Separable red-green and luminance detectors for small flashes

• Published in: Vision research (Oxford) Vol. 34; no. 6; pp. 751 - 762
• Main Authors: Chaparro, A., Stromeyer, C.F., Kronauer, R.E., Eskew, R.T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.03.1994; Elsevier Science
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Chromatic detection; Color Perception - physiology; Contrast Sensitivity - physiology; Fovea Centralis - physiology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Luminance detection; Perception; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells - physiology; Sensory Thresholds - physiology; Small flashes; Spectrophotometry; Vision; Chromatic detection; Luminance detection; Small flashes; Human; Luminance; Color vision; Stimulus size; Perception threshold; Detection threshold; Luminous stimulus; Perception; Experimental study; Psychophysics
• DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90214-3
• ISSN: 0042-6989

Detection contours were measured in L and M cone contrast coordinates for foveal flashes of 200 msec duration and 2.3, 5, 10 and 15 min arc diameter on a bright yellow field. The test flash consisted of simultaneous incremental and decremental red and green lights in various amplitude ratios. At all sizes, the most sensitive detection mechanism was not a luminance mechanism, but rather a red-green mechanism that responds to the linear difference of equally weighted L and M cone contrasts, and signals red or green sensations at the detection threshold. Both temporal and spatial integration were greater for red-green detection than luminance detection. A coincident, subthreshold, yellow flash (a luminance pedestal) did not affect the threshold of the red-green mechanism. Such a pedestal is a sum of equal L and M cone contrast—it represents a vector parallel to the red-green detection contour and thus is expected not to stimulate directly the red-green mechanism. When suprathreshold, the coincident pedestal facilitated chromatic detection by ~2 × at all tested sizes; intense pedestals did not mask chromatic detection. This insensitivity to intense luminance pedestals further indicates that the red-green mechanism has fixed spectral tuning with balanced opponent L and M contrast inputs. This view of fixed spectral weights contrasts with the “variable tuning hypothesis”, which postulates that the weights change with spatial-temporal variations in the test stimulus. The red-green mechanism, when facilitated by the suprathreshold luminance pedestal, can account for the color discrimination of small, slightly suprathreshold, incremental monochromatic flashes, so it is not necessary to postulate an array of detectors with variable spectral tuning for small flashes.