Hemorrhagic Complications of Anticoagulant Treatment

• Published in: Chest Vol. 126; no. 3; pp. 287S - 310S
• Main Authors: Levine, Mark N., Raskob, Gary, Beyth, Rebecca J., Kearon, Clive, Schulman, Sam
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01.09.2004; Elsevier B.V
• Subjects: anticoagulant; Anticoagulants (Medicine); bleeding; Care and treatment; complications; Complications and side effects; Health aspects; Hemorrhagic diseases; Heparin; United States; CARS; WARSS; RCT; bleeding; DVT; NSAID; VTE; anticoagulant; INR; CHAMP; heparin; UFH; SPORTIF; SPIRIT; WARIS; OR; complications; SPAF; CI; AMS; IST; APTT; LMWH; TIMI; ASPECT
• DOI: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.287S
• ISSN: 0012-3692

This chapter about hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant treatment is part of the seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Bleeding is the major complication of anticoagulant therapy. The criteria for defining the severity of bleeding varies considerably between studies, accounting in part for the variation in the rates of bleeding reported. The major determinants of vitamin K antagonist-induced bleeding are the intensity of the anticoagulant effect, underlying patient characteristics, and the length of therapy. There is good evidence that vitamin K antagonist therapy, targeted international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0), is associated with a lower risk of bleeding than therapy targeted at an INR > 3.0. The risk of bleeding associated with IV unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is < 3% in recent trials. This bleeding risk may increase with increasing heparin dosages and age (> 70 years). Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is associated with less major bleeding compared with UFH in acute VTE. UFH and LMWH are not associated with an increase in major bleeding in ischemic coronary syndromes, but are associated with an increase in major bleeding in ischemic stroke. Information on bleeding associated with the newer generation of antithrombotic agents has begun to emerge. In terms of treatment decision making for anticoagulant therapy, bleeding risk cannot be considered alone, ie, the potential decrease in thromboembolism must be balanced against the potential increased bleeding risk.