Three-compartment model: critical evaluation based on neutron activation analysis

1 Exercise and Health Laboratory, Faculty of Human Movement-Technical University of Lisbon, 1495-688 Lisbon, Portugal; 2 New York Obesity Research Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University Institute of Human Nutrition, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City 10025; 3...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of physiology: endocrinology and metabolism Vol. 287; no. 5; pp. E962 - E969
Main Authors Silva, Analiza M, Shen, Wei, Wang, ZiMian, Aloia, John F, Nelson, Miriam E, Heymsfield, Steven B, Sardinha, Luis B, Heshka, Stanley
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.11.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0193-1849
1522-1555
DOI10.1152/ajpendo.00104.2004

Cover

More Information
Summary:1 Exercise and Health Laboratory, Faculty of Human Movement-Technical University of Lisbon, 1495-688 Lisbon, Portugal; 2 New York Obesity Research Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University Institute of Human Nutrition, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City 10025; 3 Department of Medicine, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, New York 11501; and 4 John Hancock Center for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 Submitted 1 June 2004 ; accepted in final form 1 June 2004 There is renewed interest in Siri's classic three-compartment (3C) body composition model, requiring body volume (BV) and total body water (TBW) estimates, because dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and in vivo neutron activation (IVNA) systems cannot accommodate subjects with severe obesity. However, the 3C model assumption of a constant ratio ( ) of mineral (M) to total body protein (TBPro) and related residual mass density (D RES ) based on cadaver analyses might not be valid across groups differing in sex, race, age, and weight. The aim of this study was to derive new 3C model coefficients in vivo and to compare these estimates to those derived by Siri. Healthy adults ( n = 323) were evaluated with IVNA and DEXA and the measured components used to derive and D RES . For all subjects combined, values of and D RES (means ± SD, 0.351 ± 0.043; 1.565 ± 0.023 kg/l) were similar to Siri's proposed values of 0.35 and 1.565 kg/l, respectively. However, and D RES varied significantly as a function of sex, race, weight, and age. Expected errors in percent body fat arising by application of Siri's model were illustrated in a second group of 264 adults, including some whose size exceeded DEXA limits but whose BV and TBW had been measured by hydrodensitometry and 2 H 2 O dilution, respectively. Extrapolation of predictions by newly developed models to very high weights allows percent fat error estimation when Siri's model is applied in morbidly obese subjects. The present study results provide a critical evaluation of potential errors in the classic 3C model and present new formulas for use in selected populations. body composition models; obesity; total body water; underwater weighing Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. B. Heymsfield, Obesity Research Center, 1090 Amsterdam Ave., 14th Floor, New York, New York 10025 (E-mail: SBH2{at}Columbia.edu )
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0193-1849
1522-1555
DOI:10.1152/ajpendo.00104.2004