Symmetry of generalized rivalry network models determines patterns of interocular grouping in four-location binocular rivalry
Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possibl...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neurophysiology Vol. 122; no. 5; pp. 1989 - 1999 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Physiological Society
01.11.2019
|
Series | 50 Years of Modeling Neural Activity: Celebrating Jack Cowan's Career |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possible perceptual states in 12 experiments with four retinal locations. Percepts in binocular rivalry involving more than three locations have not been empirically investigated due to the difficulty in reporting simultaneous percepts at multiple locations. Here, we develop a novel reporting procedure in which the stimulus disappears when the subject is cued to report the simultaneously perceived colors in all four retinal locations. This procedure ensures that simultaneous rather than sequential percepts are reported. The procedure was applied in 12 experiments with six binocular rivalry stimulus configurations, all consisting of dichoptic displays of red and green squares at four locations. We call configurations with an even or odd number of red squares even or odd configurations, respectively. In experiments using even stimulus configurations, we found that even percepts were more frequently observed than odd percepts, whereas in experiments using odd stimulus configurations even and odd percepts were observed with equal probability. The generalized rivalry network models in which couplings depend on stimulus features and spatial configurations was in better agreement with the empirical results. We conclude that the excitatory coupling strength in the horizontal and vertical configurations are different and the coupling strengths between the same color and between different colors are different.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY Wilson network models of interocular groupings during binocular rivalry are constructed by considering features that indicate equal coupling strengths. Network symmetries, based on equal couplings, predict percepts. For a four-location rivalry experiment with red or green squares at each location, we analyze different possible Wilson networks. In our experiments we develop a novel reporting procedure and show that networks in which stimulus features and spatial configurations are distinguished best agree with experiments. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possible perceptual states in 12 experiments with four retinal locations. Percepts in binocular rivalry involving more than three locations have not been empirically investigated due to the difficulty in reporting simultaneous percepts at multiple locations. Here, we develop a novel reporting procedure in which the stimulus disappears when the subject is cued to report the simultaneously perceived colors in all four retinal locations. This procedure ensures that simultaneous rather than sequential percepts are reported. The procedure was applied in 12 experiments with six binocular rivalry stimulus configurations, all consisting of dichoptic displays of red and green squares at four locations. We call configurations with an even or odd number of red squares
even
or
odd
configurations, respectively. In experiments using even stimulus configurations, we found that even percepts were more frequently observed than odd percepts, whereas in experiments using odd stimulus configurations even and odd percepts were observed with equal probability. The generalized rivalry network models in which couplings depend on stimulus features and spatial configurations was in better agreement with the empirical results. We conclude that the excitatory coupling strength in the horizontal and vertical configurations are different and the coupling strengths between the same color and between different colors are different.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY
Wilson network models of interocular groupings during binocular rivalry are constructed by considering features that indicate equal coupling strengths. Network symmetries, based on equal couplings, predict percepts. For a four-location rivalry experiment with red or green squares at each location, we analyze different possible Wilson networks. In our experiments we develop a novel reporting procedure and show that networks in which stimulus features and spatial configurations are distinguished best agree with experiments. Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possible perceptual states in 12 experiments with four retinal locations. Percepts in binocular rivalry involving more than three locations have not been empirically investigated due to the difficulty in reporting simultaneous percepts at multiple locations. Here, we develop a novel reporting procedure in which the stimulus disappears when the subject is cued to report the simultaneously perceived colors in all four retinal locations. This procedure ensures that simultaneous rather than sequential percepts are reported. The procedure was applied in 12 experiments with six binocular rivalry stimulus configurations, all consisting of dichoptic displays of red and green squares at four locations. We call configurations with an even or odd number of red squares even or odd configurations, respectively. In experiments using even stimulus configurations, we found that even percepts were more frequently observed than odd percepts, whereas in experiments using odd stimulus configurations even and odd percepts were observed with equal probability. The generalized rivalry network models in which couplings depend on stimulus features and spatial configurations was in better agreement with the empirical results. We conclude that the excitatory coupling strength in the horizontal and vertical configurations are different and the coupling strengths between the same color and between different colors are different. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Wilson network models of interocular groupings during binocular rivalry are constructed by considering features that indicate equal coupling strengths. Network symmetries, based on equal couplings, predict percepts. For a four-location rivalry experiment with red or green squares at each location, we analyze different possible Wilson networks. In our experiments we develop a novel reporting procedure and show that networks in which stimulus features and spatial configurations are distinguished best agree with experiments. Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possible perceptual states in 12 experiments with four retinal locations. Percepts in binocular rivalry involving more than three locations have not been empirically investigated due to the difficulty in reporting simultaneous percepts at multiple locations. Here, we develop a novel reporting procedure in which the stimulus disappears when the subject is cued to report the simultaneously perceived colors in all four retinal locations. This procedure ensures that simultaneous rather than sequential percepts are reported. The procedure was applied in 12 experiments with six binocular rivalry stimulus configurations, all consisting of dichoptic displays of red and green squares at four locations. We call configurations with an even or odd number of red squares or configurations, respectively. In experiments using even stimulus configurations, we found that even percepts were more frequently observed than odd percepts, whereas in experiments using odd stimulus configurations even and odd percepts were observed with equal probability. The generalized rivalry network models in which couplings depend on stimulus features and spatial configurations was in better agreement with the empirical results. We conclude that the excitatory coupling strength in the horizontal and vertical configurations are different and the coupling strengths between the same color and between different colors are different. Wilson network models of interocular groupings during binocular rivalry are constructed by considering features that indicate equal coupling strengths. Network symmetries, based on equal couplings, predict percepts. For a four-location rivalry experiment with red or green squares at each location, we analyze different possible Wilson networks. In our experiments we develop a novel reporting procedure and show that networks in which stimulus features and spatial configurations are distinguished best agree with experiments. Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possible perceptual states in 12 experiments with four retinal locations. Percepts in binocular rivalry involving more than three locations have not been empirically investigated due to the difficulty in reporting simultaneous percepts at multiple locations. Here, we develop a novel reporting procedure in which the stimulus disappears when the subject is cued to report the simultaneously perceived colors in all four retinal locations. This procedure ensures that simultaneous rather than sequential percepts are reported. The procedure was applied in 12 experiments with six binocular rivalry stimulus configurations, all consisting of dichoptic displays of red and green squares at four locations. We call configurations with an even or odd number of red squares even or odd configurations, respectively. In experiments using even stimulus configurations, we found that even percepts were more frequently observed than odd percepts, whereas in experiments using odd stimulus configurations even and odd percepts were observed with equal probability. The generalized rivalry network models in which couplings depend on stimulus features and spatial configurations was in better agreement with the empirical results. We conclude that the excitatory coupling strength in the horizontal and vertical configurations are different and the coupling strengths between the same color and between different colors are different.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Wilson network models of interocular groupings during binocular rivalry are constructed by considering features that indicate equal coupling strengths. Network symmetries, based on equal couplings, predict percepts. For a four-location rivalry experiment with red or green squares at each location, we analyze different possible Wilson networks. In our experiments we develop a novel reporting procedure and show that networks in which stimulus features and spatial configurations are distinguished best agree with experiments.Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze generalized rivalry network models with different types of symmetry (based on different kinds of excitatory coupling) to derive predictions of possible perceptual states in 12 experiments with four retinal locations. Percepts in binocular rivalry involving more than three locations have not been empirically investigated due to the difficulty in reporting simultaneous percepts at multiple locations. Here, we develop a novel reporting procedure in which the stimulus disappears when the subject is cued to report the simultaneously perceived colors in all four retinal locations. This procedure ensures that simultaneous rather than sequential percepts are reported. The procedure was applied in 12 experiments with six binocular rivalry stimulus configurations, all consisting of dichoptic displays of red and green squares at four locations. We call configurations with an even or odd number of red squares even or odd configurations, respectively. In experiments using even stimulus configurations, we found that even percepts were more frequently observed than odd percepts, whereas in experiments using odd stimulus configurations even and odd percepts were observed with equal probability. The generalized rivalry network models in which couplings depend on stimulus features and spatial configurations was in better agreement with the empirical results. We conclude that the excitatory coupling strength in the horizontal and vertical configurations are different and the coupling strengths between the same color and between different colors are different.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Wilson network models of interocular groupings during binocular rivalry are constructed by considering features that indicate equal coupling strengths. Network symmetries, based on equal couplings, predict percepts. For a four-location rivalry experiment with red or green squares at each location, we analyze different possible Wilson networks. In our experiments we develop a novel reporting procedure and show that networks in which stimulus features and spatial configurations are distinguished best agree with experiments. |
Author | Zhao, Yukai Golubitsky, Martin Wang, Yunjiao Lu, Zhong-Lin |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Martin surname: Golubitsky fullname: Golubitsky, Martin organization: Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio – sequence: 2 givenname: Yukai orcidid: 0000-0001-8924-3356 surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Yukai organization: Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio – sequence: 3 givenname: Yunjiao surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Yunjiao organization: Department of Mathematics, Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas – sequence: 4 givenname: Zhong-Lin surname: Lu fullname: Lu, Zhong-Lin organization: Division of Arts and Sciences, NYU Shanghai, Shanghai, China, Center for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, NYU-ECNU Institute of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Shanghai, China |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptUU2LFDEQDbLizq4evUqOXnqsJJPu9EWQxS9Y8KCeQzpdGTN2J2OSXhnB_25md1ZUPOVReR9UvQtyFmJAQp4yWDMm-YtdWANshFpzYP0Dsqoz3jDZqzOyAqhYQNedk4ucdwDQSeCPyLlgUgiAdkV-fjzMM5Z0oNHRLQZMZvI_cKTJ35ipjgOW7zF9pXMcccp0xIJp9gEz3ZtScchHpQ8VRrtMJtFtisveh20dUheX1EzRmuJjoIMPJ87J_TF56MyU8cnpvSSf37z-dPWuuf7w9v3Vq-vGCtWVpmuh5cqwAYSDUTg3cAlDK7hUrucbxdRgHFozCtF3qhtAOYXWjnIcpTBsIy7Jyzvf_TLMOFoMpe6p98nPJh10NF7__RP8F72NN7pVXd-3bTV4fjJI8duCuejZZ4vTZALGJWvO-xotW6kq9dmfWb9D7m9eCeKOYFPMOaHT1pfbA9VoP2kG-tis3gV926w-NltVzT-qe-P_838BfqypsA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10827_020_00743_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fncom_2023_1137015 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0218127421300196 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0218127422300336 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_23_10_15 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00146-7 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.010 10.1152/jn.00228.2011 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.007 10.1016/j.visres.2016.12.017 10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00113-7 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00088 10.1137/070705842 10.1016/j.visres.2007.07.007 10.3758/BF03210465 10.1186/2190-8567-4-12 10.1007/978-3-0348-8167-8 10.1142/S1793005709001301 10.1080/14689360701450410 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.003 10.1162/089976603322518777 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15508 10.1023/A:1017925416289 10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.014 10.1137/110858392 10.1017/S0952523800004971 10.1186/2190-8567-3-6 10.1016/j.visres.2004.04.017 10.1002/wcs.151 10.1080/14786443208647909 10.1017/S0952523806233145 10.1016/j.visres.2017.07.016 10.3390/sym11060799 10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.015 10.1038/380621a0 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.021 10.1068/p230771 10.1090/S0273-0979-06-01108-6 10.1152/jn.00557.2005 10.1023/A:1014942129705 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.019 10.1364/JOSAA.26.002612 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.057 10.1167/8.5.16 10.1080/713754296 10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.009 10.1088/0951-7715/25/4/1045 10.1162/089976698300017377 10.1152/jn.00604.2006 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002991 10.2307/1415275 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2019 the American Physiological Society 2019 American Physiological Society |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2019 the American Physiological Society 2019 American Physiological Society |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1152/jn.00438.2019 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
DocumentTitleAlternate | SYMMETRY IN FOUR-LOCATION BINOCULAR RIVALRY |
EISSN | 1522-1598 |
EndPage | 1999 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC6879966 31533006 10_1152_jn_00438_2019 |
Genre | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: ; ; grantid: DMS-1440386 – fundername: ; ; grantid: EY021553; EY017491; EY021553; EY017491 – fundername: ; ; grantid: HRD-1800406; CNS-1831980 |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X .55 18M 29L 2WC 39C 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS AAYXX ABCQX ABHWK ABIVO ABJNI ABKWE ACGFO ACGFS ACNCT ADBBV ADFNX ADHGD ADIYS AENEX AETEA AFFNX AFOSN AIZAD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BKKCC BTFSW CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD EMOBN F5P H13 H~9 ITBOX KQ8 L7B OK1 P2P RAP RHI RPL RPRKH SJN TR2 UHB UPT W8F WH7 WOQ WOW X7M XSW YBH YQT YSK NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-760628a1b03f0d3ffb250b63258f924818bafecad339787b08f8eccd5dd53a143 |
ISSN | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 13:46:09 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 12:38:22 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:03:24 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:08:37 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:33:53 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | Wilson networks binocular rivalry interocular grouping Hopf bifurcation symmetry |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c387t-760628a1b03f0d3ffb250b63258f924818bafecad339787b08f8eccd5dd53a143 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-8924-3356 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6879966 |
PMID | 31533006 |
PQID | 2293975658 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6879966 proquest_miscellaneous_2293975658 pubmed_primary_31533006 crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_jn_00438_2019 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00438_2019 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2019 text: 2019-11-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Bethesda, MD |
PublicationSeriesTitle | 50 Years of Modeling Neural Activity: Celebrating Jack Cowan's Career |
PublicationTitle | Journal of neurophysiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neurophysiol |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | American Physiological Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Physiological Society |
References | B21 B22 B23 B24 B25 B26 B27 B28 B29 B30 B31 B32 B33 B34 B36 B37 B38 B39 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B40 B41 B42 B43 B44 B45 Hollins M (B20) 1980; 19 B46 Wilcox R (B47) 2012 B48 Wilson HR (B49) 2009 B50 B51 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14 B15 B16 B17 B18 B19 Papathomas TV (B35) 2005 |
References_xml | – ident: B2 doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00146-7 – ident: B19 doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.010 – ident: B38 doi: 10.1152/jn.00228.2011 – ident: B29 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.007 – ident: B22 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.12.017 – ident: B34 doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00113-7 – ident: B24 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00088 – ident: B7 doi: 10.1137/070705842 – ident: B48 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.07.007 – ident: B46 doi: 10.3758/BF03210465 – ident: B10 doi: 10.1186/2190-8567-4-12 – ident: B16 doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8167-8 – ident: B23 doi: 10.1142/S1793005709001301 – ident: B41 doi: 10.1080/14689360701450410 – ident: B13 – ident: B43 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.003 – ident: B42 doi: 10.1162/089976603322518777 – ident: B27 doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15508 – ident: B3 doi: 10.1023/A:1017925416289 – ident: B12 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.014 – ident: B9 doi: 10.1137/110858392 – volume: 19 start-page: 1117 year: 1980 ident: B20 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci – ident: B4 doi: 10.1017/S0952523800004971 – ident: B11 doi: 10.1186/2190-8567-3-6 – ident: B18 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.04.017 – ident: B1 doi: 10.1002/wcs.151 – ident: B32 doi: 10.1080/14786443208647909 – ident: B21 doi: 10.1017/S0952523806233145 – ident: B51 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.07.016 – ident: B40 doi: 10.3390/sym11060799 – ident: B50 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.015 – ident: B30 doi: 10.1038/380621a0 – start-page: 217 volume-title: Cortical Mechanisms of Vision year: 2009 ident: B49 – ident: B36 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.021 – ident: B33 doi: 10.1068/p230771 – ident: B17 doi: 10.1090/S0273-0979-06-01108-6 – ident: B14 doi: 10.1152/jn.00557.2005 – ident: B28 doi: 10.1023/A:1014942129705 – ident: B6 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.019 – start-page: 193 volume-title: Modern Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences: A Practical Introduction year: 2012 ident: B47 – ident: B44 doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.26.002612 – ident: B25 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.057 – ident: B26 doi: 10.1167/8.5.16 – ident: B45 doi: 10.1080/713754296 – ident: B5 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.009 – ident: B15 doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/25/4/1045 – ident: B8 doi: 10.1162/089976698300017377 – start-page: 155 volume-title: Binocular Rivalry year: 2005 ident: B35 – ident: B39 doi: 10.1152/jn.00604.2006 – ident: B37 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002991 – ident: B31 doi: 10.2307/1415275 |
SSID | ssj0007502 |
Score | 2.3295767 |
Snippet | Previously, symmetry of network models has been proposed to account for interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Here, we construct and analyze... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 1989 |
Title | Symmetry of generalized rivalry network models determines patterns of interocular grouping in four-location binocular rivalry |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533006 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2293975658 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6879966 |
Volume | 122 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWcuGCgPJYKMhIqBdIydNJjhUCKigIRCu1p8hO7DYL66Bucmgl_hE_kvErj7KVCpdo5bWdbObbmfF45jNCLwIi4ozSxGMiiL04jwj8pXzuMRrmLM3B6Ood_E-fyd5h_OEoOZrNfo-ylrqW7ZQXa-tK_keq0AZyVVWy_yDZflJogM8gX7iChOF6LRl_O18ueWs2yU8Mf3R9wVW-ONwFmqXJ8TbH3axeVjb1ha8UnaqKBK4cYwSYMZ2Pqos8bJmLgEfwlK3TEIEVtO1jZ7_CrdUEmTpeMgnYv4cXwerWhmoNecEoaK0Dtsfdd1oPEX6jhY47uahp45r3O72dctrIE2_fTmGDFkFuq_dGilgVEfj2BBdudS-0gXeVTZRzGI5QmIxUrUr2GpltRaew3iQkimJ2IXf0pqdK5ssH2-f2-y-ZxD5RUS-RkrBYyEIPL9TwG-hmCIsSdV7Gx68DNz34XgM3Pfw0x-iahK8nd596QH8tay5n547cnYM76LYVKN41oLuLZlzeQ5u7krbN8hxv4y-9hDfRL4dD3Ag8wiG2SMEWh9jgEA84xA6HauQIh9jhEBrxBIe4x6Gb_T46fPf24M2eZ4_18MooS1svJapulwbMj4RfRUIw0AiMRGGSiTyMwYNkVPCSVhH4ylnK_ExkoGiqpKqSiIJ__wBtyEbyRwgTGF3yMoc1RBCXLGBpVVFekjhISSIEmaNX7lUXpeW8V0ev_CjWCnaOtvvuPw3Zy1Udnzu5FaCO1R4blbzpVkUI7nOewiopm6OHRo79VJFaW4GVm6N0IuG-g6J6n34j61NN-U6yVAUmHl_3AZ-gW8PfbgtttGcdfwrec8ueadD-AUnfzlE |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Symmetry+of+generalized+rivalry+network+models+determines+patterns+of+interocular+grouping+in+four-location+binocular+rivalry&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Golubitsky%2C+Martin&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Yukai&rft.au=Wang%2C+Yunjiao&rft.au=Lu%2C+Zhong-Lin&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1989&rft.epage=1999&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00438.2019&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1152_jn_00438_2019 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |