Partner choice in the Netherlands, 1813-1922: the changing importance of ascribed and achieved status

• Published in: The history of the family Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 123 - 148
• Main Authors: Maas, Ineke, van Leeuwen, Marco H. D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Abingdon Routledge 02.01.2019; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: 19th century; Cities; Hypotheses; Love; Mate selection; Modernization; nineteenth century; Occupational status; partner choice; romantic love; Social status; status attainment; status homogamy; The Netherlands
• ISSN: 1081-602X; 1873-5398
• DOI: 10.1080/1081602X.2018.1558412

Partners choose each other on the basis of many characteristics. Social status is one of them. A person's social status can be ascribed, e.g. derived from the position of her or his parents, or achieved, e.g. derived from her or his own occupation. According to the status-attainment hypothesis, during the nineteenth century achieved status increased in importance and ascribed status decreased, especially in regions that experienced more modernization. In contrast, the romantic-love hypothesis predicts that modernization caused a decrease in the importance of both ascribed and achieved status. This paper tests these claims. We use data on all the marriages that took place in all the municipalities in six (of eleven) Dutch provinces between 1813 and 1922. These couple-level data are supplemented with municipal-level data on several dimensions of modernization. We find that men's occupational status did indeed become more important and the occupational status of their fathers less important in the second half of the nineteenth century, when modernization accelerated. In general, modernization is positively related to partner selection based on achieved characteristics and negatively related to partner selection based on ascribed characteristics. However, especially in larger cities, some support is also found for the romantic-love hypothesis.