/0951-7715/25/4/1045
10.1162/089976698300017377
10.1152/jn.00604.2006
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002991
10.2307/1415275
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2019 the American Physiological Society 2019 American Physiological Society
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2019 the American Physiological Society 2019 American Physiological Society
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1152/jn.00438.2019
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
DocumentTitleAlternate SYMMETRY IN FOUR-LOCATION BINOCULAR RIVALRY
EISSN 1522-1598
EndPage 1999
ExternalDocumentID PMC6879966
31533006
10_1152_jn_00438_2019
Genre Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: ; ;
  grantid: DMS-1440386
– fundername: ; ;
  grantid: EY021553; EY017491; EY021553; EY017491
– fundername: ; ;
  grantid: HRD-1800406; CNS-1831980
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
.55
18M
29L
2WC
39C
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
AAYXX
ABCQX
ABHWK
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABKWE
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACNCT
ADBBV
ADFNX
ADHGD
ADIYS
AENEX
AETEA
AFFNX
AFOSN
AIZAD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BKKCC
BTFSW
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
H13
H~9
ITBOX
KQ8
L7B
OK1
P2P
RAP
RHI
RPL
RPRKH
SJN
TR2
UHB
UPT
W8F
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
XSW
YBH
YQT
YSK
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-760628a1b03f0d3ffb250b63258f924818bafecad339787b08f8eccd5dd53a143
ISSN 0022-3077
1522-1598
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 13:46:09 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 12:38:22 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:03:24 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:08:37 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:33:53 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords Wilson networks
binocular rivalry
interocular grouping
Hopf bifurcation
symmetry
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c387t-760628a1b03f0d3ffb250b63258f924818bafecad339787b08f8eccd5dd53a143
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-8924-3356
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6879966
PMID 31533006
PQID 2293975658
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6879966
proquest_miscellaneous_2293975658
pubmed_primary_31533006
crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_jn_00438_2019
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00438_2019
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Bethesda, MD
PublicationSeriesTitle 50 Years of Modeling Neural Activity: Celebrating Jack Cowan's Career
PublicationTitle Journal of neurophysiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurophysiol
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher American Physiological Society
Publisher_xml – name: American Physiological Society
References B21
B22
B23
B24
B25
B26
B27
B28
B29
B30
B31
B32
B33
B34
B36
B37
B38
B39
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
B40
B41
B42
B43
B44
B45
Hollins M (B20) 1980; 19
B46
Wilcox R (B47) 2012
B48
Wilson HR (B49) 2009
B50
B51
B10
B11
B12
B13
B14
B15
B16
B17
B18
B19
Papathomas TV (B35) 2005
References_xml – ident: B2
  doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00146-7
– ident: B19
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.010
– ident: B38
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00228.2011
– ident: B29
  doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.007
– ident: B22
  doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.12.017
– ident: B34
  doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00113-7
– ident: B24
  doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00088
– ident: B7
  doi: 10.1137/070705842
– ident: B48
  doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.07.007
– ident: B46
  doi: 10.3758/BF03210465
– ident: B10
  doi: 10.1186/2190-8567-4-12
– ident: B16
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8167-8
– ident: B23
  doi: 10.1142/S1793005709001301
– ident: B41
  doi: 10.1080/14689360701450410
– ident: B13
– ident: B43
  doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.003
– ident: B42
  doi: 10.1162/089976603322518777
– ident: B27
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15508
– ident: B3
  doi: 10.1023/A:1017925416289
– ident: B12
  doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.014
– ident: B9
  doi: 10.1137/110858392
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1117
  year: 1980
  ident: B20
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
– ident: B4
  doi: 10.1017/S0952523800004971
– ident: B11
  doi: 10.1186/2190-8567-3-6
– ident: B18
  doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.04.017
– ident: B1
  doi: 10.1002/wcs.151
– ident: B32
  doi: 10.1080/14786443208647909
– ident: B21
  doi: 10.1017/S0952523806233145
– ident: B51
  doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.07.016
– ident: B40
  doi: 10.3390/sym11060799
– ident: B50
  doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.015
– ident: B30
  doi: 10.1038/380621a0
– start-page: 217
  volume-title: Cortical Mechanisms of Vision
  year: 2009
  ident: B49
– ident: B36
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.021
– ident: B33
  doi: 10.1068/p230771
– ident: B17
  doi: 10.1090/S0273-0979-06-01108-6
– ident: B14
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00557.2005
– ident: B28
  doi: 10.1023/A:1014942129705
– ident: B6
  doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.019
– start-page: 193
  volume-title: Modern Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences: A Practical Introduction
  year: 2012
  ident: B47
– ident: B44
  doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.26.002612
– ident: B25
  doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.057
– ident: B26
  doi: 10.1167/8.5.16
– ident: B45
  doi: 10.1080/713754296
– ident: B5
  doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.009
– ident: B15
  doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/25/4/1045
– ident: B8
  doi: 10.1162/089976698300017377
– start-page: 155
  volume-title: Binocular Rivalry
  year: 2005
  ident: B35
– ident: B39
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00604.2006
– ident: B37
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002991
– ident: B31
  doi: 10.2307/1415275
SSID ssj0007502
Score 2.3295767
Snippet Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 1989
Title Symmetry of generalized rivalry network models determines patterns of interocular grouping in four-location binocular rivalry
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533006
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2293975658
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6879966
Volume 122
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWcuGCgPJYKMhIqBdIydNJjhUCKigIRCu1p8hO7DYL66Bucmgl_hE_kvErj7KVCpdo5bWdbObbmfF45jNCLwIi4ozSxGMiiL04jwj8pXzuMRrmLM3B6Ood_E-fyd5h_OEoOZrNfo-ylrqW7ZQXa-tK_keq0AZyVVWy_yDZflJogM8gX7iChOF6LRl_O18ueWs2yU8Mf3R9wVW-ONwFmqXJ8TbH3axeVjb1ha8UnaqKBK4cYwSYMZ2Pqos8bJmLgEfwlK3TEIEVtO1jZ7_CrdUEmTpeMgnYv4cXwerWhmoNecEoaK0Dtsfdd1oPEX6jhY47uahp45r3O72dctrIE2_fTmGDFkFuq_dGilgVEfj2BBdudS-0gXeVTZRzGI5QmIxUrUr2GpltRaew3iQkimJ2IXf0pqdK5ssH2-f2-y-ZxD5RUS-RkrBYyEIPL9TwG-hmCIsSdV7Gx68DNz34XgM3Pfw0x-iahK8nd596QH8tay5n547cnYM76LYVKN41oLuLZlzeQ5u7krbN8hxv4y-9hDfRL4dD3Ag8wiG2SMEWh9jgEA84xA6HauQIh9jhEBrxBIe4x6Gb_T46fPf24M2eZ4_18MooS1svJapulwbMj4RfRUIw0AiMRGGSiTyMwYNkVPCSVhH4ylnK_ExkoGiqpKqSiIJ__wBtyEbyRwgTGF3yMoc1RBCXLGBpVVFekjhISSIEmaNX7lUXpeW8V0ev_CjWCnaOtvvuPw3Zy1Udnzu5FaCO1R4blbzpVkUI7nOewiopm6OHRo79VJFaW4GVm6N0IuG-g6J6n34j61NN-U6yVAUmHl_3AZ-gW8PfbgtttGcdfwrec8ueadD-AUnfzlE
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Symmetry+of+generalized+rivalry+network+models+determines+patterns+of+interocular+grouping+in+four-location+binocular+rivalry&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Golubitsky%2C+Martin&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Yukai&rft.au=Wang%2C+Yunjiao&rft.au=Lu%2C+Zhong-Lin&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1989&rft.epage=1999&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00438.2019&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1152_jn_00438_2019
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon